Use these links to rapidly review the document
TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the Registrantý
Filed by a Party other than the Registranto

Check the appropriate box:
o Preliminary Proxy Statement
o
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
ý Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to § 240.14a-12

AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

N/A
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

ý   No fee required.

o

 

 

 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 

(1)

 

 

 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

(2)

 

 

 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

 

(3)

 

 

 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

(4)

 

 

 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

 

(5)

 

 

 

Total fee paid:

o

 

 

 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

o

 

 

 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 

(1)

 

 

 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

(2)

 

 

 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

(3)

 

 

 

Filing Party:

 

 

(4)

 

 

 

Date Filed:

Table of Contents

LOGOGRAPHIC


Table of Contents

LOGO

Notice of 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

To Our Stockholders:

        You areWe cordially invitedinvite you to attend our 20162019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held at the Embassy Suites, 800 North Central207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203 on Thursday, April 28, 2016,25, 2019 at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time. At the meeting, stockholderswe will vote onconduct the following items of business:

GRAPHICElect the 11 directors nominated by our Board to serve a one-year term;
GRAPHICApprove, on an advisory basis, our executive compensation;
GRAPHICRatify the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2019; and
GRAPHICTransact any other business properly brought before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

        Our Board recommends that stockholdersyou voteFOR each of the director nominees named in Item 1 andFOR Items 2 and 3. After considering these items of business at the meeting, Dean Scarborough, our Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Mitch Butier, our President and Chief Operating Officer, will review our 2015 performance and answer your questions.

        Stockholders of record as of February 29, 201625, 2019 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof.

        We will be mailingmail our Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, which includes instructions on how to access these materials on the Internet, on or before March 11, 2016. Stockholders who2019. If you previously elected to receive a paper copy of our proxy materials, we will be mailedmail you our 20162019 proxy statement, 2015statement; 2018 annual report, Chairman's letterwhich includes letters to stockholders from our Chairman and our Chairman-Elect, President and Chief Executive Officer; and a proxy card on or about March 14, 2016.11, 2019.

        Even if you cannot attend the Annual Meeting, it is important thatWe want your shares to be represented and voted. You maycan vote as follows:shown in the chart below.

GRAPHIC

INSTRUCTIONS FOR VOTING

GRAPHIC



On the Internet

You can vote online atwww.proxyvote.com before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 24, 2019. You will need the 16-digit control number on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card.


GRAPHIC


By Telephone

In the U.S. and Canada, you can vote by calling 1.800.690.6903 before 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 24, 2019. You will need the 16-digit control number on your Notice of Internet Availability or proxy card.


GRAPHIC



By Mail

You can vote by mail by completing, dating and signing your proxy card and returning it in the postage-paid envelope or otherwise to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.


GRAPHIC


In Person

Unless your shares are held through our Employee Savings Plan, you can vote in person at the Annual Meeting. Beneficial holders must contact their broker or other nominee if they want to vote in person.

        On behalf of the Board of Directors, management and employees of Avery Dennison, thank you for your continued support.

  By Order of the Board of Directors

 

 

Susan C. Miller
Corporate Secretary

 

 

March 8, 20162019

Table of Contents

Our Plan to Win
OUR PLAN TO WIN




Drive outsized growth in high value product categories with higher growth and margin potential (e.g., specialty labels, graphics, industrial tapes and radio-frequency identification (RFID))
Grow profitably in our base business through tailored go-to-market strategies and disciplined execution
Maintain our relentless focus on productivity through continued operational excellence and enterprise lean sigma
Deploy capital effectively by balancing investments in organic growth, productivity and acquisitions, while returning cash to stockholders
Our Strategies


Our ValuesGRAPHIC





Customers
We provide innovative, high quality products and solutions, with industry-leading service
Employees
We cultivate a diverse, engaged, safe and healthy workforce
Communities
We are responsible stewards of the environment and a force for good in our communities
Investors
We are committed to delivering superior shareholder returns over the long term
Our Stakeholders

Table of Contents

At TABLE OF CONTENTS

PROXY SUMMARY


i

PROXY STATEMENT


1

GOVERNANCE, SUSTAINABILITY AND SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY


1

BOARD OF DIRECTORS


10

Overview

10

Governance Guidelines

12

Director Independence

13

Board Leadership Structure

13

Board Committees

15

Executive Sessions

17

Risk Oversight

17

Human Capital Management

20

Director Education

21

Board and Committee Evaluations

21

Stockholder Engagement and Communications

22

ITEM 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


23

Selection of Director Nominees

23

Board Matrix

25

Board Refreshment and Director Succession Planning

25

Director Diversity

27

2019 Director Nominees

27

Director Compensation

32

Director Compensation Table

34

ITEM 2 — ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


35

COMPENSATION AND EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE REPORT


36

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS (CD&A)


37

Executive Summary

37

Summary of Compensation Decisions for 2018

47

Discussion of Compensation Components and Decisions Impacting 2018 Compensation

49

Compensation-Setting Tools

62

Independent Oversight and Expertise

62

Other Considerations

64

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES


66

2018 Summary Compensation Table

66

2018 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

68

2018 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

69

2018 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

71

2018 Pension Benefits

72

2018 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

73

Payments Upon Termination as of December 29, 2018

75

Equity Compensation Plan Information as of December 29, 2018

79

CEO PAY RATIO


80

ITEM 3 — RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


82

AUDIT MATTERS


83

AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT


85

SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION


88

Security Ownership of Management and Significant Stockholders

88

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

89

Related Person Transactions

89

VOTING AND MEETING Q&A


90

APPENDIX A — RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES FROM GAAP


A-1

Avery Dennison we are creating a more sustainable world through our:Corporation

    ·|
    Vision —An aspirational picture 2019 Proxy Statement |Table of our future;

    ·
    Values —The core beliefs that guide our actions and support our vision;

    ·
    Leadership Principles —The characteristics and behaviors we expect from our leaders in support of our objectives; and

    ·
    Strategies —How we own, manage and profitably operate a portfolio of businesses to transform information and elevate brands.

GRAPHIC

GRAPHICContents


Table of Contents


PROXY SUMMARY

        This section contains summarysummarizes information described in greater detail in other parts of this proxy statement and does not contain all the information you should consider before voting. Stockholders are urgedWe encourage you to read the entire proxy statement before voting.

ANNUAL MEETING INFORMATION



TIME AND DATE1:30 p.m. Pacific Time on Thursday, April 28, 2016

PLACE


Embassy Suites, 800 North Central Avenue, Glendale, California 91203

RECORD DATE


Stockholders as of the close of business on February 29, 2016 are entitled to vote at the meeting

ATTENDING THE MEETING


Please follow the instructions contained in theMeeting and Voting Information section of this proxy statement

TIME AND LOCATION OF ANNUAL MEETING

        The Annual Meeting will take place at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time on April 25, 2019 at 207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203. Parking will be available next door at 127 Burchett Street, Glendale, California 91203. Attendants will be available to provide assistance with directions and parking tickets will be validated at the Annual Meeting.

ITEMS BEING VOTED ON AT ANNUAL MEETING

        StockholdersYou are being asked to vote on the following items of business shown below at the Annual Meeting. As shown below, ourOur Board of Directors (our "Board") recommends that stockholdersyou vote for all tenFOR each of the 11 director nominees and in favor ofFOR the other two other items being brought forbefore the stockholder vote.

ITEM
 BOARD
RECOMMENDATION

 VOTE
REQUIRED

 DISCRETIONARY
BROKER VOTING

 PAGE
REFERENCE

1.GRAPHIC Election of directors FOR each nominee Majority of votes cast No 13-2223
2.GRAPHIC Advisory vote to approve executive compensation FOR Majority of shares represented and entitled to vote No 23-6735
3.GRAPHIC Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 20162019 FOR Majority of shares represented and entitled to vote Yes 68-72
82

2015 BUSINESS STRATEGY OVERVIEW

        We strive to create superior long-term, sustainable value for our customers, employees and investors and improve the communities in which we operate. To realize the business aspects of this vision, we are focused on executing the following key strategies:

    Driving outsized growth in high value product categories with higher growth and margin potential (e.g., specialty labels, graphics, industrial tapes and radio-frequency identification (RFID));

    Growing profitably in our base business through tailored go-to-market strategies and disciplined execution;

    Maintaining our relentless focus on productivity through continued operational excellence and enterprise lean sigma; and

    Deploying capital effectively by balancing investments in organic growth, productivity and acquisitions, while returning cash to stockholders.

FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE HIGHLIGHTS

        Strong 2018 Performance and Execution of Strategic Priorities.    Fiscal year 2015 was another2018 marked our seventh consecutive year of solid progress for our company. With net sales of approximately $6.0 billion, we delivered 4.6% in organic salesstrong top-line growth, operating margin expansion, and 10.6% growth indouble-digit adjusted earnings per share (EPS). Adjusted EPS growth. We exceeded our financial goals for the year, with the accomplishments shown below and on the following page.

    Achievednet sales of $3.44approximately $7.2 billion, an increase of 8.2% over prior year.

    Excluding the impact of currency, sales grew by 6.9%. On an organic basis, sales grew by 5.5%, driven by growth in high value product categories and sales in emerging markets.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |i


Table of Contents

    Reported EPS significantly increased from $3.13 in 2017 to $5.28 in 2018 due to the combined effects of 2017 tax charges related to the enactment of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and a net tax benefit from a discrete foreign tax planning action, the combined effect of volume and mix, and benefits from productivity initiatives. These benefits were partially offset by settlement charges resulting from the 2018 termination of our U.S. pension plan, higher restructuring charges, higher employee-related costs, growth investments, and the net impact of pricing and raw material inflation.

    Adjusted EPS increased from $5.00 to $6.06 due to the combined effect of volume and mix, as well as benefits from productivity initiatives, partially offset by higher employee-related costs, growth investments, and the net impact of pricing and raw material inflation. Adjusted EPS exceeded the high end of the $3.20-$3.40$5.70 to $5.95 annual guidance range we providedgave to investorsour stockholders in January 2015. Free2018.

    Withnet cash provided by operating activities of $457.9 million, delivered free cash flow rebounded to $329.4of $429.2 million.

    Onnet income of $467.4 million from $184.7 million in the prior year, which reflected actions we took in 2014 to reduce the volatility associated with year-end changes to our levels, achieved return on total capital (ROTC) of working capital.

    18.6%.

        OrganicSales change ex. currency, organic sales growth,change, adjusted EPS, free cash flow, and return on total capital (ROTC)ROTC are non-GAAPsupplemental financial measures that we provide to investors to assist theminvestors in assessing our performance and operating trends andtrends. They are defined in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement and reconciled from generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) inAppendix A of this proxy statement. These non-GAAP financial measures are not in accordance with, nor are they a substitute for or superior to, the comparable financial measures under generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (GAAP) and are reconciled to GAAP in Appendix A to this proxy statement.GAAP.


GRAPHIC
*
Decrease from prior year due primarily
to the impact of currency; sales on an
organic basis increased 4.6%
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|i

Table of ContentsGRAPHIC

        Delivered Against Long-TermDelivering Financial Targets.    In May 2012, we communicated to our stockholders the long-termOur five-year financial targets we planned to realize by the end of 2015. As shown below, we delivered strong financial performance during the 2012-2015 period, meeting our organic sales growth and adjusted EPS growth targets. Although our free cash flow fell substantially short of our annual target in 2014, we reached our target of $300+ million in three of the four years in the period and achieved a four-year average of $287 million. We substantially delivered our 2015 commitments to investors.


2012-2015
TARGETS

2012-2015
RESULTS


Organic Sales Growth


3%-5%


4%

Adjusted EPS Growth


15%-20%+


20%

Annual Free Cash Flow


$300 mil.+


Avg. of $287 mil.

DELIVERED AGAINST 2015 FINANCIAL TARGETS

        In May 2014, we announced new long-term financial targetsgoals through 2018. We raised the midpoint of our long-term2018 included an organic sales growth target fromof 4% to 4.5%, reflecting confidence5% and a GAAP operating margin target of 9% to 10% in the trajectory of our two primary operating segments.2018. We continued targetingalso targeted double-digit adjusted EPS growth. We also introduced a target forgrowth and ROTC which has long been a key internal financial metric for our company. We believe that theof at least 16% in 2018. The combination of our growth and ROTC targets effectively communicates our value creation objectives, which together areis a proxy for growth in economic value added (EVA), one of the performance objectives used in our long-term incentive (LTI) compensation program. As shown below, we achieved or exceeded our five-year commitments through 2018.

For the 2014-2018 period, on a five-year compound annual basis (with 2013 as the base period), GAAP reported net sales, reported EPS and reported net income grew by 3.1%, 19.9% and 17.0%, respectively.



2014-2018
TARGETS

2014-2018
RESULTS(1)



Organic Sales Growth(2)


4%-5%


4.3%


GAAP Operating Margin in 2018


9%-10%


10.0%










Adjusted EPS Growth(2)


12%-15%+


17.7%


ROTC in 2018


16%+


18.6%








ACHIEVED OR EXCEEDED 2018 FINANCIAL TARGETS


(1)


Results for non-GAAP measures are reconciled from GAAP inAppendix A of this proxy statement.
(2)Percentages reflect five-year compound annual growth rates, with 2013 as the base period.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |ii


Table of Contents

        In March 2017, we announced five-year goals through 2021, targeting continued solid organic sales growth, GAAP operating margin of at least 11% in 2021, double-digit adjusted EPS growth on a compound annual basis, and ROTC of at least 17% in 2021. As shown below, based on our results for the first two years of this five-year period, we are on track to deliver our 2018 commitments to investors.these targets.

For the 2017-2018 period, on a two-year compound annual basis (with 2016 as the base period), GAAP reported net sales, reported EPS and reported net income increased by 8.5%, 22.1% and 20.7%, respectively.


 
 2014-20182017-2021
TARGETS

 2014-20152017-2018
RESULTS(1)



Organic Sales Growth(2)

 

4%-5%+ organic
5%+ ex. currency(3)

 

4%4.8% organic
7.5% ex. currency


GAAP Operating Margin


Adjusted EPS Growth11%+ in 2021

 

12%-15%10.0% in 2018










Adjusted EPS Growth(2)


10%+

 

13%22.8%


ROTC


Return on Total Capital17%+ in 2021

 

16%+18.6% in 2018










ON TRACK TO DELIVER 2021 FINANCIAL TARGETS


(1)

 

15%Results for non-GAAP measures are reconciled from GAAP in 2015
(up from 11% in 2013)Appendix A of this proxy statement.

(2)ON TRACK TOWARD 2018 FINANCIAL TARGETSPercentages for targets reflect five-year compound annual growth rates, with 2016 as the base period. Percentages for results reflect two-year compound annual growth rates, with 2016 as the base period.
(3)Target for sales growth ex. currency reflects the impact of completed acquisitions as of March 2017 of approximately 1 point.

        Disciplined Capital Allocation.    Effectively deployingWe have consistently executed our disciplined approach to capital is oneallocation, balancing our investments in organic growth, productivity and acquisitions, while continuing to return cash to stockholders through dividends and share repurchases.In 2018, we delivered ROTC of nearly 19% and invested $256.6 million in capital expenditures to support future growth and productivity improvement, made $3.8 million in equity investments, paid $175.0 million in dividends, and repurchased $392.9 million in shares of our core strategies, and wecommon stock.

        We have been consistently disciplinedinvested in our executionbusinesses to support organic growth and pursued targeted acquisitions that support our strategy of that strategyincreasing our exposure to high value product categories.We increased our spending on capital expenditures in 2018 by beingover 13% compared to prior year to enable the future growth of our businesses, improve our profitability and expand our operating margins. In addition, during 2018, we continued integrating the following acquisitions we made in 2017: (i) Hanita Coatings Rural Cooperative Association Limited, an Israel-based pressure-sensitive manufacturer of specialty films and laminates; (ii) Yongle Tape Ltd., a patient investor with respectChina-based manufacturer of specialty tapes and related products used in a variety of industrial markets; and (iii) Finesse Medical Limited, an Ireland-based manufacturer of healthcare products used in the management of wound care and skin conditions. We also made equity investments in two start-up companies developing innovative technological solutions, and negotiated a further investment in a small company in which we first invested in 2016, for which payment was made in early 2019.

        In 2018, we deployed approximately $568 million to acquisitions(i) repurchase nearly four million shares at an aggregate cost of nearly $393 million and (ii) pay an annual dividend of $2.01 per share repurchases.for an aggregate amount of $175 million. We have paid quarterly dividends for decades and increasedmost recentlyraised our annualquarterly dividend rate per share by over 80% since 2010.16% in April 2018. Given the lower price of our common stock in the second half of the year, as well as our substantially decreased use of capital for acquisitions and equity investments, we repurchased a significantly greater dollar amount in shares in 2018 compared to prior years. As shown in the graph on the following page,over the last five years, we have returned more than $1.5allocated over $2 billion to our stockholders, delivering on our commitment to return an increased amount of cash to our stockholders over the long term. Sharedividends and share repurchases declined in 2015 compared to the prior year, reflecting the disciplined execution of our capital allocation strategy, which considers our leverage capacity, assessment of the discount to intrinsic value of our common stock and other opportunities for investment, such as acquisitions. Given the higher price of our common stock in 2015 compared to 2014, the volume guidelines under which we make repurchases dictated that a lower range of shares be repurchased..

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|ii

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |iii


Table of Contents


Substantial Return of CashCapital Allocated to StockholdersDividends,
Share Repurchases and Acquisitions*

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

* Amounts for acquisitions include investments in unconsolidated businesses.

        Strong        Three- and Five-Year Cumulative TSR.TSR Outperformance.    As shown below, our strong annualdespite negative total stockholder return (TSR) of approximately 24% in 2015 contributed to our substantial outperformance in2018, we delivered cumulative TSR for the 2013-20152016-2018 three-year period compared toand the 2014-2018 five-year period that significantly outperformed the S&P 500® and the median of the S&P 500 Industrials and Materials subsets (we are a member of the Materials subset, but also share many characteristics with members of the Industrials subset; investors have advisedinformed us that they look at both subsets in evaluating our relative performance)performance, as we do internally). TSR measures the return that we have provided to our stockholders, including stock price appreciation and dividends paid (assuming reinvestment thereof)of dividends).


Three-Year Cumulative        We believe that our longer-term TSR
is a more meaningful measure of our performance than our one-year TSR, which can be significantly impacted by short-term market volatility that may be unrelated to our underlying performance. For example, although we delivered strong performance in 2018 — exceeding the high end of our adjusted EPS guidance for the year — our 2018 TSR was negative.

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

        For the 2011-2015 five-year period, our cumulative TSR was above the peer company median but below the S&P 500; annual TSR was higher than both groups in three of the five years, including significant outperformance in 2015.

TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURN

1-, 3- and 5-YEAR TSR

1-, 3- and 5-YEAR TSR

 2011 2012 2013 2014 1-Year
TSR
 3-Year
TSR
 5-Year
TSR
 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 3-Year
TSR
 5-Year
TSR

AVY

 -30.2% 26.2% 47.5% 6.2%  23.8% 93.9%  70.8%   6.2% 23.8% 14.6% 66.7% (20.3)% 52.3% 100.2%

S&P 500

 2.1% 16.0% 32.4% 13.7%  1.4% 52.6%  80.8% 13.7%   1.4% 12.0% 21.8%   (4.4)% 30.4%   50.3%

S&P Indus. & Mats.* (median)

 -3.3% 19.3% 39.9% 11.3%  -7.2% 49.0%  67.2%

S&P 500 Indus. & Mats.* (median)

 11.8% (4.5)% 20.0% 26.9% (15.5)% 35.2%   48.9%
*
Based on companies in subsets as of December 31, 2015.2018.
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|iii

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |iv


Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT

        We continued our longstanding practice of ongoing engagement and open dialogue with stockholders in 2018. Our corporateengagement program takes place throughout the year and — with respect to governance, policiessustainability and practices reflectexecutive compensation matters — generally as shown in the graphic below.

GRAPHIC

ENGAGEMENT PROCESS

        In advance of the 2018 Annual Meeting, we contacted our values,35 largest institutional stockholders, representing over 55% of our then-outstanding shares. Board members, including our Lead Independent Director, and allowmanagement were made available to answer questions and address concerns regarding the items being brought before the Annual Meeting. While we received responses from stockholders representing over 28% of our then-outstanding shares, none of them desired to substantively engage at that time.

        In the summer and fall, without the time pressures associated with proxy season, we contacted our 41 largest institutional stockholders, representing nearly 60% of our then-outstanding shares, to request a meeting with members of our Board to effectively overseeand/or management. Proposed topics for these meetings included our company in the interest of creating long-term value. The key elementsbusiness strategy and financial performance, executive compensation matters, Board composition and succession planning, and progress towards achieving our sustainability goals. We received responses from stockholders representing nearly 30% of our programthen-outstanding shares and their benefitsspoke with stockholders representing over 25% of our then-outstanding shares. We substantively engaged with every stockholder who requested to do so and included our Lead Independent Director in engagements upon stockholder request.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |v


Table of Contents


        The graphics below show the results of our 2018 stockholder engagement on governance, sustainability and executive compensation matters.

GRAPHIC

STOCKHOLDER FEEDBACK DURING 2018 ENGAGEMENT

Governance and Sustainability Matters

        With respect to matters related to governance, we discussed several topics related to our Board composition, skills and succession planning and refreshment processes. We also discussed our business strategies and related risks, diversity and inclusion initiatives, and sustainability priorities.

Executive Compensation Matters

        With respect to executive compensation, we discussed our approach to human capital management, including our leadership development and succession planning processes, as well as the linkage between our incentive compensation and business strategies. We also reviewed the robust oversight provided by our Board's Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee (the "Compensation Committee").

        Our Board and management believe that regular stockholder engagement fosters a deeper understanding of investors' evolving expectations on governance, sustainability and executive compensation matters. We look forward to continuing our longstanding practice of engaging in dialogue with our stockholders are described below.to ensure our programs continue to align with best practices.

OUR POLICY OR PRACTICE
DESCRIPTION AND BENEFIT TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS
STOCKHOLDER RIGHTS
Annual Election
of Directors

Our directors are elected annually, reinforcing their accountability to our stockholders.
Single Class of
Outstanding Voting Stock
We have no class of preferred stock outstanding, meaning our common stockholders control our company, with equal voting rights.
Majority Voting for
Director Elections

We have a majority vote standard for uncontested director elections, which increases Board accountability to our stockholders.
Mandatory Director
Resignation Policy
Incumbent directors who are not elected by the majority of our stockholders must tender their resignation.
No Supermajority
Voting Requirements

We eliminated the supermajority provisions in our charter and bylaws; as a result, stockholders may amend these documents or approve mergers and similar transactions by simple majority vote.
No Poison PillWe do not have a stockholder rights plan (commonly referred to as a "poison pill").
BOARD STRUCTURE
Governance
Guidelines

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide stockholders with information regarding the best practice principles of our corporate governance program and Board framework.
89%
Independent
Currently, all but one of our current directors are independent, ensuring that they oversee our company without undue influence from management. If all director nominees are elected by our stockholders, our Board will be 80% independent after the Annual Meeting.
Robust
Lead Independent
Director Role


Our Lead Independent Director is selected annually by our independent directors to perform clearly delineated duties, such as presiding at executive sessions and approving Board agendas.
Committee
Governance
Our Board Committees have written charters and are comprised exclusively of independent directors. Committee composition and charters are reviewed annually by our Board.
Mandatory
Retirement Policy

We have adopted a mandatory director retirement age of 72, which helps ensure regular refreshment of our Board.
Board RefreshmentOur Board's Governance and Social Responsibility Committee annually reviews our Board composition, which helps ensure we have the right balance between continuity and fresh perspectives. We have added three new directors in the past six years and have nominated a new director for election at the Annual Meeting.
Annual
Performance Evaluations

Our Board's Governance and Social Responsibility Committee oversees an annual performance evaluation of our Board and its Committees and leadership to ensure that they continue to serve the best interests of stockholders.
Access to
Management and Experts
Our Board and Committes have complete access to all levels of management and can engage advisors at our expense, giving them access to employees with direct responsibility for managing our company and experts to help them fulfill their oversight responsiblities on behalf of our stockholders.
Succession PlanningOur Board's Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee and/or the full Board reviews senior executive successors at least annually to identify and develop our future leaders and ensure business continuity if any of these key employees were to leave our company.
​ 
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Stringent Stock
Ownership Guidelines
All of our directors and executive officers meet our stringent stock ownership guidelines (5x base salary for our CEO and 3-4x base salary for our other NEOs), helping ensure the alignment of their interests with those of our stockholders.
Performance-Based
Compensation

85% of our CEO's 2015 target total direct compensation was performance-based.
Compensation
Best Practices
Our executive compensation program reflects best practices, which are summarized at the end of this proxy summary and in greater detail in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis section of our proxy statement.
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|iv

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |vi


Table of Contents

SUSTAINABILITY

        Sustainability is one of our core values and has long been part of our approach to doing business. Our aim is to improve the sustainability of our products and processes while helping to create shared value for all of our stakeholders. Key to our progress has been integrating sustainability into our underlying business strategies and engaging employees at all levels.

        2016 We publicly report on our sustainability progress every two years. In September 2017, we issued our 2014-2016 Sustainability Report, summarizing our achievements against our 2015 sustainability goals and providing details on the 2025 sustainability goals we set in 2015, which are shown on the following page. In the first three years of the 10-year horizon for our new goals, we have made meaningful progress. We expect to issue our 2016-2018 Sustainability Report in the fall of 2019, describing our continued progress towards achieving our 2025 sustainability goals. We encourage you to review these reports, which contain greater information on the highlights summarized in theSustainability section of this proxy statement, on our website atwww.averydennison.com/sustainability.

2025 SUSTAINABILITY GOALS

FOCUS AREA
GOAL(S)
GRAPHIC
Greenhouse Gas EmissionsAchieve at least 3% absolute reduction year-over-year and at least a 26% overall reduction, compared to our 2015 baseline, by 2025.

GRAPHIC


Paper


Source 100% certified paper, of which at least 70% will be Forest Stewardship Council®–certified.

GRAPHIC



Films


Ensure that 70% of the films we buy conform to, or enable end products to conform to, our environmental and social guiding principles.

GRAPHIC


Chemicals


Ensure that 70% of the chemicals we buy conform to, or enable end products to conform to, our environmental and social guiding principles.

GRAPHIC



Products and Solutions


Through innovation, deliver above-average growth in sales from sustainability-driven products and services.

Ensure that 70% of our products and solutions conform to, or enable end products to conform to, our environmental and social guiding principles.


GRAPHIC


Waste


Be 95% landfill-free, with at least 75% of our waste reused, repurposed or recycled.

Eliminate 70% of the matrix and liner waste from our value chain.


GRAPHIC



Transparency


Commit to goals publicly and be transparent in reporting our progress.

GRAPHIC


People


Continue to cultivate a diverse (40%+ female at the level of manager and above), engaged, safe (recordable incident rate of <0.25), productive and healthy workforce.

Continue to invest in our employees and the communities in which they live and work.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |vii


Table of Contents

2019 DIRECTOR NOMINEES (ITEM 1)

        Our Board has provided our management and company with strong oversight, with the following notable accomplishments in recent years:

    Successful execution of our Board-aligned business strategies, which has delivered seven consecutive years of strong organic sales growth, operating margin expansion, and double-digit adjusted EPS growth, as well as TSR over the most recent three- and five-year periods of over 52% and 100%, respectively, in each case significantly outperforming the S&P 500;

    The closing and integration of five acquisitions and the completion of equity investments in five other companies, in each case consistent with our disciplined approach to acquisitions through which we target companies that can enhance our existing capabilities and increase our exposure to high value product categories;

    Orderly executive leadership development and succession planning, with experienced leaders promoted to CEO and CFO and effectively transitioning into their roles; and

    Thoughtful Board refreshment and succession planning, with four new independent directors appointed to our Board in the last six years, three of whom increased the racial, ethnic or gender diversity on our Board.

BOARD REFRESHMENT AND SUCCESSION

Appointment of New Independent Director

        As part of its efforts to ensure regular Board refreshment, our Board's Governance and Social Responsibility Committee (the "Governance Committee") oversaw our Board's search for a new independent director during 2018. The Committee engaged Spencer Stuart, an executive search firm, to assist it in identifying and evaluating potential candidates. Spencer Stuart identified a number of potential candidates (including Mark Barrenechea) who were initially evaluated by the Governance Committee and our Chairman, with input from other Board members and senior management.

        The Governance Committee and other members of our Board interviewed Mr. Barrenechea, uniformly supporting his candidacy based on the deep technology industry expertise he could bring to our Board as we continue refining our go-to market strategies in our high value product category of Intelligent Labels. Upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, our Board unanimously appointed Mr. Barrenechea to our Board effective September 10, 2018, recognizing his senior leadership experience, technology industry experience, global exposure and public company board experience.

Departure of Current Chairman; Post-Annual Meeting Board Leadership Structure

        In February 2019, our Chairman, Dean Scarborough, notified our Board of his intention not to stand for reelection at the 2019 Annual Meeting so that he may focus on other endeavors. Mr. Scarborough's membership on, and chairmanship of, our Board will end on the date of the Annual Meeting.

        In light of Mr. Scarborough's upcoming departure, the Governance Committee evaluated our Board leadership structure and recommended to our Board that Mitch Butier, our President and CEO, be elected as Chairman, noting that he has successfully led our company for the last three years and, with Mr. Scarborough's departure, is best positioned to lead our Board in overseeing our strategies to drive long-term value creation for our key stakeholders. The committee further noted that Mr. Butier has articulated and worked to realize the long-term vision for our company and that we could best continue our progress towards achieving our 2021 financial and 2025 sustainability goals with combined leadership in the boardroom at this time. Upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, our Board unanimously elected Mr. Butier (with him and Mr. Scarborough abstaining) to serve as our Chairman, effective immediately after the Annual Meeting subject to his reelection.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |viii


Table of Contents

        The Governance Committee also recommended that Mr. Pyott (with him abstaining) continue serving as Lead Independent Director. Retaining Mr. Pyott as Lead Independent Director will provide Mr. Butier valuable mentorship, independent guidance and leadership continuity as he transitions into the Chairman role. In addition, Mr. Pyott has significantly contributed to our executive compensation and governance programs through his strong, independent leadership of our Board. Upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, our independent directors unanimously selected Mr. Pyott (with him abstaining) to continue serving as our Lead Independent Director, effective immediately after the Annual Meeting subject to his reelection.

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

        Since 2011, our Board has overseen a significant transformation of our company, including the execution of our business strategies to deliver strong cumulative TSR of approximately 94% and 71% over the last three and five years, respectively; the divestiture of two of our businesses in 2013, allowing us to focus primarily on our industry-leading Pressure-sensitive Materials (PSM) and Retail Branding and Information Solutions (RBIS) segments; a restructuring program that delivered over $100 million in annualized savings and substantially improved our productivity, followed by additional restructuring actions designed to substantially improve the cost structure of RBIS; and the implementation of our Board's succession planning with the recent election of Mitchell Butier as our President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) effective May 1, 2016, and his nomination for election as aOur director on our Board. Effective immediately before the Annual Meeting, our Board is increasing its size from nine to ten. Our incumbent directorsnominees have demonstrated atheir commitment to diligently and effectively executing their fiduciary duties on behalf of our stockholders, and we recommend that our stockholders elect each of the following nominees be electedshown in the chart below at the Annual Meeting.

NAME
 AGE
 DIRECTOR
SINCE

 CURRENT PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION
 INDEPENDENT
 AC
 CC
 GC
 AGE
 DIRECTOR
SINCE

 PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION
 INDEPENDENT
 AC
 CC
 GC
Bradley A. Alford 59 2010 Retired Chairman & CEO, Nestlé USA 
GRAPHIC


  M M 62 2010 Retired Chairman & CEO, Nestlé USA GRAPHIC
  M M
Anthony K. Anderson 60 2012 Retired Vice Chair & Managing Partner, Ernst & Young LLP 
GRAPHIC
 M     63 2012 Retired Vice Chair & Managing Partner, Ernst & Young LLP GRAPHIC M   M
Peter K. Barker 67 2003 Retired Chairman of California, JPMorgan Chase & Co. 
GRAPHIC


C   70 2003 Retired Chairman of California, JPMorgan Chase & Co. GRAPHIC
M  C
Mark J. Barrenechea 54 2018 Vice Chair, CEO & CTO, OpenText Corporation GRAPHIC      
Mitchell R. Butier 44  President & COO, Avery Dennison Corporation No       47 2016 Chairman-Elect, President & CEO, Avery Dennison Corporation GRAPHIC
  
Ken C. Hicks 63 2007 Retired Chairman, Foot Locker, Inc. 
GRAPHIC


M  M 66 2007 Chairman & CEO, Academy Sports + Outdoors GRAPHIC M M  
Andres A. Lopez 56 2017 President & CEO, Owens-Illinois, Inc. GRAPHIC
M  
David E. I. Pyott (LID) 62 1999 Retired Chairman & CEO, Allergan, Inc. 
GRAPHIC
   C M 65 1999 Retired Chairman & CEO, Allergan, Inc. GRAPHIC   M M
Dean A. Scarborough 60 2000 Chairman & CEO, Avery Dennison Corporation No   
Patrick T. Siewert 60 2005 Managing Director and Partner, The Carlyle Group 
GRAPHIC
 M     63 2005 Managing Director & Partner, The Carlyle Group GRAPHIC
C  
Julia A. Stewart 60 2003 Chairman & CEO, DineEquity, Inc. 
GRAPHIC


  M C 63 2003 Former Chairman & CEO, Dine Brands Global, Inc. GRAPHIC   C M
Martha N. Sullivan 59 2013 President & CEO, Sensata Technologies Holding N.V. 
GRAPHIC
   M   62 2013 President & CEO, Sensata Technologies Holding PLC GRAPHIC
M M 

    AC = Audit & Finance Committee    CC = Compensation & Executive Personnel Committee GC = Governance & Social Responsibility Committee
    M = Member    C = ChairmanChair    LID = Lead Independent Director

            Our director nominees bring a balance of skills, qualifications and demographic backgrounds in overseeing our company, as highlighted below and shown in greater detail in the Board Matrix included in theItem 1 — Election of Directors section of this proxy statement.

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |ix


GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|v

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

COMPENSATION PHILOSOPHY AND STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

        Our governance program reflects our company values and facilitates our Board's independent oversight of our company. The highlights of our program, which we believe is consistent and aligned with the Investor Stewardship Group's Corporate Governance Principles for U.S. Listed Companies, are shown below.

Stockholder Rights

    Annual Election of Directors
    Majority Voting in Director Elections
    Single Class of Outstanding Voting Stock
    Market-Standard Proxy Access

    No Supermajority Voting Requirements
    No Poison Pill
    No Exclusive Forum or Fee Shifting Bylaws

Board Governance

    Current Directors 83% Independent
    Robust Lead Independent Director Role
    Ongoing Director Succession Planning and Board Refreshment
    Executive Succession Planning and Leadership Development
    Annual Board Evaluations
    Mandatory Director Retirement Policy
    Governance Guidelines
    Strong Committee Governance
    Direct Access to Management and Experts

APPROVAL OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION (ITEM 2)

COMPENSATION DESIGN

        The Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee (the "Compensation Committee") designs our executive compensation program to motivate our executives to execute our business strategies and deliver long-term stockholder value. The program delivers pay for performance, with realized compensation dependent on our company achieving annual and long-term financial performance and value creation performance objectives that advance the interests of our stockholders.

        We value stockholder feedback on our executive compensation practices, and we actively solicit input through our stockholder engagement program. Our Board and management continued their long-standing practice of open dialogue with stockholders in 2015. In advance of the 2015 Annual Meeting, we proactively contacted our thirty largest institutional stockholders, representing over 60% of our then-outstanding shares, to solicit their views on our executive compensation program and make directors and management available to answer questions or address concerns. As a result of this effort, we engaged in telephonic discussions with stockholders representing approximately 35% of our then-outstanding shares. In addition, after one of our directors and members of management met in person with four of our largest stockholders and the two leading proxy advisory firms in the fall of 2014, we followed up on these meetings with as-needed engagement during 2015.

PERFORMANCE-BASED COMPENSATION TARGETED AT MARKET MEDIAN

        Target total direct compensation (TDC) tofor our executives is comprised of the following three components:

    Base salary;

    Performance-based annual cash incentive award under our Annual Incentive Plan (AIP); and

    Long-term incentives (LTI) delivered in performance-based equity awards, consisting 50% of performance units (PUs) and 50% of market-leveraged stock units (MSUs).


Elements of Total Direct Compensation

GRAPHIC

        The Compensation Committee targetsestablishes the target TDC of our Named Executive Officers' (NEOs') TDCOfficers (NEOs) to incent economic and the components thereof atstockholder value creation, giving consideration to the market median, giving consideration torole responsibilities, individual performance, tenure, retention succession and market factors.succession. The majority of this compensation is at risk,performance-based, meaning that our executives ultimately may not realize some of these components of TDC if we fail to achieve our financial objectives and create stockholder value, our executives may ultimately not realize some or all of these performance-based components of compensation. In 2015, 85%, 79% and 67% of our CEO's, President's and average of other current NEOs' TDC, respectively, was performance-based.objectives.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|vi

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |x


Table of Contents

        As shown in the charts shown below, in 2018, approximately 86% and 70% of the TDC of our CEO and average of our other NEOs, respectively, was performance-based.


20152018 Target Total Direct Compensation Mix

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

CEO TRANSITION

        In October 2014, Mr. Butier was elected by our Board as President and Chief Operating Officer (COO) effective November 1, 2014. Mr. Butier served in these capacities throughout 2015, resigning from the additional position of Chief Financial Officer (CFO) in March 2015 in connection with the appointment of Anne Bramman as our Senior Vice President and CFO. In February 2016, after having discussed CEO transition matters during executive session at all but the first meeting held during 2015, our Board determined to elect Mr. Butier as President and CEO effective May 1, 2016, replacing Mr. Scarborough in the CEO role at that time. The independent directors of our Board determined to elect, subject to his election by our stockholders, Mr. Scarborough as Executive Chairman of our Board also effective May 1, 2016. In recognition of responsibilities in these respective roles, as well as the advice of its independent compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson, the Compensation Committee made the following decisions:

    For Mr. Butier, increase his base salary from $765,000 to $1,100,000 effective May 1, 2016; raise his 2016 target AIP and LTI opportunities from 90% and 300%, respectively, to 125% and 400%, respectively (the AIP opportunity will be prorated based on the portion of the year for which he serves as President and COO and the portion for which he serves as President and CEO); and, consistent with similar promotion grants to CEOs in the market, grant him an option to purchase shares of our common stock with a grant date fair value of approximately $2,000,000 on June 1, 2016, which will vest 50% on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant. This equity grant provides for realizable gains that align directly with the long-term appreciation of our common stock and intentionally differs from our annual LTI awards to underscore its special purpose and one-time nature. Mr. Butier's new target TDC of $6,875,000 is less than the market median; the Compensation Committee believes that positioning his compensation at the 40th percentile acknowledges that he will be new to the CEO role yet compensates him within a reasonable CEO market range.

    For Mr. Scarborough, decrease his base salary from $1,125,000 to $875,000 effective May 1, 2016 and decrease his 2016 target AIP and LTI opportunities from 125% and 450%, respectively, to 100% and 300%, respectively (the AIP opportunity will be prorated based on the portion of the year for which he serves as Chairman and CEO and the portion for which he serves as Executive Chairman). Mr. Scarborough's 2016 target TDC of $4,375,000 is at (i) the market median for an executive chairman role and (ii) represents a 45% decrease from his current target TDC of $7,593,750. The Compensation Committee believes that in his new role as Executive Chairman, Mr. Scarborough will provide critical leadership experience and mentorship to facilitate a smooth CEO transition.

    For 2017, Mr. Scarborough's base salary is expected to be further reduced to $230,000; he is not expected to be eligible to participate in the AIP; and his annual LTI opportunity is expected to be valued at approximately $140,000, the same as that of our non-employee directors. Mr. Scarborough's anticipated 2017 target TDC of $370,000 is expected to be at the market median for a non-executive chairman.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|vii

Table of Contents

PAY-FOR-PERFORMANCE

        Over the past five years, our cumulative TSR has increased over 70%by 100% while the total compensation of our CEO'sCEO decreased by approximately 28%. In the graph below, CEO pay reflects the compensation has increased only 18%. Seeof our former CEO, Mr. Scarborough, for 2014 and 2015, and theSummary Compensation Table in this proxy statement for more information. compensation of our current CEO, Mr. Butier, from 2016 to 2018.


Five-Year CEO Pay and Cumulative TSR

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|viii

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |xi


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION BEST PRACTICES

        As summarized below and described in further detail in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, we believe that our executive compensation program aligns with our goals and strategies and reflects best practices.

What We Do


    Pay for performance — 85%86% of our CEO's 20152018 target TDC was tied to company performance
    Emphasize long-term performance — 66%68% of our CEO's 20152018 target TDC was equity-based and tied to creatingdelivering long-term stockholder value
    Use double-trigger change of control vesting provisions — Vesting of equity followingvesting requires a change of control requiresqualifying termination of employment within 24 months
    Manage share usage conservatively — We have reduced our dilution andthree-year average burn rate to 4.0% and 0.4%, respectivelyat the end of fiscal year 2018 of 0.8% was at the 50th percentile of companies in the S&P 500
    Maintain rigorous stock ownership guidelinespolicy — 5x6x base salary for our CEO and 3-4x3x base salary for our other NEOsNEOs; requires holding 50% of minimum ownership level in vested shares
    Review tally sheets — Compensation Committee performs a detailed review of all executiveAble to clawback compensation components
    Maintain market consistent clawback policy
    UseRely on the advice of an independent compensation consultant retained directly by, and serving at the direction of, the Compensation Committee
    AssessAnnually evaluate the Compensation Committee and review its charter
    Periodically assess risks related to our compensation policies and practices
    ObtainFollowing termination, obtain releases from liability from and post-terminationimpose restrictive covenants fromon our departing executives
    Annually review the Compensation Committee's charter and evaluate the Compensation Committee's performanceReview tally sheets for our NEOs reflecting all compensation components

What We Don't Do


    HaveNo employment agreementscontracts with our NEOs
    Gross upNo guaranteed AIP awards and generally no individual modifiers for our NEOs
    No excise tax gross-ups on change of control severance benefits for excise taxes
    ProvideNo hedging or pledging of company stock by directors and officers
    No tax gross-ups on perquisites
    No above-market interest rates in our only deferred compensation plan currently openavailable for deferrals
    Provide gross-ups to cover tax liabilities associated with executive perquisites
    Permit directors or officers to hedge or pledge company stock
    Grant stock options with an exercise price less than the fair market value on the dateNo re-pricing of grant
    Re-price or exchange stock options without stockholder approval
    PayNo payout of accrued dividend equivalentsdividends unless performance conditions are met and until the underlying equity awards vest
    No granting of stock options below fair market value
    No supplemental retirement benefits for executive officers

RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF PwC (ITEM 3)

        Our Board's Audit and Finance Committee has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016,2019, and our Board is seeking stockholder ratification of the appointment. PwC is knowledgeable about our operations and accounting practices, and isvery well qualified to act as our independent registered public accounting firm.firm and has a deep understanding of our operations and accounting practices. The Audit and Finance Committee considered the qualifications, performance, and independence of PwC, the quality of its discussions with PwC, and the fees charged by PwC for the level and quality of services provided during 2015,2018, and determined that the reappointment of PwC is in the best interest of our company and its stockholders.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|ix

Table of ContentsAvery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |xii

TABLE OF CONTENTS FOR PROXY STATEMENT FOR
2016 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

PROXY SUMMARY

i

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE, SUSTAINABILITY AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY


1

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS


4

Overview

4

Corporate Governance Guidelines

5

Director Independence

5

Board Leadership Structure

6

Board Committees

7

Executive Sessions

8

Risk Oversight

9

Succession Planning

10

Director Education

11

Board and Committee Evaluations

11

Stockholder Engagement and Communications

12

ITEM 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS


13

Selection of Director Nominees

13

Director Qualifications

14

Board Refreshment and Director Succession Planning

14

Director Diversity

16

2016 Director Nominees

16

Director Compensation

20

Director Compensation Table

22

ITEM 2 — ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION


23

COMPENSATION AND EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE REPORT


23

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS


24

Executive Summary

25

Summary of Compensation Decisions for 2015

35

Discussion of Compensation Components and Decisions Impacting 2015 Compensation

37

Compensation-Setting Tools

50

Independent Oversight and Expertise

50

Other Considerations

52

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES


54

2015 Summary Compensation Table

54

2015 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

56

2015 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

57

2015 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

59

2015 Pension Benefits

60

2015 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

62

Payments Upon Termination as of January 2, 2016

64

Equity Compensation Plan Information as of January 2, 2016

67

ITEM 3 — RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


68

AUDIT MATTERS


69
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|Table of Contents

Table of Contents

AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

71

SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION


73

Stock Ownership Guidelines

73

Insider Trading Policy; Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging

73

Security Ownership of Management and Significant Stockholders

74

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

75

Related Person Transactions

75

MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATION


76

APPENDIX A — RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES TO GAAP


A-1
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|Table of Contents

Table of Contents

PROXY STATEMENT

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE,
SUSTAINABILITY AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

        We develop identificationproduce pressure-sensitive materials and decorative solutions primarily for businesses worldwide. Oura variety of tickets, tags, labels and other converted products. We sell most of our pressure-sensitive materials to label printers and converters that convert the materials into labels and other products includethrough embossing, printing, stamping and die-cutting. We sell other pressure-sensitive labeling technology and materials; films for graphicmaterials in converted form as tapes and reflective applications; performance tapes; brandsheeting. We also manufacture and pricesell a variety of other converted products and items not involving pressure-sensitive components, such as fasteners, tickets, tags, and labels (including radio-frequency identification inlays);(RFID) inlays and pressure-sensitive adhesive products for surgical, wound care, ostomy,tags, and electromedical applications. Weimprinting equipment and related solutions, which serve our customers with insightsthe apparel and innovations that help make brands more inspiring and the world more intelligent.other end markets.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

        Under the oversight of our Board of Directors (our "Board"), we have designed our corporate governance program to ensure continued compliancecomply with applicable laws and regulations — including the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) — and to reflect best practices as informed by the policiespractices of other large public companies, recommendations from our outside advisors, the voting guidelines of our stockholders and the policies of proxy advisory firms. The key features of our program and the related benefits to our stockholders are describednoted in theCorporate Governance Highlights section of ourthe Proxy Summary (see page iv).Summary; together they form a program that we believe is consistent and aligned with the Investor Stewardship Group's Corporate Governance Principles for U.S. Listed Companies.

        We encourage stockholdersyou to visit the Corporate Governance section of our website atwww.averydennison.com/corporategovernance, where you can review and download the following corporate governance documents can be found:documents:

      CodeAmended and Restated Certificate of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Senior Financial Officers;Incorporation;

      Code of Conduct;

      Audit Committee Complaint Procedures for AccountingAmended and Auditing Matters;Restated Bylaws (our "Bylaws");

      Corporate Governance Guidelines (our "Governance Guidelines"); and

      Charters for our Board's Audit and Finance Committee (the "Audit Committee"), Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee (the "Compensation Committee"), and Governance and Social Responsibility Committee (the "Governance Committee").;

      Code of Conduct;

      Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Senior Financial Officers; and

      Audit Committee Complaint Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters.

        Our website also includes copies of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and our Amended and Restated Bylaws ("Bylaws").        You can access these documents on our website using the links contained in this proxy statement, but should note that information on our website is not and should not be considered part of, nor is it incorporated by reference into, this proxy statement. You can also receive copies of these documents, without charge, by written request mailedwriting to our Corporate Secretary at Avery Dennison Corporation, 207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |1


Table of Contents

CODE OF ETHICS

        We have adopted a Code of Ethics that requires our Chief Executive Officer (CEO),CEO, Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and ControllerChief Accounting Officer (CAO) to act professionally and ethically in fulfilling their responsibilities. These individuals are expected to

Code of Ethics

    Our CEO, CFO and CAO mustavoid actual or apparent conflicts between their personal and professional relationshipsof interest and disclose any material transaction or relationship that could reasonably be expected to give rise toraise a conflict of interest to the Governance Committee.

    In addition, they must:

    Ensure that our SEC filings are expected to ensure that the reportscomplete and documents we file with the SECaccurate and contain full, fair, accurate and understandable information; respect

    Respect the confidentiality of information acquired in the course of the performance of their responsibilities; employ

    Employ corporate assets responsibly; and resources in a responsible manner; and report

    Report violations of our Code of Ethics to the Chair of either the Audit Committee or the Governance Committee.

        Supporting the principles ofreflected in our Code of Ethics, our controllership and internal audit functions ensure that we maintain a robust internal control environment, with the leaders of these functions regularly reporting to, and regularly report toperiodically meeting in executive session with, the Audit Committee.

        Our Code of Ethics is available on our website atwww.averydennison.com/codeofethics. Only the Audit Committee or the Governance Committee can amend or waive the provisions of the Code of Ethics, and any amendments or waivers must be posted promptly on our website or timely filed with the SEC on a Current Report on Form 8-K. Since we first adoptedWe last amended our Code of Ethics in February 2004, no amendments have been made and no waivers have been granted.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|1

Table of ContentsApril 2014.

CODE OF CONDUCT

        Our Code of Conduct — which is built on our core values of Integrity, Service, Teamwork, Innovation, Excellence and Community — applies to all of our directors, officers and employees and is available on our website at www.averydennison.com/codeofconduct. Our Code of Conductemployees. It has been translated into over 30 languages and our leaders are trained on it and affirm their commitment to complycomplying with it when they first join our company and annually thereafter. The coreWe train employees on the Code of Conduct at least biannually, in addition to our online training program consisting of four courses per year covering specific risk areas from the Code of Conduct that designated computer-based employees are required to complete. To ensure that the policies and principles encompassed in our Code of Conduct reach all our employees, we develop and launch three "Talkabout" toolkits (also in over 30 languages) globally each year, which managers are required to use to engage in meaningful discussion with their teams regarding topics from the Code of Conduct. These toolkits consist of presentation slides, a leader discussion guide and an introductory subtitled video, which includes messages from our Chief Compliance Officer and other company leadership.

Recent Code Updates

        In 2017, we refreshed our Code of Conduct, which is available on our website atwww.averydennison.com/codeofconduct, with updated leadership messages, additional guidance on certain higher risk areas, and case studies to provide additional guidance on more complex ethical situations. We introduced the updated Code of Conduct with manager and employee communications and created a pocket version for distribution to all employees. In 2018, we further updated our Code of Conduct to reflect our updated values of Integrity, Courage, External Focus, Diversity, Sustainability, Innovation, Teamwork and Excellence. These values will shape our culture and guide our behavior as we continue to grow. Our "Values in Action" campaign during the year provided our employees around the world the opportunity to demonstrate how they are living our values and helping maintain our values-based culture.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |2


Table of Contents

Ethics-Based Corporate Culture and Policies

        Reflecting the culture of our company since its inception, the ethics-based corporate policies and other matters discussed in our Code of Conduct are shown below. Our global supplier standards extend our commitment to many of these principles to our third party service providers, establishing our expectation that they also do business in an ethical manner.

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

Business Conduct GuideLine

            Our Business Conduct GuideLine is a whistleblower hotline available at all hours for employees or third parties to report potential violations of our Code of Conduct, anonymously if they so choose,choose.

        The GuideLine may be reached by (i) calling 888.567.4387800.461.9330 toll-free in the United States; 704.731.0166 collectStates, 720.514.4400 direct with applicable charges from any location, or toll-free outside of the United States; 10.800.711.0729States using the country-specific toll-free numbers found in North China; or 10.800.110.0672 toll-free in South Chinaour Code of Conduct or (ii) visitingwww.integrity-helpline.com/AveryDennison.jspaverydennison.com/guidelinereport (www.financial-integrity.com/AveryDennison.jspaverydennison.com/guidelinereport-eu in Europe). The hotline is operated by an independent third party and accepts reports in any language to accommodate the needs of our global workforce and customer/supplier base. All reports are investigated under the direction of our Chief Compliance Officer, in consultation with theour law department and senior management and with oversight from the Governance Committee. Our policiesWe prohibit retaliation for good-faith reporting.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |3

|2016 Proxy Statement|2

Table of Contents

COMPLAINT PROCEDURES FOR ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING MATTERS

            The Audit Committee is responsiblehas adopted procedures for ensuring thatthe confidential, anonymous submission of complaints related to accounting, accounting standards, internal accounting controls and audit practices are handled appropriately and has adopted procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission of complaints regarding these matters.practices.

        These procedures relate to complaints forof (i) fraud or deliberate error in the preparation, evaluation, review or audit of our financial statements or other financial reports; (ii) fraud or deliberate error in the recording or maintenance of our financial records; (iii) deficiencies in, or noncompliance with, our internal accounting controls; (iv) misrepresentation or false statement to or by a senior officer or accountant regarding aany matter contained in our financial records, statements, or other reports; or (v) deviation from full and fair reporting of our financial condition. Any person, including third parties, may submit a good faith complaint regarding accounting and auditing matters;matters and employees may do so without fear of dismissal or other retaliation. The Audit Committee oversees these procedures, which are available on our website atwww.averydennison.com/auditprocedures. Investigations are conducted under the direction of our internal audit department in consultation with theour Chief Compliance Officer, law department and members of senior management to the extent appropriate under the circumstances.

        Stockholders and other interested parties interested in communicating regarding these matters may make a confidential, anonymous report by (i) reporting tocontacting the Business Conduct GuideLine as described above,on the previous page or (ii) writing to the Audit and Finance Committee Chair, c/o Corporate Secretary, Avery Dennison Corporation, 207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203.

STOCK OWNERSHIP POLICY

Our stock ownership policy requires that non-employee directors acquire and maintain a minimum ownership interest in our company equal to $500,000 and our CEO and other NEOs acquire and maintain a minimum ownership interest in our company equal to 6x and 3x their annual base salary, respectively.

        The values of the following shares/units are considered in measuring compliance with our stock ownership policy: (i) shares beneficially owned or deemed to be beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, under federal securities laws; (ii) shares or units held in qualified and non-qualified employee benefit plans; (iii) unvested RSUs subject only to time-based vesting; and (iv) 50% of the value of unvested MSUs at the target payout level. Neither unvested PUs nor stock options are considered in measuring compliance.

            If a director or officer fails to achieve or make reasonable progress towards achieving his or her respective ownership level, he or she is required to retain shares acquired, net of taxes, from the exercise of stock options or vesting of stock awards until such level is met. Executives are not allowed to transact in company stock until they certify they will remain in compliance with our stock ownership policy after giving effect to the transaction they plan to effectuate.

        The Compensation Committee and the Governance Committee reviewed the stock ownership of our non-employee directors in December 2018 and February 2019, respectively. Both Committees noted thatall of our non-employee directors have exceeded the minimum ownership level required by the policy, except for Messrs. Barrenechea and Lopez who became directors in September 2018 and February 2017, respectively, and have five years to reach the minimum ownership level. The Committee noted that, because they had made reasonable progress towards meeting the applicable level, Messrs. Barrenechea and Lopez were also in compliance with the policy. On average, the ownership of our non-employee directors was approximately 6x the minimum ownership level, aligning their interests with those of our stockholders and further incenting their focus on long-term stockholder value creation.

The Compensation Committee reviewed officer stock ownership in December 2018 and determined that all of our NEOs were in compliance with our stock ownership policy.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |4


Table of Contents

COMPLIANCE WITH STOCK OWNERSHIP POLICY
 
 
 SHARES AS OF
2018 FYE (#)

 MINIMUM
GUIDELINE

 % OF GUIDELINE
 COMPLIANCE
 

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

  $   500,000   

Bradley Alford

  35,020    625%  GRAPHIC 

Anthony Anderson

  14,246    254%  GRAPHIC 

Peter Barker

  58,666    1047%  GRAPHIC 

Mark Barrenechea

  880    16%  GRAPHIC 

Ken Hicks

  38,609    689%  GRAPHIC 

Andres Lopez

  4,050    72%  GRAPHIC 

David Pyott

  67,165    1199%  GRAPHIC 

Dean Scarborough

  47,177    842%  GRAPHIC 

Patrick Siewert

  14,640    261%  GRAPHIC 

Julia Stewart

  55,321    988%  GRAPHIC 

Martha Sullivan

  13,933    249%  GRAPHIC 

PRESIDENT & CEO

  6x Base Salary   

Mitchell Butier

  189,312 $6,798,000  249%  GRAPHIC 

OTHER NEOs

  3x Base Salary*   

Gregory Lovins

  25,239 $1,800,000  125%  GRAPHIC 

Georges Gravanis

  21,746 $1,883,907  103%  GRAPHIC 

Susan Miller

  37,467 $1,692,374  198%  GRAPHIC 

Deon Stander

  20,175 $1,077,920  167%  GRAPHIC 

*
Mr. Stander's minimum guideline in 2018 was 2x base salary. As an NEO, his guideline increased to 3x base salary for 2019, which he exceeded at year-end 2018.

INSIDER TRADING POLICY

        Our insider trading policy prohibits our directors, officers and employees from (i) engaging in transactions in our company's stock while in the possession of material non-public information; (ii) engaging in transactions in the stock of other companies while in possession of material non-public information that they become aware of in performing their duties; and (iii) disclosing material non-public information to unauthorized persons outside our company.

Limited Trading Windows

        Our insider trading policy restricts trading for directors and officers (including all NEOs) during blackout periods, which generally begin two weeks before the end of each fiscal quarter and end two business days after the release of earnings for the quarter.

Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging

        Our insider trading policy expressly prohibits our directors, officers and employees from purchasing financial instruments (such as prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of shares of our common stock they hold, directly or indirectly. In addition, directors and officers are expressly prohibited from — and our non-officer employees are strongly discouraged from — pledging any of their shares of common stock to secure personal loans or other obligations, including by holding such shares in a margin account.

            To our knowledge, based on our review of their written representations in our annual director and officer questionnaire, all of our directors and executive officers complied with our insider trading policy during 2018, and none of them has hedged or pledged shares of our common stock.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |5


Table of Contents

SUSTAINABILITY

        Sustainability is rooted inone of our core values and has long been part of our approach to doing business. It drivesbusiness, driving us to work collaboratively across our entire value chain to address the environmental and social impacts of our packaging, labeling, retail branding and graphics materials. products.Our aim is to continually improve the sustainability of our products and processes while helping to create shared value for all our stakeholders. Management leads the execution of our stakeholders.

        In 2018, leadership over ensuring meaningful progress towards achieving our 2025 sustainability promise through our Sustainability Council, which is chaired by Mitchellgoals transitioned from Mitch Butier, our President and Chief Operating Officer (COO),CEO, to Deon Stander, Vice President and General Manager of our Retail Branding and Information Solutions (RBIS) business. Our Sustainability Council, now led by Mr. Stander and comprised of other corporatean expanded group of functional and business leaders withto help drive broad accountability and accelerate our progress, meets bimonthly and updates our executive leadership team quarterly. The Council has the following four work streams to help focus its efforts, each of which is led by an internal leader from one of our businesses: operations; technology and innovation; products and solutions; and social impact and transparency. Board oversight fromover sustainability is primarily conducted by the Governance Committee.Committee, which receives a report from management at least once a year. In addition, our full Board hears from our business leaders on our sustainability initiatives during its regular review of our business strategies.

ENGAGING OUR STAKEHOLDERS

        We seek to ensure that our sustainability efforts are consistent with the expectations of our stakeholders, as shown below. We regularly communicate with individuals and organizations interested in how we do business generally and our sustainability efforts in particular, and also conduct stakeholder interviews as part of our regular sustainability materiality assessments. These assessments help set our sustainability agenda, allowing us to focus on the areas in which we can have the most impact.

GRAPHIC

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |6


Table of Contents

ADVANCEMENTS TOWARDS 2025 SUSTAINABILITY GOALS

        We publicly report on our sustainability progress every two years. In September 2015,2017, we issued our second2014-2016 Sustainability Report, coveringsummarizing our achievements against our 2015 sustainability goals and providing details on the 2013-2014 period2025 sustainability goals we set in 2015. In the first three years of the 10-year horizon for our new goals, we have made meaningful progress, the key to which has been integrating sustainability into our underlying business strategies and reporting onengaging employees at all levels. We expect to issue our 2016-2018 Sustainability Report in the fall of 2019, describing our continued progress towards achieving our 2025 sustainability goals. We encourage you to review these reports, which contain greater information on the 2015 sustainability goals we announced in 2009. Each ofhighlights summarized on the following page, on our goals was grounded in a vision for the future of our company, and we were proud to report that, as of the end of fiscal year 2014, we were on track to meet or exceed each of these goals by the end of 2015. Details of our accomplishments may be found in the Sustainability Report posted in the "Sustainability" section of our company website at www.averydennison.com/sustainability.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |7


Table of Contents

VISION
2015 GOAL
YE 2014 STATUS2025 SUSTAINABILITY GOALS
FOCUS AREA
GOAL(S)
HIGHLIGHTS OF PROGRESS THROUGH 2018
Industry leadership inGreenhouse
sustainable solutionsGas Emissions



GRAPHIC





  Create market-leading sustainable materialsAchieve at least a 3% absolute reduction year-over-year and solutionsat least a 26% overall reduction, compared to our 2015 baseline, by 2025. Several sustainableReduced our absolute GHG emissions by over 5% in 2018 and over 25% through 2018 compared to our 2015 baseline.
solutions developed


GRAPHIC

Responsibly sourced materialsPaper


GRAPHIC

 

  Our strategic suppliers achieve a preferred environmental performance ratingSource 100% certified paper, of which at least 70% will be Forest Stewardship Council®-certified.

 

On track



GRAPHICOver 90% of the total volume of paper we procured in 2018 was certified, with at least 45% of the volume Forest Stewardship Council®-certified.

ReduceFilms


GRAPHIC






Ensure that 70% of the films we buy conform to, or enable end products to conform to, our carbon footprintenvironmental and social guiding principles.

 

  Reduce greenhouse gas emissions indexedSharpened the focus of our films goal on recyclable content.

Our RBIS business partnered with Plastic Bank, a Canada-based organization focused on eliminating ocean plastics, to net sales by 15% from 2005 levelsestablish collection and recycling centers in key supply chain locations.

Chemicals


GRAPHIC

 

ExceededEnsure that 70% of the chemicals we buy conform to, or enable end products to conform to, our environmental and social guiding principles.

 


GRAPHICCompleted pilots of the bluesign® system, a solution for sustainable textile production used by many of the apparel customers of our RBIS business.

Zero wasteProducts and
Solutions



GRAPHIC







Through innovation, deliver above-average growth in sales from sustainability-driven products and services.

Ensure that 70% of our products and solutions conform to, landfillor enable end products to conform to, our environmental and social guiding principles.




Determined that at least 30% and 20% of our LGM and RBIS business' revenues, respectively, were from sustainability-driven products in 2018.

Developed our ClearIntent™ portfolio of products in our LGM and RBIS businesses made with materials that are responsibly sourced, use less material with the same functionality, contain recycled content and/or enable recycling.

Continued to enable customers in our RBIS business to replace conventional packaging and brand elements with more environmentally friendly alternatives.

Waste


GRAPHIC

 

  Reduce manufacturingBe 95% landfill-free, with at least 75% of our waste sent to landfill to 15%reused, repurposed or recycled.

Eliminate 70% of totalthe matrix and liner waste generatedfrom our value chain.

 

ExceededAs of the end of 2018, diverted over 90% of our solid waste from landfills with at least 90 of our sites worldwide over 95% landfill-free, and recycled over 60% of diverted waste.



GRAPHICContinued our goal of reducing plastic waste by working to build systems and infrastructure to allow label converters and brand owners to cost-effectively recycle label waste.

Transparency


GRAPHIC






Commit to goals publicly and be transparent in reporting our progress.

 

  Achieve a world-class safety incident rateWorked with third parties to develop tools to better measure our progress towards achieving our sustainability goals.

Began preparing our 2016-2018 Sustainability Report, partnering with Business for Social Responsibility to update our sustainability materiality assessment to ensure continued alignment with the sustainable practices and goals of 0.40our customers and the industries we serve.

People


GRAPHIC

 

ExceededContinue to cultivate a diverse (40%+ female at the level of manager and above), engaged, safe (recordable incident rate of <0.25), productive and healthy workforce.

Continue to invest in our employees and the communities in which they live and work.

 

Expanded our flexible work arrangements, female employee leadership program and unconscious bias training across our company. In addition, evaluated our gender pay equity with positive results, developing plans to make identified adjustments to compensation for 2019. While we have made significant progress with our gender diversity efforts, our female representation at the level of manager and above was 33% at the end of 2018.

GRAPHIC
Safe and fair labor practices
  Report on social compliance performanceContinued our world class safety record, with a recordable incident rate of key suppliersOn track
GRAPHIC

Invest0.25 in our global
communities


  Triple our community investment2018, far surpassing the manufacturing industry average of 3.5 in emerging markets


On track



GRAPHIC2017 (the most recently available industry average).

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |8


Table of Contents

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY

AVERY DENNISON FOUNDATION

        With Board oversight from the Governance Committee, our social responsibility efforts reflect our spirit of community and help strengthen the places around the world in which we do business. We make most of our community investments through the Avery Dennison Foundation leads our community outreach efforts and is built on our company's leadership principle(the "Foundation"), which annually invests at least 5% of model integrity and social responsibility. Our vision isits assets from the prior year to inspire human promise toward a more intelligent and sustainable world — a vision that drives us to advance women's empowerment, education and sustainability, initiativesand encourages employee engagement with a spirit of invention and innovation.The Foundation invests in communities by making grants to community-based organizations, promoting employee volunteerism and engagement, and awarding scholarships.

GLOBAL GRANTMAKING

        The Foundation's global grantmaking initiative is its primary means of giving. Grantmaking is also aided by our employees worldwide who help identify qualified NGOs. Grant decisions are guided by the priorities shown below, which are targeted to the communities in which our employees live learn and work. In cooperation with not-for-profit organizations, non-governmental organizations

GRAPHIC

EMPLOYEE ENGAGEMENT

        As the hands and schools, we encourage our employees to volunteer their time to improve quality of life in their communities and identify organizations that provide needed services with the same spirit of invention and innovation found at the heart of our company's success. In recent years,company, our employees are critical to advancing the Foundation's efforts. Because they often have the best understanding of the needs of their communities, more than 150 employee teams coordinate volunteerism locally at our global givinglocations. Nearly 50% of the Foundation's grants are enhanced with volunteer time from our employees.

        The Foundation also engages employees through the Granting Wishes program, has expanded into China, India and Brazilwhich allows employees globally to measurably improve the lives of students and families in these nations where werecommend one-time grants to local NGOs. Employees often have a significant presence.connection to the organizations they nominate through volunteerism or service on the organization's board. In the eight years since the Foundation launched Granting Wishes, more than 1,000 of our employees have taken part, enabling grants to more than 280 organizations.

SCHOLARSHIPS

        The Foundation provides scholarships to the children of our employees in the U.S. More than 620 scholarships have been awarded to U.S. college students.

        In China and India, the Foundation's InvEnt Scholarships have for more than a decade supported the next generation of innovators in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. By providing undergraduates with tuition assistance, an invention competition and professional development opportunities, the Foundation inspires the spirit of innovation in future engineers and technology workers. As part of their application, students submit ideas for an invention they then design during their scholarship year. Over 186 scholarships have been awarded to Chinese and Indian students who have demonstrated outstanding innovative spirit and strong practical competence.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |9

|2016 Proxy Statement|3

Table of Contents

OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS

OVERVIEW

        Our Board is responsible for overseeing, counselingoversees, counsels and directingensures management inis serving the long-termbest interests of our company and stockholders, with the goal of building long-term value and ensuringmaximizing the vitalityperformance of our businesses for our customers, employees and other stakeholders.to deliver long-term value.

        Our Board's primary responsibilities include establishing an effective corporatethe following:

    Establishing astrong governance program, with a Board and Committee structure that ensures independent oversight; overseeing

    Conductingdirector succession planning to ensure we maintain an engaged and diverse Board with the skills and backgrounds to effectively oversee our company;

    Approving ourannual operating plan and significant strategic and operational actions, includingsignificant capital expenditures and acquisitions;

    Overseeing ourbusinesses, strategies and risks; maintainingrisks;

    Maintaining theintegrity of our financial statements; evaluatingstatements;

    Evaluating the performance of our senior executivesleaders and determining their compensation; undertaking executive compensation; and

    Conductingsuccession planning for our CEO and other senior executives;executives, and reviewingensuring we have ahuman capital management program that is effectively developing our annual operating plan and significant strategic and operational actions.

    leaders.

BOARD COMPOSITION2019 DIRECTOR NOMINEES

        Our Bylaws currently provide that our Board be comprised of between eight and 12 directors, with the exact number fixed from time to time by Board resolution. Effective immediately before our Annual Meeting, ourOur Board has fixed the current number of directors at ten.12, but plans to reduce the number of directors to 11 when Mr. Scarborough leaves the Board in April 2019. The nominees for election at the Annual Meeting — and the year of their tenure,initial appointment or election, current or most recent principal occupation, independence status, and committee memberships (if applicable) during 2015  — are as follows:shown in the chart below.

NAME
DIRECTOR
SINCE

CURRENT PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION
INDEPENDENT
AC
CC
GC
Bradley A. Alford2010Retired Chairman & CEO, Nestlé USA
GRAPHIC


MM
Anthony K. Anderson2012Retired Vice Chair & Managing Partner, Ernst & Young LLP
GRAPHIC
M
Peter K. Barker2003Retired Chairman of California, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
GRAPHIC


C
Mitchell R. ButierPresident & COO, Avery Dennison CorporationNo
Ken C. Hicks2007Retired Chairman, Foot Locker, Inc.
GRAPHIC


MM
David E. I. Pyott (LID)1999Retired Chairman & CEO, Allergan, Inc.
GRAPHIC
CM
Dean A. Scarborough2000Chairman & CEO, Avery Dennison CorporationNo
Patrick T. Siewert2005Managing Director and Partner, The Carlyle Group
GRAPHIC
M
Julia A. Stewart2003Chairman & CEO, DineEquity, Inc.
GRAPHIC


MC
Martha N. Sullivan2013President & CEO, Sensata Technologies Holding N.V.
GRAPHIC
M
NAME
 AGE
 DIRECTOR
SINCE

 PRINCIPAL OCCUPATION
 INDEPENDENT
 AC
 CC
 GC
Bradley A. Alford 62 2010 Retired Chairman & CEO, Nestlé USA GRAPHIC   M M
Anthony K. Anderson 63 2012 Retired Vice Chair & Managing Partner, Ernst & Young LLP GRAPHIC M   M
Peter K. Barker 70 2003 Retired Chairman of California, JPMorgan Chase & Co. GRAPHIC M  C
Mark J. Barrenechea 54 2018 Vice Chair, CEO & CTO, OpenText Corporation GRAPHIC      
Mitchell R. Butier 47 2016 Chairman-Elect, President & CEO, Avery Dennison Corporation GRAPHIC   
Ken C. Hicks 66 2007 Chairman & CEO, Academy Sports + Outdoors GRAPHIC M M  
Andres A. Lopez 56 2017 President & CEO, Owens-Illinois, Inc. GRAPHIC M  
David E. I. Pyott (LID) 65 1999 Retired Chairman & CEO, Allergan, Inc. GRAPHIC   M M
Patrick T. Siewert 63 2005 Managing Director & Partner, The Carlyle Group GRAPHIC C  
Julia A. Stewart 63 2003 Former Chairman & CEO, Dine Brands Global, Inc. GRAPHIC   C M
Martha N. Sullivan 62 2013 President & CEO, Sensata Technologies Holding PLC GRAPHIC M M 

AC = Audit & Finance Committee    CC = Compensation & Executive Personnel Committee    GC = Governance & Social Responsibility Committee
M = Member    C = Chair    LID = Lead Independent Director

        The ages of our director nominees range from 4447 to 67,70, with an average age of 59.61. Their lengths of service range from zeroless than one to 1619 years, with an average tenure on our Board of approximately nine years. None of our directors serves on more than two other boards of SEC-reporting companies, except for Messrs. Anderson and Pyott, each of whom iswho are both retired and servesserve on three such other boards.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |10


Table of Contents

APPOINTMENT OF NEW INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR

        As part of its efforts to ensure regular Board refreshment, the Governance Committee oversaw our Board's search for a new independent director during 2018. The Committee engaged Spencer Stuart, an executive search firm, to assist it in identifying and evaluating potential candidates. Spencer Stuart identified a number of potential candidates (including Mark Barrenechea) who were initially evaluated by the Governance Committee and our Chairman, with input from other Board members and senior management.

        The Governance Committee and other members of our Board interviewed Mr. Barrenechea, uniformly supporting his candidacy based on the deep technology industry expertise he could bring to our Board as we continue refining our go-to market strategies in our high value product category of Intelligent Labels. Upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, our Board unanimously appointed Mr. Barrenechea to our Board effective September 10, 2018, recognizing his senior leadership experience, technology experience, global exposure and public company board experience.

DEPARTURE OF CURRENT CHAIRMAN

        In February 2019, our Chairman, Dean Scarborough, notified our Board of his intention not to stand for reelection at the Annual Meeting so that he may focus on other endeavors. Mr. Scarborough's membership on, and chairmanship of, our Board will end on the date of the Annual Meeting. For information on our Board's leadership structure following Mr. Scarborough's departure, see theBoard Leadership Structure section of this proxy statement.

BOARD MEETINGS AND ATTENDANCE

        Our Board met five times and acted twice by unanimous written consent during 2015.2018. There were 2221 Committee meetings and one action by written consent of the Committees of our Board during the year. EachAll of our directors attended at least 75%82% of the aggregate number of meetings of our Board and CommitteesCommittee meetings of which he or she was a member held during 2015;2018; the average attendance of all directors was 98%97%. Directors are strongly encouraged to attend our annual stockholder meetings under our Governance Guidelines andall of the then-servingour directors attended the 20152018 Annual Meeting except for Rolf Börjesson who retired from the Board on that day..

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |11

|2016 Proxy Statement|4

Table of Contents

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

        Our Governance Guidelines which were most recently amended in February 2016, provide the corporate governance framework for our company and reflect the beliefsvalues of our Board, with respect to the matters describedas highlighted below. They are reviewed at least annually and amended from time to time to reflect changes in regulatory requirements, evolving market practices, and recommendations from our stockholdersadvisors and advisors.feedback from our stockholders. Our Governance Guidelines were most recently amended in December 2018.

Governance Guidelines Highlights

Board Composition

      Reasonable Board size of 12 directors in 2018
      Mandatory retirement after age 72, with no term limits

Director Independence

      Current directors and director nominees 83% and 91% independent, respectively
      Executive sessions of non-management directors at every 2018 Board meeting, as well as one executive session for independent directors only

Board Leadership Structure

      Annual review of Board leadership structure by the Governance Committee
      Robust Lead Independent Director role and independent Committee Chairs

Board Committees

      100% independent
      Act under charters delineating Committee responsibilities
      Directors required to attend Board and Committee meetings

Board Duties

      Directors entitled to rely on independent legal, financial or other advisors at our expense
      Regular review of long-term strategic plans, including major risks and mitigating strategies
      Regular succession planning for our CEO and other senior leaders through the Compensation Committee

Continuous Board Improvement

      All new directors participate in an initial orientation to familiarize themselves with our company and after joining a Committee to understand its responsibilities
      Directors continue their education through meetings with management, visits to our facilities and attendance at director education programs
      The Governance Committee oversees an annual evaluation process to ensure our Board, Committees, Chairman and Lead Independent Director are functioning effectively

Director Qualifications

      The Governance Committee reviews the skills and characteristics of our Board members and recommends director nominees

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |12


MATTER
DESCRIPTION
Board CompositionReasonable Size. Our Board should consist of between eight and 12 directors.

No Over-Boarded Directors. Our directors should sit on four or fewer other public company boards.

Mandatory Retirement. Directors should retire on the date of our annual stockholder meeting occurring after they reach age 72, with no established term limits on service.

Director Independence


Majority Independent. A majority of our directors should satisfy NYSE independence standards.

Regular Executive Sessions. Our independent directors should meet in executive session at each regular meeting of our Board.

Board Leadership Structure


Frequent Review. Our Governance Committee should periodically consider the appropriateness of our Board leadership structure, with the independent directors on our Board retaining the authority to separate or combine the positions of Chairman and CEO.

Robust Lead Independent Director Role. Since our current CEO is also Chairman, our independent directors should annually select one of themselves to serve as Lead Independent Director.

Board Committees


Independence. Board Committees should be comprised only of independent directors.

Governance. Board Committees should act under charters setting forth their purposes and responsibilities.

Attendance. Directors should attend all meetings of our Board and its Committees on which they serve, and are strongly encouraged to attend all annual stockholder meetings.

Board Duties


Management and Expert Access. Directors should exercise their reasonable business judgment and are entitled to rely on our senior executives, to whom they have full and free access, and any independent legal, financial or other advisors they deem necessary or appropriate, which they may engage at our expense.

Strategic and Risk Oversight. Our Board should regularly review our long-term strategic plans, including the major risks facing our company.

Succession Planning. Our Board should periodically conduct succession planning through the Compensation Committee.

Continuous Board Improvement


New Director Orientation. All new directors should participate in an orientation program after joining our Board to familiarize themselves with our company.

Continuing Education. Directors should continue their education through meetings with management, visits to our facilities and attendance at accredited director education programs and institutes.

Annual Performance Evaluations. The Governance Committee should oversee an annual evaluation process to ensure our Board, Committees, Chairman and Lead Independent Director are functioning effectively.

Director Qualifications


Diverse and Relevant Experience. The Governance Committee should review the skills and characteristics of Board members, as well as the composition of the Board as a whole, and recommend director nominees.

Table of Contents

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

        Our Governance Guidelines require that our Board be comprised of a majority of directors who satisfy the criteria for independence under NYSE listing standards. These standards also require that our audit, compensation and nominating committees be comprised entirely of independent directors. An independent director is one who meets the independence requirements of the NYSE and who our Board affirmatively determines has no material relationship with our company, directly or indirectly as a partner, stockholder or officer of an entity with which we have a relationship.

        Each year, our directors complete a questionnaire designed to solicit information that may have a bearing on the annual independence determination, including all relevant relationships they have with our company, directly or indirectly through our company's sale or purchase of products or services to or from the companies or firms withby which they are affiliated.employed. The Governance Committee reviews with our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary any relevant disclosures made in the questionnaires with our General Counsel/Corporate Secretary, as well as any transactions our company has with director-affiliated entities. In February 2016,2019, the Governance Committee reviewed the followingtwo relationships impacting the independence of our director nominees — (i) Mr. Scarborough's service as our Chairman and CEO and (ii)directors, namely Mr. Butier's service as our President and COO.CEO and Mr. Scarborough's former service as our President and CEO.

        After review and discussion of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Governance Committee concluded that only Messrs. Butier and Scarborough had relationships that were disqualifying under NYSE listing standards, otherwise material or impairing of director independence. Upon recommendation of the Governance Committee, our Board affirmatively determined the ten directors named below to be independent, representing 83% of our current directors and 91% of our director nominees.





GRAPHIC


GRAPHIC

        For a discussion of the potential impact of tenure on director independence, see theBoard Refreshment and Director Succession Planning. of this proxy statement.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|5

Table of Contents

        After review and discussion of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Governance Committee concluded that only Messrs. Scarborough and Butier had relationships that were disqualifying under NYSE listing standards, otherwise material or impairing of director independence. Upon recommendation of the Governance Committee, our Board affirmatively determined the following eight director nominees to be independent, representing 80% of our nominees.


GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

        We currently have a combined Chairman/CEO and a Lead Independent Director. Our Board understands that there are various views on the most appropriate Board leadership structure, particularly on whether it is advisable for a company's CEO also to serve as its Chairman.        Our Governance Guidelines give our Board — acting through its independent directors — the discretion to separate or combine or separate thesethe roles of Chairman and CEO as it deems appropriate based on the needs of our company at any given time; totime. To facilitate this decision-making, the Governance Committee annually discussesreviews our Board leadership structure, providing its recommendation on the appropriate structure for the following one-year term to our independent directors. Our independent directors do not view any particular Board leadership structure as generally preferred;necessarily preferable; rather, they make an informed annual determination taking into account, company circumstances,among other things, our financial and operationalposition, business strategies and any feedback received from our stockholders.

        In February 2016, subject to his election by our stockholders, our independent directors elected Mr. Scarborough as Executive Chairman effective May 1, 2016, based on their belief that his leadership will optimize the executionAvery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |13


Table of our strategic priorities in the coming year as he mentors and oversees the transition of Mr. Butier in his new role as CEO. The Chairman and CEO roles will be separated, each filled by individuals with deep industry knowledge who developed and executed our strategies effectively to deliver superior total stockholder return in recent years. Because Mr. Scarborough will remain our employee, we will continue to have a Lead Independent Director to ensure independent oversight of our Board. The Governance Committee and our independent directors plan to discuss and determine the Lead Independent Director in April 2016.Contents

        Our independent directors believe that the current structure was appropriate because it allowed for one individual to lead our company with a cohesive vision, the industry expertise and intimate company knowledge to execute that vision, and the understanding of the significant enterprise risks that need to be mitigated or overcome to achieve that vision. Combined leadership at the top has provided the flexibility for us to address the rapidly changing needs of our businesses. Mr. Scarborough serves as Chairman/CEO at the pleasure of our independent directors because he does not have an employment agreement.ROBUST LEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR ROLE

        Our Lead Independent Director balanced our combined Chairman/CEO. Mr. Pyott currently serves as our Lead Independent Director,non-independent Chairman and CEO roles in 2018, exercising critical duties in the boardroom to ensure effective and independent Board decision-making. Our Governance Guidelines clearly delineate these responsibilities, which are summarizedshown below. Mr. Pyott currently serves as our Lead Independent Director.


Lead Independent DirectorLEAD INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR Primary ResponsibilitiesPRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES
  
Current Selectee:
    David E. I. Pyott

Executive Sessions
Led in 2015:
5

Lead Independent Director is selectedSelected annually by our independent directors.

 

Preside over executive sessions of independent directorsand meetings of our Board at which the non-independent Chairman is not present

Serve as liaison between the non-independent Chairman and our independent directors

Approve meeting agendas and schedules and other information sent to our Board to ensure that appropriate items are discussed, with sufficient time for discussion of all items

Call meetings of our independent directors when necessary or appropriate

If requested, by major stockholders, consult and directly communicatemeet with our stockholders

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|6

        In addition to these responsibilities, Mr. Pyott performed the following activities as Lead Independent Director in 2018:

    TableRegularly consulted with each of Contentsthe Chairman and CEO to help guide management's ongoing engagement with the Board on our strategic direction, including reviewing our business strategies and assessing acquisition opportunities;



    Consulted regularly with our other independent directors;

    Provided feedback to our Chairman and our CEO based on his discussions with our other independent directors; and

    Met with members of senior management other than our CEO.

        Supplementing our Lead Independent Director in providing independent Board leadership are our Committee Chairs, and members, all of whom are independent. With

PRE-ANNUAL MEETING LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

        Our Board currently has a Chairman, who as a recent former employee is not independent, a separate CEO, and a Lead Independent Director. The Governance Committee oversaw the Compensation Committee conducting a rigorous annual evaluation of the CEO's performance that is discussed by all independent directors during executive session and the Governance Committee overseeing an annual performance evaluation of our Chairman and Lead Independent Director during the Board evaluation process conducted in the fourth quarter of 2018, noting that Messrs. Scarborough and Pyott received positive feedback from our independent directors in their respective roles. Based on these evaluations, we believe that our current Boardpre-Annual Meeting leadership structure provideshas provided effective independent oversight of our company. During the last few years of heightenedour ongoing engagement with our stockholders on governance matters, none of them has expressed concerns with thisour pre-Annual Meeting Board leadership structure, most likely reflectingwhich we believe reflects support for our robust and clearly delineated Lead Independent Director role.

POST-ANNUAL MEETING LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

        In February 2015,2019, in light of Mr. Scarborough's upcoming departure from our Board, the Governance Committee assessed the appropriateness ofevaluated our current Board leadership structure recommendingand recommended to our Board that Mr. Scarborough serveButier be elected as Chairman, noting that (i) his leadership generated strong financial performance overhe has successfully led our company for the pastlast three years executingand, with Mr. Scarborough's departure, is best positioned to lead our Board-alignedBoard in overseeing our strategies to drive long-term stockholder value; (ii)value creation for our key stakeholders. The committee further noted that Mr. Butier has articulated and worked to realize the long-term vision for our company and that we could best continue our progress towards achieving our 2021 financial and 2025 sustainability goals with combined leadership in the boardroom at this time. Upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, our Board unanimously elected Mr. Butier (with him and Mr. Scarborough abstaining) to serve as our Chairman, effective immediately after the Annual Meeting subject to his service as an independent director on the board and compensation, executive and finance committeesreelection.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |14


Table of Mattel, Inc. has provided him with valuable insights into board processes and decision-making; and (iii) he received positive feedback on his performance from our independent directors during the 2014 Board evaluation process.Contents

        The Governance Committee also recommended (with Mr. Pyott abstaining) that Mr. Pyott serve(with him abstaining) continue serving as Lead Independent Director. Retaining Mr. Pyott as Lead Independent Director commendingwill provide Mr. Butier valuable mentorship, independent guidance and leadership continuity as he transitions into the Chairman role. In addition, Mr. Pyott has significantly contributed to our executive compensation and governance programs through his strong, independent leadership of our Board and noting his chairmanshipBoard. Upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee and membership on the Governance Committee, have enabled usour independent directors unanimously selected Mr. Pyott (with him abstaining) to have executive compensation and corporate governance best practices.continue serving as our Lead Independent Director, effective immediately after the Annual Meeting subject to his reelection.

BOARD COMMITTEES

        Each of our Board committees has a written charter that describes its purposes, membership and meeting structure, and responsibilities. These charters, which may be found in the "Corporate Governance" section ofon our investor website atwww.investors.averydennison.comwww.averydennison.com/corporategovernance, are reviewed by the respective committee on an annual basis,at least annually, with any recommended changes adopted upon approval by our Board. Amended charters are promptly posted on our website. The Charters for the Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees were most recentlylast amended in December 2015.2018, December 2018, and December 2016, respectively.

        Each of our Board committees has the ability to form and delegate authority to subcommittees and may obtain advice and assistance from internal or external consultants, legal counsel or other advisors at our expense. In addition, each committee annually evaluates its performance. The primary responsibilities, membership and meeting information for the three standing committees of our Board during 2015 are summarized below.below and on the following page.


AuditAUDIT & Finance CommitteeFINANCE COMMITTEE Primary ResponsibilitiesPRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES

 


 
Members in 2015:Members:
  Peter K. BarkerPatrick Siewert (Chair)
  Anthony K. Anderson
  Peter Barker
  Ken C. Hicks
  Patrick T. SiewertAndres Lopez
  Martha Sullivan

Meetings in 2015:2018: 9

Average Attendance in 2015:2018: 94%93%

All members satisfy the audit committee experience and enhanced independence standards required by the NYSE and have been determined by our Board to be financially literate.

Each of Messrs. Anderson, Barker and Barker wasSiewert has been determined by our Board to be an "audit committee financial expert" under applicable SEC regulations for 2015.regulations.

 

Oversee financial statement and disclosure matters, including our quarterly and annual financial results, earnings release documentation and SEC reports, internal controls and major financial risk exposures

Appoint and oversee our independent registered public accounting firm, including its qualifications, performance and independence, and the scope, staffing and fees for its annual audit orand other audit, review or attestattestation services

Oversee our internal audit function, including appointing or dismissing the senior internal auditor's appointment or dismissal,auditor, evaluating his performance, reviewing significant issues reported to managementraised in its audits and management's response, and discussing the annual internal audit plan, budget and staffing

Perform compliance oversight responsibilities, including conducting or authorizing investigations into matters withinoverseeing ourcybersecurity risk management program; maintaining the scopeprocedures established for receipt, retention and treatment of its responsibility and reviewing complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters,matters; reviewing significant correspondence with governmental agencies and legal matters that may have a material impact on our financial statementsstatements; and making determinations and recommending actions to our Board regarding any violations of our Code of Ethics related to information contained in our SEC filings and other public communications

Conduct finance oversight responsibilities, including reviewing our capital structure and financing plans, capital allocation strategy, the funding status of our pension plans, and significant tax matters

Approve the Audit and Finance Committee Report included in our proxy statement

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |15

|2016 Proxy Statement|7

Table of Contents



CompensationCOMPENSATION & Executive Personnel CommitteeEXECUTIVE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE Primary ResponsibilitiesPRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES

 


 
Members in 2015:Members:
  David E. I. PyottJulia Stewart (Chair)
  Bradley A. Alford
  Julia A. StewartKen Hicks
  David Pyott
  Martha N. Sullivan

Meetings in 2015:2018: 5

Average Attendance in 2015:2018: 100%96%

All members satisfy the compensation committee enhanced independence standards required by the NYSE.

All members qualify as "non-employee directors" under Rule 16b-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and "outside directors" under Section 162(m)amended.

Relies on expert advice of an independent compensation consultant that reports directly to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.Committee.

 

Review and approve corporate goals and individual objectives for our CEO's compensation and evaluate our company's and his individual performance todetermine his annual CEO compensation

Review andapprove thesenior executive compensation, including base salaries and incentive compensation, of other senior executives, giving consideration to the recommendations of our CEO

Make recommendations on ourRecommend appropriate compensation strategy, incentive plans and benefit programs

Discuss with managementReview our Compensation Discussiondiversity and Analysis (CD&A) and recommend that theinclusion initiatives

Approve our CD&A as well asand the Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee Report be included in our proxy statement

Oversee our stockholders'stockholder approval of executive compensation matters, including advisory votes on executive compensation and the frequency of such votes

Periodically evaluate the extent to whichEnsure no encouragement of excessive risk-taking in our compensation policies and programs may create incentives that encourage excessive risk-taking

Recommend thenon-employee director compensation of our non-employee directors

Conduct executive succession planning for our CEO and other senior executives

Rely on expert advice of an independent compensation consultant reporting directly to the Committee to facilitate decision-makingleaders


               

GovernanceGOVERNANCE & Social Responsibility CommitteeSOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY COMMITTEE Primary ResponsibilitiesPRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES

 


 
Members in 2015:Members:
  Julia A. StewartPeter Barker (Chair)
  Bradley A. Alford
  Ken C. HicksAnthony Anderson
  David E. I. Pyott
  Julia Stewart

Meetings in 2015:2018: 37

Average Attendance in 2015:2018: 100%97%

All members satisfy the independence standards required by the NYSE.

 

Identify potential Board members and recommend director nominees using the criteria set forth in our Governance Guidelines

Recommend the structure, chairmanship and membership ofPeriodicallyconsider our Board committeesleadership structure and recommend to our Board whether to separate or combine the positions of Chairman and CEO, as well as who should serve as Lead Independent Director

Recommend Board and Committee structure, chairs and members

Recommend our independent directors using the directors who satisfy the independence requirementsstandards of the NYSE

Review andapprove any related person transactions

Oversee andconduct an annual performance evaluation of our Board and its Committees

Review our Governance Guidelines and recommend any changes to our Board

Discuss our social responsibility initiatives and consider the impact of our business operations and practices on matters of sustainability and corporate social responsibility matters

Oversee the effectiveness of our values and ethics program and Code of Conduct and, evaluate significant conflicts of interest or questions related to our Code of Conduct and policy on legal and ethical conduct, policyand make determinations and recommend actions to the Board regarding violations of the Code of Ethics (except for violations over which the Audit Committee has such authority)

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |16


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS

        Our Board believes it is important to have executive sessions without our CEO or other members of management present, which are scheduledwere held at every regular Board meeting during every meeting of the Board.2018. Our independentnon-management directors have robust and candid discussions at these executive sessions during which they critically evaluate the performance of our company, CEO and management. During 2015,As Chairman, Mr. PyottScarborough presided as Lead Independent Director at allover five executive sessions of non-management directors during 2018. As required by NYSE rules, our Board also conducts at least one executive session per year without our non-independent Chairman and our CEO. As Lead Independent Director, Mr. Pyott presided over the one executive session of independent directors.directors held during 2018.

        In addition, during 2015, executiveExecutive sessions were also scheduled for each regular meeting of the Audit, Compensation and Governance Committees. All of theseCommittees held. These executive sessions generally excluded Mr. Scarborough, Mr. Butier and other members of management, unless the Committee requested the presence of a memberMr. Scarborough or one or more members of management forto attend a portion of the session to provide information or perspective.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|8

Table of Contents

RISK OVERSIGHT

        Management is responsible for managing the day-to-day risks confronting our businesses, but our Board has responsibility for overseeing enterprise risk management (ERM). We have a Chief Compliance Officer who, with assistance from our Vice President of Internal Audit and members of their respectiveThe teams drives ERM accountability intoleading our businesses ensures that theyhave incorporated ERM into developing and executing their strategies, assessing the risks impacting their businesses, and identifying and implementing appropriate mitigating actions on an ongoing basis. In addition, in consultation with our head of risk management and senior management, these teams semiannually completeprepare a risk profile consisting of a heat map and semiannually prepares a corporatesummary of their key risks and mitigating strategies, which are used to prepare a company risk profile based on identified business-specific risks as well as enterprise-wide risks. In addition, we

        We also have robust global processes that together support a strong internal control environment to promote the early identification and continued management of risks by our company's leadership. Our legal and compliance functions report into our General Counsel to provide independent evaluation of the challenges facing our businesses and our Vice President of Internal Audit reports to the Audit Committee in the conduct of his operational responsibilities, ensuring his candor and independence from management.

        In performing its oversight role, our Board is responsible for ensuring that the ERM processes designed and implemented by management are functioning effectively, and that our culture promotes risk-adjusted decision-making.

        Our Board as a whole oversees risks related to our corporatecompany and business strategies and operations, exercising this responsibility by considering the risks related to its decisions. In performing this oversight role, our Board is responsible for ensuring that the risk management processes designed and implemented by management are functioning, and that necessary steps are taken to foster a culture of risk-adjusted decision-making within our company. Each year, our Board receives reports on the ERM process and the strategic plans and risks facing our businesses and company as a whole from our executive management, as well as each of our businesses from their respective management teams.whole. These risks include financial risks, political risks, legal and regulatory risks, legal risks, supply chain risks, competitive risks, information technology risks, and other risks related to the waysway in which we do business. Employees who lead various risk areas such as information technology; environmental, health and safety, taxsafety; tax; sustainability; and sustainability,corporate social responsibility — report periodically report to Board Committees as well asand occasionally to our full Board.

        Our Board has delegated to its Committees certain elements of its risk oversight function to its Committees to better coordinate with management andto serve the long-term interests of our company and stockholders. Our Board receives reports from its Committee Chairs regarding topics discussed at every Committee meeting,meetings, which includesinclude the areas of risk overseen primarily by the Committees.

OVERSIGHT OF RISK
BOARD OR COMMITTEE
PRIMARY AREAS OF RESPONSIBILITY
Board of Directors

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |17

Corporate and business strategies and operations

Annual operating plan and significant capital expenditures

Corporate governance

Acquisitions, divestitures and other significant transactions

Audit Committee

Financial reporting processes, statements and internal controls

Capital structure

Financing, including borrowing, liquidity, capital allocation and pension plan funding

Stockholder distributions (dividends and stock repurchases)

Information technology and cybersecurity

Legal, compliance, regulatory and tax matters

Compensation Committee

Compensation plans and benefit programs

Executive compensation

Performance objectives for our incentive plans

Director compensation

Succession planning

Governance Committee

Board and committee membership and structure

Values and ethics

Conflicts of interest and related person transactions

Corporate citizenship and sustainability

Legal, compliance and regulatory matters

        During 2015, risk areas of particular Board and Committee focus included the uncertain global economic environment, particularly the headwinds to our global businesses from currency; information technology and cybersecurity; shareholder distributions; potential acquisitions; and our CEO transition.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|9

Table of Contents

        Supplementing these processes, the Audit Committee also periodically meets in executive session with each of our CFO, Chief Accounting Officer (CAO), General Counsel, Vice President of Internal Audit, and representatives of our independent registered public accounting firm. In addition, the
RISK OVERSIGHT

GRAPHIC

        The Audit Committee oversees our internal control environment and evaluates the effectiveness of our internal controls at least annually. Supplementing these processes, the Audit Committee periodically meets in executive session with each of our CEO, CFO, CAO, General Counsel, Vice President of Internal Audit, and representatives of our independent registered public accounting firm. The Governance Committee also meets semiannually with our Chief Compliance Officer to discuss, among other things, the investigation of allegations reported to our Business Conduct GuideLine.

        During 2018, the following risk areas were of particular Board and Committee focus:

    Changes in tax laws and regulations, particularly in the U.S.;

    The termination of our U.S. pension plan;

    Cybersecurity and information technology, including the implementation of an enterprise resource planning system in our Label and Graphic Materials North America business;

    Risks associated with our restructuring actions, capital and information technology investments, and acquisitions and integration activities; and

    Risks related to our environmental, social and governance responsibilities, particularly in the areas of data privacy, sustainability, Values and Ethics, and diversity and inclusion.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |18


Table of Contents

RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH COMPENSATION POLICIES AND PRACTICES

        As described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis section of this proxy statement, we maintain best practices in compensation that collectively encourage ongoing risk assessment and mitigation. The Compensation Committee periodically reviews our executive compensation programprograms to ensure that it doesthey do not provide incentives that encourage our employees to take excessive risks in managing their respective businesses or functional areas.areas and conducted its most recent review in February 2018.

        In consultation withBased on the advice of its independent compensation consultant, Towers Watson (now Willis Towers Watson),Watson, the Compensation Committee has noted the following with respect to risks associated withrisk-mitigating features of our compensation policies and practices:practices described below and on the following page, which are substantially the same as what they were at the time of the most recent review.

    Governance and Oversight

      the program balances executive retention with rewarding stockholder value creation;The Compensation Committee has discretion to decrease Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) awards and long-term incentive (LTI) grants based on individual performance, including as a result of excessive risk-taking.

      Our clawback policy serves as a deterrent to fraud or other misconduct in connection with our financial statements.

      The Compensation Committee annually evaluates the performance of our CEO and other senior executives in the context of our company and business goals and their individual contributions.

      Our stock ownership policy is rigorous and consistent with best practices, with a minimum ownership level of 6x base salary for our CEO and a requirement that 50% of the ownership level be held in vested shares.

      We prohibit our officers from hedging or pledging company stock and require them to engage in stock transactions only during limited trading windows.

    Pay Philosophy and Structure

      Our programs prioritize incenting stockholder value creation, balanced by retention and other considerations.

      The substantial majority of executive compensation is variable, with a mix that is consistent with market practices and primarily equity-baseddelivered in equity to motivate our company's pursuit of strong long-term performance and sustainable growth;growth.

      Our change of control and executive severance plans are reasonable and consistent with market practices, with change of control benefits provided on a double-trigger basis to mitigate the risk that such a transaction be pursued to advance personal interests rather than the best interests of our stockholders.

      Our incentive mix is well-balanced, withcompensation consists of short- and long-term performance metricsobjectives that do not overlap, cover different time periods and areis balanced amongwith objectives designed to incent strong annual financial objectivesperformance and long-term economic and stockholder value creation, as well as between growth and efficient capital deployment;deployment.

    Incentive Program Design

      our Annual Incentive Plan (AIP)Our AIP and long-term incentives (LTIs) balanceLTI awards incent annual profitable growth in the near termbalanced with sustainable long-term financial success,value creation, using multiple performance metricsobjectives and providing realized compensation based primarily on our performance;

      the Compensation Committee may exercise discretion to decrease AIP and LTI awards based on individual performance;company's performance.

      AIP awards are not guaranteed, with below-threshold performance yieldingpotentially resulting in zero payout, and payments subject to an overall cap of 200%;, and individual modifiers for our NEOs generally capped at 100%.

      ourOur equity award vehicles are performance-based, use multiple performance metrics,objectives, are subject to threshold and maximum payout opportunities, to encourage appropriate performance focus and have the following additional features that limit potential risk-taking, andrisk-taking:

      Our performance units (PUs) cliff vest at the end of three years orwith the payout for the relative total stockholder return (TSR) component capped at 100% of target for any three-year performance period in which absolute TSR is negative to prevent management from being unduly enriched when stockholders experience loss, while still incenting executives to deliver relatively strong performance during challenging economic periods; and

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |19


    Table of Contents

        Our market-leveraged stock units (MSUs) vest over one-, two-, three- and four-year performance periods;

        our clawback policy is consistentperiods (with an average performance period of 2.5 years), with market practices;

        our changechallenging performance objectives, including a threshold performance level of controlabsolute TSR of (15)% and general severance plans are reasonable and appropriate, with changea target performance level of control benefits provided on a double-trigger basis and not grossed up for excise taxes;

        our stock ownership guidelines are rigorous and consistent with market practices; and

        we expressly prohibit the hedging or pledgingabsolute TSR of company stock by our officers.10%.

            Based on these and other factors, as well as the advice ofWillis Towers Watson thedetermined that our compensation program strikes an appropriate pay-risk balance.

            The Compensation Committee has concluded that our compensation policies and practices strike an appropriate compensation-risk balance, do not encourage excessive risk-taking and do not as a whole create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company.

    SUCCESSION PLANNINGHUMAN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT

            Our Board is actively involved in talent management to identify and cultivate our future leaders. We maintain a robust mid-year and annual performance review process and leadership development program for our employees. Management develops leadership at lower levels of our organization by identifying core talent, cultivating the skills and capabilities that will allow identified individuals to become our future leaders, assessing their development and identifying gaps and developmental needs in skills and experience. Through regular reports from management, our Board has the opportunity to meet with leaders of our company, including business group leaders and functional leaders in law, finance, information technology, risk, and human resources. In addition, Board members have freedom of access to all employees, and are encouraged to make site visits to meet local management and attend company events.SUCCESSION PLANNING

            The Compensation Committee and/or theand our full Board conductsconduct executive succession planning at least annually. In Februarysemiannually, developing and refining succession plans for our CEO and senior executives. Consistent with this practice, in April and October 2014,2018, the Compensation Committee reviewed individuals identified as possible CEO succession candidates,

    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|10

    Table of Contents

    including progress in current job position and career development in terms of strategy, leadership and execution. Based on these meetings and further one-on-one discussions between Mr. Scarborough and each director, the Compensation Committee discussed the potential appointment of Mr. Butier — an experienced executive who has held successive positions of increasing responsibility within our company — as President and COO, culminating in our Board electing him as such effective November 1, 2014.

            During executive sessions at Board meetings held throughout 2015, the Board continued discussing CEO transition matters, including Mr. Butier's ability to define, refine and execute our strategies in the years ahead and Mr. Scarborough's future role at our company. In February 2016, our Board elected Mr. Butier as President and CEO effective May 1, 2016. He will succeed Mr. Scarborough in the CEO role at that time. The independent directors of our Board also elected, subject to his election by our stockholders, Mr. Scarborough as Executive Chairman of our Board effective May 1, 2016.

            Consistent with its general practice of annually reviewing executive succession beyond the role of CEO, in July 2015, our Board discussed leaders below the executive officer level, identifying the talent that is currently ready — or, with continued development on their current trajectory with mentorship and coaching from our current leaders, will be ready — to fill senior executive officer positions in the event of a vacancy. Those reviews were then further discussed with our full Board. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews executive new hires, promotions, transfers and departures at its regularly-scheduled meetings.

    LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT

            Our Board is actively involved in human capital management to identify and develop our future leaders. We maintain a robust performance review process and leadership development program for our employees. Senior management develops leadership at lower levels of our organization by identifying high potential talent and critical experts, cultivating the skills and capabilities to allow identified individuals to become our future leaders, and providing them with developmental opportunities. Through regular reports from management, our Board has the opportunity to meet business leaders and functional leaders in law, finance, information technology, compliance, and human resources. In addition, Board members have freedom of access to all employees, and are encouraged to visit our facilities to meet local management and attend company events.

    DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION

            Diversity is one of our core values, reflecting our efforts to create an inclusive and respectful environment for people of all backgrounds and orientations and our recognition that we gain strength from diverse ideas and teams. The importance of diversity and inclusion to our company is evidenced by the inclusion of diversity-related targets in our 2025 sustainability goals. Diversity and inclusion at our company are championed primarily by our cross-functional and cross-divisional Diversity and Inclusion Council, currently co-chaired by Anne Hill, our Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer, and Deon Stander, the Vice President and General Manager of our RBIS business. Board oversight is conducted primarily through the Compensation Committee.

            In recent years, among other initiatives, we have focused on training our managers globally on unconscious bias, increasing the number of sites offering flexible work arrangements, and expanding our Women Empowered program that features interactive discussions among nominated participants to facilitate and enhance their development. We also evaluated our gender pay equity with positive results, developing plans to make identified adjustments to compensation for 2019. This year, we are formally launching employee resource groups, which are voluntary employee-led groups made up of individuals who join together based on common interests, backgrounds or demographic characteristics such as race, ethnicity or sexual orientation. In addition, we are establishing regional diversity and inclusion councils to provide leadership of initiatives that more strongly resonate with employees in their respective regions.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |20


    Table of Contents

    DIRECTOR EDUCATION

    NEW DIRECTORINITIAL ORIENTATION

            Our newinitial director orientation generally covers (i) our vision, strategies, performance and leadership; (ii) investor messaging; (iii) the strategies and risks of our businesses; (iv) finance matters, including our financial reporting policies and practices, internal control environment, internal audit deployment, tax planning and compliance, and capital structure; (v) legal and compliance matters, including corporateour governance policies and procedures, values and ethics compliance,program, and ERM; (vi) human resourcescapital management matters, including executive compensation, succession planning, leadership development and non-employee director compensation;diversity and inclusion; and (vii) information technology and cybersecurity.

            In connection with his initial appointment to our Board in 2018, we provided incoming independent director Mark Barrenechea with information regarding our businesses, strategic plans and risk-mitigating actions, competitors, non-employee director compensation policies and other matters. Our CEO then met with Mr. Barrenechea to discuss these matters to ensure a smooth onboarding process. In October and December 2018, Mr. Barrenechea joined as an observer in our Board's Audit, Compensation and Governance Committee meetings to better understand their respective responsibilities.

    CONTINUING EDUCATION

            Our continuing director education program consists of periodic visits to our facilities and management presentations regarding our business operations, strategies, risks and values and ethics. We provide updates on relevant topics of interest to our Board at and between meetings throughout the year.year, and provide access to a boardroom news resource platform for them to keep informed of emerging best practices. We also reimburse directors who attend accreditedcontinuing director education programs and institutes for program fees and related expenses.

    BOARD AND COMMITTEE EVALUATIONS

            The Governance Committee oversees and conducts an annual performance evaluation of our Board, Chairman, and Lead Independent Director and Board Committees, including the Committee Chairs. Our Board views the process as integral to assessing its effectiveness and identifying improvement opportunities in the pursuit of continued excellence. Many of the improvements in our corporate governance practices and Board processes have resulted fromwere identified and implemented as a result of the annual evaluation process and our Board views the process as an integral part of its commitment to excellence and best practices in its performance.process.

            In response to feedback received in recent years during the evaluation process, our Board has made the following enhancements:GRAPHIC

      Combined the previously separate Finance Committee with the Audit Committee;

      Avery Dennison Corporation|

      Maintained a Board sized near the middle of the range set forth in our Bylaws and Governance Guidelines; 2019 Proxy Statement 

      |
      Significantly increased the time allotted at meetings for executive sessions with and without the CEO; and21



      Enhanced the Board and Audit Committee's focus on cybersecurity.
    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|11

    Table of Contents

            In response to evaluation feedback received in recent years, our Board made the following enhancements to its membership and processes:

      Identified the need forindependent directors with packaging and technology expertise, culminating in the appointments of Messrs. Lopez and Barrenechea to our Board;

      Given our increased strategic focus on acquisitions, enhanceddiscussion of M&A pipeline and targets actively under consideration, as well as the integration and performance of acquired companies;

      Continued its focus onexecutive succession planning and leadership development with more frequent discussions on these matters both with the Compensation Committee and our full Board and provided regular updates on executive new hires, promotions, transfers and departures to the Compensation Committee;

      Continued our Board's and the Audit Committee's review and discussion of ourcybersecurity preparedness andexposures related to pension liabilities, including the 2018 decision to terminate our U.S. pension plan;

      Increased time devoted to sharinginvestor feedback and holdingBoard-only discussions; and

      Conducted annualpost-investment reviews of the return on significant capital expenditures, acquisitions and information technology investments.

    STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS

    GOVERNANCE ENGAGEMENT PROCESS

            We value stockholdersstockholder feedback on our governance, policiessustainability and practices,executive compensation programs, and we actively solicit input through our stockholder engagement program. Our engagement program beginson these matters to ensure that our programs reflect the changing business environment and stockholder expectations.

    STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT ON GOVERNANCE AND SUSTAINABILITY MATTERS IN 2018

            We continued our longstanding practice of open dialogue with stockholders in 2018. In advance of the spring of each year, with the filing2018 Annual Meeting, we contacted our 35 largest institutional stockholders, representing over 55% of our proxy statement. After we filethen-outstanding shares. Board members, including our proxy season engagement presentation with the SEC as supplementary proxy materials, we reach outLead Independent Director, and management were made available to our largest investors (generally representing 50-70% of our shares outstanding as of the record date), sharing the presentationanswer questions and offering members of management and/or our Board for a meeting to discuss our governance program and answer questionsaddress concerns regarding the items being brought before the Annual Meeting. On the dayWhile we received responses from stockholders representing over 28% of the Annual Meeting, we discuss preliminary vote results with our Board, following up with a more detailed analysisthen-outstanding shares, none of the vote results, including feedback from investors and views of proxy advisors, with Committees of the Board in the summer.them desired to substantively engage at that time.

            In the summer and fall, we again reach out to our largest investors to discuss governance matters, without the time pressures associated with proxy season; these more general discussions allow us to hear what issues are important to our stockholders. In the winter, as we prepare for the following proxy season, we review the feedback from our fall outreach effort with management and the Board and consider whether any changes to our governance program are advisable. We also keep stockholder feedback in mind as we prepare our next proxy statement, enhancing or clarifying our disclosure as appropriate.

    STOCKHOLDER ENGAGEMENT IN 2015

            Our Board and management continued their long-standing practice of open dialogue with stockholders in 2015. In advance of the 2015 Annual Meeting, we proactively contacted our thirty41 largest institutional stockholders, representing overnearly 60% of our then-outstanding shares, to solicit their views onrequest a meeting with members of our corporate governance programBoard and/or management. Proposed topics for these meetings included our business strategy and make directorsfinancial performance, executive compensation matters, Board composition and management available to answer questions or address concerns. As a resultsuccession planning, and progress towards achieving our sustainability goals. We received responses from stockholders representing nearly 30% of this effort, we engaged in telephonic discussionsour then-outstanding shares and spoke with stockholders representing approximately 35%over 25% of our then-outstanding shares. In addition, after one ofWe substantively engaged with every stockholder who requested to do so and included our directors and members of management metLead Independent Director in person with four of our largest stockholders and the two leading proxy advisory firms in the fall of 2014, we followed up on these meetings with as-needed engagement during 2015.engagements upon stockholder request.

            During 2015, our stockholders generally expressed their support forWith respect to matters related to governance, we discussed several topics related to our Board governance programcomposition, skills and engagement outreach efforts. Investors conveyed interest in Board compositionsuccession planning and refreshment matters; requested additional information regardingprocesses. We also discussed our Board evaluation processbusiness strategies and the Board's oversight of risk management, which has been added to this proxy statement;related risks, diversity and shared their views on stockholder rights matters, including exclusive forum bylaws, the right of stockholders to call a special meetinginclusion initiatives, and proxy access.sustainability priorities.

    CONTACTING OUR BOARD

            We welcome ongoingOur Board welcomes feedback from all our stockholders. We review correspondence submitted by stockholders, discussing theany substantive feedback received with senior management and/or our Board to the extentas appropriate.

            Stockholders orand other interested parties may contact our Board, Chairman, Lead Independent Director, any Committee or Committee Chair, or any other individual director concerning business matters by writing to: Board of Directors (or a particular subgroup or individual director), c/o Corporate Secretary, Avery Dennison Corporation, 207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |22

    |2016 Proxy Statement|12

    Table of Contents

    ITEM 1 — ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

            Our Bylaws currently provide for a Board of between eight and 12 directors, with the exact number fixed by a resolution of our Board. Effective immediately beforeIn September 2018, in conjunction with Mr. Barrenechea's appointment and upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, our Annual Meeting, our Board has fixed the number of directors at ten.12. In April 2019, our Board expects to fix the number of directors at 11 to reflect Mr. Scarborough's departure from the Board at the end of his current term. All nominees are standing for election at the Annual Meeting for a one-year term.term expiring at the 2020 Annual Meeting.

            NineEach of the ten11 nominees areis presently serving as director on our Board and all nominees havehas consented to being named in this proxy statement and serving if elected.elected by our stockholders.

    MAJORITY VOTING STANDARDSTANDARD; UNELECTED DIRECTOR RESIGNATION REQUIREMENT

            Our Bylaws provide for the approval by a majority votingof votes cast for the election of directors in uncontested elections like this one and require that an incumbent director who is not re-elected tender his or her resignation from theour Board. Our Board, excluding the tendering director, is required to determine whether to accept the resignation — taking into account the recommendation of the Governance Committee and any other factors it considers appropriate — and publicly disclose its decision regarding the tendered resignation, including its rationale for the decision, within 90 days from the date election results are certified. In a contested election,elections, plurality voting is the standard for the election of directors.

            In voting for the election of directors, each share has one vote for each position to be filled and there is no cumulative voting.

    RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS

            Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR each of the director nominees.    The persons named as proxies will vote for the election of each of the ten11 nominees, unless you specify otherwise. If any director nominee were to become unavailable prior to the Annual Meeting, your proxy would be voted for a substitute nominee designated by our Board or we would reducedecrease the size of our Board.

    SELECTION OF DIRECTOR NOMINEES

            Director nominees are generally recommended by the Governance Committee for nomination by our Board and election by our stockholders. Director nominees may also be recommended by the Governance Committee for appointment to our Board, with their election by stockholders to followtaking place at the next Annual Meeting. Our Board believes that the backgrounds and qualifications of our directors considered asreflect a group, provide a mixbalance of complementary experience, knowledgeskills, qualifications and abilitydemographics that allows our directorsthem to effectively to fulfilldischarge their oversight responsibilities.

              In considering whether to recommend a candidate as a director nominee, the Governance Committee appliesprimarily uses the following criteria describedset forth in our Governance Guidelines, including the potential nominee's ability to qualify as independent,Guidelines:

      Independence, to ensure that a majority of our Board remains independent; relevant business

      Business and leadership experience, includingindustry experience andglobal exposure and considering factors such as size, industry, scope, complexity and global operations;complexity;

      Board experience as a board member of at another public company; expertise

      Experience in finance, and accounting and/or executive compensation; timecompensation;

      Time commitments, including other boards on which the nominee serves; potential

      Potentialconflicts of interest; abilityinterest;

      Demographic characteristics (such as gender, race and ethnicity);

      Ability to contribute to the oversight and governance of our company; and ability

      Ability to represent the balanced interests of stockholders as a whole, rather than those of any special interest group.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |23


    Table of Contents

            For incumbent directors, these criteriathe Governance Committee also includeevaluates contributions to our Board and Committees;Committees, attendance record at Board and Committee meetings;meetings, compliance with our stock ownership guidelines;policy, and mandatory retirement datedates to assist with Boarddirector succession planning. The Governance Committee does not assign specific weights to the criteria and no particular criterion is necessarily applicable to all nominees.

            The Governance Committee reviews the qualifications of any candidate with those of our current directors to determine coverage and gaps in experience in relevant industries and functional areas, such as finance, manufacturing, and technology.assessing how our Board can most effectively fulfill its oversight responsibilities. Sources for identifying potential nominees include existingcurrent Board members, oursenior management, executive officers, third-party search firms, and our stockholders.

    STOCKHOLDER SUBMISSION OF DIRECTOR NOMINEES

    Advance Notice Nominees

            Stockholders may recommend director candidates by submitting the candidate's name, together with his or her biographical information, professional experience and written consent to nomination, to Governance and Social Responsibility Committee Chair, c/o Corporate Secretary, Avery Dennison Corporation, 207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203.

    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|13

    Table of Contents

    To be considered at the 20172020 Annual Meeting, advance notice stockholder nominations must comply with the requirements referenceddescribed in the last section of this proxy statement underSubmission of Stockholder Items for 2017 Annual Meeting.statement. The Governance Committee considers stockholder nominees on the same basis as it considers all other nominees.

    Proxy Access Nominees

            A stockholder, or a group of no more than 20 stockholders, owning at least 3% of our company's stock continuously for at least three years is permitted to submit director nominees (up to 20% of the Board) for inclusion in our proxy materials, subject to the requirements specified in our Bylaws. For further information on submitting proxy access nominees, please refer to the last section of this proxy statement.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |24


    Table of Contents

    DIRECTOR QUALIFICATIONSBOARD MATRIX

            Our director nominees bring abalance of skills, qualifications and demographic backgrounds in overseeing our company, as shown in the matrix below. The Governance Committee regularly evaluates the skills and qualifications that are particularly desirable for our directorsBoard to possess to provide oversight and stewardshipbest meet the changing needs of our company include the following:business.

    QUALIFICATION
    DESCRIPTION
    VALUE TO OUR BOARD AND STOCKHOLDERS
    # (%) OF NOMINEES

    Senior Leadership Experience


    Service as president, chief executive officer or in similar senior executive positions


    Provides us valuable perspectives from individuals with hands-on leadership in executive management to help us assess our operations, execute our strategies, mitigate related risks, and improve our policies and procedures


    9 (90%)
    Global ExposureSeniority in a global enterprise or significant experience in international marketsGives us insight into the geographic markets in which we operate, helping us navigate mature markets and seize opportunities in higher-growth emerging markets10 (100%)
    Industry BackgroundExperience in the retail, packaging or consumer goods industriesAllows us to better understand the needs of our customers in developing our business strategies, as well as evaluate acquisition and divestiture opportunities7 (70%)
    Financial SophisticationExpertise in accounting, auditing, tax, banking, insurance, or investmentsHelps us manage our capital structure, optimize stockholder distributions, undertake significant transactions, and ensure proper accounting, financial reporting and internal controls5 (50%)
    Board ExperiencePrior or concurrent service on other SEC-reporting company boardsHelps reinforce management accountability for maximizing long-term stockholder value and promote corporate governance and executive compensation best practices9 (90%)

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

    BOARD REFRESHMENT AND DIRECTOR SUCCESSION PLANNING

            Our Board's ongoing director succession planning is designed to ensure an independent, well-qualified Board, with diversity in experience and background to effectively provide strong oversight.

    NO TERM LIMITS

            Our Governance Guidelines reflect our Board's belief that directors should not be subject to term limits. While term limits could help facilitate fresh ideas and viewpoints being consistently brought to the Board, we believeour Board believes they are counter-balanced bycould result in the disadvantage of causing thepremature loss of a director who over a period of time has developed insight intobecome well-versed in our strategies, operations and risks and continuesis continuing to provide valuable contributions to Board deliberations. We believe that our Board's decision not to establish term limits at this time is consistent with the prevailing practice among companies in the S&P 500. We recognize

            Our Board recognizes that certain governance stakeholders have suggested that longer-serving directors may have decreased independence and objectivity; however, we believeour Board believes that arbitrarily removing knowledgeable directors and losing the oversight consistency they bring — particularly during periods of either executive management change, such as our recent CEO and CFO transitions, or Board change, such as Mr. Scarborough's April 2019 departure

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |25

    |2016 Proxy Statement|14

    Table of Contents

    periods of management changefrom our Board after having served as Chairman for the past nine years — weighs against strict restrictions on director tenure.implementing term limits at this time. Ultimately, our Board believes that it is our Board'sits responsibility to establish appropriate board refreshment policies, usingin light of our strategies, leadership team and financial position at any particular time, exercising its discretion in the best interest of our company and stockholders.

            We havePOLICIES AND RECENT ACTIONS SUPPORTING REGULAR BOARD REFRESHMENT

            Our Board has adopted the policies showndescribed below to facilitate regular refreshment of our Board and ensure that it continues to appropriatelyindependently challenge our management.

    POLICIES SUPPORTING BOARD REFRESHMENT
    POLICY
     DESCRIPTION
     EVENTS OCCURRING AT OR SINCE 2015
    2018 ANNUAL MEETING


    Mandatory Resignation Policy

     

    Incumbent directors who are not elected by our stockholders must tender their resignation.

     

    All incumbent directors were elected at the 20152018 Annual Meeting.
    Mandatory Retirement Policy Directors must retire on the date of the annual meeting of stockholders that follows their reaching the age of 72. Since inception, this policy has never been waived. Mr. BörjessonNo directors retired on the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting.under this policy in 2018.
    Resignation Tendered Upon Change in Principal Employment Directors who change the principal occupation, position or responsibility they held when they were elected to our Board must volunteer to resign from the Board. Mr. Hicks ceased being Executivejoined Academy Sports + Outdoors as Chairman of Foot Locker, Inc.and CEO in May 2015. Mr. Hicks2018 and volunteered to resign from our Board. After excusing him from the meeting, theThe Governance Committee determined that Mr. Hicks should remain on our Board.
    Prior Notice Requirement to Prevent Over-Boarding Directors must give prior notice before accepting another public company directorship so that the director's ability to fulfill Board responsibilities may be appropriately evaluated if he or she serves on more than four other public company boards. In July 2015, Mr. AlfordScarborough joined the board of ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Mr. Pyott joined the supervisory board of Koninklijke Philips N.V. In December 2015 and January 2016, Mr. Pyott joined the boards of Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc. and BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc., respectively. While neither Mr. Alford nor Mr. Pyott servesGraphic Packaging Holding Company in July 2018. Although he does not serve on more than four other public company boards, the Governance Committee discussed their additional commitments andaffirmatively determined that they bothMr. Scarborough should continue to serveremain on our Board.

            In part as a resultUpon the recommendation of these policies, a new independent director wasthe Governance Committee, Messrs. Barrenechea and Lopez were appointed to our Board during each yearas independent directors in the 2009-2013 period. While two of these directors subsequently resigned fromSeptember 2018 and February 2017, respectively. In connection with our CEO transition, Mr. Butier joined our Board (not due to any disagreement withas a non-independent director in May 2016. Mr. Scarborough's service as our company),Chairman and director will end upon the expiration of his current term in April 2019. We believe that this recent experience with both joining and departing directors demonstrates our Board's commitment to Boardregular refreshment. In addition, a new

    AGE AND TENURE

            The average age of our director has been nominated for election atnominees is 61, which we believe is comparable to the Annual Meeting.

    average board age in the S&P 500 and within the 60-63 year band in which the plurality of these companies fall. The average tenure of our director nominees is approximately nine years, which we believe is comparable to the average tenure for companies in the S&P 500 and within the six-to-ten6-10 year band in which the majority of these companies fall. The graphcharts below showsshow the age and tenure of our director nominees.nominees, which we believe reflects a balance between newer directors who bring fresh ideas and insights and longer-serving directors with deep institutional knowledge of our Board and company.


    Director Nominees

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |26

    |2016 Proxy Statement|15

    Table of Contents

    DIRECTOR DIVERSITY

            Our Governance Guidelines reflect that the Governance Committee's assessment of the qualifications of director candidates includes consideration of demographic characteristics such as race, gender and ethnicity. Although we do not haveneither the Governance Committee nor our Board has a formal policy regarding the consideration of diversity in selecting director nominees, the Governance Committee seeks to recommend individuals with a broad diversity of experience, profession, skill, geographic representation and demographic background, which may include consideration of personalincluding characteristics such as race, gender and national origin.ethnicity. While diversity is a consideration, nominees are not chosen or excluded solely or primarily on that basis; rather, the Governance Committee focuses on skills, expertiseexperience and background tothat can complement theour existing Board in light of the diverse and global nature of our businesses and operations.

            Our Board recognizes the benefits of racial, ethnic and gender diversity in the boardroom, including better reflecting our global customer base and the healthy debate that stemsresults from different viewpoints that may resultstem from diverse backgrounds. Of the five new independent directors appointed to our Board from 2009 to 2013, two were women and one was an African-American man. The racial, gender,ethnic and citizenshipgender diversity of our 20162019 director nominees is reflected onshown in the following chart.chart below.

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

    20162019 DIRECTOR NOMINEES

            The following pages provide information on each nomineethe directors nominated for election at the Annual Meeting, including his or her age, current board leadership roles, and business experience during at least the past five years. We also indicate the name of any other public company board on which each nominee currently serves, or has served during the past five years; for these purposes, "public company" means one that is required to file reports with the SEC.

            In addition to the information presented regarding each nominee's experience and qualifications that led our Board to conclude that he or she should serve as a director — which includes senior leadership experience, industry experience, global exposure, industry background, financial sophistication, and public company board experience — we believe that each of them has integrity and adheres to our high ethical standards. Each nominee also has demonstrated the ability to exercise sound judgment as well as the commitmentand is committed to serving the long-term interests of our stockholders.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |27

    |2016 Proxy Statement|16

    Table of Contents

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

     

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    Nestlé USA,Owens-Illinois, Inc., a nutrition, healthglass container manufacturer and wellness companysupplier to food and beverage brands

    Chairman & Chief Executive Officer from January 2006 to October 2012

    Nestlé Brands Company, an operating unit of Nestlé USA

    President & Chief Executive Officer since January 2016

    Chief Operating Officer & President, Glass Containers, from 2003February 2015 to December 20052015

    President, O-I Americas, from July 2014 to January 2015

    President, O-I Latin America, from April 2009 to July 2014

        

    BradleyAndres A. AlfordLopez

    Age 5956


    Director since April 2010February 2017


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    ConAgra Foods, Inc.

    Unified Grocers,Owens-Illinois, Inc.

    Past Five Years:

    None

     

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    SubstantialSenior leadership experience

    LedOversees a company with $12+over $6.9 billion in annual revenues and 26,000+more than 26,000 employees in 2018

    Industry knowledgeexperience andglobal exposure

    30+ yearsLeads a multinational packaging company in the beverage segment of the consumer goods industry

    Knowledge of the food and beverage segments into which we sell our pressure-sensitivelabel and graphic materials

    Global exposure

    International management assignmentsLed Latin America and Americas divisions, after having worked in positions of increasing responsibility throughout the region

    Public board experience

    Significant mergers and acquisitions and integration experience

    Concurrent service on one other public board

    CURRENT BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLES

    Compensation Committee Member

    GovernanceAudit Committee Member

       

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

     

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    Ernst & Young LLP, an assurance, tax, transaction and advisory services firm

    Vice Chair, Managing Partner and Member of the Executive Board from 2000 to March 2012

        

    Anthony K. Anderson

    Age 6063


    Director since December 2012


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    AAR Corporation

    Exelon Corporation

    First American Financial CorporationMarsh & McLennan Companies, Inc.

    Past Five Years:

    NoneFirst American Financial Corporation

     

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    SubstantialSenior leadership experience

    Served on the executive board of Ernst & Young for 12 years, and as the managing partner of the Midwest and Pacific Southwest regions

    Director of The Chicago Council on Global Affairs, World Business Chicago and the Chicago Urban League (Former Chairman)

    Financial sophistication

    35 years of financial statement and risk managementinternal control expertise acquired through auditing global public companies

    Substantial experience advising audit committees of large multinational corporations

    Certified public accountant (now inactive)

    Public board experience

    Concurrent service on three other public boards

    CURRENT BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLE

    Audit Committee Member

    GRAPHIC

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    JPMorgan Chase & Co., a global financial services firm

    Chairman of California and Executive Committee Member from September 2009 to January 2013

    Goldman Sachs & Co., an investment banking, securities and investment management firm

    Partner/Managing Director from 1982 to 1998

    Peter K. Barker

    Age 67


    Director since January 2003


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    Fluor Corporation

    Franklin Resources, Inc.

    Past Five Years:

    None

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    Substantial leadership experience

    Led a division with over 21,000 employees

    Member of the executive committee overseeing a global enterprise with $100+ billion in annual revenues

    Financial sophistication

    37 years of investment banking experience, advising companies on capital structure, strategic planning, financing, recapitalization, acquisitions and divestitures

    Public board experience

    Concurrent service on two other public boards; prior service on other public boards


    CURRENT BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLE

    Audit Committee Chair


    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|17

    Table of Contents

    GRAPHIC

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    Avery Dennison Corporation

    Elected President & Chief Executive Officer effective May 1, 2016

    President & Chief Operating Officer from November 2014 to Present

    Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer from June 2010 to October 2014; retained Chief Financial Officer position until March 2015

    Vice President, Global Finance and Chief Accounting Officer from March 2007 to May 2010

    Mitchell R. Butier

    Age 44


    Director since April 2016


    Not Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    None

    Past Five Years:

    None

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    Substantial leadership experience

    Has held roles of increasing responsibility at our company including, most recently, President & Chief Operating Officer

    Industry knowledge and global exposure

    Served in senior leadership positions in both of our key business segments, including an international assignment in Europe

    Financial sophistication

    Served as our Chief Financial Officer for nearly five years and our Chief Accounting Officer for over two years

    CURRENT BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLE

    None

    GRAPHIC

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    Foot Locker, Inc., a specialty athletic retailer

    Executive Chairman from December 2014 to May 2015

    Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer from February 2010 to November 2014

    President, Chief Executive Officer & Director from August 2009 to February 2010

    J.C. Penney Company, Inc., a retail company

    President & Chief Merchandising Officer from January 2005 to July 2009

    President & Chief Operating Officer from July 2002 to December 2004

    Ken C. Hicks

    Age 63


    Director since July 2007


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    None

    Past Five Years:

    Foot Locker,  Inc.

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    Substantial leadership experience

    Oversaw a company with over $7 billion in 2014 revenues and over 43,000 employees

    Industry knowledge

    29 years of senior marketing and operational experience in the retail industry into which we sell our retail branding and information solutions

    Public board experience

    Prior service on other public boards

    CURRENT BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLES

    Audit Committee Member

    Governance Committee Member

       

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

     

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    Nestlé USA, a nutrition, health and wellness company

    Chairman & Chief Executive Officer from January 2006 to October 2012

    Nestlé Brands Company, an operating unit of Nestlé USA

    President & Chief Executive Officer from 2003 to December 2005

    Bradley A. Alford

    Age 62


    Director since April 2010


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    Perrigo Company plc

    Past Five Years:

    ConAgra Foods, Inc.

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    Senior leadership experience

    Led a company then with over $12 billion in annual revenues and more than 26,000 employees

    Industry experience andglobal exposure

    35+ years in the consumer goods industry

    Knowledge of the food and beverage segments of the consumer goods industry into which we sell our label and graphic materials

    Substantial M&A and integration experience

    Public board experience

    Concurrent service on one other public board and prior service on other public boards

    BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLES

    Compensation Committee Member

    Governance Committee Member



    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |28


    Table of Contents

    GRAPHIC

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    Allergan, Inc., a global health carehealthcare company

    Chairman & Chief Executive Officer from June 2013 to March 2015 and February 2006 to April 2011

    Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer from April 2011 to June 2013 and April 2001 to January 2006

    President & Chief Executive Officer from January 1998 to March 2001

        

    David E.I. Pyott

    Age 6265


    Director since November 1999


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    Alnylam Pharmaceuticals Inc.

    BioMarin Pharmaceutical Inc.

    Koninklijke Philips N.V.

    Past Five Years:

    Allergan, Inc.

    Edwards Lifesciences Corporation

     

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    SubstantialSenior leadership experience

    Led a company then with over $7 billion in 2014annual revenues and overmore than 11,000 employees

    GlobalIndustry experience andglobal exposure

    30+ years of strategic, operational, research and development and marketing experience in the health carehealthcare industry into which we sell our pressure-sensitiveindustrial and healthcare materials and medical solutions

    Public board experience

    Concurrent service on three other public boards;boards and prior service on other public boards


    CURRENT BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLES

    Lead Independent Director

    Compensation Committee ChairMember

    Governance Committee Member


    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|18

    Table of Contents

    GRAPHIC

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    Avery Dennison Corporation

    Elected Executive Chairman effective May 1, 2016

    Chairman & Chief Executive Officer from November 2014 to Present

    Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer from April 2010 to October 2014

    President & Chief Executive Officer from May 2005 to April 2010

    President & Chief Operating Officer from May 2000 to April 2005

    Dean A. Scarborough

    Age 60


    Director since May 2000


    Not Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    Mattel, Inc.

    Past Five Years:

    None

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    Substantial leadership experience

    Six years leading our company as Chairman, 11 years as Chief Executive Officer and 15 years as President

    Global exposure and industry knowledge

    30+ years managing or overseeing our global pressure-sensitive materials operations

    Public board experience

    Concurrent service on one other public board


    CURRENT BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLE

    Chairman

    GRAPHIC

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    The Carlyle Group, a global alternative investment firm

    Managing Director and Partner from April 2007 to Present

    The Coca-Cola Company, the world's largest beverage company

    Senior Advisor from February 2006 to March 2007

    Group President, Asia from August 2001 to February 2006

    Patrick T. Siewert

    Age 60


    Director since April 2005


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    Mondelez International, Inc.

    Past Five Years:

    None

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    Industry knowledge and financial sophistication

    Led a division of a global company in the beverage segment of the consumer goods industry into which we sell our pressure-sensitive materials

    Advises on investments in consumer-related businesses across Asia

    Global exposure

    Work experience in Asia, a region in which we manufacture many of our products and a geographic market that is driving our sales growth in emerging markets

    Public board experience

    Concurrent service on one other public board

    CURRENT BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLE

    Audit Committee Member

       

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

     

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    Dine Brands Global, Inc. (formerly DineEquity, Inc.), owner, operator and franchisor of IHOP and Applebee's restaurants

    Chairman & Chief Executive Officer from June 2008 to PresentMarch 2017

    IHOP Corporation, DineEquity's predecessor entity

    Chairman & Chief Executive Officer from May 2006 to May 2008

    President, Chief Executive Officer & Chief Operating Officer from May 2002 to April 2006

    President & Chief Operating Officer from December 2001 to May 2002

    Julia A. Stewart

    Age 6063


    Director since January 2003


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    DineEquity, Inc.None

    Past Five Years:

    NoneDine Brands Global, Inc.

     

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    SubstantialSenior leadership experience

    Leads the world's largest full-service restaurantLed a company then with over $600 million in annual revenues and nearly 1,000 employees

    Global exposure

    Substantial operational and marketing experience in the dining industry

    Expertise in brand positioning, risk assessment, financial reporting and corporate governance

    Public board experience

    ConcurrentPrior service on one other public board; prior service on one public board


    boards

    CURRENT BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLES

    Compensation Committee Chair

    Governance Committee ChairMember

    GRAPHIC

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    Academy Sports + Outdoors, a sports and recreation retailer

    Chairman & Chief Executive Officer since May 2018

    Foot Locker, Inc., a specialty athletic retailer

    Executive Chairman from December 2014 to May 2015

    Chairman, President & Chief Executive Officer from February 2010 to November 2014

    President and Chief Executive Officer from August 2009 to February 2010


    Ken C. Hicks

    Age 66


    Director since July 2007


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    None

    Past Five Years:

    Foot Locker,  Inc.

    Whole Foods Corporation

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    Senior leadership experience

    Leads a company with nearly 300 U.S. locations and previously led a company then with over $7 billion in annual revenues and more than 43,000 employees

    Industry experience

    30+ years of senior marketing and operational experience in the retail industry into which we sell our retail branding and information solutions

    Public board experience

    Prior service on other public boards

    BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLES

    Audit Committee Member

    Compensation Committee Member



      

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |29

    |2016 Proxy Statement|19

    Table of Contents

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

     

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    OpenText Corporation, a global software company

    Vice Chair, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Technology Officer since January 2012






    Mark J. Barrenechea

    Age 54


    Director since September 2018


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    OpenText Corporation

    Dicks Sporting Goods

    Past Five Years:

    None

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    Senior leadership experience

    Leads a company with nearly $3 billion in revenues and more than 12,000 employees in 2018

    Industry experience andglobal exposure

    Over 30 years of experience in the technology industry, including experience globally in software, cloud solutions, cybersecurity, and information technology transformation

    Public board experience

    Concurrent service on two other public boards


    BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLES

    None

    GRAPHIC

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    Sensata Technologies Holding N.V.,PLC, a leading supplier of sensors and controls

    President & Chief Executive Officer fromsince January 2013 to Present

    President from September 2010 to December 2012

    Chief Operating Officer from April 2006 to August 2010

    Texas Instruments, Inc., Sensata's predecessor entity

    Vice President of Sensor Products from 1997 to 2006

    Martha N. Sullivan

    Age 5962


    Director since February 2013


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    Sensata Technologies Holding N.V.PLC

    Past Five Years:

    None

     

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    SubstantialSenior leadership experience

    Leads a business-to-business enterprisecompany with nearly $3over $3.5 billion in 2015 revenues and more than 21,000 employees in 2018

    GlobalIndustry experience andglobal exposure

    Oversees all business segments, global operations and strategic planning

    Strong technology background, including experience overseeing a radio-frequency identification business

    Public board experience

    Concurrent service on one other public board

    BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLES

    Audit Committee Member

    Compensation Committee Member

    GRAPHIC

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    Avery Dennison Corporation

    President & Chief Executive Officer since May 2016

    President & Chief Operating Officer from November 2014 to April 2016

    Senior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer from June 2010 to October 2014; continued serving as CFO until March 2015

    Vice President, Global Finance, and Chief Accounting Officer from March 2007 to May 2010

    Mitchell R. Butier

    Age 47


    Director since April 2016


    Not Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    None

    Past Five Years:

    None

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    Senior leadership experience

    Has held roles of increasing responsibility at our company, including CAO, CFO, COO and currently President & CEO

    Industry experience andglobal exposure

    Served in senior leadership positions in our primary business segments, including international assignments in Europe

    Financial sophistication

    Served as our CFO for almost three years and our CAO for nearly five years

    BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLES

    Chairman-Elect



    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |30


    Table of Contents

    GRAPHIC

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    The Carlyle Group, a global alternative investment firm

    Managing Director and Partner since April 2007

    The Coca-Cola Company, a beverage company

    Senior Advisor from February 2006 to March 2007

    Group President, Asia, from August 2001 to February 2006

    Patrick T. Siewert

    Age 63


    Director since April 2005


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    Mondelez International, Inc.

    Past Five Years:

    None

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    Industry experience andglobal exposure

    Led a division of a global company in the beverage segment of the consumer goods industry into which we sell our label and graphic materials

    Work experience in Asia, a region in which we manufacture many of our products and a region that is driving our growth in emerging markets

    Financial sophistication

    Advises on investments in consumer goods businesses globally, particularly in Asia

    Public board experience

    Concurrent service on one other public board


    CURRENT BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLEROLES

    CompensationAudit Committee Chair

    GRAPHIC

    SELECT BUSINESS EXPERIENCE

    JPMorgan Chase & Co., a global financial services firm

    Chairman of California and Executive Committee Member from September 2009 to January 2013

    Goldman Sachs & Co., an investment banking, securities and investment management firm

    Partner/Managing Director from 1982 to 1998

    Peter K. Barker

    Age 70


    Director since January 2003


    Independent


    Other Public Company Boards

    Current:

    Fluor Corporation

    Franklin Resources, Inc.

    Past Five Years:

    None

    SELECT SKILLS AND QUALIFICATIONS

    Senior leadership experience

    Member of the executive committee overseeing a global company then with over $100 billion in annual revenues

    Led a division then with more than 21,000 employees

    Financial sophistication

    37 years of investment banking experience, advising companies on capital structure, strategic planning, financing, recapitalization, acquisitions and divestitures

    Public board experience

    Concurrent service on two other public boards and prior service on other public boards

    BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLES

    Governance Committee Chair

    Audit Committee Member

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |31


    Table of Contents

    DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

            The Compensation Committee targets        In recommending non-employee director compensation to our Board based on the independent expert advice of Willis Towers Watson, the Compensation Committee seeks totarget compensation at the median of companies similar in size, global scope and complexity with which we compete for director talent. Compensation is reviewed periodically (approximately every three years) to ensure market competitiveness and consistency. Themajority of this compensation is delivered in equity to align director interests with those of our stockholders.

    2015 DIRECTORMEDIAN TARGET 2018 COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND CHANGES APPROVED DURING 2015

            The director compensation table provides information regarding the compensation earned by or awarded tocomponents of our non-employee directors during 2015, when target total non-employee director compensation program for 2018 are summarized in the charts below and described thereafter.

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

            Our 2017 Incentive Award Plan, which was $225,000.approved by our stockholders in April 2017, limits the sum of the grant date fair value of equity awards and the amount of any cash compensation, in each case granted to any non-employee director during any calendar year, to $600,000.

    POST-ANNUAL MEETING COMPENSATION

            In December 2015,February 2019, the Compensation Committee considered the design of our non-employee director compensation program, which had not changed for three years.the level of compensation received by our non-employee directors other than our Lead Independent Director since May 2016. At the Compensation Committee's request, Willis Towers Watson reviewed trends in boarddirector compensation and assessed the competitiveness of our program. The firm assessed all components of our program, including cash compensation (Board and Committee Chair retainers);, equity grants;grants, total direct compensation (annual cash plus equity);, total remuneration;remuneration, our stock ownership guidelines;policy and the additional retainer for the Lead Independent Director.

            Using benchmarking data from public filings of companies ranked in the Fortune 375-500, with median 2014 revenues of $6.0 billion, Towers Watson determined that our total annual remuneration of $225,000 was below the median.Willis Towers Watson recommended that the programannual equity grant be changedincreased by $15,000 to maintain its market-competitiveness and continue allowing usincrease the proportion of compensation delivered in equity to attract and retain qualified directors. On60%. This change would bring total non-employee director compensation to $255,000, the adviceprojected median non-employee director compensation of its independent compensation consultant,our Fortune 375-500 peers in 2021, the next time the Compensation Committee currently plans to review the program. Based on Willis Towers Watson's recommendation, the Compensation Committee recommended to theour Board the following changes to target total non-employee director compensation at the projected market median through 2017:

      increase target total remuneration to $250,000, reflecting the 10-13% growth rate in outside director compensation among large companies in recent years;

      raise the annual Board retainer by $10,000 to $100,000 and the supplemental Lead Independent Director retainer by $5,000 to $25,000; and

      increasethat the amount of annual equity compensation from $125,000granted to $140,000, granted 100%non-employee directors be increased to $155,000, with grants continuing to be in the form of RSUs consistent with the current program and market practices.
    that vest in one year.

            InAfter consideration of these increases,the advice from the independent compensation consultant, the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, also increasedand further discussion, our director stock ownership guidelines toBoard approved the lesserrevised program, effective as of the fixed-dollar amountdate of $500,000 (up from $325,000) and 7,500 (up from 6,500) shares.the Annual Meeting.

    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|20

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |32


    Table of Contents

            UponSTOCK OWNERSHIP POLICY

            Our stock ownership policy requires non-employee directors to own $500,000 of our company stock, 50% of which must be held in vested shares. Stock option gains are not considered towards measuring policy compliance; only shares owned directly or in a trust, deferred stock units (DSUs) and unvested RSUs count for these purposes.

            Directors are prohibited from hedging or pledging our common stock.

            Except for our two newest directors, who have five years to reach the Compensation Committee's recommendation and further discussion,minimum ownership level, all of our directors have achieved the Board approved the revised program, effective after the Annual Meeting. The primary componentsminimum ownership level required by our stock ownership policy. Based on our review of current and future non-employeetheir written representations in our annual director compensation are summarized in the chart below, and described in further detail thereafter.questionnaire, none of our directors has hedged or pledged our common stock.

    ANNUAL NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
     
     Through
    April 2016

     Starting
    May 2016

    Equity Grant of Restricted Stock Units

     $125,000 $140,000

    Cash Retainer

     $90,000 $100,000

    Match of Charitable/Educational Contributions

     $10,000 No change

    Additional Cash Retainer for Lead Independent Director

     $20,000 $  25,000

    Additional Cash Retainer for Audit Committee Chair

     $20,000 No change

    Additional Cash Retainer for Compensation Committee Chair

     $15,000 No change

    Additional Cash Retainer for Governance Committee Chair

     $15,000 No change

    TARGETED AT MEDIAN

    EQUITY COMPENSATION

            The annual2018 equity grant to non-employee directors iswas made on May 1 and denominated in restricted stock units (RSUs)the form of RSUs that vest ratably over three years, except that all unvestedon the one-year anniversary of the grant date, consistent with the one-year term to which directors are elected. Unvested RSUs (i) fully vest upon a director's death, disability, retirement from our Board after reaching age 72 or termination of service within 24 months after a change of control. Unvested RSUscontrol and (ii) are generally cancelled in the event a director voluntarily resigns, is not re-elected by our stockholders or is otherwise asked to leave our Board. On May 1, 2015,2018, each of our then-serving directors was granted 2,2391,336 RSUs with a grant date value of approximately $125,000$140,000 based on the fair market value of our common stock on that date.

            Directors are subjectOn September 10, 2018, the date of his appointment to stock ownership requirements and prohibited from hedging or pledgingour Board, Mr. Barrenechea received a prorated equity grant for the remainder of the term expiring at the 2019 Annual Meeting consisting of 880 RSUs with a grant date value of approximately $93,333 based on the fair market value of our common stock.stock on that date.

    DEFERRABLE CASH COMPENSATION

            Cash retainers are paid semi-annually in arrearssemiannually and prorated for any director's partial service during the year. Directors are also reimbursed for travel expenses incurred to attend Board meetings and continuing director education events.

            Non-employeeOur non-employee directors may choose to receive theirthis compensation in (i) cash, either paid directly or deferred into an account under our Directors Variable Deferred Compensation PlanProgram (DVDCP), which accrues earnings at the rate of return of certain bond and equity investment funds managed by an insurance company;a third party; (ii) deferred stock units (DSUs)DSUs credited to an individual account under thepursuant to our Directors Deferred Equity Compensation PlanProgram (DDECP); or (iii) a combination of cash and DSUs. None of our current non-employee directors currently participates in the DVDCP and sevennine of our non-employee directorsthem currently participate in the DDECP. When a director participating in the DDECP retires or otherwise ceases serving as a director, the dollar value of the DSUs in his or her account is divided by the closing price of our common stock on the last date of the director's service, with the resulting number of shares of our common stock issued to the director. Dividend equivalents, representing the value of dividends per share paid on shares of our common stock calculated with reference to the number of DSUs held as of a dividend record date, are reinvested on the applicable payable date in the form of additional DSUs credited to the accounts of directors participating in the DDECP.

    MATCHING GIFT PROGRAM

            We match up to $10,000 per year of a non-employee director's contributions to charitable organizations or educational institutions.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |33

    |2016 Proxy Statement|21

    Table of Contents

    DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE

    NAME
     FEES
    EARNED
    OR PAID
    IN CASH(1)

     STOCK
    AWARDS(2)

     CHANGE IN
    PENSION VALUE AND
    NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED
    COMPENSATION EARNINGS(3)

     ALL OTHER
    COMPENSATION(4)

     TOTAL
     

    Bradley A. Alford

     $90,000 $125,015 


    $10,000 $225,015 

    Anthony A. Anderson

     $90,000 $125,015     $215,015 

    Peter K. Barker

     $110,000 $125,015 


    $10,000 $245,015 

    Rolf L. Börjesson(5)

     $30,000       $30,000 

    Ken C. Hicks

     $90,000 $125,015 


    $10,000 $225,015 

    David E.I. Pyott

     $125,000 $125,015 $14,713   $264,728 

    Patrick T. Siewert

     $90,000 $125,015 


    $5,000 $220,015 

    Julia A. Stewart

     $105,000 $125,015   $10,000 $240,015 

    Martha N. Sullivan

     $90,000 $125,015 


    $10,000 $225,015 
    NAME
    FEES
    EARNED
    OR PAID
    IN CASH(1)

    STOCK
    AWARDS(2)

    CHANGE IN
    PENSION VALUE AND
    NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED
    COMPENSATION EARNINGS(3)

    ALL OTHER
    COMPENSATION(4)

    TOTAL

    Bradley A. Alford

    $100,000$137,256



    $2,250$239,506

    Anthony A. Anderson

    $100,000$137,256$237,256

    Peter K. Barker

    $115,000$137,256



    $10,000$262,256

    Mark J. Barrenechea

    $66,667$91,534$158,201

    Ken C. Hicks

    $100,000$137,256



    $10,000$247,256

    Andres A. Lopez

    $100,000$137,256$237,256

    David E.I. Pyott

    $130,000$137,256$0$10,000$277,256

    Dean A. Scarborough

    $133,333$137,256$10,000$280,589

    Patrick T. Siewert

    $120,000$137,256







    $257,256

    Julia A. Stewart

    $115,000$137,256$10,000$262,256

    Martha N. Sullivan

    $100,000$137,256



    $10,000$247,256

    (1)
    Mr. ScarboroughButier does not appear in the table because he doeswas employed by our company in 2018 and did not receive any additional compensation to serve as a director. Amounts represent retainers earned as set forthshown in the following table.table below. At their election, the following directors deferred their cash compensation through the DDECP, with the following balancebalances of DSUs in their accounts as of January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, the last day of our 20152018 fiscal year: Mr. Alford — 13,176; Mr.17,479; Anderson — 5,411; Mr.9,234; Barker — 23,428; Mr.28,920; Barrenechea — 173; Hicks — 10,848; Mr.13,263; Lopez — 591; Pyott — 42,747; Ms.49,895; Stewart — 31,376;37,335; and Ms. Sullivan — 5,312.9,129.

    NAME
     BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLES DURING 2015
     BOARD
    RETAINER

     COMMITTEE
    CHAIR RETAINER

     LEAD DIRECTOR
    RETAINER

     
    Mr. Alford  $90,000 


     
    Mr. Anderson   $90,000     
    Mr. Barker Audit Committee Chair $90,000 $20,000  
    Mr. Börjesson   $30,000     
    Mr. Hicks  $90,000 


     
    Mr. Pyott Lead Independent Director;
    Compensation Committee Chair
     $90,000 $15,000 $20,000 
    Mr. Siewert  $90,000 


     
    Ms. Stewart Governance Committee Chair $90,000 $15,000   
    Ms. Sullivan  $90,000 




     
    DIRECTOR
    BOARD LEADERSHIP ROLES
    BOARD
    RETAINER

    COMMITTEE
    CHAIR RETAINER

    LEAD DIRECTOR
    RETAINER

    Alford$100,000







    Anderson $100,000
    BarkerGovernance Committee Chair$100,000$15,000



    Barrenechea $66,667
    Hicks$100,000







    Lopez $100,000
    PyottLead Independent Director$100,000



    $30,000
    Scarborough $100,000
    SiewertAudit Committee Chair$100,000$20,000



    StewartCompensation Committee Chair$100,000$15,000
    Sullivan$100,000







    (2)
    Amounts reflect the grant date fair value without adjustment for forfeitures, of 2,2391,336 RSUs granted on May 1, 2015.2018, except for amount for Mr. Barrenechea, which reflects the grant date fair value of 880 RSUs granted on September 10, 2018 in connection with his appointment to our Board. The fair value of RSUs was determined based on the fair market value of our common stock on the grant date, adjusted for foregone dividends.date. Each non-employee director serving as of January 2, 2016 had a total of 4,972December 29, 2018 held 1,977 unvested RSUs, except that Ms. Sullivan had a total of 5,042 unvested RSUs. Because his outstandingfor Messrs. Barrenechea and Lopez, who held 880 and 1,633 unvested RSUs, vested in connection with his qualified retirement in April 2015, Mr. Börjesson had no unvested RSUs outstanding as of January 2, 2016.respectively.

    (3)
    We do not currently have a retirement benefit program for non-employee directors. Amount for Mr. Pyott reflectsdoes not reflect the $(3,491) change in present value of his accumulated benefits, based on an interest rate of 3.68% as of December 29, 2018, under a director retirement plan the accrual of benefits under which was frozen in 2002, based on an interest rate of 3.32% as of December 31, 2015.2002. This amount has been excluded from the table in accordance with SEC rules.

    (4)
    Amounts reflect our matching gifts for contributions made to charitable organizations or educational institutions.

    (5)
    Mr. Börjesson retired from our Board on the date of the 2015 Annual Meeting and received only cash compensation during the year, prorated for his period of service through April 2015.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |34

    |2016 Proxy Statement|22

    Table of Contents

    ITEM 2 — ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

            OurAfter considering the preliminary voting results of the advisory vote on the frequency of our say-on-pay vote at our 2017 Annual Meeting, our Board has determined to hold say-on-pay votes annually, at least until the next advisory vote on the frequency of our say-on-pay vote (which will(expected to occur at our 20172023 Annual Meeting). Our

            In this Item 2, our stockholders are being asked to vote on the following resolution:

                RESOLVED, that ourthe Company's stockholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of ourthe Company's Named Executive Officers (NEOs), as described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis andExecutive Compensation Tables sections of our 2016the Company's 2019 proxy statement.

    RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS

    The Compensation Committee considered        We remain committed to ongoing engagement with our stockholders to seek their feedback from stockholders regardingand discuss why we believe our executive compensation program and made significant changes to our program over the past few years to both address stockholder concerns and more closely align our compensation programproperly aligns with our strategies by incenting our leaders to deliver strong financial profileperformance and business strategies. create superior long-term, sustainable value for our customers, employees, investors and communities.Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation. Properly dated and signed proxies will be so voted unless stockholdersyou specify otherwise.

    MEANING OF ADVISORY VOTE

            The advisory vote is a vote to approve the compensation of our NEOs, as described in theCompensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) andExecutive Compensation Tables sections of this proxy statement. It isnot a vote on our general compensation policies or any specific element thereof,of compensation, the compensation of our non-employee directors, our CEO pay ratio, or the features of our compensation program features designed to prevent excessive risk-taking as described inRisks Associated with Compensation Policies and Practices.

            The results of the advisory vote are not binding on our Board. However, in accordance with SEC regulations, the Compensation Committee will disclose the extent to which it takes into account the results of the vote in the CD&A of our 20172020 proxy statement. We remain committed to continued engagement with our stockholders to solicit their viewpoints and discuss why we believe our executive compensation program properly aligns with our strategies and incents our executives to deliver strong long-term operating and financial performance for our stockholders.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |35


    Table of Contents

    COMPENSATION AND EXECUTIVE PERSONNEL COMMITTEE REPORT

            The Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee (referred to in this report as the "Committee") of theour Board of Directors has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K with management and, based on its review and thesethose discussions, has recommended to theour Board of Directors that the CD&A be included in our 20162019 proxy statement and thereby be incorporated by reference into our 20152018 Annual Report on Form 10-K.

            The Committee welcomes feedback regarding our executive compensation program. Stockholders may communicate with the Committee by writing to the Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee Chair, c/o Corporate Secretary, Avery Dennison Corporation, 207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203.

    David E. I. Pyott,Julia A. Stewart, Chair
    Bradley A. Alford
    Julia A. StewartKen C. Hicks
    David E. I. Pyott
    Martha N. Sullivan

    This Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), unless specifically incorporated by reference therein.Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |36

    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|23

    Table of Contents

    COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS*ANALYSIS*

            This Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A) provides an overview and analysis ofdescribes the principles and practices underlying our executive compensation program and the decisions made by the Compensation and Executive Personnel Committee of our Board of Directors (referred to in this CD&A as the "Committee") related to 20152018 compensation. This CD&A is organized intocontains the following sections:sections shown below.

      Executive Summary

        Delivered Against Long-Term Targets

        Business Strategy Overview
        2015 Performance

        Delivering Financial Targets
        Strong 2018 Financial Performance
        Disciplined Capital Allocation
        Three- and Five-Year Cumulative TSR

        Outperformance
        20152018 Say-on-Pay Vote and Stockholder Feedback During 2018 Engagement

        Recent Compensation Changes

        CEO Transition

        2018 NEOs
        Overview of Pay Philosophy and Executive Compensation Components

        Strong Compensation Governance Practices
      Summary of Compensation Decisions for 20152018
      Discussion of Compensation Components and Decisions Impacting 20152018 Compensation

        Base Salary

        2015 Annual Incentive Plan (AIP)2018 AIP Awards

        20152018 Grants of Long-Term Incentive (LTI)LTI Awards

        20152018 Vesting of Previously Granted LTI Awards

        Perquisites

        Relocation/International AssignmentRelocation and Other Temporary Benefits

        General Benefits

        Severance Benefits
      Compensation-Setting Tools
      Independent Oversight and Expertise
      Other Considerations

            In this CD&A and EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

    BUSINESS STRATEGY OVERVIEW

            Over theExecutive Compensation Tables section of this proxy statement, last several years, we provide compensation informationhave successfully executed our business strategies, which are designed to create long-term, sustainable value for our 2015 NEOs, whocustomers, employees and stockholders and improve the communities in which we operate. From our stockholders' perspective, we believe that value is best measured by our total stockholder return (TSR) and cumulative economic value added (EVA), both of which are identified below.performance objectives used in our long-term incentive (LTI) compensation program and inform how we set our goals for sales growth, margin improvement, asset efficiency, return on total capital (ROTC) and capital allocation.

    2015 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
    NAMETITLERECENT EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
    Dean A. ScarboroughChairman &
    Chief Executive Officer

    Served in a number of capacities since joining in 1983, including President from May 2000 to October 2014, Chief Executive Officer (CEO) since May 2005 and Chairman since April 2010. Subject to his election by our stockholders, he will serve solely as Executive Chairman effective May 1, 2016.
    Mitchell R. ButierPresident &
    Chief Operating Officer
    Appointed as President and Chief Operating Officer in November 2014, after serving as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) since June 2010. He ceased serving as CFO in March 2015. Effective May 1, 2016, he will become President and CEO.
    Anne L. BrammanSenior Vice President &
    Chief Financial Officer

    Joined as Senior Vice President and CFO in March 2015 from Carnival Cruise Line, the largest division of Carnival Corporation, where she served as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for four years.
    Georges GravanisPresident,
    Materials Group
    Elected to his current role in May 2015, after serving as Vice President and General Manager of the Asia Pacific division of the Materials Group since August 2010. Prior to that, he held several leadership roles in Asia and Europe since joining in May 2003.
    Anne HillSenior Vice President &
    Chief Human Resources Officer

    Served as Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since joining in March 2007.
    R. Shawn NevilleFormer President,
    Retail Branding and
    Information Solutions
    Began in June 2009 as Group Vice President of the business group he continued to lead as President until June 2015. He left our company after a brief transition period.

            The NEOs who served atWe communicated long-term goals in 2014 for, among other things, the endorganic sales growth, GAAP operating margin, double-digit adjusted earnings per share (EPS) growth and ROTC we planned to achieve by 2018, raising the bar from the five-year goals we established in 2012 and substantially achieved through 2015. We met or exceeded each of our 2015 fiscal year (which excludes Mr. Neville) are collectively referred2018 targets.

            In March 2017, we announced new long-term goals for 2021 for our three reporting segments — Label and Graphic Materials (LGM), Retail Branding and Information Solutions (RBIS), and Industrial and Healthcare Materials (IHM) — and our company as a whole, targeting continued solid organic sales growth, GAAP operating margin expansion, double-digit adjusted EPS growth on a compound annual basis, and ROTC we planned to in this CD&A as our "Current NEOs."achieve by 2021.

       


    *
    This CD&A contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results, performance or achievements expressed or implied thereby. For a detailed discussion of these risks, see Part I, Item 1a.1a, "Risk Factors" and Part II, Item 7.7, "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations"Operations," in our 20152018 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on February 24, 201627, 2019 with the SEC (our "2015"2018 Annual Report"). Stockholders should note that statements contained in this CD&A regarding our company and business group performance targets and goals should not be interpreted as management's expectations, estimates of results or other guidance.
    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|24

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |37


    Table of Contents

    EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
            To achieve our goals, we have been consistently executing four key strategies. First, we are focused on driving outsized growth in high value product categories (organically and through acquisitions) to improve our portfolio mix over time. Product categories are defined as high value when they serve markets that are growing faster than gross domestic product (GDP), represent large pools of potential profit and leverage our core capabilities. Examples include our specialty and durable label materials, graphic and reflective solutions, industrial tapes, and radio-frequency identification (RFID) inlays and tags. In 2018, we delivered above-average growth in these categories, while also enhancing our exposure to them through continuing to integrate the acquisitions we made in 2017.

            Second, we are focused on delivering solid growth in our base businesses by carefully balancing volume, price and mix; reducing complexity; and tailoring our go-to-market strategies.

            Third, we remain highly focused on continuously improving productivity to expand margins, enhance our competitiveness (particularly in our base businesses) and provide a funding source for reinvestment. Product reengineering and enterprise lean sigma are the primary levers we use in executing this strategy.

            Our fourth key strategy is to be a highly disciplined allocator of capital. This is reflected in how we deploy capital for organic growth and productivity and our acquisition criteria, as well as our approach to stockholder distributions (dividends and share repurchases).

    DELIVERED AGAINST LONG-TERMDELIVERING FINANCIAL TARGETS

            We initiated a major transformationOur five-year financial goals through 2018, three of our businesswhich are not in response to our relatively weak performanceaccordance with generally accepted accounting principles in 2011, committing to the achievementUnited States of aggressive long-term financial targets that we communicated to our stockholders in May 2012 and aimed to achieve by the end of 2015. In this four-year period, we substantially delivered against these goals by executing our strategies to grow through innovation and differentiated quality and service; expand margins through productivity and leveraging our scale; and deploy capital effectively. As shown below, we met our 2015 targets forAmerica (GAAP), included an organic sales growth target of 4% to 5% and a GAAP operating margin target of 9% to 10% in 2018. We also targeted double-digit adjusted earnings per share (EPS) growth. AlthoughEPS growth and ROTC of at least 16% in 2018. The combination of our growth and ROTC targets is a proxy for growth in EVA, one of the performance objectives used in our LTI compensation program. As shown on the following page, we achieved or exceeded our five-year commitments through 2018.

            Organic sales change, adjusted EPS and ROTC — as well as sales change ex. currency and free cash flow, fell substantially short of our annual targetwhich are used later in 2014, we reached our target of $300+ million in three of the four years in the period and achieved a four-year average of $287 million. We substantially delivered our 2015 commitments to investors.

            Organic sales growth, adjusted EPS, free cash flow and return on capital (ROTC)this CD&A — are non-GAAP financial measures that we provide to investors to assist them in assessing our performance and operating trends. These non-GAAP financial measures are not in accordance with, nor are they a substitute for or superior to, the comparable financial measures under generally accepted accounting principlesGAAP, are defined in the United Statesfollowing pages of America (GAAP)this CD&A, and are reconciled tofrom GAAP inAppendix A to of this proxy statement.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |38


    Table of Contents

    CHARTFor the 2014-2018 period, on a five-year compound annual basis (with 2013 as the base period), GAAP reported net sales, reported EPS and reported net income grew by 3.1%, 19.9% and 17.0%, respectively.

    (1)

    2014-2018
    TARGETS

    2014-2018
    RESULTS(1)

    Organic Sales Growth(2)(3)4%-5%4.3%

    GAAP Operating Margin in 2018


    9%-10%


    10.0%

    Adjusted EPS Growth(2)(4)


    12%-15%+


    17.7%






    ROTC(5) in 2018


    16%+


    18.6%
    ACHIEVED OR EXCEEDED 2018 FINANCIAL TARGETS

    (1)

    Results for non-GAAP measures are reconciled from GAAP inAppendix A of this proxy statement.

    (2)

    Percentages reflect five-year compound annual growth rates, with 2013 as the base period.

    (3)

    Organic sales change refers to the increase or decrease in sales excluding the estimated impact of foreign currency translation and currency adjustment for transitional reporting of highly inflationary economies (Argentina), product line exits, acquisitions and divestitures, and, where applicable, the extra week in our fiscal year.

    (4)

    Adjusted net income per common share, assuming dilution (adjusted EPS) refers to adjusted net income divided by weighted average number of common shares outstanding, assuming dilution. Adjusted net income is income from continuing operations before taxes, tax-effected at the adjusted tax rate, and adjusted for tax-effected restructuring charges and other items. Adjusted tax rate is the full-year GAAP tax rate, adjusted to exclude certain unusual or infrequent events that are expected to significantly impact the GAAP tax rate, such as completion of our 2017 provisional estimate of the impact of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, impacts related to our U.S. pension plan termination, and the effects of discrete tax planning actions.

    (5)

    ROTC refers to income from continuing operations excluding the expense and tax benefit of debt financing, divided by the average of beginning and, ending invested capital.

            In March 2017, we announced our five-year financial goals through 2021, targeting continued solid organic sales growth, GAAP operating margin of at least 11% in 2021, double-digit adjusted EPS growth on a compound annual basis, and ROTC of at least 17% in 2021. As shown below, based on our results of the first two years of this five-year period, we are on track to deliver these targets.

    For the 2017-2018 period, on a two-year compound annual basis (with 2016 as the base period), GAAP reported net sales, reported EPS and reported net income increased by 8.5%, 22.1% and 20.7%, respectively.


    2017-2021
    TARGETS

    2017-2018
    RESULTS(1)

    Sales Growth(2)4%+ organic
    5%+ ex. currency(3)

    4.8% organic
    7.5% ex. currency

    GAAP Operating Margin


    11%+ in 2021


    10.0% in 2018

    Adjusted EPS Growth(2)


    10%+


    22.8%

    ROTC


    17%+ in 2021


    18.6% in 2018
    ON TRACK TO DELIVER 2021 FINANCIAL TARGETS

    (1)

    Results for non-GAAP measures are reconciled from GAAP inAppendix A of this proxy statement.

    (2)

    Percentages for targets reflect five-year compound annual growth rates, with 2016 as the base period. Percentages for results reflect two-year compound annual growth rates, with 2016 as the base period.

    (3)

    Target for sales growth ex. currency reflects the impact of completed acquisitions as of March 2017 of approximately 1 point.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |39


    Table of Contents

    2018 FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE

            Fiscal year 2018 marked our seventh consecutive year of strong top-line growth, operating margin expansion and double-digit adjusted EPS growth. We exceeded our financial goals for the year, with the accomplishments shown below. The non-GAAP financial measures used below are reconciled from GAAP inAppendix A of this proxy statement.

      Achievednet sales of approximately $7.2 billion, an increase of 8.2% over prior year.

      Excluding the impact of currency, translation,sales grew by 6.9%. On an organic basis, sales grew by 5.5%, driven by growth in high value product line exits, acquisitionscategories and divestitures, and, where applicable, the extra weeksales in the prior fiscal year. Percentages represent compound annual growth rates.emerging markets.

      (2)
      AdjustedReported EPS significantly increased from $3.13 in 2017 to $5.28 in 2018 refersdue to reported incomethe combined effects of 2017 tax charges related to the enactment of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) and a net tax benefit from continuing operations per common share, assuming dilution, adjusted for tax-effecteda discrete foreign tax planning action, the combined effect of volume and mix, and benefits from productivity initiatives. These benefits were partially offset by settlement charges resulting from the 2018 termination of our U.S. pension plan, higher restructuring charges, higher employee-related costs, growth investments and other items. Percentages represent compound annual growth rates.the net impact of pricing and raw material inflation.

      (3)
      Adjusted EPS increased from $5.00 to $6.06 due to the combined effect of volume and mix, as well as benefits from productivity initiatives, partially offset by higher employee-related costs, growth investments and the net impact of pricing and raw material inflation. Adjusted EPS exceeded the high end of the $5.70 to $5.95 annual guidance range we gave to our stockholders in January 2018.

      Withnet cash provided by operating activities of $457.9 million, delivered free cash flow of $429.2 million. Free cash flow refers to cash flow from operations,provided by operating activities, less payments for property, plant and equipment, software and other deferred charges, plus proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment, plus (minus) net proceeds from sales (purchases) of investments.investments and proceeds from insurance. Free cash flow excludes usesis also adjusted for the cash contributions related to the termination of cash that do not directly or immediately support the underlying business, such as discretionary debt reductions, dividends, share repurchases, and certain effectsour U.S. pension plan.

      Onnet income of acquisitions and divestitures (e.g.$467.4 million, cash flow from discontinued operations, taxes, and transaction costs)achieved return on total capital (ROTC) of 18.6%.

              In May 2014, we announced new long-term financial targets through 2018. We raised the midpoint of our long-term organic sales growth target from 4% to 4.5%, reflecting confidence in the trajectory of our two primary operating segments. We continued targeting double-digit adjusted EPS growth. We also introduced a target for ROTC, which has long been a key internal financial metric for our company. We believe that the combination of our growth and ROTC targets effectively communicates our value creation objectives, which together are a proxy for economic value added (EVA), one of the

      Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|25

      Table of Contents

      performance objectives used in our long-term incentive compensation program. As shown below, based on our results for the first two years of this five-year period, we are on track to deliver our 2018 commitments to investors.


      2014-2018
      TARGETS

      2014-2015
      RESULTS

      Organic Sales Growth4%-5%4%

      Adjusted EPS Growth


      12%-15%+


      13%

      Return on Total Capital(1)


      16%+ in 2018


      15% in 2015
      (up from 11% in 2013)
      ON TRACK TOWARD 2018 FINANCIAL TARGETS

      (1)

      Return on total capital refers to income from continuing operations excluding the expense and tax benefit of debt financing divided by the average of beginning and ending invested capital.

      2015 PERFORMANCE†

              Fiscal year 2015 was another year of solid progress for our company. With net sales of approximately $6.0 billion, we delivered 4.6% in organic sales growth and 10.6% growth in adjusted EPS. Adjusted EPS for the year of $3.44 exceeded the high end of the $3.20-$3.40 guidance range we provided to investors in January 2015. Free cash flow rebounded to $329.4 million from $184.7 million in the prior year, which reflected actions we took in 2014 to reduce the volatility associated with year-end changes to our levels of working capital.

    CHARTGRAPHIC

    Disciplined Capital AllocationDISCIPLINED CAPITAL ALLOCATION

            We achieved these resultshave consistently executed our disciplined approach to capital allocation, balancing our investments in organic growth, productivity and acquisitions of targeted companies, while maintaining a healthy balance sheetcontinuing to return cash to stockholders through dividends and continuing the disciplined executionshare repurchases.In 2018, we delivered ROTC of nearly 19% and invested $256.6 million in capital expenditures to support future growth and productivity improvement, made $3.8 million in equity investments, paid $175.0 million in dividends, and repurchased $392.9 million to shares of our common stock.

            We have invested in our businesses to support organic growth and pursued targeted acquisitions that support our strategy of increasing our exposure to high value product categories.We increased our spending on capital allocation strategy. Over the last five years, we have returned more than $1.5 billionexpenditures in 2018 by over 13% compared to our stockholders, delivering on our commitmentprior year to return an increased amount of cash to our stockholders. In 2015, we returned approximately $365 million to our stockholders by (i) repurchasing 3.9 million, or approximately 4%,enable future growth of our outstanding shares atbusinesses, improve our profitability and expand our margins. In addition, we continued integrating the following acquisitions we made in 2017: (i) Hanita Coatings Rural Cooperative Association Limited, an aggregate costIsrael-based pressure-sensitive manufacturer of approximately $232 million and (ii) paying an annual dividend of $1.46 per share for an aggregate amount of approximately $133 million. We have paid quarterly dividends for decades and increased our annual dividend rate per share by over 80% since 2010; most recently, we raised the quarterly dividend rate by 6% in June 2015.

       


    For complete information regarding our 20152018 performance, see "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" — in particular the information contained under the heading "Non-GAAP Financial Measures" — and our audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in our 20152018 Annual Report.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |40

    |2016 Proxy Statement|26

    Table of Contents

    specialty films and laminates; (ii) Yongle Tape Ltd., a China-based manufacturer of specialty tapes and related products used in a variety of industrial markets; and (iii) Finesse Medical Limited, an Ireland-based manufacturer of healthcare products used in the management of wound care and skin conditions. We also made equity investments in two start-up companies developing innovative technological solutions, and negotiated a further equity investment in a small company in which we first invested in 2016, for which payment was made in early 2019.

    Over the last five years, we have allocated over $2 billion to dividends and share repurchases. In 2018, we deployed approximately $568 million to (i) repurchase nearly four million shares at an aggregate cost of nearly $393 million and (ii) pay an annual dividend of $2.01 per share for an aggregate amount of $175 million. We have paid quarterly dividends for decades and most recentlyraised our quarterly dividend rate by 16% in April 2018. Given the lower price of our common stock during the second half of the year, as well as our substantially decreased use of capital for acquisitions and equity investments, we repurchased a significantly greater dollar amount in shares in 2018 compared to prior years.

    CHARTGRAPHIC

    STRONG THREE- AND FIVE-YEAR CUMULATIVE TSR OUTPERFORMANCE

            As shown below, our strong annual total stockholder return (TSR) of approximately 24%despite negative TSR in 2015 contributed to our substantial outperformance in three-year2018, we delivered cumulative TSR for the 2013-20152016-2018 three-year period compared toand the 2014-2018 five-year period that significantly outperformed the S&P 500500® and the median of the S&P 500 Industrials and Materials subsets (we are a member of the Materials subset, but also share many characteristics with members of the Industrials subset; investors have advisedinformed us that they look at both subsets in evaluating our relative performance)performance, as we do internally). TSR measures the return that we have provided to our stockholders, including stock price appreciation and dividends paid (assuming reinvestment thereof)of dividends).


    Three-Year Cumulative        We believe that our longer-term TSR
    is a more meaningful measure of our performance than our one-year TSR, which can be significantly impacted by short-term market volatility that may be unrelated to our underlying performance. For example, although we delivered strong performance in 2018 — exceeding the high end of our adjusted EPS guidance for the year — our 2018 TSR was negative.

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

            For the 2011-2015 five-year period, our cumulative TSR was above the peer company median but below the S&P 500; annual TSR was higher than both groups in three of the five years, including significant outperformance in 2015.

    TOTAL STOCKHOLDER RETURN 

     2011 2012 2013 2014 1-Year
    TSR
     3-Year
    TSR
     5-Year
    TSR

    AVY

     -30.2% 26.2% 47.5% 6.2%  23.8% 93.9%  70.8%

    S&P 500

     2.1% 16.0% 32.4% 13.7%  1.4% 52.6%  80.8%

    S&P Indus. & Mats.* (median)

     -3.3% 19.3% 39.9% 11.3%  -7.2% 49.0%  67.2%

    1-, 3- and 5-YEAR TSR

     2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 3-Year
    TSR
     5-Year
    TSR

    AVY

        6.2% 23.8% 14.6% 66.7% (20.3)% 52.3% 100.2%

    S&P 500

     13.7%    1.4% 12.0% 21.8%    (4.4)% 30.4%    50.3%

    S&P 500 Indus. & Mats.* (median)

     11.8% (4.5)% 20.0% 26.9% (15.5)% 35.2%    48.9%
    *
    Based on companies in subsets as of December 31, 2015.2018.

    2015Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |41


    Table of Contents

    2018 SAY-ON-PAY VOTE AND STOCKHOLDER FEEDBACK DURING 2018 ENGAGEMENT

            Our Board and managementWe continued their long-standingour practice of openmaintaining proactive ongoing dialogue with stockholders in 2015. We2018. The Committee made significant changes to our executive compensation program in 2014recent years — including replacing regular grants of stock options and 2015 (described in the chart below)time-vesting restricted stock units (RSUs) with performance-based market-leveraged stock units (MSUs), capping Annual Incentive Plan (AIP) awards at 200% of target, and establishing additional guardrails on PU and MSU performance criteria — to address direct feedback from our stockholders and more closely align our long-term incentiveexecutive compensation program with our financial profile and business strategies. These changes demonstratestrategies, demonstrating the Committee's commitment to paypaying for performance and their responsivenessbeing responsive to stockholder feedback.

    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|27

    Table In 2018, during our ongoing stockholder engagement program, we discussed our executive compensation program with some of Contentsour stockholders, who generally expressed support for its current structure.

    Results and Analysis of 20152018 Vote

            At the 20152018 Annual Meeting, approximately 92%93% of our stockholders approved, on an advisory basis, our 2014 executive compensation. ThisThe level of support returned to the level we received in 2013, after having fallen to approximately 70% in 2014, below what we and the Committee deemed acceptable. During dialogue with our stockholders in connectionwas consistent with the 2014 Annual Meeting,high approval rates we determined that there was a need to highlighthave received in the significant impact on our long-term pay-and-performance alignment of our relatively poor performance in 2011, which represented the inflection point in our turnaround. We also determined that we needed to better explain market-leveraged stock units (MSUs), the new equity award vehicle adopted by the Committee based on the expert advice and recommendation of its independent compensation consultant, Towers Watson.

            To address the feedback we received and to provide additional disclosure on certain aspects of our executive compensation program, we filed supplemental proxy materials in April 2014 and 2015. These materials described the transformation of our businesses since 2011 and the resulting strong TSR outperformance during the 2012-2014 period compared to the S&P 500. We also provided additional disclosure on our compensation program, particularly relating to MSUs, which replaced stock options and restricted stock units (RSUs) to reduce our burn rate and make our long-term incentive program fully performance based. This change served to better support our business transformation and to address stockholder concerns. During 2014 and 2015, we made several changes to our compensation program based on the feedback we received, which are described underRecent Compensation Changes on the following pages.

    last three years. The Compensation Committee believes that the 92%our high approval of our 2015 say-on-pay vote,rates in recent years, along with the positive feedback we received during our engagement with stockholders, indicates theirreflects strong support of the changes to our compensation program made in 2014 and 2015,recent years, as well as the improvedour consistently improving CD&A disclosure contained in our 2015 proxy statement.disclosure.

    Ongoing Stockholder Engagement Process

            We value stockholder feedback on our executive compensation policies and practices, and we actively solicit inputseek it through our stockholder engagement program. Our ongoing engagement program beginsregarding these matters takes place throughout the year, generally as shown in the springgraphic below.

    GRAPHIC

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |42


    Table of each year,Contents

    Feedback During 2018 Engagement

            We continued our longstanding practice of ongoing dialogue with stockholders in 2018. In advance of the filing2018 Annual Meeting, we contacted our 35 largest institutional stockholders, representing over 55% of our proxy statement. After we filethen-outstanding shares. Board members, including our proxy statementLead Independent Director, and supplementary proxy materials with the SEC, we reach out to our largest investors (generally representing 50-70% of our shares outstanding as of the record date), sharing these materials and offering members of management and/or the Board for a meetingwere made available to discuss our executive compensationanswer questions and answer questionsaddress concerns regarding the items being brought before the Annual Meeting. On the dayWhile we received responses from stockholders representing over 28% of the Annual Meeting, we discuss preliminary vote results with our Board, following up with a more detailed analysisthen-outstanding shares, none of the vote results, including feedback from investors and views of proxy advisory firms, with Committees of the Board in the summer.them desired to substantively engage at that time.

            In the summer and fall, we again reach out to our largest investors to discuss executive compensation without the time pressures associated with proxy season; these more general discussions allow us to hear what issues are important to our stockholders. In the winter, as we prepare for the following proxy season, we review the feedback from our fall outreach effort with management and our Board and consider whether any changes to our executive compensation program are advisable. We also keep investor feedback in mind as we prepare our next proxy statement, enhancing or clarifying our disclosure as appropriate.

            Our Board and management continued their long-standing practice of open dialogue with stockholders in 2015. In advance of the 2015 Annual Meeting, we proactively contacted our thirty41 largest institutional stockholders, representing overnearly 60% of our then-outstanding shares, to solicit their views onrequest a meeting with members of our executive compensation program and make directors and management available to answer questions Board and/or address concerns.management. As a result of this effort,these efforts, we engaged in telephonic discussionsreceived responses from stockholders representing nearly 30% of our then-outstanding shares and spoke with stockholders representing approximately 35%over 25% of our then-outstanding shares. In addition, after oneWe substantively engaged with every stockholder who requested to do so and included our Lead Independent Director (who is also a member of our directors and members of management metthe Committee, as well as the Governance Committee) in person with four of our largest stockholders and the two leading proxy advisory firms in the fall of 2014, we followed up on these meetings with as-needed engagement during 2015.engagements upon stockholder request.

            During 2015With respect to matters related to executive compensation during our 2018 stockholder engagement, we discussed our stockholders expressed support forapproach to human capital management, in particular our leadership development and succession planning processes, as well as the substantial changes made tolinkage between our executive compensation program in response to our low 2014 say-on-pay result and stockholder feedback (as describedbusiness strategies. We also commented on the following pages), which they felt enhanced pay-for-performance linkagerobust oversight provided by the Committee.

    2018 NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS (NEOs)

            In this CD&A and more closely aligned the interestsExecutive Compensation Tables section of our executives with those of our stockholders. In addition, they appreciated the more graphical and streamlined disclosure in our 2015this proxy statement. Investors requested additionalstatement, we provide compensation information regarding the EVA performance objective used for our grants of performance units (PUs) over the past few years; responsive disclosure has been included in this CD&A.

    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|28

    Table of Contents

    RECENT COMPENSATION CHANGES

            The Committee discussed the feedback received from our stockholders with management and Towers Watson, taking several actions to address stockholder concerns. These changes, which2018 NEOs, who are describedidentified in the chart below, demonstrate the Committee's ongoing evaluation of our executive compensation program and willingness to make adjustments to reflect feedback received from stockholders and changes in our company's financial profile and business strategies.below.

    ISSUE
    STOCKHOLDER FEEDBACK
    ACTIONS TAKEN BY COMMITTEE2018 NEOs
    CHANGES MADE IN 2013


    Share Utilization




    Our burn rate (the three-year average of the sum of stock options and time-vesting restricted stock units (RSUs) granted during the year plus MSUs and PUs vested during the year, divided by the weighted average of common shares outstanding) at the end of 2012 was above 2%

    Our dilution (outstanding equity awards divided by the weighted average of common shares outstanding) at the end of 2012 was over 10%






    Suspended regular grants of stock options given impact on share usage relative to full-value awards

    Began granting cash-based incentives to lower-level management to more conservatively manage share usage and reduce dilutive impact to stockholders

    As a result of these changes, our burn rate and dilution at the end of 2015 had significantly decreased to 0.4% and 4.0%, respectively

    Performance-Based
    Nature of LTI Awards


    Program included stock options, which some stockholders and proxy advisory firms did not view as performance based

    Program included RSUs, which are not performance based


    Replaced regular grants of stock options and RSUs with performance-based MSUs, which vest over one-, two-, three- and four-year performance periods (with an average vesting period of 2.5 years) based on our absolute TSR

    Increased allocation of three-year cliff-vesting performance units (PUs) from 40% of long-term incentive (LTI) to 50%

    Suspended regular grants of time-vesting RSUs to executives

    These changes made our long-term incentive program fully performance based

    Single Performance
    Objective for PUs



    Single performance objective could unduly focus management on that measure to the exclusion of other measures of performance


    Reintroduced cumulative EVA as a second performance objective for PUs (in addition to relative TSR), weighted 50% for our corporate NEOs (based on our company as a whole) and 75% for our business group NEOs (based on their respective business group), to motivate our NEOs to achieve profitable growth as well as increase stockholder value
    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|29

    Table of Contents

    ISSUENAME
     STOCKHOLDER FEEDBACK
    ACTIONS TAKEN BY COMMITTEETITLE
    Mitchell R. ButierPresident & Chief Executive Officer
    CHANGES MADE IN 2014 AND 2015Gregory S. LovinsSenior Vice President & Chief Financial Officer

    PU
    Performance Criteria
    Georges Gravanis


     

    Potential for above-target payouts in periods of negative absolute TSR


    Capped the payout for the relative TSR component of PUs at 100% of target for any three-year performance period in which absolute TSR is negative to prevent management from being unduly enriched when stockholders experience loss, while still incenting executives to deliver relatively strong performance during challenging economic periodsPresident, Label and Graphic Materials

    MSU
    Performance Criteria
    Susan C. Miller

     

    Vesting of MSUs at threshold with TSR of -30% and vesting of MSUs at target where TSR is flat


    Increased threshold performance level for absolute TSR from -30% to -15% and target performance level from flat TSR to TSR of 10%. The performance level required for maximum payout was proportionally adjusted from TSR of 100% to 75%. Previous performance criteria for threshold and target payouts appropriately reflected the business transformation underway when the MSU program began; more stringent threshold and target performance criteria reflect our improved financial profile and business strategiesSenior Vice President, General Counsel & Secretary

    MSU
    Vesting Schedule
    Deon M. Stander


     
    Vice President & General Manager,
    Long-term incentives vesting ratably, including one-year performance periods


    Clarified disclosure to reflect that MSUs vest based on one-, two-, three-Retail Branding and four-year performance periods, with an average vesting period of 2.5 years. Emphasized MSUs were designed to advance retention objective because they replaced stock options and RSUs (both of which had annual vesting opportunities) and balance PUs (which cliff-vest after three years)

    Maximum Potential
    AIP Award


    Combination of maximum financial modifier of 200% and maximum individual modifier of 150% could result in outsize AIP award of 300%


    Capped AIP awards at 200% of target (financial modifier and individual modifier combined) for all NEOs, consistent with our historical practice for our CEO. This cap has now been extended to all AIP participants

    AIP
    Individual Modifier



    Committee's evaluation of NEO performance could increase AIP awards in seemingly discretionary manner


    Committed to providing greater transparency of individual modifier components for CEO, consistent with disclosure in our 2014 supplemental proxy materials and 2015 proxy statement

    Above-Median
    Benchmarking


    Base salaries targeted at the lower end of the third quartile and closer to the market median


    Confirmed practice of targeting base salaries at the market median. Continued emphasizing that total direct compensation is targeted at the median

    Hedging and
    Pledging Policy



    Despite historical record of no hedging or pledging by officers or directors, had not formally prohibited such activities given pending SEC regulations


    Amended insider trading policy expressly to prohibit hedging and pledging by directors and officersInformation Solutions

    CEO TRANSITION

            In October 2014, Mr. Scarborough resigned from the office of President and Mr. Butier was elected by our Board as President and COO effective November 1, 2014. Mr. Butier served in both these roles throughout 2015, resigning from his additional position of CFO in March 2015 in connection with the appointment of Anne Bramman as our Senior Vice President and CFO. In February 2016, after having discussed CEO transition matters during executive session at all but the first meeting held during 2015, our Board determined to elect Mr. Butier as President and CEO effective May 1, 2016, succeeding Mr. Scarborough in the CEO role at that time. The independent directors of our Board also determined to elect, subject to his election by our stockholders, Mr. Scarborough as Executive Chairman of our Board also effective May 1, 2016. In recognition of responsibilities in these respective roles, as well as the advice of its independent compensation consultant, Willis Towers Watson, the Committee made the following decisions:

      For Mr. Butier, increase his base salary from $765,000 to $1,100,000 effective May 1, 2016; raise his 2016 target AIP and LTI opportunities from 90% and 300%, respectively, to 125% and 400%, respectively (the AIP opportunity will be prorated based on the portion of the year for which he serves as President and COO and the portion for which he serves as President and CEO); and, consistent with similar promotion grants to CEOs in the market, grant him an option to
    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|30

    Table of Contents

        purchase shares of our common stock with a grant date fair value of approximately $2,000,000 on June 1, 2016, which will vest 50% on each of the third and fourth anniversaries of the date of grant. This equity grant provides for realizable gains that align directly with the long-term appreciation of our common stock and intentionally differs from our annual LTI awards to underscore its special purpose and one-time nature. Mr. Butier's new target total direct compensation (TDC) of $6,875,000 is less than the market median; the Committee believes that positioning his compensation at the 40th percentile acknowledges that he will be new to the CEO role yet compensates him within a reasonable CEO market range.

      For Mr. Scarborough, decrease his base salary from $1,125,000 to $875,000 effective May 1, 2016 and decrease his 2016 target AIP and LTI opportunities from 125% and 450%, respectively, to 100% and 300%, respectively (the AIP opportunity will be prorated based on the portion of the year for which he serves as Chairman and CEO and the portion for which he serves as Executive Chairman). Mr. Scarborough's 2016 target TDC of $4,375,000 is at (i) the market median for an executive chairman role and (ii) represents a 45% decrease from his current target TDC of $7,593,750. The Committee believes that in his new role as Executive Chairman, Mr. Scarborough will provide critical leadership experience and mentorship to facilitate a smooth CEO transition.

      For 2017, Mr. Scarborough's base salary is expected to be further reduced to $230,000; he is not expected to be eligible to participate in the AIP; and his annual LTI opportunity is expected to be valued at approximately $140,000, the same as that of our non-employee directors. Mr. Scarborough's anticipated 2017 target TDC of $370,000 is expected to be at the market median for a non-executive chairman.

    OVERVIEW OF PAY PHILOSOPHY AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION COMPONENTS

            The Committee has designed ourOur executive compensation program to reflect itsreflects the Committee's philosophy that a substantial majority of compensation should be tied to our success in meeting predeterminedour performance objectives and positively influencing stock price appreciation,creating stockholder value, providing higher compensation when we deliver superior, sustained performance. The objective of this strategy is to motivate our executives to achieve our annual and long-term financial goals and recognize their contributions into delivering strong corporate and/or business group performance.

    The Committee implements thisits pay-for-performance philosophy and incents our executives by following three key principles:primarily through the following:

      Positioning target TDCEstablishing total direct compensation (TDC) to incent economic and each component thereof atstockholder value creation, giving consideration to the market median giving consideration toof companies similar in size, scope and complexity with which we compete for executive talent, role responsibilities, individual performance, tenure, retention, succession and market factors;succession;

      Aligning our annual incentive awardsincentives for executives with our company's annual operating plan and key financial and strategic objectives that are predetermined and objectively measurable;goals; and

      Rewarding long-term performance using absolute and relative TSR, as well as cumulative EVA all of which, to focus our executives on consistent and sustainable stockholder value creation.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |43


    Table of Contents

            Our incentiveIncentive compensation for 2015the year consisted of a target award opportunities under our AIP and our LTI awards,compensation program, with payouts determined based on our performance against goals established by the Committee in February 2015.2018. The Committee structures annual incentive compensation to reward NEOs based on corporate and/or business group performance as well as their individual contributions, to motivate them and align their compensation with stockholder interests.interests, giving consideration to their individual contributions in achieving our financial results. Our long-term incentive compensationLTI awards provide upside opportunity for exceeding performance targets and downside risk up(up to and including cancellation,cancellation) for failing to achieve threshold performance, with EVA targets consistent with our externally communicated long-term financial goals for earnings growth and ROTC. AIP targets generallyare established at or above the midpoint of the guidance we give to our stockholders on our anticipated annual guidanceperformance and consistent with the achievement of our long-term financial goals.

    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|31

    Table of Contents


    Elements of Total Direct Compensation for Corporate NEOs

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

            As shown in red in the following graph below, the substantial majority of our Current NEOs' 2018 target TDC in 2015 was performance-based and at risk.


    2015 Target Total Direct Compensation Mix
    performance-based.

    CHARTGRAPHIC

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |44

    |2016 Proxy Statement|32

    Table of Contents

            Over the past five years, our cumulative TSR has increased over 70%by 100% while the total compensation of our CEO'sCEO decreased by approximately 28%. In the graph below, CEO pay reflects the compensation has increased only 18%. Seeof our former CEO, Mr. Scarborough, for 2014 and 2015, and theSummary Compensation Table in this proxy statement for more information. compensation of our current CEO, Mr. Butier, from 2016 to 2018.


    Five-Year CEO Pay and Cumulative TSR

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |45

    |2016 Proxy Statement|33

    Table of Contents

    STRONG COMPENSATION GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

            Our executive compensation program incorporates the following best practices shown below, which we believethe Committee believes ensure that it serves the long-term interests of our stockholders.

    POLICY OR BEST PRACTICE
     DESCRIPTION AND BENEFIT TO OUR STOCKHOLDERS
    PAY FOR PERFORMANCE
    Median TargetingCompensation Primarily Performance-Based TDC (base salary + annual cash incentive opportunity + long-term equity incentive opportunity) and the components thereof are targeted at the median of companies similar in size, scope and complexity, giving consideration to responsibilities, individual performance, tenure, retention, succession and market factors.
    Majority of Compensation
    Performance-Based
    For 2015, 85%86% of our CEO's target TDC and an70% of the average of 70%target TDC of our other Current NEOs' target TDCNEOs for 2018 was tied to company performance and at risk ofsubject to cancellation if our performance is poor.
    Capped Annual Incentive
    Set At or Above
    Midpoint of Guidance


    Annual cash incentive compensationAIP award is based primarily on our achievement of performance objectives targeted at or above the midpoint of our annual guidance and consistent with our long-term financial goals, and secondarilysubject to downward discretion based on the Committee's assessment of our NEOs'CEO's achievement of his predetermined and objectively measurable strategic objectives,goals and our other NEOs' individual contributions, with AIP awards capped at 200% of target.target and individual modifiers for our NEOs generally capped at 100%.
    Majority Long-Term Equity
    Incentive Compensation

    Our equity-based incentiveLTI awards emphasize long-term performance, with PUs cliff-vesting at the end of three years and MSUs having an average vestingperformance period of 2.5 years. Equity compensation aligns NEO interests with stockholder interests by delivering compensation dependentbased on our long-term performance and stockholder value creation.
    Median TargetingTDC (base salary + annual cash incentive opportunity + LTI equity opportunity) and its elements are targeted at the median of companies similar in size, global scope and complexity, giving consideration to role responsibilities, individual performance, tenure, retention, and succession.
    No Annual Stock Options Given their past adverse impact on our burn rate and related stockholder feedback, we last made a regular grant of stock options in 2012.2012, though stock options may be granted for special purposes such as promotion.
    BEST PRACTICES
    No Employment
    AgreementsContracts

    Our NEOs are employed at will.
    Rigorous Stock
    Ownership GuidelinesPolicy

    Our CEO is currently required to obtain and maintain shares equal to the lesser of 5x6x his annual salary or 95,000 shares; he currently owns sharessalary; at the end of 2018, Mr. Butier owned stock with a market value greater than 28 timesof approximately 15x his annual salary. Our other NEOs are required to maintain ownership of at least 3x their annual base salaries. All of our Current NEOs arewere in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines.policy at the end of 2018.
    No Hedging
    or Pledging

    Our insider trading policy prohibits our directorsofficers and employees from hedging — and our officers from hedging or pledging — our common stock and all our Current NEOs arecomplied with the policy in 2018.
    Limited Trading WindowsOur NEOs may only transact our common stock during approved trading windows after satsifying the clearance requirements under our insider trading policy, which includes certifying that they will remain in compliance with our stock ownership guidelines after giving effect to the policy.transaction they plan to effectuate.
    Low Burn Rate
    and Dilution

    Our three-year average burn rate and dilutionof 0.8% at the end of fiscal year 2015 were 0.4% and 4.0%, respectively.2018 was at the 50th percentile of the companies in the S&P 500.
    Clawback Policy Cash and equity incentive compensation is subject to clawback in the event of fraud or other intentional misconduct on the part of an NEO that necessitates a restatement of our financial results.
    No Excise Tax
    Gross Ups

     
    We dowould not gross-up payments received in connection with termination following a change of control for excise taxes.
    Double Trigger
    Equity Vesting
     Equity awards granted after April 2012 wouldare not be accelerated on change of control, unless the NEO is terminated without cause or terminates employment for good reason within 24 months thereof.
    No Repricing/Exchange of
    Underwater Stock Options

     
    Our stock option and incentive plan prohibitsequity plans prohibit the repricing/repricing or exchange of underwater options without stockholder approval.
    Limited
    Perquisites
     Other than a capped financial planning reimbursement and our payment for an annual physical examination, our corporate NEOs receive a flat taxable executive benefit allowance in lieu of enumerated perquisites that is not subject to any tax gross-up.
    Reasonable
    Severance Benefits

     
    Severance formula:formula requires qualifying termination:
    CEO: 2x (annual salary + highest AIP award in last three years + cash value of 12 months of health insurance premiums)
    Other Current NEOsOthers: 1x (annual salary + highest AIP award in last three years + cash value of 12 months of health insurance premiums)
    Reasonable Change of
    Control Benefits
     Change of Control Severance Formula (requiresformula requires qualifying termination within 24 months of a change of control):control:
    CEO: 3x (annual salary + highest AIP award in last three years + cash value of 12 months of health insurance premiums) + prorated AIP award for year of termination
    Other Current NEOsOthers: 2x (annual salary + highest AIP award in last three years + cash value of 12 months of health insurance premiums) + prorated AIP award for year of termination
    STRONG GOVERNANCE
    Independent
    Oversight

     
    The Committee is comprised solely of independent directors and its executive compensation decisions are reviewed and ratified by all of our independent directors.

    Independent
    Expert Advice
    Compensation Consultant

     

    Willis Towers Watson, (formerly Towers Watson), which has been determined by the Committee to be independent and free of conflicts of interest, provides the Committee with expert executive compensation advice.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |46

    |2016 Proxy Statement|34

    Table of Contents

    SUMMARY OF COMPENSATION DECISIONS FOR 20152018

            The Committee targetsdesigns executive compensation to pay for performance, with the target TDC forof NEOs atestablished to incent strong financial performance and stockholder value creation, giving consideration to the market median of companies similar in size, global scope and complexity with which we compete for executive talent, giving consideration torole responsibilities, individual performance, tenure, retention succession and market factors.succession. This compensation is primarily performance-based, meaning that our executives may ultimately not realize some or all of these components of compensation if we fail to achieve our financial objectives. In 2018, approximately 86% and 70% of the TDC includes base salary, target AIP opportunity and target LTI opportunity. The Committee believes this positioning is appropriate given our business portfolio mix, product diversity and the global nature of our operations, which requireCEO and average of our executives to have a wide range of business leadership experience and skills.other NEOs, respectively, was performance-based.

            In determining 20152018 NEO compensation, the Committee gave consideration toconsidered the following:

        Company/Business Performance — Our company's overall operational and financial performance, including our 20152018 adjusted sales growth, adjusted EPS, and free cash flow as well asfor our corporate NEOs, and, for our business NEOs, the performance of our two largest business segments;their respective business;

        Stockholder AlignmentReturns — Our TSR on an absolute basis, as well as relative to a predetermined listgroup of peer group companies;

        Annual Individual Performance — Each NEO's individualOur CEO's performance against the predetermined and objectively measurable strategic objectives established for themhim at the beginning of the year;year and the individual contributions of our other NEOs;

        Competitiveness — Market pay practices and company performance relative to the competitive marketplace;peers; and

        Responsiveness to Investors — The results of our 20152018 say-on-pay vote and feedback on our executive compensation received during the course of our ongoing stockholder engagement program.

            The key elements of 20152018 NEO target TDC are showndescribed in the following table.table shown below. While we provide consistent, market-competitive total direct compensationTDC opportunities for our NEOs, the actual compensation they realize varies year-to-year based primarily on company and business performance; for 2018, the incentive compensation realized by our company'sNEOs was based solely on such performance.

            In determining Mr. Butier's 2018 compensation, the Committee focused on his target LTI compensation rather than incremental cash increases to his base salary or target AIP award to bring his TDC closer to the market median. This approach reflects the Committee's pay-for-performance philosophy by using performance-based equity to further incent our CEO to deliver top quartile long-term stockholder value creation.

    20152018 TOTAL DIRECT COMPENSATION (TDC)
    COMPONENT
     DESCRIPTION
     DECISIONS IMPACTING 20152018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
    FIXED

    Base Salary

    14% of TDC for CEO; Avg. 30% of TDC for Other NEOs

    Provides fixed, market competitive monthly income for performing daily responsibilitiesThe Committee approved limited salary increases for our NEOs of approximately 3%, consistent with the average increase for our U.S. employees, except for (i) Mr. Butier, whose base salary was not increased for the reasons described above, and (ii) Mr. Lovins, whose base salary was increased by 9% to move his salary closer to the market median after he completed a year of service as our CFO.
    PERFORMANCE-BASED CASH

    Target AIP Award

    Capped at 200% of target

    18% of TDC for CEO;
    Avg. 20% of TDC for Other NEOs

    Provides variable, cash-based incentive to motivate our executives to grow sales, increase profitability and deliver strong free cash flow consistent with our annual financial goals

    AIP opportunity based on market survey data; financial modifier based on corporate or business performance; capped individual modifier based on our CEO's achievement against predetermined and objectively measurable strategic objectives and our other NEOs' individual contributions

    The only change to NEO target AIP opportunities in 2018 was an increase in Mr. Lovins' target AIP opportunity from 60% to 75% of base salary to move his annual incentive closer to the market median after he completed a year of service as our CFO.

    Our company or business performance resulted in financial modifiers of 123%, 116% and 144% for our corporate NEOs, LGM business NEO (Mr. Gravanis) and RBIS business NEO (Mr. Stander), respectively.

    The individual modifiers for our CEO and other NEOs are generally capped at 100% (rather than the 150% applicable to other AIP participants) to focus their efforts on delivering long-term company and business performance. The Committee approved individual modifiers of 100% for all NEOs for 2018.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |47


    Table of Contents

    2018 TOTAL DIRECT COMPENSATION (TDC)
    COMPONENT
    DESCRIPTION
    DECISIONS IMPACTING 2018 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
            
    PERFORMANCE-BASED EQUITY

    Target
    LTI Awards

    66%68% of TDC for CEOCEO;
    Avg. 51%50% of TDC for
    Other Current NEOs




     
    Provides variable, equity-based incentive compensation to align NEO interests with stockholder interests and drive long-term value creation

    LTI opportunity based on market survey data; award vehicles, performance criteria and weightings based oninformed by expert advice and recommendations of Willis Towers Watson

     LTI Awards Granted in 20152018

    There were noThe only changes to NEO target LTI opportunities for 2015, other than:2018 were (i) an increase in Mr. Butier's target LTI opportunity from 200%425% to 300% in connection with475% of base salary to move his election as President and Chief Operating OfficerTDC closer to the market median for the reasons described above and (ii) for 2015 only, increasesan increase in Mr. Lovins' target LTI opportunity from 180% to 200% of 40% for Mr. Gravanis, 30% for Ms. Hill, and around 10% for Messrs. Butier and Neville, reflectingbase salary to move his LTI closer to the impact their leadership had in contributing tomarket median after he completed a year of service as our strong financial performance in 2014.CFO.

    50% in PUs that cliff-vest at the end of a three-year period subjectwith payout ranging from zero to our achieving at least200% based on the threshold levelachievement of performance for the cumulative EVA and relative TSR performance objectives established for the respective NEO's award. To reflect stockholder feedback, theThe payout for the TSR component is now capped at 100% of target for any three-year performance period in which absolute TSR is negative. No otherThere were no changes to the performance objectives or weightings from 2014.the prior year for our corporate NEOs.

    50% in MSUs that vest based on our absolute TSR over one-, two-, three- and four-year performance periods, with an average vestingperformance period of 2.5 years. To reflect stockholder feedback and reflect our improved financial profile and business strategies, the Committee revisedConsistent with recent years, the performance criteria to make them more challenging:were as follows: (i) the threshold performance level for absolute TSR, increased from -30% to -15%which results in a payout at vesting of 85%, andwas (15)%; (ii) the target performance level, increased from flat TSR to requiringwhich results in a payout at vesting of 100%, requires a TSR of 10%. The Committee also proportionally adjusted; and (iii) the maximum performance level, which results in a payout level for threshold performance from 70% to 85% and theat vesting of 200%, requires a TSR required for a maximum payout from 100% toof 75%.




    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|35

    Table of Contents



    LTI Awards Vesting in 2018
    2015 TOTAL DIRECT COMPENSATION (TDC)
    COMPONENT
    DESCRIPTION
    DECISIONS IMPACTING 2015 EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

     

     

    LTI Awards Vesting in 2015

    2016-2018 PUs: Our 2016-2018 TSR was at the 9382rdth percentile of anthe objectively determined peer group established at the time of grant.in February 2016. Cumulative EVA for our company was $308.2 million. As a result,approximately $755 million, exceeding the maximum level of performance. Cumulative EVA for our LGM and RBIS businesses also exceeded their respective maximum level of performance. The PUs granted in 2013 vested2016 for the 2016-2018 performance period paid out at 200% of target for our corporate NEOs and our business group Current NEO (Mr. Gravanis) for the 2013-2015 performance period.all NEOs.

    4th Tranche of MSUs granted in 2015:

    Payout

                    2015-2018 Absolute TSR = 95%
                    Paid out at vesting200% of target for MSUs is determined based on the following formula:all NEOs

    (stock price at settlement + reinvested dividends during the period)
    stock price at grant

    3rd Tranche payout forof MSUs granted in 2013
    2016
    :

    ($59.74 + $4.80)/$36.00

                    2016-2018 Absolute TSR = 1.79

    67%

    Paid out at 179%188% of target for all NEOs

    2nd Tranche payout forof MSUs granted in 20142017:

    ($59.74 + $3.21)/$50.24

                    2017-2018 Absolute TSR = 1.25

    34%

    Paid out at 125%137% of target for all NEOs

    1st Tranche payout forof MSUs granted in 20152018

    ($59.74 + $1.49)/$52.74 = 1.16:

    Under the revised payout scale approved for 2015 MSU grants, the TSR range between target and maximum payouts decreased from 100% (reflecting flat TSR to TSR increase of 100%) to 65% (reflecting 10% TSR to 75% TSR); as a result, every one percentage point increase in TSR above 10% equates to a 1.54% increase in payout.

    (1.16 – 1.10) × 1.54 + 1 = 1.09

    Paid out at 109% of target

    PERFORMANCE-BASED CASH

    Target
    AIP Award

    Capped at 200% of target

    19% of TDC for CEO
    Avg. 19% of TDC for
    Other Current NEOs




    Provides variable, cash-based incentive to motivate our executives to grow sales, increase profitability and deliver strong free cash flow consistent with our long-term financial objectives

    AIP opportunity based on market survey data; financial modifier based on corporate and/or business group performance; individual modifier based on predetermined and measurable strategic objectives

     There were no changes in previously-serving NEO target AIP opportunities for 2015, except for (i) an increase in Mr. Butier's target AIP opportunity from 75% to 90% in connection with his election as President and COO and (ii) an increase in Mr. Gravanis' target AIP opportunity from 50% to 60% in connection with his election as President, Materials Group.

    Our company and/or business group performance resulted in financial modifier for CEO and other corporate Current NEOs of 123% and financial modifier for business group Current NEO of 161%.

    Individual NEO performance warranted modifiers within the range of 100% to 125%, reflecting their performance against their strategic objectives established at the beginning of 2015.

    The Committee determined AIP awards within the range of 110% to 154% of target.

                     2018 Absolute TSR = (19)% for all NEOs
                     Cancelled for failure to achieve threshold level of performance
    FIXED

    Base Salary

    15% of TDC for CEO
    Avg. 30% of TDC for
    Other Current NEOs

    Provides fixed, market competitive monthly income for performing daily responsibilitiesExcluding promotions and initial appointments, the Committee provided NEOs limited salary increases of around 2%, consistent with the average increase for U.S. employees.
    20152018 TDC TARGETED AT MEDIAN

            In addition to thesethe primary elements of our executive compensation program described above, we also provide our NEOs with limited perquisites and benefits that the Committee believes are comparable to those offered by other multinational public companies.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |48

    |2016 Proxy Statement|36

    Table of Contents

    DISCUSSION OF COMPENSATION COMPONENTS AND
    DECISIONS IMPACTING 20152018 COMPENSATION

            The Committee aims to have base salaries at or around the market median, with the substantial majority of NEO compensation consisting of incentive compensation to advance the Committee's pay-for-performance philosophy. This methodology drivesphilosophy, driving higher realized compensation when our financial performance is stronger and lower realized compensation when our financial performance is weaker. In addition, itprioritizing pay-for-performance provides the Committee with the flexibility to respond to changing business conditions, manage compensation in accordance withto reflect career progression, and adjust compensation to reflect differences in executive experience and performance.

    BASE SALARY

            Increases in base salary are generally driven bybased on the average percentage merit increase providedgiven to our U.S. employees, subject to marginal increase or decrease based on the NEO's performance and the market median for positions with similar scope and responsibility. In February 2015,2018, the Committee approved a 2% base salary increaseincreases of approximately 3% for our then-serving NEOs, consistent with the average increase for our U.S. employees. Ms. Bramman's initialemployees, except for (i) Mr. Butier, whose base salary was approved in connection with her election as Senior Vice Presidentnot increased for the reasons described above, and CFO and(ii) Mr. Gravanis'sLovins, whose base salary was increased from $330,957by 9% to $500,160 in connection withmove his promotionsalary closer to President, Materials Group. Mr. Gravanis' base salary was converted from Euros to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate as of our fiscal year-end. Base salaries for these two NEOs fell around the market median for roles with similar scope and responsibility.after he completed a year of service as our CFO.

    20152018 AIP AWARDS

            The 20152018 AIP was designed to incent management to create long-term stockholder value. NEOs are not eligible for guaranteed AIP awards. AIP awards are determined for each fiscal year using the following formula:formula below.In contrast to the general AIP formula shown, individual modifiers for NEOs are generally capped at 100% (although the Committee retains the discretion to determine higher individual modifiers up to 150%).

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

    2015 Target AIP Opportunities

            As a percentage of 20152018 year-end base salary, the target AIP opportunities for 20152018 were 125% for Mr. Scarborough; 90% for Mr. Butier; 75% for Mr. Neville;Messrs. Gravanis and Lovins; 60% for Mses. BrammanMs. Miller; and Hill; and 57%50% for Mr. Gravanis. TheStander. In February 2018, Mr. Lovins' target AIP opportunities for previously-serving NEOs were unchanged from last year, except for Mr. Butier's, whichopportunity was increased from 75%60% to 90%75% of base salary in connection withto move his electionannual incentive closer to the market median after he completed a year of service as President and COO. The opportunity for Mr. Gravanis was prorated based on his previous AIP opportunityour CFO.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |49


    Table of 50% and his current AIP opportunity of 60%.Contents

    2015 AIP Performance Objectives and WeightingsWeightings; Target-Setting Principles

            The following performance objectives and weightings for the 20152018 AIP were established and weighted by the Committee, in consultation with Willis Towers Watson. Our CEO, COO, CFO and Chief Human Resources Officer and CFO participated during portions of the meetingmeetings during which the Committee reviewed and recommended performance objectives for our AIP and analyzed our performance against these objectives.

            For our business group NEOs (Messrs. Gravanis and Neville)Stander), the Committee determined to link 75% of the AIP financial modifier to their respective business group'sbusiness' results and 25% to corporate results. The business groupBusiness performance objectives were designed to be achievable only if ourthe respective business groups substantially improved upon their 2014its 2017 performance and delivered results consistent with the achievement of the long-termits 2021 financial targets we announced in May 2012 and May 2014.targets.

    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|37

    Table of Contents2018 AIP TARGETS

    GRAPHICGRAPHIC

            In setting the targets for these objectives, the Committee aimed to (i) ensure consistency with our long-term2021 financial targets and (ii) require adjusted EPSsales growth and free cash flowadjusted EPS improvement from the actual amountsresults achieved in the prior year. These were the same objectives and weightings used for purposes of the 20142017 AIP to continue incenting our NEOs to increase sales on an organic basis, improve profitability, and generate strong free cash flow.

            Target adjusted sales growth was set atconsistent with our 2017-2021 target of 4%+ and slightly lower than what we achieved in 2017, reflecting uncertainty both in the low endretail apparel market served by our RBIS business and in the early success of our long-term target, reflecting top-line challenges in our Retail Brandingtransformation plan to improve the financial performance and Information Solutions (RBIS) segment. The targettrajectory of this business. Target adjusted EPS performance goal was established atabove the midpoint of the annual guidance we announcedgave to investors in January 2015, reflecting the uncertain economic environment at that time2018 and anticipated headwindsrepresented an 18% increase from currency. Targetour 2017 results for this measure. Although we did not externally communicate a free cash flow target as part of our 2021 goals, we expect our businesses to generate strong free cash flow, an important metric used internally and by our investors in evaluating our performance. Our 2018 target for free cash flow was set 5% above9% higher than the annual target of $300 million reflectedfree cash flow we generated in our 2015 financial targets. Because our annual operating plan builds on results for the prior year and takes into account the anticipated business environment — as well as our strategic plans, operational matters and2017, despite a planned increase in capital expenditures to support our AIP targets reflect these factors as well.future growth.

    CORPORATE AIP TARGETS VS. PRIOR YEAR RESULTS
    CORPORATE 2018 AIP TARGETS VS. LONG-TERM TARGETS AND 2017 RESULTS CORPORATE 2018 AIP TARGETS VS. LONG-TERM TARGETS AND 2017 RESULTS
      2014 Results  2015 AIP Target 2017-2021 Long-Term Target 2017 Results 2018 AIP Target
    Adjusted Sales Growth 4.2% 3.0% 4%+ 4.2% 4.1%
    Adjusted EPS $3.11 $3.30
    Adjusted EPS Growth 10%+ $5.00 $5.88
    (18% over 2017)
    Free Cash Flow $185 mil. $315 mil. N/A $422M $460M

    2015 Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |50


    Table of Contents

    Financial Modifiers

            Financial modifiers are capped at 200%. Consistent with prior years, in evaluating our achievement of these performance objectives, the Committee hashad the discretion to exclude the impact, positive or negative, of extraordinary items such as acquisitions and divestitures; restructuring and integration actions not included in our annual net income plan; changes in accounting principles, tax codes or related regulations and rulings; extraordinary events such as natural disasters, terrorism and war; costs related to the early extinguishment of debt; costs of litigation outside the normal course of business; and non-cash charges associated with the impairment of long-lived assets.

            The following table below shows the 2018 AIP financial modifiers for our NEOs for 2015.NEOs. As shown, we exceeded the target level establishedwas exceeded for alltwo of the three performance objectives established for our corporate NEOsNEOs; three of the four performance objectives established for our LGM business NEO; and all four of the performance objectives established for our RBIS business group Current NEO. Our corporate and business group performance resulted in AIP financial modifiers of 123% for our corporate NEOs, and 157%116% for our LGM business group CurrentNEO, and 144% for our RBIS business NEO. Because he was not employed by us at the end of 2015, Mr. Neville was not eligible for a 2015 AIP award.

    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|38

    Table of Contents

    2018 AIP FINANCIAL MODIFIERS
     
     NEO(s)
     PERFORMANCE
    OBJECTIVE

     WEIGHTING
     THRESHOLD
    (50%)

     TARGET
    (100%)

     MAXIMUM
    (200%)

     2018
    ACTUAL

     MODIFIER
     WEIGHTED
    AVERAGE
    MODIFIER

      
      Butier
    Lovins
     Total Company
    Adjusted Sales Growth(1)

     
    20% 2.0% 4.1% 8.3% 5.5% 132%27% 
      Miller Total Company
    Adjusted EPS(2)

     
    60% $5.64 $5.88 $6.48 $6.06 130%78% 
        Total Company
    Free Cash Flow(3)

     
    20% $388M $460M $604M $429M 91%18% 
      Corporate NEO Financial Modifier  123% 
      Gravanis Total Company
    Adjusted EPS(2)

     
    25% $5.64 $5.88 $6.48 $6.06 130%32% 
        LGM
    Adjusted Sales Growth(4)

     
    20% 2.1% 4.2% 8.3% 6.1% 143%29% 
        LGM
    Adjusted Net Income(4)(5)

     
    35% $416M $430M $474M $428M 92%32% 
        LGM
    Free Cash Flow(4)

     
    20% $260M $320M $440M $338M 115%23% 
      LGM Business NEO Financial Modifier  116% 
      Stander Total Company
    Adjusted EPS(2)

     
    25% $5.64 $5.88 $6.48 $6.06 130%32% 
        RBIS
    Adjusted Sales Growth(4)

     
    20% 1.4% 3.5% 8.6% 7.2% 169%34% 
        RBIS
    Adjusted Net Income(4)(5)

     
    35% $103M $110M $125M $118M 155%54% 
        RBIS
    Free Cash Flow(4)

     
    20% $77M $96M $134M $104M 120%24% 
      RBIS Business NEO Financial Modifier  144% 
    2015 NEO AIP FINANCIAL MODIFIERS
     
     NAME
     PERFORMANCE
    OBJECTIVE

     WEIGHTING
     THRESHOLD
    (50%)

     TARGET
    (100%)

     MAXIMUM
    (200%)

     2015
    ACTUAL

     MODIFIER
     WEIGHTED
    AVERAGE
    MODIFIER

      
      Mr. Scarborough
    Mr. Butier
     Total Company
    Adjusted Sales Growth(1)

     
    20% 0.9% 3.0% 7.1% 3.4% 110%22% 
      Ms. Bramman
    Ms. Hill
     Total Company
    Adjusted EPS(2)

     
    60% $3.10 $3.30 $3.70 $3.44 135%81% 
        Total Company
    Free Cash Flow(3)

     
    20% $240M $315M $466M $329M 100%20% 
      Corporate NEO Financial Modifier  123% 
      Mr. Gravanis Total Company
    Adjusted EPS(2)

     
    25% $3.10 $3.30 $3.70 $3.44 135%34% 

         Materials Group
        (MG)
     PSM Segment
    Adjusted Sales Growth(4)

     
    20% 0.8% 2.9% 7.0% 4.1% 130%26% 
        PSM Segment
    Adjusted Net Income(4)(5)

     
    35% $310M $326M $359M $361M 200%70% 
        PSM Segment
    Free Cash Flow(4)

     
    20% $250M $290M $370M $358M 157%31% 
      MG NEO Financial Modifier  157%(6) 
      Mr. Neville Total Company
    Adjusted EPS(2)

     
    25% $3.10 $3.30 $3.70     

         Retail Branding
        and Information
     RBIS Segment
    Adjusted Sales Growth(4)

     
    20% 1.5% 4.1% 9.3%     

         Solutions (RBIS) RBIS Segment
    Adjusted Net Income(4)(5)

     
    35% $63M $72M $81M     
        RBIS Segment
    Free Cash Flow(4)

     
    20% $65M $85M $125M     

    (1)
    Total Company Adjusted Sales Growth refers to reported sales growth of (5.7)%8.2%, excludingadjusted for the unfavorable impactimpacts of currency translation of 8.6%(1.4)% and product line divestituresacquisitions of 0.6%(1.4)%. Although excluded in determining organic sales growth, the impact of the extra week in the prior fiscal year is reflected in adjusted sales growth targets.Total does not sum due to rounding.

    (2)
    Total Company Adjusted EPS refers to reported net income per common share, assuming dilution, of $2.95,$5.28, adjusted for tax-effected restructuring costscharges and other items, pension plan settlements, tax benefit from discrete foreign tax planning action, and TCJA provisional estimate of $0.49.$0.78.

    (3)
    Total Company Free Cash Flow refers to cash flow from operations of $473.7$457.9 million,minus purchases of property, plant and equipment of $135.8$226.7 million and software and other deferred charges of $15.7$29.9 million,plus proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment of $7.6$9.4 million,minusplus purchasesproceeds from insurance and sales (purchases) of investments, net, of $0.5$18.5 million,plus net divestiture-related payments and free cash outflow from discontinued operationspension plan contribution for plan termination of $0.1$200.0 million. Free cash flow wasis measured quarterly to align with business seasonality and focus onensure consistent management of working capital throughout the year, subject to adjustment if the full-year targets weretarget is not achieved. While 2015total company free cash flow exceededwas 93% of target, the measurement of this objective on a quarterly basis, as required by approximately 9%, the average quarterly performanceCommittee to incent consistent delivery of free cash flow throughout the year, resulted in a modifier of 100%.

    91% for that objective.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |51


    Table of Contents

    (4)
    Adjusted sales growth, adjusted net income and free cash flow measures at the segment level are internal metrics. These metrics either exclude or make simplifying assumptions for items that cannot be allocated precisely by segment, such as interest and income tax expenses, and related balance sheet accounts, such as deferred tax assets and liabilities, income tax payables and receivables, and short- and long-term debt. Certain balance sheet accounts such as pension and other postretirement benefits and insurance that are generally managed at the corporate level, as well as the impact of foreign currency translation, are also excluded from the calculation of these metrics for the segments. In certain limited circumstances, one-time items may be excluded from segment adjusted net income. The impact of intercompany sales is included in segment metrics. While 2015 PSM segmentLGM's free cash flow was over 180%106% of target, the averagemeasurement of this objective on a quarterly performancebasis, as required by the Committee to incent consistent delivery of free cash flow throughout the year, resulted in a modifier of 157%.115% for that objective.

    (5)
    Adjusted net income refers to reported net income before taxes, tax-effected at the adjusted tax rate, and adjusted for tax-effected restructuring costscharges and other items.

    (6)
    Financial modifier reduced from 161% Adjusted tax rate is the full-year GAAP tax rate, adjusted to 157%exclude certain unusual or infrequent events that are expected to reflect a reclassification for 2014significantly impact the GAAP tax rate, such as completion of certain liquid short-term bank drafts with maturities greater than 90 daysour 2017 provisional estimate of the impact of the TCJA, impacts related to other current assets. Mr. Gravanis' financial modifier was prorated based on his previous role's financial modifierthe termination of 119%our U.S. pension plan, and his current role's financial modifierthe effects of 157%.discrete tax planning actions.

    2015 NEO Performance Evaluations & Individual Modifiers

            Our NEOs are evaluated on their achievement of strategic objectives reflected in their individual performance plans for the year, with the Committee approving our CEO's goals for the year and our CEO approving the goals of our other NEOs. The NEOs' performance against their objectivesof our NEOs is assessed in February of the following year. For theour NEOs other than ourthe CEO, this assessment considers the totality of their performance rather than assigning specific weightsweightings to each of thetheir performance goals. Individual modifiers for all participants are capped at 150%, subject to the total cap on AIP awards of 200%.

    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|39

            The Committee reviewed and evaluated our CEO's 20152018 performance, taking into account his performance against the predetermined and objectively measurable strategic objectives established at the beginningin February of thethat year, his self-assessment of his performance, and market reference and other data provided by Willis Towers Watson. Our CEO is not involved in the decisions regarding his own compensation, which are determined by the Committee meeting in executive session with Willis Towers Watson. The Committee determined the individual modifier for our CEO based on its assessment of his performance.performance, within the context of the caps described above.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |52


    Table of Contents

            For 2015,2018, the Committee evaluated the performance of our CEO, determining that he metsubstantially achieved or exceeded foureach of his strategic objectives and nearly achievedfor the strategic objectives related to the RBIS and Vancive segments,year, as shown below:in the chart below.






    2015 CEO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
    STRATEGIC OBJECTIVEWEIGHTINGEVALUATION
    Execute PSM goals, achieving targeted restructuring savings, delivering margin improvement, and growing sales in higher-value product categories25%Exceeded restructuring savings target; exceeded targeted margin improvement by nearly 10%; and significantly grew sales on an organic basis in specialty materials, performance tapes and graphics product categories
    Deliver RBIS goals, reaching milestones on organic sales growth and margin improvement25%Radio-frequency identification and external embellishment product categories grew over 20% on an organic basis; significantly improved EBIT margin, nearly reaching goal; and implemented strategy to accelerate growth through a faster and simpler business model
    Deliver milestones for our Vancive Medical Technologies segment, focusing on product family milestones and realizing targeted profitability5%Nearly achieved core business profitability goal and made the appropriate strategic decision to exit the wearable sensors product category when milestones were missed
    Build acquisition pipeline by identifying, pursuing and actively engaging with potential targets25%Held substantive discussions with acquisition targets in excess of goal and actively engaged with targets in excess of goal
    Deliver a succession plan that meets the Board's goals10%Mentored his recently announced successor, Mr. Butier, throughout 2015; appointed Ms. Bramman as Senior Vice President and CFO in March 2015; and appointed Mr. Gravanis as President, Materials Group in May 2015
    Achieve 2015 sustainability goals and establish and commit to 2025 sustainability goals10%Met or exceeded 2015 sustainability goals; established and communicated aggressive 2025 sustainability goals; and signed the American Business Act on Climate Pledge for climate change, reflecting our goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions
    Individual Modifier Based on Committee Evaluation110%
     
      
      
      
      
    2018 CEO PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

      STRATEGIC OBJECTIVE WEIGHTING EVALUATION  
     Accelerate penetration in high value product categories — Achieve growth objectives for LGM's graphics and specialty, RBIS' RFID and IHM's industrial product categories; integrate acquisitions and continue building M&A pipeline; and accelerate Intelligent Labels integration across LGM and RBIS 25% Exceeded targeted levels of organic growth in LGM's graphics and specialty categories and RBIS' RFID business, accelerated integration of Intelligent Labels platform across LGM and RBIS, and achieved many but not all acquisition and integration objectives, but did not achieve targeted level of organic growth in IHM's industrial categories 
      Drive profitable growth in base business — Maintain share in LGM's base product categories; grow volumes in RBIS' base business (adjusted for RFID); and accelerate near-term productivity in IHM 25% Maintained share position in LGM's base product categories and grew volumes in RBIS base categories, but did not accelerate IHM productivity to targeted level of EBITDA expansion  
     Continue relentless focus on productivity —Achieve targeted RBIS restructuring savings and adjusted EBITDA goal; accelerate integration of Finesse acquisition into existing Vancive Medical Technologies business 15% Exceeded targeted amount of RBIS restructuring savings and achieved targeted adjusted EBITDA goal; planned and began implementation of Board-aligned project to accelerate integration of Finesse into our Vancive business 
      Deploy capital effectively —Invest in capital expenditures at targeted amount to enable future growth; invest targeted amount in accelerated growth platforms; repurchase shares; and satisfy commitments to investment community, in each case consistent with our Board-aligned capital allocation objectives 15% Invested targeted amounts in capital expenditures and accelerated growth platforms; cost-effectively repurchase shares; and continued to execute long-term capital deployment commitments made to investment community  
     Succession planning —Refine/execute executive leadership development plans; execute senior leadership transitions; and develop CEO succession strategy to ensure availability of ready-now successors by targeted deadline 15% Completed leadership development plans; oversaw departures, promotions and new hires in several executive positions; and made meaningful progress advancing CEO succession strategy with Board oversight 
      Sustainability/Diversity — Make progress toward 2025 sustainability goals, including reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by 3%; ensure at least 90% of sites are landfill free; and evaluate gender pay equity and begin to adjust compensation as appropriate 5% Exceeded 3% GHG reduction target by nearly 3%; achieved over 95% of sites as landfill-free; and evaluated our gender pay equity with positive results, developing plans to make identified adjustments to compensation for 2019  

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     
      Individual Modifier Based on Committee Evaluation 100% 100%  

    BASED ON PERFORMANCE ASSESSED AGAINST
    PREDETERMINED AND MEASURABLE STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES

            Our CEO recommended to the Committee the individual modifiers for our other Current NEOs based on his assessment of their 20152018 performance. The Committee considered our CEO's recommendations,recommendation and challenged his assessments of our other NEOs' performance as needed and retainedappropriate, retaining the discretion to approve individual modifiers for our other Current NEOsthem lower than what the 100% our CEO hashad recommended. Other than discussing with our CEO their performance against their predetermined strategic objectives,individual performance plans, our other Current NEOs played no role in their compensation determinations.

            In determining the individual modifiers for our other Current NEOs and recognizing that the cap of 100% eliminated the potential upside from the individual modifier on their AIP awards, the Committee noted the following highlights of their respective 2015 performance:the 2018 performance of other NEOs:

        Mr. ButierLovins — Led our PSM segmentfinance function, delivering results that exceeded our 2018 goals for six months after becoming President & COO, refining its business strategyorganic sales growth and setting it on course to achieve record 2015 resultsadjusted EPS growth and exceed its 2018 targets; implemented a new strategy to increase competitiveness in the RBIS segment, delivering a significant course correction in the business' trajectory with progress against its long-term targets during the second half of 2015; supervised changes in leadership in the PSM and RBIS segments, providing mentorship to achieve successful transitions; and implemented a portfolio scoping strategy to accelerate growth in higher-value product categories.

        Ms. Bramman — Successfully on-boarded as our CFO, quickly mastering our accounting policies and internal controls and establishing her vision for the global finance function; refinedexecuting our capital deployment strategy, enabling continuedallocation strategies to support our future growth, pursue acquisition opportunities and return of cash to stockholders, investmentshareholders through dividends and share repurchases. Also served as Interim General Manager of our IHM business after the previous leader of that business ceased serving in our businesses and pursuit of acquisition opportunities; oversaw ourthat capacity.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |53

    |2016 Proxy Statement|40

    Table of Contents

          information technology function, selecting a new enterprise resource planning system; and identified and mentored new corporate leaders for our tax and treasury functions.

        Mr. Gravanis — Successfully transitioned to President, Materials Group, enablingLed our PSM segment to deliver its fourth consecutiveLGM business, delivering another strong year of strong organic salestop-line growth, with significantly improved profitability; grew volume across all key product categoriesnet income and regions, achieving above-average growth in targeted, higher-value categories;free cash flow; successfully implemented significant reorganization in Asia;executing complex footprint optimization projects and in previous rolemanaging raw material inflation; and reorganizing Graphics Solutions and Reflective Solutions as Vice President/General Manager, Materials Group Asia, consistently delivered on earnings objectives despite top-line challenges.separate business divisions, ensuring greater accountability for each unit.

        Ms. HillMiller — Led successful CEO succession planning, providing valuable insightsour legal function with particular focus on integrating our 2017 acquisitions and supporting our robust pipeline of potential acquisitions and venture investments; supporting our footprint optimization projects, including capital investments to support our future growth and restructuring actions to improve our profitability; and leading our Values and Ethics program.

        Mr. Stander — Led our RBIS business, delivering the Committeemulti-year transformation plan, with strong financial performance on key metrics and guidance to executives; directly managed support of the human resources function in our PSM segmentan improved trajectory for the first six months of 2015; supported multiple leadership changesbusiness; improving productivity, service, speed and successful transitionsquality; and accelerating our growth and enhancing our capabilities in RFID to maintain our businesses, as well as in our corporate finance and communications functions; and implemented a new global performance management system.industry-leading position.

            Based on the above assessments and after giving consideration to the recommendations of our CEO (other than with respect to himself), the Committee approved the following individual modifiers for our other Current NEOs: 125% for Mr. Butier;of 100% for Ms. Bramman; 100% for Mr. Gravanis; and 115% for Ms. Hill.all NEOs .

    2015 AIP Awards

            Our Current NEOs received the AIP awards shown in the following table below for 2015,2018, based on their respective year-end base salary, at year-end 2015, AIP opportunity, financial modifier and individual modifier:modifier.

    2015 NEO AIP AWARDS

     


    NAME

       2015 YE
    BASE SALARY
       AIP
    OPPORTUNITY
       TARGET
    AIP AWARD
       FINANCIAL
    MODIFIER
       INDIVIDUAL
    MODIFIER
       AIP
    AWARD
     

    Mr. Scarborough

     $1,125,060 125% $1,406,325 123% 110% $1,902,758 

    Mr. Butier

     $765,000  90% $688,500  123%  125% $1,058,569 

    Ms. Bramman

     $550,000 60% $330,000 123% 100% $405,900 

    Mr. Gravanis*

     $500,160  57% $285,091  ~145%  100% $413,304 

    Ms. Hill

     $501,503 60% $300,902 123% 115% $425,626 

    2018 AIP AWARDS


    NEO

     2018 YE
    BASE SALARY
     AIP
    OPPORTUNITY
     TARGET
    AIP AWARD
     FINANCIAL
    MODIFIER
     INDIVIDUAL
    MODIFIER
     AIP
    AWARD

    Butier

     $1,133,000 125% $1,416,250 123% 100% $1,741,988

    Lovins(1)

     $600,000 75% $450,000 123% 100% $553,500

    Gravanis(2)

     $627,969 75% $470,977 116% 100% $546,333

    Miller

     $564,125 60% $338,475 123% 100% $416,324

    Stander

     $538,960 50% $269,480 144% 100% $388,051

    *(1)
    Mr. Gravanis'Lovins' AIP award opportunity was prorated based on his previous role's AIP opportunityincreased from 60% to 75% of 50% and financial modifier of 119% and his current role's AIP opportunity of 60% and financial modifier of 157%. base salary in 2018.
    (2)
    Amounts for Mr. Gravanis were converted from Euros to U.S. dollarseuros using the exchange rate as of our fiscal year-end.year end.

    20152018 GRANTS OF LTI AWARDS

            Our LTI program provides variable incentive compensation to enhance alignment of executive interests with stockholder interests and drive long-term value creation. The annual LTI awards granted in 20152018 were fully performance-based and delivered inthrough the following equity comprised of:vehicles:

      50% in PUs that cliff-vest at the end of a three-year period subject to ourthe achievement of the respective cumulative EVA and relative TSR performance objectives established for the award; and

      50% in MSUs that vest at the end of the one-, two-, three- and four-year performance periods, with an average vestingperformance period of 2.5 years, based solely on our absolute TSR.

            Annual LTI awards were granted on the fourth Thursday of February 2015,22, 2018, the day our Board hadheld its regularly-scheduled meeting. Given that her start date took place a few weeks after this grant, Ms. Bramman's 2015 LTI awards were granted in June 2015, consistent with our special award policy described below.

            The Committee does not offset the loss or gain of prior year grants in determining current year grants as doing so would compromise the intended risk/reward nature of these incentives.

            Actual amounts realized from the vesting of these awards will be based on our performance, as well as our stock price, at the time of vesting.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |54


    Table of Contents

            Although we have suspended the regular grant of stock options and time-vesting RSUs to our executives, special awards may be granted by the Committee for hiring, promotion, retention or retentionother incentive purposes, with the awards granted on the first day of the last month of the calendar quarter following the hiring or promotion event or decision to make such a retention grant. The Committee approved the following specialNo such awards forwere granted to our NEOs in 2015:2018.

      for Mr. Butier, a promotion grant of RSUs on March 2, 2015 with a target grant date fair value of $2,000,000, 50% of which vested on the grant date, 40% of which will vest on December 1, 2016 and 10% of which will vest on the
    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|41

    Table of Contents

        three-year anniversary of the grant date. This replaced a grant from December 1, 2014 that was voided for not meeting our three-year minimum vesting requirement for time-vesting full-value awards;

      for Mr. Neville, a promotion grant of RSUs on March 2, 2015 of RSUs with a target grant date fair value of $1,500,000, 90% of which would have vested on December 1, 2016 and 10% of which would have vested on the three-year anniversary of the grant date. This replaced a grant from December 1, 2014 that was voided for the same reason described above for Mr. Butier. These RSUs were cancelled upon the termination of Mr. Neville's employment in 2015;

      for Ms. Bramman, a sign-on grant of RSUs on June 1, 2015 with a target grant date fair value of $400,000, which vest in equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date; and

      for Mr. Gravanis, a promotion grant of RSUs on June 1, 2015 with a target grant date fair value of $750,000, which vest in equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date.

            The table below sets forth the grant date fair value of the special awards made in 2015. As a result of the methodology for determining grant date fair value and timing, total values for special LTI awards were slightly below target values.

    2015 NEO SPECIAL LTI AWARDS

     

    NAME

     PURPOSE  RSUs (#)  RSUs ($)(1) 

    Mr. Butier

     Promotion(2) 38,081 $1,989,091 

    Ms. Bramman

     Sign-on  6,492 $380,891 

    Mr. Gravanis

     Promotion 12,172 $705,366 

    Mr. Neville(3)

     Promotion(2)  28,561 $1,456,849 

    (1)
    The fair value of RSUs was determined based on the fair value of our common stock on the grant date, adjusted for foregone dividends.
    (2)
    Replacement of grants originally made on December 1, 2014 and voided as described above.
    (3)
    Mr. Neville's RSUs were cancelled upon the termination of his employment.

    Target LTI Opportunity

            As a percentage of 2015 year-end base salary, the target LTI opportunities for our NEOs were 450%475% for Mr. Scarborough, 300% for Mr. Butier (increased from 200% following his promotion as President and COO),Butier; 200% for Mr. Neville,Lovins; 180% for Mses. BrammanMr. Gravanis and HillMs. Miller; and 130%140% for Mr. Gravanis. TheseStander. In 2018, (i) Mr. Butier's target LTI opportunity was increased from 425% to 475% of base salary to move his TDC closer to the market median for the reasons described above and (ii) Mr. Lovins' target LTI opportunity was increased from 180% to 200% of base salary to move his LTI closer to the market median after he completed a year of service as our CFO. Target LTI award opportunities represented approximately 78%68% and 72%50%, respectively, of our CEO's and other Current NEOs' average total incentive compensation. For 2015 only, the Committee increased the LTI opportunities for Mr. Gravanis by 40%, Ms. Hill by 30%, and Messrs. Butier and Neville by approximately 10% to recognize the impact their leadership had in contributing to our strong financial performance in fiscal year 2014.

    Performance Units (PUs)

            Awarded under our 2015-2017 Mid-Term Incentive Plan (MTIP),        PUs cliff-vest in shares of our common stock after the end of athe three-year 2018-2020 period at threshold (50% payout), target (100% payout) and maximum (200% payout) levels based on our achievement of the performance objectives established for the award. PUs do not accrue dividend equivalents.equivalents and are not counted towards measuring compliance with our stock ownership policy.

            Consistent with the 2014-2016 MTIP, theThe Committee selectedestablished the following performance objectives for the 2015-2017 MTIP.2018-2020 PUs. The Committee believes that these objectives continue to appropriately align executive compensation with the long-term interests of our stockholders because delivery of economic valuedelivering cumulative EVA and appreciation of our stock pricestrong TSR relative to peer companies directly impactsreflects the number of shares executives may receive at vesting.value creation we provide to our stockholders.

      Cumulative EVA, weighted 50% for our corporate NEOs (based on our total company EVA) and; 75% for our LGM business group NEOsNEO (based on theLGM's cumulative EVAEVA); and 100% for their respectiveour RBIS business group)NEO (based on RBIS' cumulative EVA). EVA is a measure of financial performance calculated by deducting the economic cost associated with the use of capital (weighted average cost of capital multiplied by average invested capital) from our after-tax operating profit. The Committee established cumulative EVA targets for our corporate EVA goalsNEOs consistent with the long-termour 2017-2021 targets we announced in May 2014 and our key financialprimary objective of delivering superior TSR, with the target payout at the low endmidpoint of our 2018 growththese targets and the maximum payout at the high end of our 2018 growththese targets. TargetsCumulative EVA targets for our business groupsNEOs focused on their respective business' EVA change compared to the prior three-year period, with (i) the target payout for executives linked to our PSM segment (including Mr. Gravanis) requiring positive EVAat the midpoint of their respective business' 2017-2021 targets and significant change in EVA and (ii) the target payout for executives linked to our RBIS segment (including Mr. Neville) recognizing the business as operating below its cost of capital, but requiring significant change in EVA. In all cases, the cost of capital is fixed over the performance period, but reassessed annually for new cycles. Average invested capital is targetedperiod. The RBIS business NEO's PUs were weighted 100% on that business' cumulative EVA to increase at a rate substantially below our targeted rateincent his singular focus on delivering the transformation plan to improve the financial performance and trajectory of organic sales growth. Cashthis business. Unlike under the AIP, cash restructuring
    Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|42

    Table of Contents

        charges — which include severance and related costs and exclude asset impairment charges and lease and other contract cancellation charges,costs — are included in EVA calculations.calculations as the Committee expects that these investments will generate a return over the three-year performance period (in contrast to the AIP, which has a one-year performance period). Whether linked to corporate or business group results, target payouts require significantthe 2018-2020 cumulative EVA targets required continued improvement in our businessfinancial performance.



      Relative TSR compared to an objectively determined peer group of companies, weighted 50% for our corporate NEOs andNEOs; 25% for our LGM business group NEOsNEO; and 0% for our RBIS business NEO. TSR measures the return that we have providedprovide to our stockholders, including stock price appreciation and dividends paid (assuming reinvestment thereof)of dividends), expressed as a percentage. TSR is a common metric used by the investment community to measure return on investment. Consistent with its pay-for-performance philosophy, the Committee designed the TSR objective to provide realized compensation only if our stockholder value creation compares favorably relative to the designated peer group. The Committee establishedset the threshold payout level at TSR at the 40th percentile, the target payout level at TSR at the 50th percentile, and the maximum payout level at TSR at the 80th percentile, which were the same levels used for the 2014-2016 MTIP. Payouts2017-2019 PUs.Reflecting previously received stockholder feedback, payouts for the relative TSR component of these PUs isare capped at 100% of target if our absolute TSR is negative infor the 2015-20172018-2020 performance period.period. In assessing the rigor of the TSR objectives, the Committee noted that our stock price and TSR had substantially increased in the economic environment remained uncertainpreceding few years; as a result, performing at the median relative to our peers over the 2018-2020 performance period would represent solid performance, particularly in light of our relatively high exposure to the impact of foreign currency translation and that the 2012-2014 MTIP cycle had paid out only slightly above target.
      challenges in the apparel industry served by our RBIS business.

    Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |55


    Table of Contents

    Consistent with the 2014-2016 MTIP2017-2019 PUs and onupon the recommendation of Willis Towers Watson, to benchmark TSR, the Committee continued utilizing a peer group(‡) comprised of U.S. companies (i) in similar industries based on their being classifiedclassification in one of five GICS codesgroups (diversified chemicals, (15101020), specialty chemicals, (15101050), metal and glass containers, (15103010), paper packaging, (15103020), and paper products (15105020))products) and (ii) with revenues during the last twelve months of $1 billion to $20 billion. The Committee continued using these objective criteria to benchmark TSR against companies that are in similar industries and of similar size. Based on the formulaic application of the same objective criteria, the peer group changed from the prior year as follows: (i) Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.PQ Group Holdings Inc. and Venator Materials PLC were added because they had become public companies and met the other criteria; (ii) Innospec Inc. was added because it became a public company in 2014its last twelve months' revenues had exceeded $1 billion; and met the criteria; (ii) OMNOVA(iii) Chemtura Corporation, Multi Packaging Solutions wasInternational Limited and Valspar Corporation were deleted because its annual revenues fell below $1 billion; (iii) Rockwood Holdings was deleted because it was acquired by Albemarle Corporation; and (iv) Taminco Corporation was deleted because it was acquired by Eastman Chemical Company. The Committee noted that all the companies designated by a leading proxy advisory firm as peers of our company were included in the TSR peer group.they had been acquired.

2015-2017 MTIP2018-2020 PUs

NAMENEO

 PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES WEIGHTING

Mr. ScarboroughButier


Lovins
Miller

Mr. Butier



 
Total Company Cumulative EVA
Relative TSR

50%
50%
Gravanis 50%

Ms. Bramman

LGM Cumulative EVA
Relative TSR
 50%

Ms. Hill

Mr. Gravanis

PSM Segment Cumulative EVA75%

Relative TSR
25%

Mr. NevilleStander

 RBIS Segment Cumulative EVA75%


Relative TSR

 
25%100%
0%

Market-leveraged Stock Units (MSUs)

        In 2013, based on the expert advice and recommendation of Towers Watson, the Committee began granting our NEOs MSUs which are linked directly to our absolute TSR performance, meaning the percentage change in our stock price (plus dividend equivalents accrued and paid at vesting). MSUs:LTI awards that:

    Are fully performance-based because they are tied to our absolute TSR performance, which represents appreciation in our stock price and dividends paid; and

    Have one-, two-, three- and four-year performance periods, with an average vestingperformance period of 2.5 years.


The following companies comprise the peer group for purposes of the 2015-2017 MTIP: A. Schulman, Inc.; AEP Industries Inc.; Albermarle Corporation; AptarGroup, Inc.; Ashland Inc.; Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.; Ball Corporation; Bemis Company, Inc.; Berry Plastics Group, Inc.; Celanese Corporation; Chemtura Corporation; Clearwater Paper Corporation; Crown Holdings Inc.; Eastman Chemical Co; Ecolab Inc.; Ferro Corporation; FMC Corp; Graphic Packaging Holding Company; Greif Inc.; HB Fuller Co.; Huntsman Corporation; International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.; KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation; Kraton Performance Polymers Inc.; Minerals Technologies Inc.; NewMarket Corporation; Olin Corp.; Owens-Illinois Inc.; Packaging Corp. of America; PH Glatfelter Co.; PolyOne Corporation; PPG Industries Inc.; RPM International Inc.; Sealed Air Corporation; Sensient Technologies Corporation; Silgan Holdings Inc.; Sonoco Products Co.; Stepan Company; The Sherwin-Williams Company; The Valspar Corporation; Valhi Inc.; Verso Corporation; W.R. Grace & Co.; and Wausau Paper Corp.
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|43

Table of Contents

        The Committee determined that it was appropriate to useselected an equity vehicle that has one-, two-, three- and four-year performance periods because MSUs replaced stock options and RSUs, both of which had vested ratably over four years. The transition from stock options and RSUs to MSUs was made to address burn rate concerns raised by our stockholders and improve the performance linkage of our LTI program. Although the grant of stock options had been negatively impacting our burn rate, they were easily understandable to executives and viewed by them as performance based given that they required stock price appreciation to deliver value. RSUs, which were generally granted in smaller amounts than stock options as a result of their respective valuation methodologies, delivered guaranteed value if executives remained employed through the applicable vesting dates. MSUs were designed to achieve the combined objectives of these previously-usedpreviously granted equity vehicles, including retention (similar to RSUs) and the provision of meaningful upside opportunity tied to stock price appreciation (similar to stock options, but more limited due to fewer shares earned for target performance and a cap on the number of shares that can be earned above target), while making the LTI compensation program fully performance based.performance-based. The Committee continues to believe that retention is an important objective of our executive compensation program.

        MSUs vest based on our performance over periods as shown in the graph on the left on the following graph,page, with the number of shares earned determined as of thepaid out at vesting date based solely on our absolute TSR.TSR and the value realized reflecting both the number of shares paid out as well as our stock price at the time of vesting. Although dividend equivalents accrue on MSUs during the performance period, they are earned and paid out only at vesting; as such, if the threshold level of performance were not achieved, any dividend equivalents accrued forduring the performance period would be cancelled.


(‡)
The following companies comprised the peer group for the 2018-2020 PUs at the time of grant: Albermarle Corporation; AptarGroup, Inc.; Ashland Global Holdings; Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.; Ball Corporation; Bemis Company, Inc.; Berry Global Corp., Inc.; Celanese Corporation; The Chemours Company; Clearwater Paper Corporation; Crown Holdings Inc.; Domtar Corporation; Eastman Chemical Company; Ecolab Inc.; Element Solutions Inc.; Ferro Corporation; GCP Applied Technologies Inc., Graphic Packaging Holding Company; Greif Inc.; H.B. Fuller Company; Huntsman Corporation; Innospec Inc.; International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.; Kraton Corporation; Minerals Technologies Inc.; NewMarket Corporation; Owens-Illinois Inc.; Packaging Corporation of America; P.H. Glatfelter Company; PolyOne Corporation; PPG Industries Inc.; PQ Group Holdings Inc.; RPM International Inc.; Sealed Air Corporation; Sensient Technologies Corporation; The Sherwin-Williams Company; Silgan Holdings Inc.; Sonoco Products Company; Stepan Company; Valhi Inc.; Venator Materials PLC; W.R. Grace & Co.; and WestRock Company.

Avery Dennison CorporationGRAPHIC| 2019 Proxy Statement |56

        The MSUs granted in 2013 and 2014 had the payout characteristics shown on the left below. The Committee significantly changed the MSU program for 2015, making the threshold and target performance criteria more rigorous to reflect stockholder feedback and our improved financial profile and business strategies, as shown on the right below. To help mitigate the effect on participants of more challenging threshold and target hurdles, the Committee also proportionally increased the payout for achieving threshold performance from 70% to 85% and decreased the TSR required for a maximum payout from 100% to 75%.

2013-2014 MSUs

 

2015 MSUs

 

  ABSOLUTE TSR   PAYOUT   ABSOLUTE TSR   PAYOUT 

Cancelled

 <-30% 0% 

Cancelled

 <-15% 0% 

Threshold

 -30%  70% 

Threshold

 -15%  85% 

Target

 0% 100% 

Target

 10% 100% 

Above Target

 >0%  >100% 

Above Target

 >10%  >100% 

Maximum

 100% 200% 

Maximum

 75% 200% 

Every 1% increase in TSR equals 1% increase in payout

 

Every 1% increase in TSR above 10% equals
1.54% increase in payout

 
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|44

Table of Contents

        The performance criteria for MSUs, which reflect previously received stockholder feedback seeking to make the criteria more challenging, are shown in the chart on the right below. Every 1% increase in TSR above 10% increases the payout by 1.54%. The Committee determined to maintain the same MSU performance objectives for 2018 and continue observing payouts to ensure that the revised MSU structure is achieving the Committee's goal of incenting strong long-term performance and value creation.


GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

2015 NEO Annual LTI Awards

        Our NEOs were granted the annual LTI awards shown in the following table below in February 2015, except for Ms. Bramman whose annual LTI awards were granted in June 2015 because she joined our company after the February grant date.2018. The number of awards granted was approved by the Committee based on (i) the respective NEO's respective(i) base salary at year-end 2014, or initial base salary in the case for Ms. Bramman,2017 and (ii) target LTI opportunity, with the number of PUs granted based on a grant date fair value equal to the average closing price for shares of our common stock during the first ten trading days of February 20152018 and the number of MSUs based on a grant date fair value determined by a preliminaryusing the Monte-Carlo simulation usingmethod. As a result of the trading days of January 2015.

        The table below sets forth themethodology used to determine grant date fair value, of the awards. The PUs and MSUs granted to Mr. Neville were cancelled upon the termination of his employment.awarded LTI values slightly exceeded target LTI values.

2015 NEO LTI AWARDS

 


NAME

   BASE SALARY   TARGET LTI
OPPORTUNITY
   2015
ADJUSTMENT(1)
   PUs
(#)
   PUs
($)
   MSUs
(#)
   MSUs
($)
   LTI VALUE 

Mr. Scarborough

 $1,103,000 450%  47,254 $2,389,547 50,887 $2,852,110 $5,241,657 

Mr. Butier

 $750,000  300%  9%  23,348 $1,180,665  25,144 $1,409,258 $2,589,923 

Ms. Bramman

 $550,000 180%  8,034 $552,588 6,357 $492,656 $1,045,244 

Mr. Gravanis(2)

 $500,160  130%  40%  6,461 $325,196  6,958 $389,993 $715,189 

Ms. Hill

 $491,670 180% 30% 10,954 $553,924 11,795 $661,101 $1,215,025 

Mr. Neville

 $580,030  200%  13%  12,480 $628,146  13,439 $753,243 $1,381,389 

2018 ANNUAL LTI AWARDS


NEO

 2017 YE
BASE SALARY
 TARGET LTI
OPPORTUNITY
 PUs
(#)
 PUs
($)
 MSUs
(#)
 MSUs
($)
 LTI
VALUE

Butier(1)

 $1,133,000 475% 23,324 $2,889,828 22,852 $2,690,823 $5,580,651

Lovins(2)

 $550,000 200% 4,768 $590,752 4,671 $550,010 $1,140,762

Gravanis(3)

 $628,595 180% 4,904 $579,918 4,805 $565,789 $1,145,707

Miller

 $547,694 180% 4,272 $529,298 4,186 $492,902 $1,022,200

Stander

 $524,280 140% 3,817 $429,827 3,740 $440,385 $870,212

(1)
The Committee adjusted theMr. Butier's target opportunity was increased from 425% to 475% in 2018.
(2)
Mr. Lovins' target LTI opportunities for Ms. Hill and Messrs. Butier, Gravanis and Nevilleopportunity was increased from 180% to recognize the impact their leadership had200% in contributing to our strong financial performance in fiscal year 2014.

2018.
(2)(3)
Mr. Gravanis' base salary was converted from Euros to U.S. dollarseuros using the exchange rate as of our fiscal year end. Mr. Gravanis' target LTI opportunity reflects his opportunity before his promotion to President, Materials Group, which occurred after the grant date.

20152018 VESTING OF PREVIOUSLY GRANTED LTI AWARDS

2013-2015 MTIP2016-2018 PUs Eligible Forfor Vesting

        The PUs granted to our NEOs in February 2013 under our 2013-2015 MTIP2016 were eligible for vesting at the end of 20152018 based (i) for our corporate NEOs (excluding Mr. Lovins, who was an LGM employee in February 2016 and received PUs with the same performance criteria as our LGM business NEO), 50% on our total company's cumulative three-year EVA and 50% on our three-year relative TSR compared to a peer group§ of companies determined using the same objective criteria used for the 2015-2017 MTIP2018-2020 PUs and (ii) for Mr. Lovins and our business group NEOs, 75% on business grouptheir respective business' cumulative three-year EVA and 25% on our three-year relative TSR. The key goal-setting principle in setting cumulative EVA targets was to correlateconsistency with above-average TSR compared to the preceding three-year period.

        The targetour 2014-2018 financial goals for corporate EVA — cumulative EVA of $208 million, reflecting a substantial increase from the approximately $85 million of cumulative EVA achieved in the prior three-year period — was used to correspond to the low end of the long-term targets for organic sales growth and adjusted net income growth that we announced in May 2012 given that increasing net income, together with balance sheet efficiency, is a key driver of EVA improvement. EVA required for maximum payout — cumulative EVA of $284 million, reflecting a substantial increase fromROTC, which the approximately $85 million of cumulative EVA achieved in the prior three-year period — was used to correspond with the high end of these long-term targets. As shownCommittee believes translates into delivering above-average TSR.


§
The following companies comprised the peer group for the 2016-2018 PUs at vesting for purposesthe time of the 2013-2015 MTIP: A. Schulman, Inc.; AEP Industries Inc.;payout: Albermarle Corporation; AptarGroup, Inc.; Ashland Inc.Global Holding; Axalta Coating Systems Ltd.; Ball Corporation; Bemis Company, Inc.; Berry Plastics Group, Inc.; Celanese Corporation; Chemtura Corporation;The Chemours Company; Clearwater Paper Corporation; Crown Holdings Inc.; Eastman Chemical Co;Company; Ecolab Inc.; Element Solutions Inc. (previously traded as Platform Specialty Products Corporation); Ferro Corporation; FMC Corp; Graphic Packaging Holding Company; Greif Inc.; HBH.B. Fuller Co.;Company; Huntsman Corporation; Innospec Inc.; International Flavors & Fragrances Inc.; KapStone Paper and Packaging Corporation; Kraton Performance Polymers Inc.; Minerals Technologies Inc.; NewMarket Corporation; Olin Corp.; OM Group Inc.; OMNOVA Solutions Inc.; Owens-Illinois Inc.; Packaging Corp.Corporation of America; PHP.H. Glatfelter Co.;Company; PolyOne Corporation; PPG Industries Inc.; RPM International Inc.; Sealed Air Corporation; Sensient Technologies Corporation; Sigma-Aldrich Corporation; Silgan Holdings Inc.; Sonoco Products Co.;Company; Stepan Company; The Sherwin-Williams Company; The Valspar Corporation; Valhi Inc.; Verso Corporation;WestRock Company; and W.R. Grace & Co and Wausau Paper Corp.Co.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |57

|2016 Proxy Statement|45

Table of Contents

        The cumulative EVA target of $537 million for our corporate NEOs was consistent with our 2014-2018 targets for organic sales growth and operating margin and recognized that increasing sales and operating margin, together with balance sheet efficiency, are key drivers of EVA improvement.The target was approximately two-and-a-half times higher than our cumulative EVA for the three-year period ending in 2015. EVA required for maximum payout – cumulative EVA of $612 million — was consistent with the high end of our long-term growth and operating margin targets. As shown below, we delivered total company cumulative EVA of $308.2over $755 million duringfor the 2013-20152016-2018 performance period, resulting in a payout of 200% onfor the EVA component for our corporate NEOs.

2013-2015 MTIP: CORPORATE CUMULATIVE EVA 
2016-2018 PUs: CORPORATE CUMULATIVE EVA2016-2018 PUs: CORPORATE CUMULATIVE EVA 
($ millions) 2013 2014 2015 CUMULATIVE 
(In millions) 2016 2017 2018 CUMULATIVE EVA 
Adjusted EBIT(1) $428.0 $440.5 $483.6   $586.4 $656.6 $713.1  
LESS: Taxes(2) $140.4 $137.0 $159.1   
Taxes(2) $(192.3)$(183.8)$(178.3)   
Equity method investment net losses   $(2.0) 
 $287.6 $303.5 $324.5  
LESS: Capital charge(3) $214.3 $210.3 $182.8   
 $394.1 $472.8 $532.8   
Capital charge(3) $(185.3)$(221.9)$(237.4) 
EVA $73.3 $93.2 $141.7 $308.2  $208.8 $250.9 $295.4 $755.1 
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ 

(1)
Adjusted operating incomeEBIT refers to earnings before interest expense and taxes, excluding non-cash restructuring costs, andas well as other items (non-GAAP).items. Adjusted EBIT includes cash restructuring costs and is a non-GAAP financial measure and is reconciled tofrom GAAP inAppendix A to of this proxy statement.

(2)
BasedThe GAAP tax rate for 2016, 2017 and 2018 was 32.8%, 52.2% and 15.4%, respectively. Taxes shown in the table are based on an effectiveadjusted tax rate of 32.8%, 31.1%28.0% and 32.9%25.0% for fiscal years 2013, 20142016, 2017 and 2015, respectively

2018, respectively. The adjusted tax rate represents the full-year GAAP rate, adjusted to exclude certain unusual or infrequent events that are expected to significantly impact the GAAP tax rate, such as completion of our 2017 provisional estimate of the impact of the TCJA, impacts related to the termination of our U.S. pension plan, and the effects of discrete tax planning actions.
(3)
8.5% of average invested capital of $2.52$2.18 billion, $2.47$2.61 billion and $2.15$2.79 billion for fiscal years 2013, 20142016, 2017 and 2015,2018, respectively, using an annual five-point average (December of prior year and March, June, September and December of current year) of short- and long-term debt plus equityequity.

        The cumulative EVA generated by our PSM segmentLGM business also exceeded the maximum targetlevel of performance established by the Committee. As a result,Committee; as such, the payout onfor the EVA component for Mr. Lovins and our LGM business NEO was 200%. The cumulative EVA generated by our RBIS business also exceeded the maximum level of performance established by the Committee; as such, the payout for the EVA component for our RBIS business group Current NEO was also 200%. Due to the competitively sensitive nature of information on segment levelregarding business-level EVA, targets and actual results are not disclosed. Information regarding the goal-setting process and rigor of the EVA performance objectives has beenis included in the previous discussion of the 2015-2017 MTIP above. The PUs granted to Mr. Neville were cancelled upon the termination of his employment before the end of our 2015 fiscal year.2018-2020 PUs.

        Relative TSR for the 2016-2018 performance period was at the 9382rdnd percentile of the designated peer group, resulting in a 200% payout for this component for all Current NEOs.


GRAPHIC

GRAPHIC

Avery Dennison CorporationGRAPHIC| 2019 Proxy Statement |58


Table of Contents

MSUs Eligible Forfor Vesting

        ThreeFour tranches of MSUs were eligible for vesting at the end of 20152018 based on our absolute TSR for the four-, three-, two-, and one-year performance periods shown below, with payouts determined as follows:

      3rd Tranche payout for MSUs granted in 2013:

      3-Year performance period: 2013-2015
      (stock price at settlement (avg. closing price for trading daysthe number of January 2016) + reinvested dividends during period)
                                           stock price at grant (avg. closing price for trading days of January 2013)
      ($59.74 + $4.80/$36.00) = 1.79
      Paidshares paid out at 179% of target
vesting determined in accordance with the following formula:

GRAPHIC

4TH TRANCHE OF MSUS GRANTED IN 20153RD TRANCHE OF MSUS GRANTED IN 2016
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|46
Performance period = 4 yearsPerformance period = 3 years
2015-2018 Absolute TSR = 95%2016-2018 Absolute TSR = 67%
Paid out at 200% of targetPaid out at 188% of target


2ND TRANCHE OF MSUS GRANTED IN 2017


1ST TRANCHE OF MSUS GRANTED IN 2018
Performance period = 2 yearsPerformance period = 1 year
2017-2018 Absolute TSR = 34%
Paid out at 137% of target
2018 Absolute TSR = (19)%
Cancelled for failure to achieve threshold level of performance

Table of Contents

      2nd Tranche payout for MSUs granted in 2014:

      2-Year performance period: 2014-2015
      (stock price at settlement (avg. closing price for trading days of January 2016) + reinvested dividends during period)
                                           stock price at grant (avg. closing price for trading days of January 2014)
      ($59.74 + $3.21/$50.24) = 1.25
      Paid out at 125% of target

      1st Tranche payout for MSUs granted in 2015:

      1-Year performance period: 2015
      (stock price at settlement (avg. closing price for trading days of January 2016) + reinvested dividends during period)
                                           stock price at grant (avg. closing price for trading days of January 2015)
      ($59.74 + $1.49/$52.74) = 1.16
      Under the revised payout scale approved for 2015 MSU grants, the TSR range between target and maximum payouts decreased from 100% (reflecting flat TSR to 100% TSR) to 65% (reflecting 10% TSR to 75% TSR); as a result, every one percentage point increase in TSR above 10% equates to a 1.54% increase in payout.
      (1.16–1.10) × 1.54 + 1 = 1.09
      Paid out at 109% of target

        The MSUs granted to Mr. Neville were cancelled upon the termination of his employment before the end of our 2015 fiscal year.

PERQUISITES

        Consistent with market practices, our U.S. NEOs receive the perquisites describedshown in the chart below. We do not reimburse our NEOs for the tax consequences of their receipt of these perquisites.

LIMITED PERQUISITES
PERQUISITE DESCRIPTION AND LIMITATIONS BENEFIT TO STOCKHOLDERS
Executive Benefit
Allowance

$70,000 for CEO and $65,000 for our other NEOs, (notwhich has not increased since program inception in 2011);2011; taxable to NEO with no gross-up Flat allowance reduces expense of administering a variety of separate perquisites

Financial Planning

 

Annual reimbursement of up to $25,000 for our CEO and $15,000 for our other NEOs; taxable to NEO with no gross-up

 

Allows executives to focus on job duties

Annual Physical
Examination


 

Paid directly to the service provider only to the extent actually used; as such, not taxable to the NEOour NEOs

 

Facilitates maintenance of good overall health by key company leaders

        RELOCATION/INTERNATIONAL ASSIGNMENTIn 2018, Mr. Gravanis received an automobile allowance consistent with customary executive benefits in the Netherlands. For more information, see footnote (6) of the2018 Summary Compensation Table.

RELOCATION AND OTHER TEMPORARY BENEFITS

        We provide relocation assistance to some of our senior level employees, which may include our NEOs. In 2015, consistent with the termsNone of her offer letter, Ms. Brammanour NEOs received relocationsuch benefits on terms and conditions substantially similar to our other relocating executives. In addition, in certain circumstances, we provide certain reimbursements and benefits to employees who accept an international assignment at our request. In 2015, Mr. Gravanis received benefits of this nature on terms and conditions substantially similar to our other executives on international assignment, including gross-up for taxes on certain of the benefits. For detailed information on these benefits, see footnote (6) of theSummary Compensation Table.2018.

GENERAL BENEFITS

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Benefits

        Our U.S. NEOs are eligible to participate in our nonqualified deferred compensation plan, which allows eligible U.S. employees to defer up to 75% of their base salary and up to 90% of their AIP award. Although we previously allowed deferral of LTI awards, we suspended this plan feature in 2015. Mr. Gravanis was not eligible to participate in the plan since he was not a U.S. employee during 2015. The plan provides those NEOs and other eligible employees in the U.S. with a long-term capital accumulation opportunity because savingsdeferred amounts accumulate on a pre-tax basis. Participating executives may select from among a number of investment options. Our only deferred compensation plan currently open for deferrals does not offer above-market interest rates. Deferrals are 100% vested.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |59


Table of Contents

        We made an annual contribution in early 2015as of January 1, 2018 to the deferred compensation accounts of our U.S. NEOs of up to 6% offor 401(k) eligible earnings and deferred compensation in 2017 in excess of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code") compensation limit. This annual contribution provided an automatic contribution of 3% of pay and a matching contribution of up to the first 6% of pay above the Code compensation limit. In 2019, for 401(k) eligible earnings and deferred compensation in 2018 in excess of the Code compensation limit, the matching contribution will increase to the first 7% of pay above the Code compensation limit. This benefit wasis designed to supplement 401(k) contributions that are limited under the Code.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|47

Table of Contents

        Our CEO previously participated in deferred compensation plans that are no longer available for new deferrals.        For additional information regarding our deferred compensation plansplan and accrued NEO benefits thereunder, see20152018 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation inExecutive Compensation Tables.

Retirement Benefits

        Except for Ms. Bramman and Messrs. Gravanis and Neville, ourOur U.S. NEOs aremay be eligible for retirement benefits under our U.S. pension plan and our benefit restoration plan, a nonqualified excess benefit plan, in each case subject to the same terms and conditions as our other eligible U.S. employees. Because we froze the accrual of benefits under these plans as of December 31, 2010, none of our eligible NEOs accrued additional retirement benefits during 2015.2018. In addition, we terminated our U.S. pension plan as of September 28, 2018. For additional information regarding these plans and accrued NEO benefits thereunder, see20152018 Pension Benefits inExecutive Compensation Tables.

Executive Retirement Benefits

        We have a supplemental executive retirement plan that provides designated executives with supplemental benefits upon retirement to induce them to remain with our company and further our long-term growth. Our CEO is the only Current NEO who is a participant under the plan, and the Committee does not currently intend to designate any of our other Current NEOs as a participant in the plan. Because we froze the accrual of benefits under this plan as of December 31, 2010, our CEO accrued no executive Mr. Gravanis has legally mandated retirement benefits during 2015. For additional information onin his previous work location of France and his current work location of the supplemental executive retirement plan and our CEO's accrued benefits thereunder, see2015 Pension Benefits inExecutive Compensation Tables.Netherlands.

Defined Contribution Benefits

        Our U.S. NEOs are eligible to participate in our employee savings plan, a qualified 401(k) plan that permits U.S. employees to defer up to 100% of their eligible earnings less payroll deductions to the plan on a pre-tax basis and 25% of their eligible earnings to the plan,on an after-tax basis, subject to the annual limit prescribed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for the aggregate of company contributions and employee pre- and post-tax contributions. Employee deferrals are immediately vested upon contribution andcontribution. In 2018, we make a contributioncontributed up to 6%6.5% (a 0.5% increase from 2017) of an employee's eligible compensation, 3% of which iswas an automatic contribution and up to 3%3.5% of which iswas a matchmatching contribution of 50% of the employee's contributions up to 6%,7% of pay, subject to certain otherthe Code limits.compensation limit. Participants vest in company contributions to their savings plan account after two years of service.

        Employees are immediately eligible to participate in the savings plan, and all our Current NEOs participated in the plan during fiscal year 2015,2018, except for Mr. Gravanis who wasis not a U.S. employee and was therefore ineligible. Our U.S. NEOs participate in these plans subject to the same eligibility and benefit terms and conditions as our other U.S. employees.

Life Insurance Benefits

        In addition to the $50,000 in life insurance benefits we provide to all U.S. employees, our U.S. NEOs are provided with supplemental life insurance benefits equal to three times the NEO's base salary less $50,000, up to a maximum coverage amount of $1 million.

Personal Excess Liability Insurance Benefits

        We provide $3 million of personal excess liability insurance coverage to our U.S. NEOs. Personal excess liability coverage provides an additional layer of liability coverage that supplements the coverage provided by the individual's personal liability insurance. In order toTo receive any benefit from this coverage,excess liability insurance, the NEO must maintain certain minimum coverage requirements under his or her personal liability policy.

SEVERANCE BENEFITS

        None of our NEOs has an employment agreement.contract. The absence of employment agreementscontracts reflects our pay-for-performance philosophy; if an NEO is no longer performing at the expected level, he or she can be terminated immediately without receiving a contractually-guaranteed payment. However, the Committee believes that providing our executives with severance benefits helps ensure that they act in the best interests of our company and stockholders, even if doing so may be contrary to their personal interests, such as where it could lead to the termination of their employment or a change of control of our company. We believe the amount ofThe Committee believes these benefits and the terms and conditions upon which they are provided are consistent with market practices. Unvested equity awards outstanding on the date of termination are generally cancelled, except for employees who qualify as retirement eligible under the terms of our Amended and Restated Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the "Equity Plan"). Of our Current NEOs, only Messrs. Scarborough and Gravanis qualify as retirement eligible.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |60

|2016 Proxy Statement|48

Table of Contents

        The rightscompensation of our NEOs in the event of termination not for cause are governed by our Amended and Restated Executive Severance Plan (the "Severance Plan") and our Amended and Restated Key Employee Change of Control Severance Plan (the "COC Severance Plan"). We use these plans rather than individually negotiated agreements to provide us with the flexibility to change the severance benefits for which our NEOs are eligible to reflect market practices without the need to obtain their individual consent. In addition, this plan-based approach eliminates the time and expense it would require to individually negotiate separation payments and ensures that our NEOs are eligible for benefits that are comparable toon the same terms and conditions as employees with similar levels of responsibility. Receipt of benefits under these plans is conditioned on the executive signing a waiver and release of anymost claims against our company, as well as agreeing to non-competition, non-solicitation, and non-disclosure covenants in favor of our company. Any violation of these covenants could result in our company seeking to recover some or all severance benefits previously paid or pursuing any other claims that may be appropriate inunder the circumstances.

        Unvested equity awards outstanding on the date of termination are generally cancelled, except for employees who qualify as retirement eligible under the terms of our equity incentive plans, whose awards are accelerated upon termination of service. Mr. Gravanis and Ms. Miller qualified as retirement eligible as of the end of fiscal year 2018. As a result, their outstanding PUs and MSUs would vest at the end of the performance period on a prorated basis based on our actual performance.

        Mr. Gravanis' severance benefits would also be subject to applicable Dutch labor laws and regulations in effect at the time of his separation, and he would receive the greater of the amount provided under our plans and the amount required by those laws and regulations.

        For additional information regarding potential NEO benefits under these plans, including the treatment of equity awards under various termination scenarios, seePayments Upon Termination as of January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 inExecutive Compensation Tables.

Severance Following Involuntary Termination Not Forfor Cause

        Our NEOs are eligible to receive severance benefits upon involuntary termination not for "cause," in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Severance Plan. In the event of a qualifying termination, our CEO would be eligible to receive two times the sum of his annual pay,salary, his highest AIP award received in the preceding three years and the cash value of 12 months of his qualified medical and dental insurance premiums; our other NEOs except for Mr. Gravanis, would be eligible to receive one times his or her respective sum of these amounts. All participating NEOs would also be eligible to receive up to $25,000 in outplacement services for up to one year following termination of employment. Any payments made under the Severance Plan would be offset by any payments received by the NEO under any statutory, legislative and regulatory requirement or, if applicable, the COC Severance Plan. Mr. Gravanis' severance benefits would be based on applicable French labor laws and regulations in effect at the time of his separation.

        In connection with his separation from our company and in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Severance Plan, Mr. Neville received severance benefits of $1,358,797, which reflected (i) his annual base salary as of his termination date of $580,030; (ii) $758,989, the highest of his last three AIP awards; and (iii) $19,778, the cash value of 12 months of insurance premiums for the qualified medical and dental plans in which he participated as of his termination date. In consideration of his receipt of these benefits, Mr. Neville agreed to a waiver and release of any claims against our company and to non-competition, non-solicitation and non-disclosure covenants in favor of our company. All unvested stock options and full-value awards held by Mr. Neville on the date of his termination of employment were cancelled. He had six months from his date of termination to exercise any of his vested stock options and no such options were outstanding at the end of fiscal year 2015.

Severance Following Change Ofof Control

        Our NEOs are eligible for severance payments upon termination not for "cause" or by the executive for "good reason" within 24 months of a "change of control" of our company, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the COC Severance Plan. In the event of a qualifying termination following a change of control, our CEO would be eligible to receive three times the sum of his annual pay,salary, highest AIP award received in the preceding three years and the cash value of 12 months of his qualified medical and dental insurance premiums; our other NEOs would be eligible to receive two times his or her respective sum of these amounts. Our NEOs would also be eligible to receive a pro-rata AIP award for the year of termination and up to $25,000 in outplacement services for up to one year following termination of employment. Any payments under the COC Severance Plan would be offset by any payments received by the NEO under the Severance Plan and any other statutory, legislative and regulatory requirement.

        Under the Equity Plan,our equity incentive plans, unvested equity awards granted to our NEOs after April 26, 2012 would generally vest only if the NEO is terminated without "cause" or resigns for "good reason" within 24 months after the change of control; however, unvested equity awardscontrol. Outstanding PUs and MSUs granted prior to April 26, 2012beginning in 2018 would vest based on a change of control in accordance with the previous terms of the Equity Plan.actual performance, if determinable, and otherwise based on target performance.

        Our NEOs are not eligible to receive any excise tax gross-up on amounts payable under the COC Severance Plan. However, if an NEO would otherwise incur excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Code, the NEO's payments under the COC Severance Plan may be reduced at the participating NEO's election so that no excise taxes would be due.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |61

|2016 Proxy Statement|49

Table of Contents

COMPENSATION-SETTING TOOLS

USE OF MARKET SURVEY DATA

        The Committee annually considers market survey data to target TDC, looking at a cross section of U.S. companies to reflect the broad talent market across which we seek our executives. Each year, theThe Committee reviews results from surveys prepared by third parties to understand market compensation practices and assess our competitiveness, narrowing the scope of the results to account for variations caused by company size.

        In February 2015,2018, the Committee reviewedwas presented with industry-wide data from the following published compensation surveys, with executive matches based on job and functional responsibility: (i) the most recent Willis Towers Watson U.S. Compensation General Industry Database, which was narrowed in scope to focus on the data of the 8252 participants with $6 billion to $10 billion in annual revenues, and (ii) the most recent Hewitt Total Compensation Measurement Survey, which was narrowed in scope to focus on the data of the 5955 participants with $6$5 billion to $10 billion in annual revenues. The Committee reviewed the data from each survey on an aggregated basis, with no consideration of either survey's respective component companies, which were not determined or known by the Committee.

        The Committee uses the market survey data as a reference point to target TDC and the components thereof at the market median, giving consideration to responsibilities, individual performance, tenure, retention, succession and market factors.succession.

USE OF PEER GROUPS

        For determining our relative TSR for purposes of vesting 2016-2018 PUs and granted under the 2013-2015 MTIP and 2015-2017 MTIP,2018-2020 PUs, the Committee used a peer group comprised of U.S. companies satisfying objective criteria for industry classification and revenue size, the names of which are disclosed elsewhere in this CD&A. The Committee does not utilize a peer group for any other purpose.

USE OF TALLY SHEETS

        The Committee annually reviews tally sheets that reflect the components of each NEO's compensation. The tally sheets includereviewed in 2018 included the following information for each of theour last three fiscal years:

    compensationCompensation history, including annual cash compensation (base salary and AIP awards), LTI awards, value of vested LTI awards, and annualized cost of benefits and perquisites;

    theThe expected value of annual compensation for the year, including base salary, AIP award and the grant date fair value of LTI awards;

    accumulatedAccumulated value of compensation, including total accumulated value of LTI awards and accumulated benefit values under our retirement and deferred compensation plans;

    a summary of potentialPotential payments under various termination scenarios; and

    whether the executive has achieved his or her applicable level underCompliance with our stock ownership guidelines.policy.

        The Committee believes that reviewing tally sheets areis useful in determining executive compensation because they provide a historical perspective on NEO compensation and reflectinclude information that will be includedcontained in our proxy statement.

INDEPENDENT OVERSIGHT AND EXPERTISE

        Our Board believes that hiring and retaining effective executives and providing them with market-competitive compensation are essential to the success of our company and advance the interests of our stockholders. The Committee, which is comprised solely of independent directors, has responsibilityis responsible for overseeing our executive compensation program. The Committee may delegate authority to subcommittees or, in certain limited circumstances not related to the compensation of our executive officers, to our CEO.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |62


Table of Contents

        Under its charter, the Committee has the authority, in its sole discretion and at our expense, to obtain advice and assistance from external advisors. The Committee may retain and terminate any compensation consultant or other external advisor and has sole authority to approve any suchthe advisor's fees and other terms and conditions of the retention. In retaining its advisors, the Committee must consider each advisor's independence from management, as required by NYSE listing standards.

        During 2015,2018, the Committee retained Willis Towers Watson (now Willis Towers Watson) as its independent compensation consultant. Towers Watson generally assistedconsultant and the Committee by providing competitive market compensation data for senior executives;

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|50

Table of Contents

conducting periodic reviews of elements of our non-employee director, executive and employee compensation programs; assisting with annual and long-term incentive compensation design, including performance objectives and weightings thereof; and sharing executive and non-employee director compensation trends, issues and regulatory developments.

        During 2015, Towers Watsonfirm performed the following services for the Committee:

WILLIS TOWERS WATSON 20152018 SERVICES
Assisted with design ofsetting the target TDC for our 2015 incentive program, includingCEO
Evaluated proxy advisory firms' pay-for-performance analyses
Commented on our MSU and PU programs, and advising2018 CD&A
Recommended the relative TSR peer group for the PUs granted in 2018
Provided guidance on the impact of currencythe TCJA on executive compensation
Reviewed the appropriateness of our executive compensation philosophy and program
Conducted analyses of the share utilization and stockholder value transfer related to our CEO'sLTI compensation
Advised on executive compensation trends, including pay benchmarking, and analyzed the pay-for-performance methodologies used by two proxy advisory firms
Commented on the CD&A contained in our 2015 proxy statement, as well as on our 2015 supplemental proxy materials
Evaluated our executive retention and pay considerations, including assisting with CEO transition compensation planning
Reviewed our 2015 incentive program goals
Evaluated the results of our 2015 say-on-pay vote, including the vote recommendations of proxy advisory firms and the feedback received from our stockholders during our engagement with them
Reviewed and advised on regulatory updates, including SEC rulemaking
Prepared for, attended and reviewed documentation for Committee meetings

        Towers Watson performed no services for our company in 2015 other than its work undertaken for or at the request of the Committee. In 2015,2018, Willis Towers Watson received $176,210$210,639 in compensation from our company all of which was for professional services directly performed for or at the request of the Committee. We also reimbursed the firm for its reasonable expenses.

        The Committee conducted its annual assessment of Willis Towers Watson's performance in December 2015,2018, which included a review of the services provided during the year, the fees paid therefor and the following additional evaluation criteria:

    Experience — The firm's depth and breadth of executive compensation knowledge and experience; qualification as a board-level consultant; quality of staff, data, and other resources; and understanding of our business strategy and issues, industry, performance drivers and human capital considerations;

    Independence — The firm's objectivity in giving advice and making recommendations, and its willingness to provide candid feedback regarding management and Committee proposals, questions and concerns;

    Preparation — The quality and timeliness of the firm's reports andreports; its review and feedback on management proposals;proposals, and the firm's preparation with the Committee Chair and our management, as appropriate; and

    Committee Relationship — The accessibility and availability of members of the engagement team; the firm's relationship with the Committee Chair and management;our management, primarily our human resources staff; and the effectiveness of its communication.

        Based on this assessment, the Committee determined that it continued to bewas satisfied with the performance of Willis Towers Watson and the individual members of the engagement team serving the Committee.

ADVISOR INDEPENDENCE

        Willis Towers Watson and the Committee have had the following protocols in place since the commencement of the engagement commenced to ensure the firm's independence from management: the Committee has the sole authority to select, retain and terminate Willis Towers Watson, as well as authorize the firm's fees and determine the other terms and conditions that govern the engagement; the Committee directs Willis Towers Watson on the process for delivery and communication of its work product, including its analyses, findings, conclusions and recommendations; in the performance and evaluation of its duties, Willis Towers Watson is accountable, and reports directly, to the Committee; and the Committee may consult with Willis Towers Watson at any time, with or without members of management present, at the Committee's sole discretion.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |63


Table of Contents

        As required by SEC regulations and NYSE listing standards, the Committee considered the independence of its advisors in December 2015.2018. The Committee affirmatively determined Towers Watson to be independent and both the firm and the members of the engagement team advising the Committee to be free of any conflicts of interest based on its review ofreviewed information provided by Willis Towers Watson, members of the Committee and our executive officers related to the following factors:

    Other services provided to our company — During fiscal year 2018, Willis Towers Watson performed no services for our company other than work undertaken for orexecutive compensation services performed at the request of the Committee during 2015;Committee;

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|51

Table of Contents

    Fees paid by our company as a percentage of the firm's total revenue — Fees from our company reflected approximately 0.003%0.002% of Willis Towers Watson's revenue for its fiscal year ended June 30, 2015;December 31, 2017;

    Policies and procedures maintained to prevent or mitigate conflicts of interest — Willis Towers Watson has multiple suchseveral policies and procedures to mitigate conflicts of interest, including a comprehensive code of conduct and ethics and quality policies that mandate rigorous work reviews and periodic compliance reviews;reviews, which the firm represented to the Committee are highly effective;

    Business or personal relationships with members of the Committee — Based on disclosures from Willis Towers Watson and members of the Committee, we are aware of no such business or personal relationships;

    Company stock owned by Willis Towers Watson firm representatives — No members of the Willis Towers Watson team serving the Committee own any stock in our company, other than perhaps through investments in mutual or other funds managed without the member's input; and

    Business or personal relationships with any executive officer of our company — Based on disclosures from the firm and our executive officers, we are aware of no business or personal relationships with Willis Towers Watson or the members of the engagement team advising the Committee.

        The Committee affirmatively determined Willis Towers Watson to be independent and both the firm and the members of the engagement team advising the Committee to be free of any conflicts of interest.

OTHER CONSIDERATIONS

CLAWBACK POLICY

        In the event of fraud or other intentional misconduct on the part of an NEO that necessitates a restatement of our financial results, the NEO would be required to reimburse our company for any AIP or LTI awards paid or granted in excess of the amount that would have been paid or granted based on the restated financial results. These remedies would be in addition to, not instead of, any other actions taken by our company (through the imposition of any discipline up to and including termination), law enforcement agencies, regulators or other authorities. This clawback policy has been contractually acknowledged by our NEOs upon the execution of their LTI award agreements since 2010.

        The Committee approved our clawback policy in December 2009 to subject incentive compensation to forfeiture if our financial results are not achieved consistent with our high ethical standards. This policy is one of the terms and conditions in bothexpressly incorporated into our AIP and Equity Plan.LTI plans. The Committee anticipates that it will revise the policy if and as necessary to comply with final rules issued by the SEC.

TAX IMPLICATIONS OF EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

        The Committee aims to compensate our NEOs in a manner that is tax effective for our company. However, the Committee may adopt or implement compensation programs and/or practices that are not fully tax deductible to the extent it believes doing so is in the best interests of our company and stockholders.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |64


Table of Contents

Section 162(m) of the Code

        UnderPrior to the 1993 Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act andenactment of the TCJA, Section 162(m) of the Code ("Section 162(m)"), generally limited our federal income tax deductions for executive compensation arein any fiscal year to the extent total compensation for certain executive officers exceeded $1 million in such year, unless it qualified as "performance-based." The TCJA amended Section 162(m) by, among other things, expanding the scope of executive officers covered by Section 162(m) and eliminating the exception for "performance-based" compensation. As a result, under Section 162(m) as in effect for fiscal year 2018, our federal income tax deductions for executive compensation in fiscal year 2018 were generally limited to the extent total compensation for certain executive officers exceedsexceeded $1 million, in any one year, unless it qualifies as "performance-based."qualified for limited transition relief under the TCJA. To qualify as performance-based,for transition relief, compensation must, among other things, be based solely uponpayable pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017 and not subsequently modified in any material respect.

        While in the achievementpast we have structured certain of objective performance goals and made underour incentive compensation in a plan that is administered by a compensation committee comprised solelymanner intended to be tax-deductible for purposes of "outside directors." In addition,Section 162(m), due to the material terms of the plan must be disclosed to and approved by our stockholdersTCJA and the Committee must certify thatuncertainties in the performance goals were achieved before payments can be made.

        Our Senior Executive Annual Incentive Plan is designed to comply with the provisionsapplication of Section 162(m) and was last approvedas amended by our stockholders in 2014, which constituted approval of the performance-based criteria reflected therein. Under the plan, our NEOs are eligible to receive a maximum annual cash incentive compensation award based on a specified percentage of our gross profit less marketing, general and administrative expenses, in each case as reported on our consolidated statement of operations for the applicable fiscal year. The Committee annually reviews the maximum plan awards and may exercise its discretion to decrease, but not increase, such awards. The AIP awards granted to our NEOs were substantially below these maximums.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|52

Table of Contents

        In addition to the Senior Executive Annual Incentive Plan, we have designed certain of our other compensation programs to comply with Section 162(m) of the Code and related regulations so that total compensation paid to any employee covered by Section 162(m) generally should not, unless otherwise determined appropriate, exceed $1 million in any one year, except for compensation payments that qualify as "performance-based." Due to uncertainties in the applications of Section 162(m) and the regulations thereunder,TCJA, there is no guarantee that deductions claimed under Section 162(m) will not be challenged or disallowed by the IRS.IRS and our ability to deduct compensation under Section 162(m) may be restricted. Furthermore, although we believethe Committee believes that deductibility of executive compensation is an important consideration we reserveand may continue to consider the effects of the TCJA on our future pay practices, it reserves the right to pay compensationapprove and approvepay executive compensation arrangements that are not fully tax deductible, and/or modify compensation programs and practices without regard for tax deductibility, if we believeit believes that doing so is in the best interests of our company and our stockholders.

Section 409A of the Code

        Nonqualified deferred compensation must be deferred and paid under plans or arrangements that satisfy the requirements of Section 409A of the Code with respect to the timing of deferral elections and payments and certain other matters. Failure to satisfy these requirements could expose individuals to accelerated income tax liabilities, penalty taxes and interest on their compensation deferred under these plans. As a general matter, we design and administer our compensation and benefit plans and arrangements so that they arein a manner intended to cause these plans and arrangements to be either exempt from, or satisfy the requirements of, Section 409A.409A of the Code.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |65

|2016 Proxy Statement|53

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION TABLES

20152018 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

        The following table below shows the compensation earned by or awarded to our NEOs during fiscal years 2015, 2014,2018, 2017 and 20132016 in accordance with SEC regulations. Compensation as shown in the table does not necessarily reflect the compensation actually realized by our NEOs for these years. For example, the amounts set forth under "Stock Awards" in 2015 do not represent amounts realized by our NEOs; rather, they represent the aggregate grant date fair value for financial reporting purposes of PUs (which are subject to ourthe achievement of cumulative EVA and relative TSR performance objectives measured at the end of a three-year period and ultimately may result in no such compensation ultimately being realized by the NEO)our NEOs) and MSUs (which are subject to cancellation in the event our absolute TSR declines more than 15% over one-, two-, three- andor four-year performance periods).

NAME AND
PRINCIPAL POSITION

 YEAR
 SALARY(1)
 BONUS(2)
 STOCK
AWARDS(3)

 NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
COMPENSATION(4)

 CHANGE IN
PENSION VALUE
AND NQDC
EARNINGS(5)

 ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION(6)

 TOTAL
 
Dean A. Scarborough 2015 $1,119,545 


$5,241,657 $1,902,758 $4,732 $296,647 $8,565,339 
Chairman & 2014 $1,095,000 


$4,924,387 $1,032,408 $4,681,738 $279,486 $12,013,019 
Chief Executive Officer 2013 $1,063,250 


$5,026,511 $2,200,000 


$169,190 $8,458,951 
Mitchell R. Butier  2015 $761,250   $4,579,014 $1,058,569   $160,240 $6,559,073 
President &  2014 $620,029   $1,540,767 $570,375 $193,931 $137,692 $3,062,794 
Chief Operating Officer  2013 $571,279   $1,217,909 $893,966 $67,802 $100,643 $2,851,599 
Anne L. Bramman(7) 2015 $425,868 $200,000 $1,426,135 $405,900 


$329,572 $2,787,475 
Senior Vice President &
Chief Financial Officer

 
                
Georges Gravanis(7)(8)  2015 $440,528   $1,420,555 $413,304   $461,401 $2,735,788 
President, Materials Group                         
Anne Hill(7) 2015 $499,045 


$1,215,025 $425,626 


$141,937 $2,281,633 
Senior Vice President & 2014 $488,090 


$1,053,406 $276,122 $100,190 $640,568 $2,558,376 
Chief Human Resources                 
Officer                 
R. Shawn Neville  2015 $388,884   $2,838,238     $1,483,683 $4,710,805 
Former President,  2014 $575,031   $1,467,460 $139,207 $34 $123,908 $2,305,640 
Retail Branding and  2013 $555,840   $1,160,931 $758,989 $12,507 $100,775 $2,589,042 
Information Solutions                         
NAME AND
PRINCIPAL POSITION

YEAR
SALARY(1)
BONUS(2)
STOCK
AWARDS(3)

OPTION
AWARDS

NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN
COMPENSATION(4)

CHANGE IN
PENSION VALUE
AND NQDC
EARNINGS(5)

ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION(6)

TOTAL
Mitchell R. Butier         

President &

2018$1,133,000$5,580,651$1,741,988$0$254,058$8,709,697

Chief Executive Officer

2017$1,124,750$4,864,416$2,407,625$344,240$218,437$8,959,468
 2016$988,333$4,694,582$2,000,008$1,832,620$170,266$152,978$9,838,787
Gregory S. Lovins(7)         

Senior Vice President &

2018$587,500$1,140,762$553,500$0$123,963$2,405,725

Chief Financial Officer

2017$480,949$100,000$1,038,782$467,500$89,626$283,905$2,460,762
Georges Gravanis(8)         

President, LGM

2018$651,785$1,145,707$546,333$26,640$2,370,465
 2017$618,551$984,354$598,737$50,267$2,251,909
 2016$523,775$925,850$682,964$403,353$2,535,942
Susan C. Miller         

Senior Vice President,

2018$560,017$1,022,200$416,324$0$147,356$2,145,897

General Counsel &

2017$543,706$995,936$558,647$1,307,825$141,896$3,548,010

Secretary

2016$527,870$991,532$468,996$331,781$126,461$2,446,640
Deon M. Stander(7)         

Vice President &

2018$535,290$750,000$870,212$388,051$0$98,242$2,641,795

General Manager, RBIS

         

(1)
Amounts include any portions of salary contributed to our employee savings plan or deferred under our deferred compensation plan. IncreasesChanges in base salary if any,approved by the Compensation Committee for 2018 became effective on April 1 of eachthat year. Ms. Bramman elected to defer 15% of her 2015 salary and Mr. Neville elected to defer 3% of his 2015 salary.

(2)
Amount for Ms. BrammanMr. Stander in 2018 reflects her sign-on bonusthe payout of a special one-time cash retention and incentive award granted in accordance withFebruary 2017, before he became an executive officer. Payout of the termsaward was conditioned on the successful execution of her offer letter.the RBIS transformation plan, as determined in April 2018. The requisite performance condition was deemed to have been met in light of the business' substantially improved financial performance and trajectory.

(3)
Amounts reflect the aggregate grant date fair value of stock awards, without adjustment for forfeitures,PUs and MSUs granted in 2018 and do not reflect compensation actually realized by our NEOs.NEOs in that year. For values actually realized by our NEOs from the vesting of PUs and MSUs during 2015,the year, see the "Value Realized on Vesting" column of the20152018 Option Exercises and Stock Vested table.

Amounts in 20152018 include the grant date fair value of PUs, without adjustment for forfeitures, which are payablepaid out in shares of our common stock at the end of a three-year period provided that the designated performance objectives are achieved as ofat the end of the period. The actual number of shares issuedpaid out at vesting can range from 0% to 200% of the target shares at the time of grant. The performance objectives that determine the number of shares that may be earned for the PUs granted in 2015 are2018 were (i) cumulative EVA (weighted 50% based on our total company for our corporate NEOs, and 75% based on the applicableLGM business group for our LGM business group NEOs)NEO, and 100% based on the RBIS business for our RBIS business NEO), which is a performance condition under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718,Compensation — StockCompensation-Stock Compensation (ASC 718), and (ii) relative TSR (weighted 50% for our corporate NEOs, and 25% for our LGM business group NEOs)NEO, and 0% for our RBIS business NEO), which is a market condition under ASC 718, compared to the TSR of a peer group of companies objectively determined based on GICS code and revenue size, which is a market condition under ASC 718, in each case computed over the three-year (2015-2017)(2018-2020) performance period. The performance condition component of the fair value of PUs was determined based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant adjusted for foregone dividends.date. The maximum grant date fair valuevalues of the performance condition component of the PUs granted in 2015 was $2,367,251, $1,169,648, $485,533were $2,626,485, $536,918, $828,350, and $937,803$859,655 for Messrs. Scarborough, Butier, Lovins, Gravanis, and Neville,Stander, respectively, and $459,644 and $548,755$481,064 for Mses. Bramman and Hill, respectively.Ms. Miller. The market condition component of the fair value of PUs was determined as of the date of grant using the Monte-Carlo simulation method, which utilizes multiple input variables to estimate the probability of meeting the performance objectives established for the award, including the expected volatility of our stock price and other assumptions appropriate for determining fair value. Thevalue; as such, their maximum grant date fair valuevalues are the same as their target grant date fair values included in the table. The grant date fair values of the market condition component of the PUs granted in 2015 was $1,205,922, $595,841, $82,430were $1,576,586, $322,293 and $159,245$165,743 for Messrs. Scarborough, Butier, GravanisLovins and Neville,Gravanis, respectively, and $322,766 and $279,546$288,766 for Mses. Bramman and Hill, respectively.Ms. Miller. The PUs granted to Mr. Neville were cancelled upon the termination of his employment before the end of our 2015 fiscal year.Stander in 2018 did not have a market condition component.

Amounts in 20152018 also include the grant date fair value of MSUs, without adjustment for forfeitures, which are payablepaid out in shares of our common stock over one-, two-, three- and four-year performance periods provided that the respective designated performance objective isobjectives are achieved as of the end of each vesting period. The actual number of shares issuedpaid out at vesting can range from 0% to 200% of the target shares aton the time of grant.grant date. The single performance objective that determines the

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|54

Table of Contents

    number of units tothat may be earnedpaid out for MSUs granted in 2015 is our absolute TSR, which is a market condition under ASC 718. Since these awards do not have performance conditions718; as defined under ASC 718,such, their maximum grant date fair value isvalues were the same as thetheir target grant date fair values includedshown in the table. The grant date fair value of MSUs of $117.75 in 2018 for all NEOs was determined as of the date of grant using the Monte-Carlo simulation method described above. All of the NEOs were granted MSUs on February 26, 2015, except for Ms. Bramman whose MSUs were granted on June 1, 2015. The weighted average per-share grant date fair value for the MSUs granted on February 26, 2015 and June 1, 2015 was $56.05 and $77.50, respectively. The MSUs granted to Mr. Neville were cancelled upon the termination of his employment before the end of our 2015 fiscal year.

    Amounts in 2015 also include the grant date fair value of the following RSUs, without adjustment for forfeitures: (i) a replacement promotion grant to Mr. Butier on March 2, 2015, 50% of which vested on the grant date, 40% of which vest on December 1, 2016 and 10% of which vest on the three-year anniversary of the grant date; (ii) a new hire grant to Ms. Bramman on June 1, 2015, which vests ratably over three years; (iii) a promotion grant to Mr. Gravanis on June 1, 2015, which vests ratably over four years; and (iv) a replacement grant to Mr. Neville on March 2, 2015, 90% of which would have vested on December 1, 2016 and 10% of which would have vested on the three-year anniversary of the grant date. The fair value of these RSUs was determined based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date, adjusted for foregone dividends. The RSUs granted to Mr. Neville were cancelled upon the termination of his employment before the end of our fiscal year.

    For information regarding the assumptions we use for our stock-based compensation, see Note 12, "Long-Term Incentive Compensation," to the consolidated financial statements contained in our 2015 Annual Report.

(4)
Amounts reflect earnings under ourcash AIP awards for the applicable year, which are determined in February and paid in March of the following year. Because he was not employed on the last day of our 2015 fiscal year, Mr. Neville was not eligible for a 2015 AIP award.

(5)
Amounts in 2015 are indicated as zero becauseof $(113,709), $(12,179) and $(25,681) for Messrs. Butier, Lovins and Stander and $(472,527) for Ms. Miller have been excluded from the year-over-year change in actuarial present value was negative. Accumulated retirement benefits under our pension plan, benefit restoration plan and supplemental executive retirement plan, as applicable, were frozen effective December 31, 2010. Changes in pension values are based primarily on changes in the actuarial assumptions used to calculate pension amountstable in accordance with SEC regulations, rather than changes in benefits or the amount the individual will actually receive upon retirement. The actual change in the actuarial present valuerules. Mr. Gravanis was $(1,246,519) and $(42,250) for Messrs. Scarborough and Butier, respectively, and $(27,928) for Ms. Hill. Ms. Bramman and Messrs. Gravanis and Neville are ineligiblenot eligible to participate in these plans.

With respect to Mr. Scarborough, amount reflects above-market earningsAvery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |66


Table of $4,732 earned in 2015 in a legacy deferred compensation plan that is no longer open for deferrals. Above-market earnings mean a crediting interest rate in excess of 120% of the applicable federal rate, which was 3.47% for 2014. The crediting rate under the legacy plan was 4.19% from January 3, 2015 to November 30, 2015 and 3.93% from December 1, 2015 to January 2, 2016.Contents

(6)
The table shown below detailsshows the components of the amounts for 2015.2018.

 
 PERQUISITES BENEFITS  
 
NAME
 Executive
Benefit
Allowance

 Financial
Planning

 Other*
 Company
Contribution
& Match,
Employee
Savings Plan

 Company
Contributions,
Deferred
Comp. Plan

 Excess Life
Insurance

 Executive
Long-Term
Disability
Insurance

 Executive
Liability
Insurance

 Executive
Severance
Plan**

 TOTAL
 

Mr. Scarborough

 $70,000 $25,000 


$15,447 $182,160 $1,236 $2,331 $473 


$296,647 

Mr. Butier

 $65,000     $15,900 $75,300 $1,236 $2,331 $473   $160,240 

Ms. Bramman

 $48,750 


$270,515 $7,950 


$721 $1,360 $276 


$329,572 

Mr. Gravanis

     $461,401             $461,401 

Ms. Hill

 $65,000 $15,000 


$15,900 $41,997 $1,236 $2,331 $473 


$141,937 

Mr. Neville

 $46,042 $503   $15,900 $61,159 $927   $355 $1,358,797 $1,483,683 

 
PERQUISITESBENEFITS 
        NAME
Executive
Benefit
Allowance

Financial
Planning

Other*
Company
Contribution
and Match,
Employee
Savings Plan

Company
Contributions,
Deferred
Comp. Plan

Excess
Life
Insurance

Executive
Long-Term
Disability
Insurance

Executive
Liability
Insurance

TOTAL

Butier

$70,000







$17,875$161,302$1,944$2,700$237$254,058

Lovins

$65,000$17,875$36,207$1,944$2,700$237$123,963

Gravanis





$3,164$23,476



















$26,640

Miller

$65,000$15,000$17,875$44,600$1,944$2,700$237$147,356

Stander

$50,000







$17,875$25,486$1,944$2,700$237$98,242

    *
    Amount for Ms. Bramman reflects benefits of $270,515 related to her relocation to our headquarters in California on terms and conditions substantially similar to those for our other relocating executives, including the following: (i) $160,381 for certain fees, costs and commissions for the sale of her prior home; (ii) $46,984 for the shipment and storage of her household goods; and (ii) other lesser amounts for transportation, househunting, temporary housing, and tax assistance. Amount for Mr. Gravanis reflects benefits of $461,401 related to his international assignment in Hong Kong during 2015, at our company's request and on terms and conditions substantially similar to those for our other expatriate executives, including: (i) a goods and services differential of $109,048; (ii) a housing allowance of $266,927; and (iii) other lesser amounts$23,476 for an automobile allowance, tuition assistance, a home leave allowance, a utilities allowance, and tax preparation fees. These expatriate benefits will cease upon his localization.

    **
    Amount for Mr. Neville reflects severance benefits related to his separationconverted from our company in accordance witheuros using the terms and conditions of the Executive Severance Plan, representing the sum of (i) his annual base salary of $580,030exchange rates as of his termination date; (ii) $758,989, the highest of his last three AIP awards; and (iii) $19,778, the cash value of 12 months of insurance premiums for the qualified medical and dental plans in which he participated as of his termination date. In consideration of his receipt of these benefits, Mr. Neville agreed to a waiver and release of any claims against our company and to non-competition, non-solicitation and non-disclosure covenants in favor of our company.each month-end during 2018.

(7)
Mses. BrammanMessrs. Lovins and HillStander first became NEOs in 20152017 and 2014, respectively; Mr. Gravanis first became an NEO in 2015.2018, respectively. As permitted by SEC rules, the table reflectsshows their compensation only sincebeginning in the respective year in which they became NEOs.an NEO.

(8)
Amounts for Mr. Gravanis' compensation wasGravanis were converted from Euros to U.S. dollarseuros using the exchange rate as of our fiscal year-end (1.06416942).(1.1412919), except for amounts forAll Other Compensation described in footnote (6) above.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |67

|2016 Proxy Statement|55

Table of Contents

20152018 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

        The following table below provides information regarding grants of plan-based incentive awards made to our NEOs during 2015.2018.

 
  
  
 ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS ($)(1)
 ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS (#)(2)
 ALL OTHER
STOCK AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SHARES OF
STOCK OR
UNITS(#)

  
 
 
  
  
 GRANT DATE
FAIR VALUE
OF STOCK
AND OPTION
AWARDS ($)(3)

 
NAME
 AWARD
TYPE

 GRANT
DATE

 THRESHOLD
 TARGET
 MAXIMUM
 THRESHOLD
 TARGET
 MAXIMUM
 

Mr. Scarborough

 MSUs 02/26/15 








43,254 50,887 101,774 


$2,852,110 

 PUs 02/26/15 








23,627 47,254 94,508 


$2,389,547 

 AIP Award 


$703,163 $1,406,325 $2,812,650 











 

Mr. Butier

 MSUs  02/26/15        21,372  25,144  50,288   $1,409,258 

 PUs  02/26/15        11,674  23,348  46,696   $1,180,665 

 RSUs  03/02/15              38,081 $1,989,091 

 AIP Award   $344,250 $688,500 $1,377,000           

Ms. Bramman

 MSUs 06/01/15 








5,403 6,357 12,714 


$492,656 

 PUs 06/01/15 








4,017 8,034 16,068 


$552,588 

 RSUs 06/01/15 

















6,492 $380,891 

 AIP Award 


$165,000 $330,000 $660,000 











 

Mr. Gravanis

 MSUs  02/26/15        5,914  6,958  13,916   $389,993 

 PUs  02/26/15        3,231  6,461  12,922   $325,196 

 RSUs  06/01/15              12,172 $705,366 

 AIP Award   $141,713 $283,425 $566,850           

Ms. Hill

 MSUs 02/26/15 








10,026 11,795 23,590 


$661,101 

 PUs 02/26/15 








5,477 10,954 21,908 


$553,924 

 AIP Award 


$150,451 $300,902 $601,804 











 

Mr. Neville

 MSUs  02/26/15        11,423  13,439  26,878   $753,243 

 PUs  02/26/15        6,240  12,480  24,960   $628,146 

 RSUs  03/02/15              28,561 $1,456,849 

 AIP Award   $217,511 $435,022 $870,044          
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
ALL OTHER
STOCK
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
SHARES OF
STOCK
UNITS(#)

 
 
 
 
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS ($)(1)
ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS (#)(2)
 
 
 
 
GRANT DATE
FAIR VALUE
OF STOCK
AND OPTION
AWARDS ($)(3)

NAME
AWARD
TYPE

GRANT
DATE

THRESHOLD
TARGET
MAXIMUM
THRESHOLD
TARGET
MAXIMUM

Mitchell R. Butier

          

MSUs02/22/1819,42422,85245,704$2,690,823

PUs02/22/1811,66223,32446,648$2,889,828

AIP Award$708,125$1,416,250$2,832,500

Gregory S. Lovins

          

MSUs02/22/183,9704,6719,342$550,010

PUs02/22/182,3844,7689,536$590,752

AIP Award$137,500$450,000$550,000

Georges Gravanis

          

MSUs02/22/184,0844,8059,610$565,789

PUs02/22/182,4524,9049,808$579,918

AIP Award$235,488$470,976$941,952

Susan C. Miller

          

MSUs02/22/183,5584,1868,372$492,902

PUs02/22/182,1364,2728,544$529,298

AIP Award$169,238$338,475$676,950

Deon M. Stander

          

MSUs02/22/183,1793,7407,480$440,385

PUs02/22/181,9093,8177,634$429,827

AIP Award$134,740$269,480$538,960

(1)
Amounts represent threshold, target and maximum amountsopportunities under the 20152018 AIP. Target awards were established by multiplying each NEO's base salary at the end of 20152018 by the following target AIP opportunities: 125% for Mr. Scarborough; 90% for Mr. Butier; 75% for Mr. Neville;Messrs. Lovins and Gravanis; 60% for Mses. BrammanMs. Miller; and Hill; and 57%50% for Mr. Gravanis.Stander. Payout levels range from 50% ofif the target amounts for threshold performance are achieved with respect to each of the performance objectives to 200% ofif the target amounts for maximum performance (reflecting an overall capare achieved with respect to each of 200% irrespective of company and individual performance). Amounts for Mr. Gravanis reflect his current AIP opportunity of 60% and his previous AIP opportunity of 50%, in each case prorated for the months of his service during the year. Because Mr. Neville was not employed on the last day of our 2015 fiscal year, he did not receive a 2015 AIP award.performance objectives.

(2)
Amounts for MSUs represent threshold, target and maximum payout opportunities, which are payablepaid out in shares of our common stock over one-, two-, three- and four-year performance periods provided that the absolute TSR performance objective is achieved as of the end of each performance period. The actual number of shares issuedpaid out can range from 0% to 200% of the target number of shares on the grant date, with a threshold payout opportunity of 85%. MSUs accrue dividend equivalents during the performance period, which are earned and paid out only at vesting.

Amounts for PUs represent threshold, target and maximum opportunities for the 2018-2020 PUs, which are paid out in shares of our common stock at the end of a three-year performance period provided that the cumulative EVA and relative TSR performance objectives, as applicable, are achieved at the end of the period. The actual number of shares paid out can range from 0% to 200% of the target number of shares at the time of grant, with a threshold payout opportunity of 85%. MSUs accrue dividend equivalents during the vesting period, which are earned and paid only at vesting. The MSUs granted50% if threshold performance is achieved with respect to Mr. Neville were cancelled upon the termination of his employment before the end of our 2015 fiscal year.

Amounts for PUs represent threshold, target and maximum payout opportunities granted under the 2015-2017 MTIP, which are payable in shares of our common stock at the end of a three-year period provided that the cumulative EVA and relative TSR performance objectives are achieved aseach of the end of the period. The actual number of shares issued can range from 0% to 200% of the target number of shares at the time of grant, with a threshold payout opportunity of 50%. The PUs granted to Mr. Neville were cancelled upon the termination of his employment before the end of our 2015 fiscal year.performance objectives.

(3)
The grant date fair value of MSUs was determined using the Monte-Carlo simulation method, which utilizes multiple input variables, including expected volatility of our stock price and other assumptions appropriate for determining fair value, to estimate the probability of satisfying the performance objective established for the award.

The grant date fair value of PUs with afor the performance condition component of PUs was determined based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant adjusted for foregone dividends.date. The grant date fair value of PUs with afor the market condition component of PUs was determined as of the grant date of grant using the Monte-Carlo simulation method described above. The grant date fair value of RSUs was determined based on the fair market value of our common stock on the date of grant, adjusted for foregone dividends.

For information regarding the assumptions we use for our stock-based compensation, see Note 12, "Long-Term Incentive Compensation," to the consolidated financial statements contained in our 20152018 Annual Report.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |68

|2016 Proxy Statement|56

Table of Contents

20152018 OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

        The following table provides information regardingbelow shows NEO equity awards outstanding as of January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, the end of our 20152018 fiscal year. Mr. Neville held no outstanding equity awards as of January 2, 2016 and therefore has not been included in the table.

NAME
 GRANT
DATE

 NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS —
EXERCISABLE (#)

 NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS —
UNEXERCISABLE (#)

 OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE ($)

 OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE

 NUMBER OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED (#)

 MARKET
VALUE OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED ($)(1)

 EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED (#)

 EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
MARKET OR
PAYOUT VALUE
OF UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED ($)(1)

 

Mr. Scarborough

 12/07/06 100,000(2)


$67.80 12/07/16 








 

 02/28/08 230,000(2)


$52.12 02/28/18 








 

 02/26/10 200,000(2)


$31.67 02/26/20 








 

 12/13/10 200,000(2)


$41.57 12/13/20 








 

 02/24/11 250,000(2)


$39.32 02/24/21 








 

 02/23/12 137,454(2)45,819 $30.50 02/23/22 11,379 $713,008 


 

 02/28/13 

















114,976(4)$7,204,396 

 02/28/13 

















48,202(5)$3,020,337 

 02/27/14 

















99,526(4)$6,236,299 

 02/27/14 

















65,798(5)$4,122,903 

 02/26/15 

















94,508(4)$5,921,871 

 02/26/15 

















92,439(5)$5,792,228 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Total

  1,117,454 45,819   11,379 $713,008 515,449 $32,298,034 

Mr. Butier

  12/07/06  15,070(2)  $67.80  12/07/16         

  02/28/08  20,580(2)  $52.12  02/28/18         

  09/02/08  15,000(2)  $49.44  09/02/18         

  02/26/10  13,971(2)  $31.67  02/26/20         

  06/01/10  28,000(2)  $33.61  06/01/20         

  02/23/12  35,404(2) 11,802 $30.50  02/23/22  2,931 $183,656     

  02/28/13              27,858(4)$1,745,582 

  02/28/13              11,682(5)$731,994 

  02/27/14              31,140(4)$1,951,232 

  02/27/14              20,587(5)$1,289,981 

  02/26/15              46,696(4)$2,925,971 

  02/26/15              45,675(5)$2,861,996 

  03/02/15          19,041(3)$1,193,109    
 

Total

     128,025  11,802        21,972 $1,376,765  183,638 $11,506,756 

Ms. Bramman

 06/01/15 











6,492(3)$406,789 


 

 06/01/15 

















16,068(4)$1,066,821 

 06/01/15 

















11,471(5)$718,773 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Total

  





  6,492 $406,789 27,539 $1,785,594 

Mr. Gravanis

  12/07/06  12,317(2)  $67.80  12/07/16         

  02/23/12    5,100 $30.50  02/23/22  1,267 $79,390     

  02/28/13              12,996(4)$814,329 

  02/28/13              5,448(5)$341,372 

  02/27/14              12,720(4)$797,035 

  02/27/14              8,410(5)$526,971 

  02/26/15              12,922(4)$809,693 

  02/26/15              12,640(5)$792,022 

  06/01/15          12,172(3)$762,698    
 

Total

     12,317  5,100        13,439 $842,088  65,136 $4,081,422 
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|57

Table of Contents

NAME
 GRANT
DATE

 NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS —
EXERCISABLE (#)

 NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS —
UNEXERCISABLE (#)

 OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE ($)

 OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE

 NUMBER OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED (#)

 MARKET
VALUE OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED ($)(1)

 EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED (#)

 EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
MARKET OR
PAYOUT VALUE
OF UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED ($)(1)

  GRANT
DATE

 NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS —
EXERCISABLE (#)

 NUMBER OF
SECURITIES
UNDERLYING
UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS —
UNEXERCISABLE (#)

 OPTION
EXERCISE
PRICE ($)

 OPTION
EXPIRATION
DATE

 NUMBER OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED (#)

 MARKET
VALUE OF
SHARES OR
UNITS OF
STOCK
THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED
($)(1)

 EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED (#)

 EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
MARKET OR
PAYOUT VALUE
OF UNEARNED
SHARES,
UNITS OR
OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT
VESTED ($)(1)

Ms. Hill

 06/01/07 30,000(2)


$65.38 06/01/17 








 

 02/23/12 27,765(2)9,256 $30.50 02/23/22 2,299 $144,055 


 

 02/28/13 

















21,318(4)$1,335,786 

 02/28/13 

















8,940(5)$560,180 

 02/27/14 

















21,290(4)$1,334,031 

 02/27/14 

















14,077(5)$882,065 

 02/26/15 

















21,908(4)$1,372,755 

 02/26/15 

















21,427(5)$1,342,616 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Mitchell R. Butier

                  

 02/26/15       13,126(5) $1,165,983

 02/25/16       70,320(4) $6,246,526

 02/25/16       30,196(5) $2,682,311

 06/01/16  141,108(2) $73.96 06/01/26    

 02/23/17       58,904(4) $5,232,442

 02/23/17       35,080(5) $3,116,156

 02/22/18       46,648(4) $4,143,742

 02/22/18       17,591(5) $1,562,609
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 

Total

  57,765 9,256   2,299 $144,055 108,960 $6,827,433     141,108       271,865 $24,149,769

Gregory S. Lovins

                  

 02/26/15       2,827(5) $251,122

 02/25/16       7,672(4) $681,504

 02/25/16       3,295(5) $292,695

 02/23/17       6,228(4) $553,234

 02/23/17       3,711(5) $329,648

 09/01/17     4,359(3) $387,210  

 02/22/18       9,536(4) $847,082

 02/22/18       3,596(5) $319,433

Total

         4,359 $387,210 36,865 $3,274,718

Georges Gravanis

                  

 02/26/15       3,634(5) $322,808

 06/01/15     3,043(3) $270,310  

 02/25/16       14,390(4) $1,278,263

 02/25/16       6,179(5) $548,881

 02/23/17       12,294(4) $1,092,076

 02/23/17       7,321(5) $650,324

 02/22/18       9,808(4) $871,244

 02/22/18       3,699(5) $328,582

Total

         3,043 $270,310 57,325 $5,092,178

Susan C. Miller

                  

 02/26/15       5,365(5) $476,573

 02/25/16       14,852(4) $1,319,304

 02/25/16       6,378(5) $566,558

 02/23/17       12,060(4) $1,071,290

 02/23/17       7,182(5) $637,977

 02/22/18       8,544(4) $758,964

 02/22/18       3,222(5) $286,210

Total

           57,603 $5,116,876

Deon M. Stander

                  

 02/26/15       2,808(5) $249,435

 02/25/16       20,138(4) $1,788,858

 02/25/16       2,883(5) $256,097

 02/23/17       16,192(4) $1,438,335

 02/23/17       3,215(5) $285,588

 02/22/18       7,634(4) $678,128

 02/22/18       2,879(5) $255,742

               55,749 $4,952,183

(1)
Market value calculated based on a stock price of $62.66, the closing price of our common stock of $88.83 on December 31, 2015,28, 2018, the last trading day of our 20152018 fiscal year.

(2)
Stock options granted to Mr. Butier on June 1, 2016 vest in equal installments50% on each of the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date, except for the stock options grantedsubject to Mr. Gravanis on December 7, 2006, which vested 100% on the four-year anniversaryhis continued service.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |69


Table of the grant date.

Contents

(3)
RSUs granted to (i) Mr. ButierLovins on March 2, 2015 vest 50% on the grant date, 40% on DecemberSeptember 1, 20162017 and 10% on the three-year anniversary of the grant date; (ii) Ms. Bramman on June 1, 2015 vest in equal installments on the first, second and third anniversaries of the grant date; and (iii) Mr. Gravanis on June 1, 2015 vest in equal installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the respective grant date.date, in each case subject to his continued service.

(4)
PUs are eligible for vesting at the end of a three-year performance period, subject to our achievement of the cumulative EVA and relative TSRapplicable performance objectives established for the NEO's award. Amounts are listedshown at the (i) maximum level200% of performancetarget for the 2016-2018 PUs, granted underwhich was the 2013-2015 MTIPpayout for our corporateall NEOs (Messrs. Scarborough and Butier and Mses. Bramman and Hill) and our business group NEO (Mr. Gravanis) (the payouts based on ourthe actual performance during the period as determined by the Compensation Committee in February 2016);2019, and (ii) the maximum level of performance for the 2017-2019 PUs granted under the 2014-2016 MTIP and 2015-2017 MTIP2018-2020 PUs for all NEOs as our actual performance through January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 would result in above-target payouts for all NEOs.payouts.

(5)
MSUs are eligible for vesting on a ratable basisas of the end of the period over one-, two-, three- and four-year performance periods, subject to our achievement of the absolute TSR performance objective established for the award. Amounts are listedshown at 179%(i) 200%, 125%188%, 137% and 109%0% of target for the vesting tranches of the MSUs granted in 2013, 20142015, 2016, 2017 and 2015,2018, respectively, (thethe payouts for all NEOs based on our actual performance duringfor the respective performance periods as determined by the Compensation Committee in February 2016), and at2019; (ii) the maximum level of performance for the remaining tranches of these grants (as ourthe MSUs granted in 2016 and 2017, as actual performance through January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 would result in above-target payouts),payouts; and (iii) the target level of performance for the remaining tranches of the MSUs granted in 2018, as actual performance through December 29, 2018 would result in below-target payouts, in each case including dividend equivalents accrued as of January 2, 2016.December 29, 2018.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |70

|2016 Proxy Statement|58

Table of Contents

20152018 OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

        The following table below provides information regarding the number of shares acquired and the value realized by our NEOs upon the exercise of stock options and the vesting of stock awards during 2015.2018. Amounts under stock awards includereflect the vesting of (i) the PUs granted in 20122015 for the 2015-2017 performance period, which paid out at 107%200% of target based on our relative TSR duringfor all NEOs and at 200% of target based on our cumulative EVA for our corporate NEOs (excluding Mr. Lovins), 200% of target based on LGM's cumulative EVA for Messrs. Lovins and Gravanis, and 61% of target based on RBIS' cumulative EVA for Mr. Stander; (ii) the 2012-2014 performance period; (ii)fourth tranche of MSUs granted in 2014 that paid out at 200% of target based on our 2014-2017 absolute TSR; (iii) the third tranche of MSUs granted in 2015 that paid out at 200% of target based on our 2015-2017 absolute TSR; (iv) the second tranche of MSUs granted in 20132016 that paid out at 154%200% of target based on our 2013-20142016-2017 absolute TSR, including accrued dividend equivalents paid out at vesting; (iii)TSR; (v) the first tranche of MSUs granted in 20142017 that paid out at 108%188% of target based on our 20142017 absolute TSR, includingTSR; and (vi) RSUs granted in 2015 and 2017 that vested in 2018. MSU amounts include accrued dividend equivalents paid out at vesting; and (iv) RSUs granted in 2011, 2012 and 2015 that vested in 2015.vesting.

 
 OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS 
NAME
 NUMBER OF SHARES
ACQUIRED ON EXERCISE (#)

 VALUE REALIZED
ON EXERCISE ($)(1)

 NUMBER OF SHARES
ACQUIRED ON VESTING (#)

 VALUE REALIZED
ON VESTING ($)(2)

 

Mr. Scarborough

 450,000 $10,990,445 108,633 $5,881,568 

Mr. Butier

  77,506 $1,727,266  47,459 $2,559,818 

Ms. Bramman

 








 

Mr. Gravanis

  36,602 $447,328  13,185 $713,034 

Ms. Hill

 199,454 $4,449,557 21,783 $1,179,349 

Mr. Neville

  293,942 $7,900,621  29,439 $1,593,850 

(1)
Amounts reflect the number of shares acquired on exercise multiplied by the difference between the fair market value of our common stock on the exercise date and the exercise price, and include the exercise of the following option awards:

NAME
 GRANT DATE
 NUMBER OF
SHARES ACQUIRED
ON EXERCISE (#)

 EXERCISE
PRICE ($)

 FAIR MARKET
VALUE ON
EXERCISE DATE ($)

 VALUE
REALIZED
ON EXERCISE ($)

 

Mr. Scarborough

 05/02/2005 50,000 $52.08 $54.45 $118,575*

 12/01/2005 100,000 $59.47 $65.10 $563,870*

 02/26/2009 300,000 $20.64 $55.00 $10,308,000 

Mr. Butier

  12/01/2005  12,363 $59.47 $64.63 $63,888*

  02/24/2011  65,143 $39.32 $64.85 $1,663,378 

Mr. Gravanis

 12/01/2005 12,951 $59.47 $65.91 $83,530*

 02/28/2008 15,189 $52.12 $65.76 $207,303 

 02/24/2011 3,363 $39.32 $52.49 $44,298 

 02/23/2012 5,099 $30.50 $52.50 $112,197 

Ms. Hill

  02/28/2008 ��45,779 $52.12 $64.74 $577,978 

  03/03/2008  22,000 $50.98 $64.75 $303,107 

  02/26/2009  15,684 $20.64 $54.60 $532,670 

  02/26/2010  56,663 $31.67 $58.63 $1,527,827 

  02/24/2011  59,328 $39.32 $64.74 $1,507,975 

Mr. Neville**

 06/01/2009 50,000 $27.94 $56.27 $1,416,314 

 02/26/2010 129,273 $31.67 $60.38 $3,711,657 

 02/24/2011 77,143 $39.32 $60.37 $1,624,238 

 02/23/2012 37,526 $30.50 $61.10 $1,148,412 
*
Options would have expired had they not been exercised before the ten-year anniversary of the grant date.
**
All of Mr. Neville's options would have been cancelled had he not exercised them within six months of his termination date.
 
 OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS
NAME
 NUMBER OF
SHARES ACQUIRED
ON EXERCISE (#)

 VALUE REALIZED
ON EXERCISE ($)

 NUMBER OF
SHARES ACQUIRED
ON VESTING (#)

 VALUE REALIZED
ON VESTING ($)(1)

Mitchell R. Butier

 



100,035 $11,777,116

Gregory S. Lovins

   19,501 $2,279,893

Georges Gravanis

 



28,780 $3,355,193

Susan C. Miller

   35,174 $4,144,904

Dean M. Stander

 



15,767 $1,824,341
Avery Dennison Corporation
|2016 Proxy Statement|59
(1)Amounts reflect the number of shares paid out at vesting multiplied by the fair market value of our common stock on the vesting date, and include the vesting of the following stock awards. Numbers of shares paid out at vesting for MSUs include payout of accrued dividend equivalents.


NAME
 AWARD
TYPE

 GRANT
DATE

 NUMBER OF
UNITS
SUBJECT TO
VESTING (#)

 PERFORMANCE
MODIFIER (%)

 NUMBER OF
SHARES
ACQUIRED
ON VESTING (#)*

 FAIR
MARKET
VALUE ON
VESTING
DATE ($)

 VALUE
REALIZED ON
VESTING ($)

Butier

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 RSUs  03/02/15 3,809  3,809 $114.95 $437,845

 MSUs  02/27/14 4,083 200% 8,166 $117.84 $962,281

 MSUs  02/26/15 6,708 200% 13,415 $117.84 $1,580,823

 MSUs  02/25/16 7,853 200% 15,705 $117.84 $1,850,677

 MSUs  02/23/17 6,513 188% 12,244 $117.84 $1,442,833

 PUs  02/26/15 23,348 200% 46,696 $117.84 $5,502,657

Lovins

              

 RSUs  09/01/17 1,453  1,453 $105.38 $153,117

 MSUs  02/27/14 1,050 200% 2,100 $117.84 $247,464

 MSUs  02/26/15 1,444 200% 2,887 $117.84 $340,204

 MSUs  02/25/16 856 200% 1,712 $117.84 $201,742

 MSUs  02/23/17 689 188% 1,295 $117.84 $152,603

 PUs  02/26/15 5,027 200% 10,054 $117.84 $1,184,763

Gravanis

              

 RSUs  06/01/15 3,043  3,043 $105.93 $322,345

 MSUs  02/27/14 1,668 200% 3,336 $117.84 $393,114

 MSUs  02/26/15 1,856 200% 3,711 $117.84 $437,304

 MSUs  02/25/16 1,607 200% 3,213 $117.84 $378,620

 MSUs  02/23/17 1,359 188% 2,555 $117.84 $301,081

 PUs  02/26/15 6,461 200% 12,922 $117.84 $1,522,729

Miller

              

 MSUs  02/27/14 2,395 200% 4,790 $117.84 $564,454

 MSUs  02/26/15 2,740 200% 5,480 $117.84 $645,763

 MSUs  02/25/16 1,659 200% 3,317 $117.84 $390,875

 MSUs  02/23/17 1,334 188% 2,507 $117.84 $295,425

 PUs  02/26/15 9,540 200% 19,080 $117.84 $2,248,387

Stander

              

 RSUs  09/01/15 2,700  2,700 $105.38 $284,526

 MSUs  02/27/14 1,401 200% 2,801 $117.84 $330,070

 MSUs  02/26/15 1,433 200% 2,866 $117.84 $337,729

 MSUs  02/25/16 750 200% 1,499 $117.84 $176,642

 MSUs  02/23/17 597 188% 1,122 $117.84 $132,217

 PUs  02/26/15 4,991 96% 4,779 $117.84 $563,157

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |71


Table of Contents

(2)
Amounts reflect the number of shares acquired on vesting multiplied by the fair market value of our common stock on the vesting date, and include the vesting of the following stock awards. Number of shares acquired on vesting for MSUs includes payout of accrued dividend equivalents at vesting.

NAME
 AWARD
TYPE

 GRANT
DATE

 NUMBER OF
UNITS
SUBJECT TO
VESTING (#)

 PERFORMANCE
MODIFIER (%)

 NUMBER OF
SHARES
ACQUIRED
ON VESTING (#)*

 FAIR
MARKET
VALUE ON
VESTING
DATE ($)

 VALUE
REALIZED ON
VESTING ($)

 

Mr. Scarborough

 RSUs 02/23/2012 11,379 


11,379 $53.13 $604,566 

 MSUs 02/28/2013 12,410 154% 19,111 $54.26 $1,036,963 

 MSUs 02/27/2014 12,229 108% 13,207 $54.26 $716,612 

 PUs 02/23/2012 60,688 107% 64,936 $54.26 $3,523,427 

Mr. Butier

 RSUs  02/23/2012  2,931    2,931 $53.13 $155,724 

 RSUs  03/02/2015  19,040    19,040 $53.63 $1,021,115 

 MSUs  02/28/2013  3,007  154%  4,631 $54.26 $251,278 

 MSUs  02/27/2014  3,826  108%  4,132 $54.26 $224,202 

 PUs  02/23/2012  15,631  107%  16,725 $54.26 $907,499 

Mr. Gravanis

 RSUs 02/24/2011 844 


844 $53.13 $44,842 

 RSUs 02/23/2012 1,266 


1,266 $53.13 $67,262 

 MSUs 02/28/2013 1,403 154% 2,161 $54.26 $117,256 

 MSUs 02/27/2014 1,562 108% 1,687 $54.26 $91,537 

 PUs 02/23/2012 6,754 107% 7,227 $54.26 $392,137 

Ms. Hill

 RSUs  02/23/2012  2,298    2,298 $53.13 $122,093 

 MSUs  02/28/2013  2,301  154%  3,544 $54.26 $192,298 

 MSUs  02/27/2014  2,615  108%  2,824 $54.26 $153,230 

 PUs  02/23/2012  12,259  107%  13,117 $54.26 $711,728 

Mr. Neville

 RSUs 02/23/2012 3,106 


3,106 $53.13 $165,022 

 MSUs 02/28/2013 2,997 154% 4,616 $54.26 $250,464 

 MSUs 02/27/2014 3,694 108% 3,989 $54.26 $216,443 

 PUs 02/23/2012 16,568 107% 17,728 $54.26 $961,921 

20152018 PENSION BENEFITS

        The present values of accumulated pension benefit values set forthbenefits shown in the table below have been calculated based on the same assumptions we useused to calculate our pension benefit obligations forin the consolidated financial statements contained in our audited financial statements.2018 Annual Report. Since the accrual of additional amounts under all of these plans has been frozen since December 31, 2010, the significant fluctuationsfluctuation in pensionpresent values from year to year areis based primarily on changes in the assumptions usedwe use to determine the present value of participants' accumulated benefits for purposes of our year-end audited financial statements and secondarily on the passage of time. For example, we are required to calculate the present value of future pension liabilities using a discount rate based on corporate bond yields. As discount rates decrease, the present values of accumulated benefits can increase significantly, which occurred in 2014. The present value of accumulated benefits for our NEOs under these plans is shown below; Ms. Bramman and Messrs. Gravanis and NevilleStander have not been included in the table because they have no accrued benefits under these plans. No payments from these plans were made to any of our pension plans.NEOs in 2018.

NAME
  
 PLAN NAME
 NUMBER OF
YEARS OF
CREDITED
SERVICE (#)

 PRESENT VALUE OF
ACCUMULATED
BENEFIT(1) ($)

   
 PLAN NAME
 NUMBER OF
YEARS OF
CREDITED
SERVICE (#)

 PRESENT VALUE OF
ACCUMULATED
BENEFIT(1) ($)

 

Mr. Scarborough

  Pension Plan 26.83 $1,163,864 

  Benefit Restoration Plan 16.08 $3,956,891 

  Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan 8.67 $13,716,836 
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ 

 Total   $18,837,591 

Mr. Butier

 Pension Plan 9.33 $215,289 

Mitchell R. Butier

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 
 

 Pension Plan 9.33 $310,097 

 Benefit Restoration Plan 9.33 $199,532  Benefit Restoration Plan 9.33 $225,701 

 Total     $535,798 

Gregory S. Lovins

       

 Pension Plan 15.58 $310,414 

 Benefit Restoration Plan 15.58 $30,049 

 Total     $414,821  Total     $340,463 

Ms. Hill

  Pension Plan 5.50 $138,465 

Susan C. Miller

       

 Pension Plan 21.00 $921,263 

 Benefit Restoration Plan 21.00 $424,692 

  Benefit Restoration Plan 5.50 $185,629 
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ 

 Total   $324,094 

 Total     $1,345,955 

(1)
Amounts reflect the lump-sum value of the applicable pension benefit accrued as of December 31, 2015.29, 2018. While the Benefit Restoration Plan and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan allowallows for lump-sum payment, except in special circumstances, the Pension Plan requires that distributions take the form of a monthly annuity.annuity, except in special circumstances. For information regarding the assumptions we use to determine the present value of accumulated benefits for our pension plans, see Note 6, "Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits," to the consolidated financial statements contained in our 20152018 Annual Report.
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|60

Table of Contents

PENSION PLAN

        We provide qualified retirement benefits for eligible U.S. employees under the Avery Dennison Pension Plan (the "Pension Plan"). All of our NEOs — except (i) Ms. Brammanfor Messrs. Gravanis and Mr. Neville, who joined our company after the Pension Plan was closed to new employees, and (ii) Mr. Gravanis, who has not been employed in the U.S.Stander — are eligible to receive benefits under the Pension Plan, including reduced benefits in the event of early retirement. The accrual of additional benefits under the Pension Plan was frozen as of December 31, 2010; as a result, no additional accruals were made under the Pension Plan during 2015.2018.

        Compensation covered by the Pension Plan includes base salary and AIP awards, up to the applicable statutory limitations each plan year. Employees vest in the Pension Plan after five years of service, or at age 55 upon termination of employment. The annual pension benefit payable as of January 2, 2016in 2018 was limited to $210,000$220,000 under the Code.

        Benefits under the Pension Plan are based on pensionable earnings, length of service, when benefits commence, and how they are paid. Benefits are calculated separately for each year of applicable service using a formula equal to 1.25% times compensation up to the breakpoint (which for each year prior to our freezing the accrual of additional benefits was the average of the Social Security wage bases for the preceding 35 years) plus 1.75% times compensation in excess of the breakpoint. The results of the calculation for each year of service are added together to determine the annual single life annuity benefit under the Pension Plan for an employee at normal retirement (age(generally age 65), which is not subject to reduction for Social Security payments.

        Eligible participants may elect to receive their benefits in one of several payment forms that are all payable in monthly installments. Benefits are generally paid in annuity form over the lifetime of the participant and/or a beneficiary. By default, single participants are eligible for a single life annuity, and they can choose from alternate payment forms that may include benefits payable to a beneficiary. By default, married participants are eligible for a joint and survivor annuity that is payable over the participant's lifetime, and, if survived by a spouse, over the spouse's lifetime. Married participants can choose alternate payment forms, with the consent of the spouse. The monthly benefit each eligible participant may receive is adjusted based on the plan's definition of actuarial equivalence.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |72


Table of Contents

        Benefits are generally payable without reduction after participants reach age 65; however, certain participants — including our participating NEOs — may be eligible to receive an unreduced benefit at age 62. Prior to age 62, a participant's benefits are reduced by 15% for commencement of benefits at age 61 and an additional 5% for each additional year early the participant elects to receive benefits early, provided that no benefit may commence before a participant reaches age 55.

        We terminated our U.S. pension plan as of September 28, 2018. We expect to fully fund the plan prior to transferring its liability to one or more insurance companies in the first half of 2019. Termination of the plan is expected to settle our U.S. pension liability through a combination of (i) lump-sum payments we made in 2018 to eligible participants who timely elected to receive them; (ii) the purchase of a group annuity contract(s) with one or more insurance companies; and (iii) the transfer to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation of the benefits of those participants that qualify under applicable guidelines.

BENEFIT RESTORATION PLAN

        Our Benefit Restoration Plan (BRP) is a nonqualified excess benefit plan that provides for the payment of supplemental retirement benefits to eligible participants in an amount equal to the amount by which their benefits otherwise payable under the Pension Plan would be reduced under the Code. All NEOs — except for (i) Ms. BrammanMessrs. Gravanis and Mr. Neville, who joined our company after the BRP was closed to new employees, and (ii) Mr. Gravanis, who is not employed in the U.S.Stander — are eligible to receive benefits under the BRP. The accrual of additional benefits under the BRP was frozen as of December 31, 2010; as a result, no additional accruals were made under the BRP during 2015.2018.

        Because the BRP is designed to mirror the Pension Plan, the information concerning the compensation covered, benefit formula, early retirement provisions, and payment forms is similar tothe same as that of the Pension Plan except that (i) the BRP provides for payment in the form of a lump-sum distribution, unless a timely election is made for monthly payments over the lifetime of the participant and a designated beneficiary, and (ii) BRP benefits are generally payable upon the later of separation from service and age 55.

SUPPLEMENTAL EXECUTIVE RETIREMENT PLAN

        Our Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) provides designated key executives with additional retirement benefits to induce them to remain with our company and further our long-term growth. The SERP, a nonqualified plan, is an unfunded obligation of our company. The accrual of additional benefits under the SERP was frozen as of December 31, 2010; as a result, no additional accruals were made under the SERP during 2015.

        The vesting age for a designated participant is determined based on the target retention date for the executive. Benefits under the SERP would commence at the same time, and in the same form of payment, as the BRP, at a benefit level which — when added to the benefits to which a designated participant would be entitled from the Pension Plan and the BRP at the time of retirement, certain company contributions (plus interest) to the Employee Savings Plan, fixed amounts representative of his contributions to the deferred compensation plans and estimated Social Security benefits — would equal a specified percentage of the participant's average compensation as of December 31, 2010 (average of the highest 36 months of the last 60 months of

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|61

Table of Contents

base salary and annual bonuses earned or paid by December 31, 2010). No benefits would be provided under the SERP to a participant who voluntarily terminates employment before reaching the specified vesting age. Survivor and disability benefits are payable under the SERP under certain circumstances.

        Mr. Scarborough is the only NEO designated as a participant under the SERP. He vested at age 60 and the specified percentage of his average compensation is 62.5%. If Mr. Scarborough elects to retire and begins receiving benefits before reaching age 62, his SERP benefit would be reduced in the same manner as it would be under the Pension Plan.

20152018 NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION(1)

        The following table below provides information regarding NEO and company contributions to nonqualified deferred compensation plans(1) in fiscal year 2015.2018. Mr. Gravanis has not been included in the table because, as a non-U.S. employee, he is not eligible to participate in the only plan currently open for deferrals.

 NAME
 EXECUTIVE
CONTRIBUTIONS
IN LAST FY ($)

 REGISTRANT
CONTRIBUTIONS IN
LAST FY ($)(2)

 AGGREGATE
EARNINGS IN
LAST FY ($)(3)

 AGGREGATE
WITHDRAWALS/
DISTRIBUTIONS ($)

 AGGREGATE
BALANCE AT
LAST FYE ($)(4)

 
 

Mr. Scarborough

 


$182,160 $(62,275)


$4,942,941 
 

Mr. Butier

   $75,300 $(6,328)  $935,952 
 

Ms. Bramman

 $48,125 


$(365)


$47,760 
 

Ms. Hill

   $41,997 $2,639   $661,826 
 

Mr. Neville

 $18,627 $61,159 $(29,982)


$276,456 
NAME
 EXECUTIVE
CONTRIBUTIONS
IN LAST FY ($)

 REGISTRANT
CONTRIBUTIONS
IN LAST FY ($)(2)

 AGGREGATE
EARNINGS
IN LAST FY ($)(3)

 AGGREGATE
WITHDRAWALS/
DISTRIBUTIONS ($)

 AGGREGATE
BALANCE AT
LAST FYE ($)

Mitchell R. Butier

 



$161,302

 

$(113,709)

 



$1,542,455

Gregory S. Lovins

  $36,207 $(12,709)  $216,703

Susan C. Miller

 

$44,600 $(472,527) 

$4,975,516

Deon M. Stander

 $112,624 $25,486 $(25,681)  $295,730

(1)
Except for Mr. Scarborough, amountsAmounts reflect only the NEOs' participation in the Executive Variable Deferred Retirement Plan (EVDRP). Under the EVDRP, participants may choose from a group ofamong publicly available funds ranging from money market and bond funds to index and other equity/mutual funds. The rate of return depends on the funds selected by the participant, who may make changes via an online database provided by the plan administrator. The funds available for investment under the EVDRP during 2015, and their respective rate of return for the year or such shorter portion of the year during which the fund was available, are set forth below.participant.

 NAME OF FUND
 2015
RATE OF RETURN

 NAME OF FUND
 2015
RATE OF RETURN

 Advisor Managed Portfolio, Conservative Allocation (1.69)% M Large Cap Growth 8.13%
 Advisor Managed Portfolio, Moderate Allocation (3.12)% American Century VP Mid Cap Value, Class 2 (1.19)%
 Advisor Managed Portfolio, Moderate Growth Allocation (3.33)% Fidelity VIP Mid Cap, Service Class 2 (4.12)%
 Advisor Managed Portfolio, Growth Allocation (3.26)% AllianceBernstein NFJ Small Cap Value (3.96)%
 Advisor Managed Portfolio, Aggressive Allocation (3.47)% BlackRock Small Cap Index (4.55)%
 Avery Fixed Account EVDRP 3.68% M Capital Appreciation (6.21)%
 Fidelity VIP Money Market Service Class 0.40% Templeton Foreign VIP Class 2 (6.13)%
 PIMCO Inflation Managed (2.68)% M International Equity (3.56)%
 Western Asset Diversified Bond 1.45% Invesco V.I. International Growth Series II Shares (2.23)%
 BlackRock VIF Basic Value, Class 3 (5.78)% Oppenheimer Emerging Markets (13.71)%
 BlackRock Equity Index 1.54% MFS VIT Utilities, Service Class (14.42)%
 Fidelity VIP Contrafund, Service Class 2 0.81% Ivy Technology (2.66)%
 American Funds Growth (0.92)% Van Eck VIP Global Hard Assets (33.18)%
 Janus Growth LT 7.88%    

    Amounts for Mr. Scarborough also reflect his participation in the Capital Accumulation Plan (CAP) and the Executive Deferred Retirement Plan (EDRP). The CAP and EDRP have fixed rates of return; as a result, Mr. Scarborough cannot make any changes to impact his rates of return thereunder. The fixed rate of return for the CAP is designated by Pacific Life Insurance Company and subject to enhancement by our company in accordance with the terms of the CAP; the annual rate of return for 2015 was 4.41%. The fixed rate of return for the EDRP was 4.19% from January 3, 2015 to November 30, 2015 and 3.93% from December 1, 2015 to January 2, 2016.

(2)
Company contributions to the EVDRP are included in the "All Other Compensation" column of the2018 Summary Compensation Table.

(3)
Above-market earnings of $4,732 credited to Mr. Scarborough's EDRP account are included under the "Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings" column of theSummary Compensation Table. The other NEOs only participate in the EVDRP, which does not offer above-market interest rates.

(4)
Amounts reflect EVDRP vested account balances as of January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, the last day of our 20152018 fiscal year. Ms. Miller elected to defer the MSUs granted to her in 2013, including related dividend equivalents, under the EVDRP. The following amounts shown below were reported under the "All Other Compensation" column of theSummary Compensation Table in previous proxy statements:statements.

NAME
 AGGREGATE COMPANY CONTRIBUTIONS
PREVIOUSLY REPORTED ($)

 

Mr. Scarborough

 $685,008 

Mr. Butier

 $154,776 

Ms. Bramman

  

Ms. Hill

 $38,569 

Mr. Neville

 $141,851 
Avery Dennison CorporationNAME
|AGGREGATE COMPANY
CONTRIBUTIONS
PREVIOUSLY REPORTED ($)
2016 Proxy Statement|62

Butier

$401,038

Lovins

$44,764

Miller

$120,298

Stander


Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |73


Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE VARIABLE DEFERRED RETIREMENT PLAN

        Our Executive Variable Deferred Retirement Plan (EVDRP) is ourthe only active deferred compensation plan available to our eligible U.S. employees. Earnings are based on a fixed rate and/or the performance of variable bond and equity funds selected by the participant from available options.options. The EVDRP does not offer investment options that provide above-market interest rates.

        Eligible employees are able to defer U.S. taxes until their investment is withdrawn, providing an opportunity for them to accumulate savings on a pre-tax basis. We also benefit from this arrangement because we do not have to expend cash to pay amounts individuals who electhave elected to defer receipt of these amounts.defer. As a result, we can use this cash for other corporate purposes until a deferred compensation account is paid to a participant at the time the participant elected to receive in-service withdrawals or after termination of employment.

        All deferred compensation amountsaccounts are unfunded obligations of our company and subject to the same risks as any of our general debts and obligations. As a result, these accounts help incent executives to avoid risk-takingmitigate risk-seeking behavior by management that could be detrimental to the long-term health of our company.

Employee Contributions

        Under the EVDRP, eligible employees can defer up to 75% of their salary and 90% of their AIP award. Of our NEOs, Ms. Bramman elected to defer 15% of her 2015 salary and Mr. Neville elected to defer 3% of his 2015 salary.

Company ContributionsContribution

        In the beginningAs of 2015,January 1, 2018, we made a contribution to the deferred compensation accounts of eligible employees of up to 6% of an eligible employee's annualbased on 401(k) eligible earnings and deferred compensation in 2017 in excess of the Code compensation limit. OurThis annual contribution provided an automatic contribution of 3% of pay plus a matching contribution on the first 6% of pay above the Code compensation limit. This contribution was added to the deferred compensation accounts of eligible employees including our NEOs, who were employed at year-end 20142017, which included all our participating NEOs. In 2019, for 401(k) eligible earnings and whodeferred compensation in 2014 contributed into our Employee Savings Plan (i)2018 in excess of the Code compensation limit, the matching contribution will increase to the first 7% of pay above the Code compensation limit. This benefit is designed to supplement 401(k) contributions that are limited under the Code.

Withdrawals/Distributions

        Contributions to deferred compensation accounts are required to be distributed following an eligible employee's separation from service. Subject to Section 409A of the Code, eligible employees may elect to receive separation from service withdrawals in the form of a lump-sum payment or monthly installments over two to 20 years. Eligible employees may change the method in which payments are distributed provided that they do so at least 6%12 months before the date of their pre-tax eligible compensationdistribution; however, any change results in the distribution occurring or (ii) up to the Code pre-tax limit.

CAPITAL ACCUMULATION PLAN

        The Capital Accumulation Plan (CAP) is a legacy deferred compensation plan that last received deferrals in 2005. Ofbeginning five years later than it would have otherwise. All of our NEOs only Mr. Scarborough is a participantare "key employees" under Section 409A of the Code. Distributions to key employees cannot be made until at least the seventh month after separation from service, except in the CAP.

        The CAP has a fixed rateevent of return designated by Pacific Life Insurance Company (4.00% for 2015) and is subject to enhancement by our company in accordance with the terms of the CAP. The CAP's enhanced annual rate of return for 2015 was 4.41%.death.

EXECUTIVE DEFERRED RETIREMENT PLANAvery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |74

        The Executive Deferred Retirement Plan (EDRP) is a legacy deferred compensation plan that last received deferrals in 2000. Of our NEOs, only Mr. Scarborough is a participant in the EDRP.

        The EDRP has a fixed rate of return determined by multiplying the rolling 10-year average of the September 10-year Treasury note rate by 1.25. The EDRP's annual rate of return was 4.19% from January 3, 2015 to November 30, 2015 and 3.93% from December 1, 2015 to January 2, 2016.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|63

Table of Contents

PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION AS OF JANUARY 2, 2016DECEMBER 29, 2018

        The following table provides information regardingbelow shows potential benefits that would have been payable to our Current NEOs in the event of termination on January 2, 2016,December 29, 2018, the last day of our 20152018 fiscal year. Amounts paid or distributed upon actual termination may differ from amounts shown due to timing and any future changes to our benefit plans. Because he was no longer employed at our fiscal year-end, Mr. Neville has not been included in the table. The severance payments and benefits Mr. Neville received in connection with his actual termination during 2015 are discussed underExecutive Severance Plan below.


  
 TERMINATION SCENARIOS
AS OF THE END OF FISCAL YEAR 2015

   
 TERMINATION SCENARIOS AS OF THE END OF FISCAL YEAR 2018
 
NAME
 BENEFIT
 DEATH
 QUALIFYING
DISABILITY

 QUALIFYING
RETIREMENT(2)

 INVOLUNTARY
TERMINATION
NOT FOR
CAUSE

 TERMINATION
WITHIN 24
MOS. OF
CHANGE OF
CONTROL

  BENEFIT
 DEATH
 QUALIFYING
DISABILITY

 QUALIFYING
RETIREMENT(2)

 INVOLUNTARY
TERMINATION
NOT FOR
CAUSE

 TERMINATION
WITHIN 24
MOS. OF
CHANGE OF
CONTROL

 
Mr. Scarborough Severance Payment 








$6,688,681 $10,033,021 
 Unvested Stock Options(1) 





$1,473,539 $1,473,539 $1,473,539 
 Unvested RSUs(1) $713,008 $713,008 $713,008 $713,008 $713,008 
 Unvested PUs(1) $3,065,745 $3,065,745 $3,065,745 $3,065,745 $6,079,085 
 Unvested MSUs(1) $2,398,938 $2,398,938 $3,179,818 $3,179,818 $4,818,491 
 Outplacement 








$25,000 $25,000 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
Total
 $6,177,691 $6,177,691 $8,432,110 $15,145,791 $23,142,144 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
 Value of Forfeited Equity(1) $(6,906,433)$(6,906,433)$(5,894,815)$(5,894,815) 
Mr. Butier Severance Payment    $1,678,744 $3,357,488 
Mitchell R. ButierMitchell R. Butier           
 Severance Payment    $7,122,334 $10,683,502 
 Unvested Stock Options(1)     $2,098,840 
 Unvested Stock Options(1)     $379,552  Unvested RSUs(1)      
 Unvested RSUs(1) $1,376,766 $1,376,766   $1,376,766  Unvested PUs(1) $5,558,034 $5,558,034   $7,811,355 
 Unvested PUs(1) $1,138,073 $1,138,073   $2,438,602  Unvested MSUs(1) $4,209,061 $4,209,061   $5,870,583 
 Unvested MSUs(1) $868,817 $868,817   $1,895,528  Outplacement    $25,000 $25,000 
 Outplacement    $25,000 $25,000  Code Section 280G Adjustment     $(5,072,513)
Total $3,383,656 $3,383,656  $1,703,744 $9,472,936  $9,767,095 $9,767,095  $7,147,334 $21,416,767 
 Value of Forfeited Equity(1) $(2,706,792)$(2,706,792)$(6,090,447)$(6,090,447)   Elimination of Excise Tax Liability     $(3,629,151)
Ms. Bramman Severance Payment 








$887,844 $1,775,688 
 Unvested Stock Options(1) 











 
 Unvested RSUs(1) $406,789 $406,789 





$406,789 
 Unvested PUs(1) $167,803 $167,803 





$503,410 
 Unvested MSUs(1) $109,848 $109,848 





$304,214 
 Outplacement 








$25,000 $25,000 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
Total
 $684,440 $684,440 


$912,844 $3,015,101 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
 Value of Forfeited Equity(1) $(529,973)$(529,973)$(1,214,413)$(1,214,413) 
Mr. Gravanis Severance Payment    $1,250,551 $1,450,705 
 Value of Forfeited Equity(1) $(6,013,683)$(6,013,683)$(15,780,779)$(15,780,779)  
Gregory S. LovinsGregory S. Lovins           
 Severance Payment    $1,088,042 $2,176,084 
 Unvested Stock Options(1)   $164,016 $164,016 $164,016  Unvested Stock Options(1)      
 Unvested RSUs(1) $842,056 $842,056 $842,056 $842,056 $842,056  Unvested RSUs(1) $387,210 $387,210   $387,210 
 Unvested PUs(1) $400,627 $400,627 $400,627 $400,627 $803,364  Unvested PUs(1) $666,343 $666,343   $1,040,910 
 Unvested MSUs(1) $305,645 $305,645 $399,189 $399,189 $625,911  Unvested MSUs(1) $622,283 $622,283   $896,594 
 Outplacement     $25,000  Outplacement    $25,000 $25,000 
Total $1,548,328 $1,548,328 $1,805,888 $3,056,439 $3,911,052  $1,675,836 $1,675,836  $1,113,042 $4,525,798 
 Value of Forfeited Equity(1) $(887,018)$(887,018)$(781,021)$(781,021)   Value of Forfeited Equity(1) $(648,877)$(648,877)$(2,324,714)$(2,324,714)  
Ms. Hill Severance Payment 








$992,139 $1,984,277 
 Unvested Stock Options(1) 











$297,673 
 Unvested RSUs(1) $144,055 $144,055 





$144,055 
 Unvested PUs(1) $673,470 $673,470 





$1,353,393 
 Unvested MSUs(1) $511,969 $511,969 





$1,051,873 
 Outplacement 








$25,000 $25,000 
Georges GravanisGeorges Gravanis           
 Severance Payment    $1,365,663 $2,731,327 
 Unvested Stock Options(1)      
 Unvested RSUs(1) $270,310 $270,310 $270,310 $270,310 $270,310 
 Unvested PUs(1) $1,148,365 $1,148,365 $1,642,289 $1,642,289 $1,620,792 
 Unvested MSUs(1) $916,492 $916,492 $1,031,713 $1,031,713 $1,264,127 
 Outplacement    $25,000 $25,000 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
Total
 $1,329,494 $1,329,494 


$1,017,139 $4,856,271  $2,335,165 $2,335,167 $2,944,312 $4,334,975 $5,911,556 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
​ ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ 
 Elimination of Excise Tax Liability     $(969,504)
 Value of Forfeited Equity(1) $(820,063)$(820,063)    
Susan C. MillerSusan C. Miller           
 Severance Payment    $1,136,747 $2,273,493 
 Unvested Stock Options(1)      
 Unvested RSUs(1)      
 Unvested PUs(1) $1,143,242 $1,143,242 $1,676,440 $1,676,400 $1,574,778 
 Unvested MSUs(1) $970,530 $970,530 $1,198,407 $1,198,407 $1,290,508 
 Outplacement    $25,000 $25,000 
 Value of Forfeited Equity(1) $(1,517,501)$(1,517,501)$(2,846,995)$(2,846,995)

 
Total $2,113,772 $2,113,772 $2,874,847 $4,036,554 $5,163,779 
 Value of Forfeited Equity(1) $(751,514)$(751,514)    
Deon M. StanderDeon M. Stander           
 Severance Payment    $866,206 $1,732,412 
 Unvested Stock Options(1)      
 Unvested RSUs(1)      
 Unvested PUs(1) $1,486,896 $1,486,896   $1,952,661 
 Unvested MSUs(1) $542,569 $542,569   $766,951 
 Outplacement    $25,000 $25,000 
Total $2,029,465 $2,029,465  $891,206 $4,477,024 
 Value of Forfeited Equity(1) $(690,148)$(690,148)$(2,719,612)$(2,719,612) 
 

(1)
Values for equity awards as of January 2, 2016 were determined as follows: (i) for stock options, the number of shares that would have been exercisable multiplied by the difference between the fair market value of our common stock on December 31, 2015,29, 2018, the last trading day of our 20152018 fiscal year, and the applicable exercise price; (ii) for RSUs, PUs and MSUs, the number of shares that would have been forfeitedacquired or acquiredforfeited on vesting multiplied by the fair market value of our common stock on December 31, 2015.29, 2018.

(2)
Only Messrs. ScarboroughMr. Gravanis and GravanisMs. Miller qualified as retirement eligible at the end of fiscal year 2018 because they had reached the age of 55 and had completed over ten years of service with our company as of January 2, 2016.company. As a result, in every termination scenario, all of their unvested equity awards would vest, with unvested PUs and MSUs vesting on a prorated basis after the end of their respective performance period based on our actual performance.
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|64

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |75


Table of Contents

        In addition to the amounts shown in the table on the previous page, in the event of termination, our Current NEOs would be entitled to receive their accrued and vested benefits under any pension and deferred compensation plans in which they participate. These amounts would be determined and paid in accordance with the terms and conditions of the applicable plans, and are not included in the table. See20152018 Pension Benefits and20152018 Nonqualified Deferred Compensation for information on these benefits.

        None of our Current NEOs has an employment agreement;contract; if an NEO iswere no longer performing at the expected level, he or she cancould be terminated for cause immediately without receiving a contractually-guaranteed payment. The other potential payments upon termination or a change of control are described below.

EXECUTIVE SEVERANCE PLAN

        Each of our Current NEOs except for Mr. Gravanis, is a participant in the Severance Plan. Upon involuntary termination not for cause, they would be entitled to the following benefits:benefits shown below.

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

        Benefits Not Subject to Gross up.    Benefits are subject to withholding for all applicable taxes and not grossed-up for taxes.

        Trigger for Benefits.    Involuntary termination, whichexcludes termination for cause; due to disability; due to death; due to voluntary resignation; or due to an executive declining simultaneous or continuing employment in a comparable position.

        Definition of Cause.    Cause is defined as (i) commission of a crime or other act that could materially damage the reputation of our reputation;company or its subsidiaries; (ii) theft, misappropriation, or embezzlement of company or subsidiary property; (iii) falsification of company or subsidiary records; (iv) substantial failure to comply with written policies and procedures; (v) misconduct; or (vi) substantial failure to perform material job duties not cured within 30 days after written notice.

        Mr. Gravanis' severance benefits would be based onsubject to applicable FrenchDutch labor laws and regulations in effect at the time of his separation.

        In connection with his separation, from our company in 2015, Mr. Neville received severance benefitsand he would therefore receive the greater of $1,358,797 in accordance with the terms and conditions ofamount provided under the Severance Plan which reflected (i) his annual base salaryand the amount required by those laws and regulations.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |76


Table of $580,030 as of his termination date; (ii) $758,989, the highest of his last three AIP awards; and (iii) $19,778, the cash value of 12 months of insurance premiums for the qualified medical and dental plans in which he participated as of his termination date. In consideration of his receipt of these benefits, Mr. Neville agreed to a waiver and release of any claims against our company and to non-competition, non-solicitation and non-disclosure covenants in favor of our company.Contents

KEY EXECUTIVE CHANGE OF CONTROL SEVERANCE PLAN

        Each of our Current NEOs is also a participant in the COC Severance Plan, which is designed to retain certain key executives during a period in which a change of control transaction is being negotiated or a hostile takeover is being attempted.Participants are only entitled to benefits if they are terminated not for "cause" or terminate employment for "good reason" within 24 months of the change of control (a "double trigger"). In suchthese circumstances, our NEOsthey would be entitled to the following benefits:benefits shown below.

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

        Benefits Not Subject to Gross-up.    Benefits are subject to withholding for all applicable taxes and not grossed-up for excise or other taxes. However, if the payment would trigger an excise tax for a particular NEO, the NEO can elect to receive

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|65

Table of Contents

(i) his or her full benefits, with him or her responsible for paying any applicable excise taxes, or (ii) reduced benefits to an amount sufficient to eliminate any excise tax liability.

        Definition of Change of Control.    Change of control is defined as (i) replacement of a majority of our Board during any 12-month period by directors whose appointment or election was not endorsed by a majority of the members of our Board; or (ii) acquisition by any person, group or corporation that has entered into a merger, acquisition, consolidation, purchase, stock acquisition, asset acquisition, or similar business transaction with our company, of (A) together with any of our company's stock previously held, more than 50% of the total fair market value or the total voting power of our company's stock; (B) 30% or more of the total voting power of our company's stock during any 12-month period; or (C) assets of our company having a total gross fair market value of 40% or more of the total gross fair market value of all of our company's assets during any 12-month period.

        Definition of cause.    Cause is defined as it is under the Severance Plan.

        Definition of good reason.    Good reason is defined as (i) material diminution in base compensation; (ii) material diminution in authority, duties, or responsibilities or supervisor's authority, duties, or responsibilities; (iii) material change in geographic job location; or (iv) any other action or inaction that constitutes a material breach by our company.

        Mr. Gravanis' severance benefits would be subject to applicable Dutch labor laws and regulations in effect at the time of his separation, and he would therefore receive the greater of the amount provided under the COC Severance Plan and the amount required by those laws and regulations.

AMENDED AND RESTATED STOCK OPTION ANDEQUITY INCENTIVE PLANPLANS

        Under the Equityour previous Amended and Restated Stock Option and Incentive Plan last approved by our stockholders in April 2012 and our 2017 Incentive Award Plan approved by stockholders in April 2017, unvested equity awards held by our Current NEOs on the date of termination would be treatedvest as set forthshown in the table on the following table. Messrs. Scarboroughpage. Mr. Gravanis and Gravanis are the only NEOs whoMs. Miller qualified as retirement eligible underat the Equity Planend of our 2018 fiscal year because they had reached the age of 55 and had completed over ten years of service with our company at the endcompany.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |77


Table of our 2015 fiscal year.Contents

VESTING OF EQUITY AWARDS ON TERMINATION EVENTS
 
 PUs
 MSUs
 RSUs
 Stock Options
Resignation/Involuntary Termination, whether For or Not for Cause Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled Cancelled
Death Vest at time of event on a prorated basis based on target performance Vest at time of event on a prorated basis based on target performance for each tranche Vest Cancelled
Qualifying Disability Same as death Same as death Vest Cancelled
Qualifying Retirement Vest after the end of the performance period on a prorated basis based on actual performance Vest after the end of the performance period on a prorated basis based on actual performance Vest Vest and exercisable by our CEO for the full term of the option and by our other NEOs for the lesser of five years and the full term of the option
Change of Control*Vest based on actual, if determinable, and otherwise target performance only in the event of termination without cause or for good reason within 24 months after change of controlVest based on actual, if determinable, and otherwise target performance only in the event of termination without cause or for good reason within 24 months of change of control Vest only in the event of termination of servicewithout cause or for good reason within 24 months after change of control based on target performance Vest only in the event of termination of service within 24 months of the change of control based on target performanceVest only in the event of termination of servicewithout cause or for good reason within 24 months after change of control if granted after April 26, 2012; vest on change of control if granted before April 26, 2012Vest only in the event of termination of service within 24 months after change of control if granted after April 26, 2012; vest on change of control if granted before April 26, 2012

        All unvested

*
Unvested PUs and MSUs granted prior to May 2017 would vest based on target performance. Unvested stock options and full-value awards held by Mr. Nevillegranted prior to May 2012 would vest on the datea change of his termination of employment were cancelled in accordance with the provisions described above. He had six months from his date of termination to exercise any of his vested stock options and no such options were outstanding at the end of fiscal year 2015.control.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |78

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|66

Table of Contents

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION AS OF JANUARY 2, 2016DECEMBER 29, 2018

PLAN CATEGORY
 NUMBER OF SECURITIES
TO BE ISSUED UPON
EXERCISE OF
OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS, WARRANTS
AND RIGHTS (A)

 WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE OF
OUTSTANDING OPTIONS,
WARRANTS AND RIGHTS (B)

 NUMBER OF SECURITIES
REMAINING AVAILABLE FOR
FUTURE ISSUANCE UNDER
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
(EXCLUDING SECURITIES
REFLECTED IN COLUMN (A)) (C)

  NUMBER OF SECURITIES
TO BE ISSUED UPON
EXERCISE OF
OUTSTANDING
OPTIONS, WARRANTS
AND RIGHTS (A)

 WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
EXERCISE PRICE OF
OUTSTANDING OPTIONS,
WARRANTS AND RIGHTS (B)

 NUMBER OF SECURITIES
REMAINING AVAILABLE FOR
FUTURE ISSUANCE UNDER
EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS
(EXCLUDING SECURITIES
REFLECTED IN COLUMN (A)) (C)

Equity compensation plans approved by security holders

             

Amended and Restated Stock Option and Incentive Plan(1)

 

4,677,931

 

$

45.21

 


9,246,808
  1,557,393 $45.06 

Amended and Restated Director Equity Plan(2)

 

43,000

 

$

50.02

 



  

2,000

 

$20.64

 

2017 Incentive Award Plan(3)

 

566,807

 

 

4,899,701

Total

 
4,720,931
 
$

45.30
 
9,246,808
 

 

2,126,200

 

$45.06

 

4,899,701


(1)
TheOur Amended and Restated Stock Option and Incentive Plan (the "Previous Plan") was last approved by stockholders in April 2012. We last issued awards under the Previous Plan in March 2017. Under the plan,Previous Plan, shares issuable under outstanding equity awards granted prior to January 2, 2016 includeDecember 29, 2018 included (i) stock options RSUs and DSUsRSUs for non-employee directors;directors and (ii) stock options, RSUs, PUs and MSUs for officers and other eligible employees. AmountsAmount in column (A) include 2,369,877includes 509,598 stock options; 214,60529,473 RSUs; 132,298 DSUs; 1,139,732392,595 MSUs (including accrued dividend equivalents and reflecting the tranches of the 2015, 2016 and 2017 MSUs subject to vesting as of December 29, 2018 at 200%, 188% and 137%, respectively, the payouts based on our actual performance as determined by the Compensation Committee in February 2019, and the remaining unvested tranches of the MSUs granted in 2013, 20142015, 2016 and 20152017 at the maximum level of performance as ouractual performance as of December 29, 2018 would result in above-target payouts); 625,727 PUs (reflecting the maximum level of performance for the relative TSR component of the 2016-2018 and 2017-2019 PUs as actual performance would result in above-target payouts, and the vested tranches at 179%, 125% and 109%, respectively, reflecting the payout based on actual performance); 864,419 PUs (reflecting the 2013-2015 MTIP at the actual levela weighted average of performance, with corporate participants at the maximum level of performance for both relative TSR and cumulative EVA and business group participants at the maximum level of performance for relative TSR and weighted-average of 190% for cumulative EVA), the 2014-2016 and 2015-2017 MTIPs at the maximum level of performance as our actual performance would result in above-target payouts for relative TSR and a weighted-average of 149%185% and 174%, respectively, for the cumulative EVA. PricesEVA component of these PUs). Price in column (B) dodoes not include RSUs, DSUs, MSUs, PUs or dividend equivalents.

(2)
Under theour Amended and Restated Director Equity Plan, equity awards included stock options and stock units.DSUs. We last issued awards under the Director Equity Planthis plan in April 2009 and thereafter began issuingissued awards to our non-employee directors under the Previous Plan (and now issue these awards under our 2017 Incentive Award Plan (the "Current Plan")). Amount in column (A) includes only stock options.

(3)
The Current Plan was approved by our stockholders in April 2017. We began issuing awards under the Equity Plan. AmountsCurrent Plan in May 2017. Under the Current Plan, shares issuable under outstanding equity awards granted prior to December 29, 2018 included (i) RSUs and DSUs for non-employee directors and (ii) RSUs, DSUs, PUs and MSUs for officers and other eligible employees. Amount in column (A) include only stock options.includes 58,950 RSUs, 191,366 DSUs, 87,973 MSUs (including accrued dividend equivalents and reflecting the tranche of the 2018 MSUs subject to vesting as of December 29, 2018 at 0%, the payout based on our actual performance as determined by the Compensation Committee in February 2019, and the unvested tranches of the MSUs granted in 2018 at the target level of performance as actual performance as of December 29, 2018 would result in below-target payouts, and 228,518 PUs, reflecting the maximum level of performance for the relative TSR component of the 2018-2020 PUs as actual performance as of December 29, 2018 would result in above-target payouts, and a weighted average of 191% for the cumulative EVA component of these PUs). Amount in column (C) represents the aggregate number of shares available for future issuance, with each full-value award decreasing the number of shares available for future issuance by 1.5 shares.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |79

|2016 Proxy Statement|67

Table of Contents

CEO PAY RATIO

        As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we are providing this disclosure about the relationship between the median annual total compensation of our employees to the annual total compensation of our CEO. We are located in countries around the world to best serve our customers, with approximately 77% of our revenues generated outside the U.S. and approximately 49% of our revenues generated in emerging markets (Asia, Latin America, Eastern Europe and Middle East/Northern Africa). As a global organization with employees located in over 50 countries, approximately 87% of our employees are located outside the U.S. and approximately 68% are located in emerging markets.

        The charts shown below provide a breakdown of our global employee population by region and function. Over 19,000 of our approximately 32,000 employees, representing 60% of our global workforce, are in Asia, serving our customers in that region. In addition, approximately 60% of our global workforce works in the operations of our manufacturing facilities worldwide or in positions directly supporting them from other locations

GRAPHICGRAPHIC

        Our compensation philosophy is to offer market-based, competitive wages and benefits in all the markets where we compete for talent — 97% of our employees were paidabove the applicable legal minimum wage at the end of 2018. Our CEO's compensation is driven by pay for performance, in-line with our peers and commensurate with that provided by companies of similar size, scope, complexity and performance.

2018 PAY RATIO

    The annual total compensation of our median employee (among all employees except for our CEO) was approximately $12,523.
    Our CEO's annual total compensation, as reported in theTotal column of the2018 Summary Compensation Table, was $8,709,697.
    Based on this information, a reasonable estimate of the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the annual total compensation of our median employee was approximately 696 to 1.

        We calculated this ratio based on the rules and guidance provided by the SEC. SEC rules allow for varying methodologies for companies to use in identifying their median employee; other companies may have different workforce demographics and employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their CEO pay ratios. Consequently, the CEO pay ratios reported by other companies may not be meaningful for purposes of comparison to our CEO pay ratio.

IDENTIFICATION OF MEDIAN EMPLOYEE

        Given that there were no changes in the compensation arrangements of our global workforce from 2017 to 2018 that would cause a significant change in our CEO pay ratio, as allowed by SEC rules, we considered using the same median employee in 2018 as we did in 2017. However, given that the role of the median employee identified for 2017 changed in 2018, we identified another employee as the median employee for 2018 from the same group from which we identified the 2017 median employee, as described more fully on the following page. The employee identified for 2018 had comparable pay to the median employee in 2017 but best represented the compensation of the employees in this group given the 2017 median employee's role change.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |80


Table of Contents

        For purposes of identifying our median employee in 2017, we considered annual base compensation, which is the most common pay element for all our employees, as reflected in our global human resources information system. We selected this compensation element because it represents the principal broad-based compensation element for the vast majority of our employees globally. We measured compensation for purposes of determining the median employee using the 12-month period ending December 31, 2017. No cost-of-living adjustments were made.

        We selected November 1, 2017 as the date on which to determine our median employee. As of that date, we had 30,256 employees, 26,231 of which were located outside of the United States and approximately 21,000 of which were located in emerging markets. We utilized the de minimis exemption to eliminate countries representing no more than 5% of our global population in the aggregate. The countries excluded were Indonesia, Pakistan and Sri Lanka, with 542, 202 and 646 employees, respectively, in the aggregate representing approximately 4.6% of our global workforce.

        To determine our medianable group, we used a statistical sampling approach known as stratified sampling to concentrate on medianable employees, which were those within a narrow range of the estimated median salary of $9,524, because these employees were all reasonably likely to be our median employee. As a result of this statistical sampling process, we identified 647 employees with a salary within $500 of this amount. Employees from China represented 51% of the medianable group; as a result, we narrowed the medianable group to those 329 employees. Finally, we identified the nine employees who were potentially our median employee by analyzing additional qualitative and quantitative characteristics, including pay volatility.

MEDIAN EMPLOYEE COMPENSATION

        Using the methodology described above, we determined that our median employee for 2018 was a full-time, salaried employee working at a manufacturing facility in China. For purposes of this disclosure, we converted the employee's base compensation from Chinese Yuan to U.S. dollars using the exchange rate as of December 1, 2018 of 0.14408184.

        In determining the annual total compensation of approximately $12,523 for our median employee, as required by SEC rules, we calculated the employee's compensation in accordance with Item 402(c)(2)(x) of Regulation S-K, consistent with how we determine our CEO's total compensation for the2018 Summary Compensation Table.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |81


Table of Contents

ITEM 3 — RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

        The Audit Committee — which is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation (including approval of audit and non-audit fees) and evaluation of the independent registered public accounting firm that audits our financial statements and internal control over financial reporting — has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016,2019, and our Board is seeking stockholder ratification of the appointment. Stockholder ratification is not required by our Bylaws or applicable laws and regulations. However, our Board annually submits this appointment for stockholder ratification as a matteran element of good corporate governance.our strong governance program. If stockholders were not to ratify the appointment, the Audit Committee would reconsider whether or not to retain PwC, but could determine to do so in the committee's discretion. In addition, even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee could subsequently appoint a different independent registered public accounting firm without stockholder approval if the committee were to determine that doing so would be in the best interests of our company and stockholders.

        Although no formal statement from PwC is planned, representatives of the firm will be present at the Annual Meeting to answer questions from stockholders.

AUDIT COMMITTEE EVALUATION

        In determining whether to reappoint PwC, the Audit Committee considered the qualifications, performance, and independence of the firm and the audit engagement team, the quality of its discussions with PwC, and the fees charged by PwC for the levelquality and qualitybreadth of services provided. In connection with the 20162019 appointment, the Audit Committee considered, among other things:things, the following:

    Audit Quality — The quality of PwC's audit and non-audit work, based on its discussionoversight of the firm's work product, as well as its discussions with management in executive session without PwC present and its discussiondiscussions with PwC in executive session without management present;

    Prior Performance — PwC's reports on its quality controls and its performance during our company's 20152018 and prior yearprior-year audits;

    Qualitative Review — The results of the worldwideour global survey of members of management and the Audit Committee evaluating PwC's (i) expertise and resources, (ii) audit planning, (iii) communication and interaction, (iv) independence, objectivity and professional skepticism and (v) value for fees;

    Self-Assessment — PwC's annual self-assessment of its accomplishments in connection with itsthe 2018 audit, its satisfaction of the client service needs and expectations of the Audit Committee and management, and areas forof continued focus and improvement opportunities;

    Regulatory ReviewReviewss — External data on the firm's audit quality and performance, including recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) reports on PwC and its peer firms;

    Reasonableness of Fees — The appropriateness of PwC's fees for audit and non-audit services, both on both an absolute basis and relative to comparable firms;

    Independence — Written disclosures from the firm and the independence letter required by the PCAOB; and

    Tenure — PwC's tenure as our independent auditor, including the benefits of having a long-tenured auditor and the controls we and they have in place to mitigate any potential independence risk.

        The Audit Committee has determined that the appointment of PwC is in the best interest of our company and stockholders. The Audit Committee has appointed, subject to stockholder ratification, PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016 is in the best interest of our company and its stockholders. The Audit Committee has appointed, subject to stockholder ratification, PwC in such capacity2019 and recommends that stockholders ratify the appointment at the Annual Meeting.

RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS

        Our Board of Directors recommends that you vote FOR ratification of the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016.2019. Properly dated and signed proxies will be so voted unless stockholdersyou specify otherwise.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |82

|2016 Proxy Statement|68

Table of Contents

AUDIT MATTERS

AUDITOR TENURE

        PwC has been our independent registered public accounting firm since 1998 and served in that capacity during fiscal year 2015.2018. Through its predecessor entities, the firm has served as our independent auditor since at least 1960, which was the first year our financial statements were subject to SEC reporting requirements. We have been unable to determine the exact year PwC began serving as the auditor for our company. PwC is knowledgeable about our operations and accounting practices, and isvery well qualified to act as our independent registered public accounting firm.firm and has a deep understanding of our operations and accounting practices. Some governance stakeholders have suggested that long tenure poses a risk to auditor independence. The Audit Committee believes, however, that PwC's tenureyears of experience auditing our company confers significant benefits, including:including the following:

    HigherGreater Audit Quality — Having performed nearly 20 years of annual audits and quarterly reviews of our financial statements, PwC has deep institutional knowledge regarding our operations, businesses, and accounting policies and practices;

    Economies of Scale —PwC has a global presence including employeeswith resources in virtually all of the countries in which we do business, giving themenabling the capacityfirm to cost-effectively perform statutory audit work on our subsidiary accounts in a cost-effective manner;accounts; and

    Cost Efficiency — Having familiarity with our businessbusinesses allows PwC to perform its services and ensure audit quality in the performance of its services on a more cost-competitive basiscost-competitively than other firms.

        In addition, in conducting its periodic review of whether to appoint a new independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee considers the fact that onboarding a new firm would require a significant time commitment on the part of management, potentially distracting from the paramount focus on financial reporting and internal controls, without necessarily increasing audit quality.

        The Audit Committee has several controls in place to mitigate any potential independence risk, including the following:

    Limits on Non-Audit Services — The Audit Committee assesses the impact providing non-audit services may have on PwC's independence each time it approves the firm's provision of suchthese services, as well as during its annual assessment of the firm's independence;

    Periodic Consideration of Auditor Rotation — The Audit Committee periodically considers whether to change the independent registered public accounting firm based on its assessment of PwC's audit quality, performance, compensation and independence;independence, having most recently done so in 2015 and determined to retain PwC, reconfirming its decision in 2018;

    Executive Sessions — The Audit Committee meets regularly both with PwC without management present and with management without PwC present; and

    Lead AuditEngagement Partner Selection — The Audit Committee selects any new lead auditengagement partner, in consultation with members of senior management and representatives of PwC.

        In order to regularly bring a fresh perspective to the audit, engagement, a new lead auditengagement partner is designated at least every five years, and ayears. A new partner was sohas been designated for the 2014 audit.2019 audit, having shadowed the 2018 partner to ensure service continuity and knowledge transfer. The Audit Committee Chair and two other members of the committee interviewed the partner prior to his designation, and the Audit Committee as a whole was directly responsible for making the selection, in consultation with members of senior management and representatives from PwC.

AUDITOR INDEPENDENCE

        PwC has advised us that neither the firm nor any member thereof has any financial interest, direct or indirect, in any capacity in our company or itsour subsidiaries. As a result, PwC has confirmed to the Audit Committee that it is in compliance with allthe rules, standards and policies of the PCAOB and the regulations of the SEC governing auditor independence.

        The Audit Committee considers the impact providing non-audit services may have on PwC's independence each time it approves the firm's provision of such services, as well as during its annual assessment of the firm's

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |83


Table of Contents

independence. In February 2016,2019, the Audit Committee reviewed the non-audit services approved by the Committee and provided by PwC in 2015,during 2018, including the related fees, and determined that the firm's provision of these services did not impair PwC's independence.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|69

Table of Contents

AUDITOR COMPENSATION

        In negotiating and approving PwC's fees and services, the Audit Committee considers whether PwC is best positioned to provide the services effectively and efficiently due to its familiarity with our operations, businesses, accounting policies and practices, internal controls, and financial and information technology systems, as well as whether the services enhance our ability to manage or control risks and improvemaintain audit quality. The Audit Committee monitors the services rendered and fees paid to PwC to ensure that the servicesthey are within the parameters approved by the Audit Committee.

COMMITTEE APPROVAL OF FEES

        The Audit Committee has adopted procedures for the pre-approval of all audit and non-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm, and the fees paid to PwC in 20152018 were pre-approved. The Audit Committee pre-approved 2015the estimated audit fees in February of that year,2018, received a mid-year update on year-to-date fees incurred in July, and reviewedassessed the final fees in connection with its review of the audited financial statementsresults of the audit in February 2016.2019. These procedures include reviewing and approving a plan for audit and permitted non-audit services, which includes a description of, and estimated fees for, audit services and non-audit services. Additional Audit Committee approval is required for non-audit services not included in the initial budgetplan or substantially in excess of the budgeted amount for the particular category of services. The Audit Committee has delegated interim pre-approval authority to its Chair for services not included in the audit plan; these services are reviewed with the entire Audit Committee at its next regulara subsequent meeting.

AUDIT FEES

        For fiscal years 20152018 and 2014,2017, PwC provided the following services shown below for our company — all of which were approved by the Audit Committee in conformity withusing the procedures described above — for which we paid the firm the following fees. While the Audit Committee's general practice is not to approve PwC to perform services other than for audit, audit-related and tax matters, in 2014, the Audit Committee approved a limited engagement of PwC's strategy consulting group for a market segment study for our Vancive Medical Technologies segment due to the firm's expertise in emerging technologies in the digital health care industry.fees indicated.

(in millions)
 2015
 2014
 

2018
2017

Audit Fees(1)

 $5.8 $6.5 

$

7,946,000



$

8,025,000

Audit-Related Fees(2)

 0.3 0.2 503,000448,000

Tax Fees:

       

Tax Compliance(3)

 2.0 2.2 2,312,0001,949,000

Tax Planning(4)

 1.5 2.0 1,792,0001,369,000

All Other Fees(5)

  0.1 40,00055,000

Total Fees



$

12,593,000



$

11,846,000

Total Fees

 $9.6 $11.0 

(1)
Includes fees for services performed to comply with the standards established by the PCAOB, including the audit of our consolidated financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; audits in connection with statutory filings; or forand other services that generally only the principal independent registered public accounting firm reasonablymost effectively and efficiently can provide, such as procedures related to audits of our income tax provisions and related reserves, consents and review of our SEC filings.

(2)
Includes fees associated with assurance and related services traditionally performed by the independent registered public accounting firm and reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, including assistance in financial due diligence related to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures; accounting consultations; consultations concerning financial accounting and reporting standards; general advice on implementation of SEC and Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requirements; and audit services not required by statute or regulation. This category also may includeincludes audits of pension and other employee benefit plans, as well as the review of financial or information technology systems and internal controls unrelated to the audit of the financial statements.

(3)
Includes fees associated with tax compliance such as preparation of tax returns, tax audits and transfer pricing.

(4)
Includes fees for domestic and international tax planning, and tax planning for restructurings, mergers,related to restructuring actions, acquisitions and divestitures.

(5)
Includes fees for any services not capturedother than those described in any of the above categories. Fees for fiscal year 2014 related to the engagement of PwC's strategy consulting group forIncluded an information technology license in both years, and a discreteresearch and development study in Israel and a trade compliance project as described above.in Malaysia in 2017.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |84

|2016 Proxy Statement|70

Table of Contents

AUDIT AND FINANCE COMMITTEE REPORT

COMPOSITION AND QUALIFICATIONS

        The Audit and Finance Committee (referred to in this report as the "Committee") of theour Board of Directors is comprised of the directors named below, each of whom meets the enhanced independence and experience standards for audit committee members set forth in Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) listing standards. Our Board of Directors has determined all members to be financially literate and designated each of Messrs. Anderson, Barker and BarkerSiewert as an "audit committee financial expert" under applicable SEC regulations for 2015.regulations. Members of the Committee are prohibited from sitting on the audit committee of more than two other public companies, and all members are in compliance with this restriction.

PRIMARY RESPONSIBILITIES

   ��    The Committee has a written charter adopted by theour Board of Directors, which is available on our website atwww.averydennison.com/auditcharter. The Committee annually reviews the charter and recommends changes to the Board for approval. The charter was last amended onin December 3, 2015.2018.

        During fiscal year 2015,2018, the Committee primarily performed the following activities on behalf of our Board of Directors:

    reviewedReviewed and discussed with management and the independent registered public accounting firm our quarterly and annual financial results, earnings release documentation and the related reports filed with the SEC;

    reviewedReviewed and discussed with management, the Vice President of Internal Audit and the independent registered public accounting firm our internal controls report and the independent registered public accounting firm's attestation thereof;

    evaluatedEvaluated the qualifications, performance and independence of the independent registered public accounting firm and met with representatives of the firm to discuss the scope, budget, staffing and progress of the firm's audit;

    supervisedSupervised the Vice President of Internal Audit with respect to the scope, budget, staffing and progress of the internal audit;audit and evaluated his personal performance, as well as the performance of the internal audit function; and

    discussed with management our majorDiscussed significant financial risk exposures, including our cybersecurity risk management program, and the steps taken by management to monitor and control these exposures.

OVERSIGHT OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

        Management is responsible for our consolidated financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles,policies, internal control over financial reporting, and disclosure controls and procedures. The Committee appointed the independent registered public accounting firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) to provide audit, audit-related and tax compliance services, with limited tax services.planning and other non-audit services to the extent approved by the Committee. PwC was responsible for performing an independent audit of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) and issuing an opinion on the conformity of those financial statements with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The Committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes, the audit of our consolidated financial statements and our internal control over financial reporting. The members of the Committee are not professionally engaged in the practice of auditing or accounting and rely without independent verification on the information provided to them and the representations made by management and PwC.

        The Committee reviewed and discussed theour consolidated financial statements and related footnotes for the fiscal year ended January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 — including our company's critical accounting policies and management's significant estimates and judgments — with management and PwC, as well as PwC's report and unqualified opinion on the audit. Management represented to the Committee and PwC that our consolidated financial statements were prepared in

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |85


Table of Contents

accordance with GAAP. PwC presented the matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 16,1301,Communications with Audit Committees,. as adopted by the PCAOB and currently in effect. The Committee received these written disclosures and the letters from PwC required by the applicable requirements of the PCAOB regarding communications concerning independence — including Rule 3524,Audit Committee Pre-approval of Certain Tax Services; Rule 3525,Audit Committee Pre-approval of Non-Audit Services Related to Internal Control Over Financial Reporting; and Rule 3526,Communication with Audit Committees Concerning Independence —and discussed with PwC its independence from our company and management.

        Based on the Committee's review and discussions with management and PwC described above, as well as the Committee's review of the representations of management and the audit report and unqualified opinion of PwC, the Committee recommended that our Board of Directors approve the inclusion of the audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 2, 2016December 29, 2018 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|71

Table of Contents

OVERSIGHT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

        The Committee's responsibility is to appoint the independent registered public accounting firm, and monitor and oversee the firm's qualifications, compensation, performance and independence. In this capacity, the Committee reviewed with PwC the overall scope of and fees for its audit, and the Committee regularly monitored the progress of PwC's audit in assessing our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, including the firm's findings and required resources and progress.resources.

        PwC provided to the Committee the written disclosures and independence letter required by the PCAOB. The Committee discussed with PwC its independence from our company and management and concluded that PwC was independent during fiscal year 2015.2018. The Committee has a policy requiring pre-approval of fees for audit, audit-related, tax and other services and has concluded for 20152018 that PwC's provision of limited non-audit services to our company in 2018 was compatible with maintaining its independence.

        Under its charter, the Committee is required to periodically consider whether it is appropriate to change the independent registered public accounting firm, and the Committee had discussionsmost recently evaluated with management and PwC regarding whether it may be appropriate to do so during 2015.in 2015, with a view to ensuring that audit quality would continue to be paramount. The Committee determined at that time to retain PwC, and the Committee reconfirmed its decision in 2018.

        The Committee has determined that the appointment of PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 20162019 is in the best interest of our company and its stockholders. The Committee has appointed subject to stockholder ratification, PwC in such capacity and recommends that stockholders ratify suchthe appointment at the Annual Meeting.

OVERSIGHT OF INTERNAL AUDIT

        The Committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee our internal audit function, reviewing the significant issuesaudit results reported to management and management's responses thereto. In this capacity, the Committee reviewedreviews with the Vice President of Internal Audit the overall scope and budget for the internal audit, function, and the Committee regularly monitors itsthe progress of the internal audit in assessing our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, including the Vice President of Internal Audit's key findings and required resourcesresources. The Committee directly supervises the Vice President of Internal Audit in the conduct of his operational responsibilities and progress.evaluates his individual performance as well as that of the entire internal audit function.

EXECUTIVE SESSIONS

        The Committee regularly meets separately andin executive session without management present with each of the Vice President of Internal Audit and PwC to review and discuss their evaluations of the overall quality of our accounting and financial reporting and internal control. The Committee also periodically meets, without PwC andor the Vice President of Internal Audit present, with management, as well as occasionally with only our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Accounting Officer, and the General Counsel to discuss, among other things, significant risk exposures impacting our financial statements and accounting processes.policies.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |86


Table of Contents

STOCKHOLDER FEEDBACK

        The Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment, on a confidential basis, of complaints regarding our accounting, internal controls and auditing matters. See "ComplaintComplaint Procedures for Accounting and Auditing Matters"Matters in theCorporate Governance, Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility section of this proxy statement. The Committee welcomes feedback regarding its oversight of our audit and finance programs. Stockholders may communicate with the Committee by writing to the Audit and Finance Committee Chair, c/o Corporate Secretary, Avery Dennison Corporation, 207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203.

Peter K. Barker,Patrick T. Siewert, Chair
Anthony K. Anderson
Peter K. Barker
Ken C. Hicks
Patrick T. SiewertAndres A. Lopez
Martha N. Sullivan

This Audit and Finance Committee Report does not constitute soliciting material and should not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, unless specifically incorporated by reference therein.Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |87

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|72

Table of Contents

SECURITY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

        To further align their interests with those of our stockholders, our stock ownership guidelines currently require that non-employee directors acquire and maintain a minimum equity interest in our company equal to the lesser of (A) $325,000 or (B) 6,500 shares; in connection with the increase in non-employee director compensation effective as of the Annual Meeting, these minimum requirements will increase to $500,000 and 7,500 shares, respectively. These guidelines also require that our CEO, President, and other NEOs acquire and maintain a minimum equity interest in our company equal to the lesser of (A) five, four and three times their annual base salary, respectively, or (B) 95,000, 60,000 and 27,000 shares of our common stock, respectively. If a director or NEO fails to comply with or make reasonable progress towards meeting his or her guideline level, he or she is required to retain all net shares acquired from the exercise of stock options or vesting of stock awards until such level is met.

        Consistent with market practices, the following shares/units and their related values are considered in measuring compliance with our stock ownership guidelines: shares beneficially owned or deemed to be beneficially owned, directly or indirectly, under federal securities laws; shares or units held in qualified and non-qualified employee benefit plans; unvested RSUs subject only to time-based vesting; 50% of the embedded value of any vested, unexercised stock options; and unvested MSUs at the target payout level. Unvested PUs are not considered in measuring compliance because they would be cancelled in the event the threshold level of performance is not achieved (which would result in no payout).

        The Governance Committee reviewed non-employee director stock ownership in February 2016, noting that all of our directors had exceeded the minimum ownership level required by the guidelines as of January 2, 2016 and that all of our directors own stock in our company. On average, the ownership level of non-employee directors was approximately five and seven times the 2015 shares and dollar guideline, respectively, aligning them with stockholders and incenting their focus on long-term stockholder value.

        The Compensation Committee reviewed NEO stock ownership in December 2015 and determined that all of our Current NEOs — except for Ms. Bramman who joined the company in March 2015 and has five years to reach her applicable guideline — had exceeded their respective guideline level required by the guidelines as of January 2, 2016. The Committee noted that, because Ms. Bramman had made reasonable progress towards meeting the applicable level, she was also in compliance with the guidelines.

COMPLIANCE WITH STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES
 
 SHARE
GUIDELINE

 SHARES AS OF
2015 FYE (#)

 DOLLAR
GUIDELINE

 DOLLAR % AS OF
2015 FYE (%)

 COMPLIANCE

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS

 6,500  $325,000  

Bradley A. Alford

  27,852  537%
GRAPHIC

Anthony K. Anderson

  13,932  269%
GRAPHIC

Peter K. Barker

  51,578  994%
GRAPHIC

Ken C. Hicks

  35,091  677%
GRAPHIC

David E. I. Pyott

  62,383  1,203%
GRAPHIC

Patrick T. Siewert

  26,327  508%
GRAPHIC

Julia A. Stewart

  51,242  988%
GRAPHIC

Martha N. Sullivan

  12,796  247%
GRAPHIC

CHAIRMAN & CEO

  95,000    5x Base Salary     

Dean A. Scarborough

     502,597 ($5,625,300)  564%
GRAPHIC

PRESIDENT & COO

 60,000  4x Base Salary  

Mitchell R. Butier

  138,430 ($3,060,000) 286%
GRAPHIC

OTHER CURRENT NEOS

  27,000    3X Base Salary     

Anne L. Bramman

     12,963 ($1,650,000)  50%
GRAPHIC

Georges Gravanis

     28,250 ($1,500,479)  119%
GRAPHIC

Anne Hill

     66,191 ($1,504,510)  278%
GRAPHIC

INSIDER TRADING POLICY; PROHIBITION ON HEDGING AND PLEDGING

        Our insider trading policy prohibits our directors, officers and employees from engaging in transactions in our company's stock while in the possession of material non-public information; engaging in transactions in the stock of other companies while in possession of material non-public information that they become aware of in performing their duties; and disclosing material non-public information to unauthorized persons outside our company. In addition, the policy restricts trading for

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|73

Table of Contents

directors and officers (including all NEOs) during blackout periods, which generally begin two weeks before the end of each fiscal quarter and end two business days after the release of earnings for the quarter.

        Our insider trading policy expressly prohibits our directors and executive officers from (i) purchasing financial instruments (such as prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars and exchange funds) designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of shares of our common stock held, directly or indirectly, by them or (ii) pledging any of their shares of common stock to secure personal loans or other obligations, including by holding such shares in a margin account. To our knowledge, based solely on our review of their written representations, none of our directors or executive officers has hedged or pledged our common stock.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND SIGNIFICANT STOCKHOLDERS

        The following table below shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned by our (i) current directors; (ii) NEOs; (iii) current directors and executive officers as a group; and (iv) greater-than-five-percent, or "significant," stockholders, in each case as of the February 29, 201625, 2019 record date for the Annual Meeting. "Beneficial ownership" means only that the individual, group or entity, directly or indirectly, has or shares with others the power to vote (or direct the voting of) or the power to dispose of (or direct the disposition of) the shares; the individual, group or entity may or may not have any economic interest in the shares. The reporting of information in the table does not constitute an admission that the individual, group or entity is, for the purpose of Section 13 or 16 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), the beneficial owner of the shares shown.

NAME OF
BENEFICIAL OWNER

 COMMON
STOCK(1)

 NUMBER OF SHARES SUBJECT
TO DSUS, OPTIONS
EXERCISABLE, AND
RSUS VESTING
WITHIN 60 DAYS(2)

 NUMBER OF SHARES
BENEFICIALLY OWNED

 PERCENT
OF
CLASS(3)

COMMON
STOCK(1)

NUMBER OF SHARES SUBJECT
TO DSUS, OPTIONS
EXERCISABLE, AND
RSUS, PUs and MSUs
VESTING
WITHIN 60 DAYS(2)

NUMBER OF SHARES
BENEFICIALLY OWNED

PERCENT OF
CLASS(3)

Directors

    

Dean A. Scarborough

 278,026 1,163,273 1,441,299 1.6%48,668278,930327,598*

Bradley A. Alford

 7,064 29,185 36,249 *15,56433,48849,052*

Anthony K. Anderson

 3,577 8,181 11,758 *3,0359,23412,269*

Peter K. Barker

 19,838 45,437 65,275 *27,76944,92972,698*

Mark J. Barrenechea

173173*

Mitchell R. Butier

157,604107,211264,815*

Ken C. Hicks

 15,438 35,857 51,295 *23,36929,27252,641*

Andres A. Lopez

1,9745912,565*

David E. I. Pyott

 11,438 64,756 76,194 *15,29365,90481,197*

Patrick T. Siewert

 17,180 22,009 39,189 *12,66312,663*

Julia A. Stewart

 11,517 53,385 64,902 *16,00948,31764,326*

Martha N. Sullivan

 3,096 6,136 9,232 *11,0279,95320,980*

Mitchell R. Butier

 96,312 139,827 236,139 *

Anne L. Bramman

 1,108 
       —

1,108 *

Non-Director NEOs

    

Gregory S. Lovins

16,02713,07029,097*

Georges Gravanis

 20,781 17,417 38,198 *11,88622,92334,809*

Anne Hill

 50,495 67,021 117,516 *

R. Shawn Neville

        —        —        — *

All current directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons)

 567,970 1,821,931 2,389,901 2.7%

Susan C. Miller

30,53425,17555,709*

Deon M. Stander

16,03425,18941,223*

All current directors and executive officers as a group (18 persons)

407,456714,3591,121,8151.3%

Significant stockholders

    

The Vanguard Group(4)

 9,908,100        — 9,908,100 11.1%9,847,0879,847,08711.7%

BlackRock, Inc.(5)

 7,669,827 
       —

7,669,827 8.6%6,272,0946,272,0947.5%

(1)
Except as otherwise noted herein, each director, NEO and executive officer has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares indicated and no shares have been pledged as security by any such person. Includes for the following beneficial owners the following amounts of shares held in various employee savings plans as of February 29, 2016:25, 2019: Mr. Scarborough — 41,138;44,587; Mr. Butier — 3,615;3,816; Mr. Lovins — 1,985; Ms. HillMiller — 2,648;698; and all current directors and executive officers as a group — 48,535.55,610. For Mr. Scarborough, also includes 3,1842,730 shares held in the CAPCapital Accumulation Plan, a legacy deferred compensation plan, and 148 and 20 shares held by his wife and one of his children, respectively, as to which he disclaims beneficial ownership. For Ms. Miller, also includes 16,427 shares held in the EVDRP.

(2)
Numbers reported in this column are not entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Includes the following number of DSUs deferred through the DDECP forby the following directors as of February 29, 2016,25, 2019, as to which they have no voting or investment power: Mr. Alford — 13,176;17,479; Mr. Anderson — 5,411;9,234; Mr. Barker — 23,428;28,920; Mr. Barrenechea — 173; Mr. Hicks — 10,848;13,263; Mr. Lopez — 591; Mr. Pyott — 42,747;49,895; Ms. Stewart — 31,376;37,335; and Ms. Sullivan — 5,312.9,129. DSUs are included as beneficially owned because, if any of these directorsthe director were to separateresign or retire from our Board, theirhis or her DDECP account would be valued as of the date of separation and the equivalent number of shares of our common stock would be issued to the individual.separating director.

(3)
Percent of class based on 89,324,23083,972,867 shares of our common stock outstanding as of February 29, 2016.25, 2019. Individuals with an (*) beneficially own less than 1% of our outstanding common stock.

(4)
Number of shares beneficially owned based on information as of December 31, 20152018 contained in Amendment No. 58 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2016.11, 2019. The Vanguard Group has sole voting power with respect to 165,375104,565 shares; shared voting power with respect to 8,50017,497 shares; sole dispositive power with respect to 9,731,5359,725,858 shares; and shared dispositive power with respect to 176,565121,229 shares. The Vanguard Group is an investment adviser, in accordance with Rule 13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(E) of the Exchange Act, with a business address of 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355.

(5)
Number of shares beneficially owned based on information as of December 31, 20152018 contained in Amendment No. 710 to Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on January 25, 2016.February 4, 2019. BlackRock, Inc. has sole voting power with respect to 6,850,1515,444,707 shares and sole dispositive power with respect to all 6,272,094 shares. BlackRock, Inc. is a parent holding company or control person, in accordance with Rule 13d-1(b)(1)(ii)(G) of the Exchange Act, with a business address of 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055.
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|74

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |88


Table of Contents

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

        Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors, executive officers, directors, and owners of moregreater than 10% our equity securities (collectively, our "Insiders") to timely file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC. Due to the complexity of SEC reporting rules, we undertake to file these reports on behalf of our directors and executive officers and have instituted procedures to assist them with complying with their reporting obligations. Based solely on our review ofWe reviewed our records, SECthe Section 16 filings related our company stock and written representations from our directors and executive officers that no other reports were required to have been filed, we believe that allfiled.

        All of our Insiders complied with the Section 16(a) filing requirements on a timely basis during 2015.2018.

RELATED PERSON TRANSACTIONS

        Both our Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy (our "COI Policy") provide that conflicts of interest should be avoided. Under our Governance Guidelines, directors are expected to comply with the Code of Conduct and avoid any action, position or interest that conflicts with the interests of our company, or gives the appearance of a conflict. Our COI Policy proscribes any of our officers (including our executive officers) or employees — or any of their immediate family members — from directly or indirectly doing business, seeking to do business or owning an interest in an entity that does business or seeks to do business with our company without approval in writing from the Governance Committee. Under our COI Policy, any officer or employee who has a question as to the interpretation of the policy or its application to a specific activity, transaction or situation may submit the question in writing to our General Counsel/Secretary for any further necessary review by the Governance Committee.

On an annual basis, all of our employees globally at the level of manager and above are required to complete a compliance certification in which they must (i) disclose, among other things, whether they or any of their immediate family members have a job, contract or other position with an entity that has commercial dealings with our company and (ii) certify their compliance with our COI Policy and Code of Conduct. Non-supervisory professionals in our sales, marketing, customer service and purchasing functions complete this certification in even years, and non-supervisory professionals in our technology, finance, supply chain, technical services, environmental, health and safety, legal and risk functions do so in odd years. All disclosures are reviewed by our compliance department in consultation with theour law department and senior management to determine whether the activity has the potential to significantly influence our business. The Governance Committee receives a report from our Chief Compliance Officer on the disclosures elicited duringin the annual compliance certification process and, in the event that a disclosure potentially gives rise to a conflict of interest, determines whether a conflict of interest exists or whether there is a reasonable likelihood that the activity, transaction or situation would influence the individual's judgment or actions in performing his or her duties for our company. Under our COI Policy, any officer or employee who has a question as to the interpretation of the policy or its application to a specific activity, transaction or situation may submit the question in writing to our Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary for review by the Governance Committee.

        In addition, each of our directors and executive officers annually completes a questionnaire designed to solicit information about any potential related person transactions. Transactions involving directors are reviewed with the Governance Committee by the Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Counsel/Secretary in connection with the annual assessment of director independence and review of related person transactions. Responses from executive officers are reviewed by the Office of the General Counsel with oversight by the Governance Committee in the event any transactions are identified.

        Senior management reviewsWe review internal financial records to identify transactions with security holders known by us from information contained in Schedules 13D or 13G filed with the SEC to be beneficial owners of more than five percent of our common stock to determine whether we have any relationships with the security holders that might constitute related person transactions under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K. Findings are then discussedIn the event of any findings, our General Counsel/Secretary discusses them with the Governance Committee.

        During fiscal year 2015, we did not participate in any2018, there were no related person transactions requiring disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K.

To our knowledge, all related person transactions with any director, executive officer or greater-than-five-percent security holder were subject to review approval or ratification under our policies and procedures, and there were no situations where the policies and procedures described above were not followed during fiscal year 2015.procedures.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |89

|2016 Proxy Statement|75

Table of Contents

VOTING AND MEETING AND VOTING INFORMATIONQ&A

        This proxy statement is being furnished to stockholders on behalf of our Board to solicit proxies for the Annual Meeting to be held on Thursday, April 28, 2016, at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time at the Embassy Suites, 800 North Central Avenue, Glendale, California 91203 and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. The items of business to be acted upon at the meeting are set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders appearing at the beginning of this proxy statement.

        All stockholders are urged to vote by telephone or on the internet by following the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice"). If you have properly requested and received a paper copy of this proxy statement, you may vote your shares by (a) submitting a proxy by telephone or on the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card or (b) completing, dating and signing the proxy card and promptly returning it in the preaddressed, postage paid envelope provided. Stockholders of record may obtain a copy of this proxy statement without charge by writing to our Corporate Secretary, Avery Dennison Corporation, 207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203. ANNUAL REPORT AND PROXY MATERIALS

DELIVERY OFWHEN WILL I RECEIVE THE 2018 ANNUAL REPORTREPORT?

        Our 2015We expect to mail or make available our 2018 Annual Report to Stockholders will be mailed or made available to all stockholders of record on or beforeabout March 11, 2016.2019.

DELIVERY OFHOW DO I ACCESS THE 2019 PROXY MATERIALSMATERIALS?

        We have elected to provide access to our proxy materials on the Internet. Accordingly, we are sending the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials (the "Notice") to our stockholders of record. Brokers, banks and other nominees (collectively, "nominees") who hold shares on behalf of beneficial owners (also called "street name" holders) will send a similar notice. All stockholdersYou will have the ability to access our proxy materials on the website referred to in the Notice. Instructions on how to request printed proxy materials by mail, including an option to receive paper copies in the future, may be found in the Notice and on the website referred to in the Notice.

        On or beforeabout March 11, 2016,2019, we intend to make this proxy statement available on the Internet and mail the Notice to all stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.vote. We intend to mail this proxy statement, together with a proxy card, to stockholders entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting who have previously requested paper copies on or about March 14, 2016.11, 2019. In addition, stockholders who properlyif you request paper copies of these materials for the first time, they will be mailed them within three business days of request. If you hold your shares in street name, you may request paper copies of the proxy statement and proxy card from your nominee by following the instructions on the notice your nominee provides to you.

        Stockholders of record may obtain a copy of this proxy statement without charge by writing to our Corporate Secretary, Avery Dennison Corporation, 207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203.

HOUSEHOLDINGWHAT IS HOUSEHOLDING?

        We have adopted a procedure approved by the SEC called "householding."householding. Under this procedure, we are permitted to deliver a single copy of our proxy statement and annual report to stockholders sharing the same address. Householding allows us to reduce our printing and postage costs and limits the volume ofprevents duplicative information from being received at your household. HouseholdingOur use of householding affects only the delivery of proxy materials; it has nodoes not impact on the delivery of dividend checks.

        For certain holders who share a single address, we are sending only one annual report and proxy statement to that address unless we have received instructions to the contrary from any stockholder at that address. If you wish to receive an additional copy of our annual report or proxy statement, or if you receive multiple copies of our annual report or proxy statement and wish to receive a single copy in the future, you may make suchyour request by writing to our Corporate Secretary at Avery Dennison Corporation, 207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203.

        If you are a street name holder and wish to revoke your consent to householding and receive separate copies of our proxy statement and annual report in future years, you may call Broadridge Investor Communications Services toll-free at 800.542.1061866.540.7095 or write to them c/o Householding Department, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, New York 11717.

SHARESHOW CAN I ACCESS THE ANNUAL REPORT AND PROXY MATERIALS ELECTRONICALLY?

        Instead of receiving paper copies of proxy statements and annual reports by mail in the future, you can elect to receive an email that will provide a link to these documents on the Internet. By electing to access proxy materials on the Internet, you will be able to access them more quickly, save us the cost of printing and mailing them to you, reduce the amount of mail you receive from us, and help us preserve environmental resources.

        You may enroll to access proxy materials and annual reports electronically for future Annual Meetings by registering online at the following website:https://enroll.icsdelivery.com/avy. If you are voting on the Internet, you can follow the links on the voting website to get to the electronic enrollment website.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |90


Table of Contents

VOTING

WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTEVOTE?

        Stockholders of record as of the close of business on February 29, 201625, 2019 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. Our common stock is the only class of shares outstanding, is common stock and there were 89,324,23083,972,867 shares of our common stock outstanding on February 29, 2016. A25, 2019. The list of stockholders entitled to vote will be available for inspection at the Annual Meeting, as well as starting 10 days before the Annual Meeting during regular business hours at our company headquarters. Each stockholder of record isYou are entitled to one vote for each share of common stock held on the record date.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|76

Table of Contents

VOTING YOUR SHARESHOW DO I VOTE?

        You may vote by attending the Annual Meeting andsubmitting a proxy or voting in person or you may vote by submitting a proxy.at the Annual Meeting. If you hold your shares in street name, you may only vote in person at the meeting if you properly request and receive a legal proxy in your name from the nominee that holds your shares.

        The method of voting by proxy differs depending on whether you are viewing this proxy statement on the Internet or reviewing a paper copy, as follows:

      ifIf you are viewing this proxy statement on the Internet, you may vote your shares by (i) submitting a proxy on the Internet by following the instructions on the website or (ii) requesting a paper copy of the proxy materials and following one of the methods described below; and

      ifIf you are reviewing a paper copy of this proxy statement, you may vote your shares by (i) submitting a proxy by telephone or on the Internet by following the instructions on the proxy card or (ii) completing, dating and signing the proxy card included with the proxy statement and returning it in the preaddressed, postage paid envelope provided.

        We encourage you to vote by proxy by telephone or on the Internet since these methods immediately record your votesvote and allow you to confirm that your votes have been properly recorded. Telephone and Internet voting facilities close at 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 27, 2016.24, 2019.

WHAT IF MY SHARES HELD IN OURWERE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE DIRECT SHARE PURCHASE AND SALE PROGRAMPROGRAM?

        If you are a participant inShares acquired through our Direct Share Purchase and Sale Program your shares acquired through the program may be voted by following the procedures described above.

WHAT IF MY SHARES ARE HELD IN OURTHE EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLANPLAN?

        If you arehold shares as a participant in our Employee Savings (401(k)) Plan, your vote will serveserves as a voting instruction to Fidelity Management Trust Company, the trustee of the plan, on how to vote the shares you hold through the plan. Your voting instructionsinstruction must be received by the trustee by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 25, 2016 for them to be followed.22, 2019.

        If your instructions are not timely received, the trustee will votedoes not receive your instruction in a timely manner, your shares will be voted in the same proportion as the shares voted by participants in the plan who timely furnish instructions. Shares of our common stock that have not been allocated to participant accounts will also be voted by the trustee in the same proportion as the shares voted by participants in the plan who timely furnish instructions.

REVOKING YOURHOW DO I REVOKE MY PROXY OR CHANGING YOURCHANGE MY VOTE AFTER I HAVE VOTED?

        A stockholder givingIf you give a proxy pursuant to this solicitation, you may revoke it at any time before it is acted upon at the Annual Meeting by (i) submitting another proxy by telephone or on the Internet (only your last voting instructions will be counted); (ii) sending a later dated paper proxy; (iii) delivering to our Corporate Secretary a written notice of revocation prior to the voting of the proxy at the Annual Meeting; or (iv) if you are entitled to do so, voting in person at the Annual Meeting. Simply attending the Annual Meeting will not revoke your proxy.

        If your shares are held in street name, you may only change your vote by submitting new voting instructions to your nominee. You must contact your nominee to find out how you can change your vote. Shares held in our Employee Savings Plan cannot be changed or revoked after 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on April 25, 2016,22, 2019, nor can they be voted in person at the Annual Meeting.

CONFIDENTIALITY OF YOURAvery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |91


Table of Contents

IS MY VOTE CONFIDENTIAL?

        Except in contested proxy solicitations, when required by law or as expressly authorized by you (such as by making a written comment on your proxy card, in which case the comment, but not your vote, will be shared with our company), your vote or voting instruction irrespective of method of submission, is confidential and will not be disclosed to any other person other than to the broker, trustee, agent or other personentity tabulating your vote. None of ourOur directors, officers or employees will be able tonot learn how individual stockholdersyou voted.

Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|77

Table of ContentsHOW WILL VOTES BE COUNTED?

QUORUM AND VOTES REQUIRED

        Votes cast by proxy or in person at the Annual Meeting will be tabulated by Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., the independent agent appointed as inspector of election appointed by our Board. The inspector of election will also determine whether or not a quorum is present. At the Annual Meeting, shares represented by proxies that reflect abstentions or "broker non-votes" (which are shares held by a nominee that are represented at the meeting, but with respect to which the nominee neither has non-discretionarydiscretionary authority to vote nor has been given actual authority to vote on a particular item) will be counted as shares that are present and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting for purposes of determining the presence of a quorum. All of the items scheduled to be considered at the Annual MeetingItems 1 and 2 are "non-routine" under the rules of the NYSE, except forand Item 3 ratification of the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm.is routine. Nominees are prohibited from voting on non-routine items in the absence of instructions from the beneficial owners of the shares; as a result, if you hold your shares in street name and do not submit voting instructions to your nominee, your shares willnot be voted on Item 1, election of directors; anddirectors, or Item 2, approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation. We urge you to promptly provide voting instructions to your nominee so that your vote is counted.

        The vote required to approve each of the Items,Annual Meeting items, as well as the impact of abstentions and broker non-votes, is summarizedshown in the chart below.

 
 ITEM
 VOTE
REQUIRED

 IMPACT OF
ABSTENTIONS

 IMPACT OF BROKER
BROKER NON-VOTES

1.GRAPHIC Election of directors Votes FOR a nominee must exceedMajority of votes AGAINST that nomineecast Not counted as votes cast; no impact on outcome Not counted as votes cast; no impact on outcome
2.GRAPHIC Advisory vote to approve executive compensation Majority of shares represented and entitled to vote Negative impact on outcome Not counted as represented and entitled to vote; no impact on outcome
3.GRAPHIC Ratification of appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 20162019 Majority of shares represented and entitled to vote Negative impact on outcome Not applicable

VOTING ONWHAT IF THERE IS ADDITIONAL BUSINESS TO BE VOTED ON?

        As of the date of this proxy statement, we know of no other business to be presented for consideration at the meeting. However, if any other business properly comes before the meeting, votesyour vote will be cast in respect ofon any such other business in accordance with the best judgment of the personsindividuals acting pursuant to the proxies.your proxy.

HOW DO I FIND VOTE RESULTSRESULTS?

        We intendexpect to announce preliminary voting results at the conclusion of the Annual Meeting. We expect toMeeting and report final voting results in a Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on or before May 4, 2016.1, 2019.

PROXY SOLICITATION

        We will bear all costs related to this solicitation of proxies. We have retained D. F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in soliciting proxies for a fee of $12,000, plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incident to the preparation and mailing of our proxy materials. Some of our employees may solicit proxies in person, by telephone or by email; these employees will not receive any additional compensation for their proxy solicitation efforts. We will reimburse banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses they incur in forwarding our proxy materials to beneficial stockholders. You can help reduce these costs by electing to access proxy materials electronically.

ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO PROXY MATERIALS AND ANNUAL REPORT

        Instead of receiving paper copies of proxy statements and annual reports by mail in the future, you can elect to receive an email message that will provide a link to these documents on the Internet. By opting to access proxy materials via the Internet, you will be able to access them more quickly, save us the cost of printing and mailing them to you, reduce the amount of mail you receive from us, and help us preserve environmental resources.

Avery Dennison Corporation|MEETING
2016 Proxy Statement|78

Table of Contents

        You may enroll to access proxy materials and annual reports electronically for future Annual Meetings by registering online at the following website:https://enroll.icsdelivery.com/avy. If you vote on the Internet, simply follow the prompts on the voting website to link to the electronic enrollment website.

WHAT IS THE TIME AND LOCATION OF THE ANNUAL MEETINGMEETING?

        The Annual Meeting will take place at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time on April 28, 201625, 2019 at the Embassy Suites, 800 North Central207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203. Parking will be available next door at 127 Burchett Street, Glendale, California 91203. Attendants will be available to provide assistance with directions and parking tickets will be validated at the Annual Meeting.

ANNUAL MEETING PROCEDURESAvery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |92


Table of Contents

ADMISSIONHOW CAN I ATTEND THE MEETING?

        If you would like to attend the Annual Meeting, you will be asked to present personalplease bring photo identification. If you are a stockholder of record, you may bring the top half of your proxy card or your Notice to serve as your admission ticket. If you hold your shares in street name, you willmay be required to present proof of ownership to be admitted into the meeting. Acceptable documentation includes your Notice, a recent brokerage statement or a letter from your nominee evidencing your beneficial ownership of shares of our common stock as of February 29, 2016.25, 2019. If you would like to secure admission in advance, you may send a written request with proof of ownership to our Corporate Secretary at Avery Dennison Corporation, 207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203.

        Stockholders will be admitted into the Annual Meeting beginning at 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time and seating will be on a first-come basis. For safety and security reasons, cameras, recording equipment, computers, or large bags briefcases or other packages will not be permitted into the meeting.

CONDUCT PROCEDURESMAY I ASK QUESTIONS AT THE MEETING?

        Our Chairman will conduct the Annual Meeting in an orderly and timely manner in accordance with our Bylaws and Delaware law. To assist the Chairmanhim in fulfilling his responsibilities, we have established rules for stockholders wishing to address the meeting, which will be available at the meeting. Only stockholders as of the record date or their properly-appointed proxies may addressask questions at the meeting, and they may do so only after recognized by our Chairman, who may limit the length of discussion on any particular matter.

        As a result of time constraints and other considerations, we cannot assure you that every stockholder wishing to address the meeting will have the opportunity to do so. However, all stockholders are invited to direct inquiries or comments regarding business matters to our Investor Relations teamdepartment by email toinvestorcom@averydennison.com or by mail to Avery Dennison Corporation, 207 Goode Avenue, Glendale, California 91203. In addition, stockholders wishing to address matters to our Board or any of its members may do so as described underContacting Our Board in theOur Board of Directors section of this proxy statement.

SUBMISSION OF STOCKHOLDER OTHER MATTERS

HOW ARE PROXIES BEING SOLICITED?

        We have retained D. F. King & Co., Inc. to assist in soliciting proxies for a fee of $12,000, plus reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incident to preparing and mailing our proxy materials. Some of our employees may solicit proxies in person, by telephone or email; these employees will not receive any additional compensation for their proxy solicitation efforts. We will bear all costs related to this solicitation of proxies and we will reimburse banks, brokers and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses they incur in forwarding our proxy materials to beneficial stockholders. You can help reduce these costs by electing to access proxy materials electronically.

HOW DO I SUBMIT ITEMS FOR 2017POTENTIAL CONSIDERATION AT THE 2020 ANNUAL MEETINGMEETING?

        For potential consideration atTo propose business otherwise satisfying the 2017eligibility requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8 to be considered for inclusion in our proxy statement for the 2020 Annual Meeting, stockholderyou must mail proposed items must beso they are received at our principal executive offices on or before November 9, 2016. Our Bylaws generally provide that stockholders wishing12, 2019. If you wish to nominate persons for election to our Board or bring any other business before the stockholders at an annual meeting under the advanced notice provisions or our Bylaws, you must notify our Corporate Secretary in writing 90 to 120 days prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year's annual meeting (with respect to the 20172020 Annual Meeting, no earlier than December 29, 201627, 2019 and no later than January 28, 2017)26, 2020).

���

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |93

|2016 Proxy Statement|79

Table of Contents

        TheYour notice must include, among other things, the following information:

      asAs to each person whom the stockholder proposeswho you propose to nominate for election or re-electionreelection as a director:

      allAll information relating to the person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors in an election contest or is otherwise required pursuant to Regulation 14 under the Exchange Act;

      theThe person's written consent to be named in our proxy statement as a nominee and to serve as a director if elected; and

      aA description of any material relationships between the stockholderyou (and itsyour associates and affiliates) and the nominee (and itshis or her associates and affiliates), as more particularly set forth in our Bylaws;

      asAs to any other item of business the stockholder proposesyou propose to bring before the meeting, a brief description of the business, the reasons for conducting the business at the meeting and any material interest the stockholder hasyou have in the business being proposed; and

      the stockholder'sYour name and address, and class and number of shares ownedyou own beneficially and as of record, as well as information relating to the stockholder'syour security ownership in our company, as described in greater detail in Article II, Section 14 of our Bylaws, a copy of which isare available on our website atwww.averydennison.com/bylaws.

        We will not permit stockholderStockholder items of business that do not fully comply with the advance notice requirements contained in our Bylaws will not be permitted to be brought before the 20172020 Annual Meeting.

HOW DO I NOMINATE DIRECTORS FOR INCLUSION IN THE 2020 PROXY STATEMENT?

        Our Bylaws to permit a stockholder, or a group of no more than 20 stockholders, owning at least 3% of our company's outstanding shares of common stock continuously for at least three years to nominate and include in our annual meeting proxy materials director nominees constituting up to the greater of two nominees or 20% of our Board, subject to the requirements specified in Article II, Section 17 of our Bylaws, which are available on our website atwww.averydennison.com/bylaws. Notice of proxy access director nominees for the 2020 Annual Meeting must be delivered to our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than October 13, 2019 and no later than November 12, 2019 and must otherwise comply with our Bylaws.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |94

|2016 Proxy Statement|80

Table of Contents

APPENDIX A —
RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES TOFROM GAAP

        We report our financial results in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP, and also communicate with investors using certain non-GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are not in accordance with, nor are they a substitute for or superior to, the comparable GAAP financial measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are intended to supplement the presentation of our financial results that are prepared in accordance with GAAP. Based upon feedback from investors and financial analysts, we believe that the supplemental non-GAAP financial measures we provide are useful to their assessment of our performance and operating trends, as well as liquidity.

        Our non-GAAP financial measures exclude the impact of certain events, activities or strategic decisions. The accounting effects of these events, activities or decisions, which are included in the GAAP financial measures, may make it difficult to assess our underlying performance in a single period. By excluding the accounting effects, both positive or negative, of certain items (e.g., restructuring charges, legal settlements, certain effects of strategic transactions and related costs, losses from debt extinguishments, gains or losses from curtailment or settlement of pension obligations, gains or losses on sales of certain assets, and other items), we believe that we are providing meaningful supplemental information that facilitates an understanding of our core operating results and liquidity measures. These non-GAAP financial measures are used internally to evaluate trends in our underlying performance, as well as to facilitate comparison to the results of competitors for a single period. While some of the items we exclude from GAAP financial measures recur, they tend to be disparate in amount, frequency, or timing.

        We use the following non-GAAP financial measures in this proxy statement:

      Sales change ex. currency refers to the increase or decrease in sales excluding the estimated impact of foreign currency translation and currency adjustment for transitional reporting of highly inflationary economies (Argentina). The estimated impact of foreign currency translation is calculated on a constant currency basis, with prior period results translated at current period average exchange rates to exclude the effect of currency fluctuations.

      Organic sales change refers to sales change ex. currency, excluding the estimated impact of product line exits, acquisitions and divestitures, and, where applicable, the extra week in our fiscal year.

    We believe that sales change ex. currency and organic sales change assist investors in evaluating the sales change from the ongoing activities of our businesses and enhance their ability to evaluate our results from period to period.

      Adjusted net income per common share, assuming dilution (adjusted EPS), refers to adjusted net income divided by weighted average number of common shares outstanding, assuming dilution. Adjusted net income is income from continuing operations before taxes, tax-effected at the adjusted tax rate, and adjusted for tax-effected restructuring charges and other items. Adjusted tax rate is the full-year GAAP tax rate, adjusted to exclude certain unusual or infrequent events that are expected to significantly impact the GAAP tax rate, such as completion of our 2017 provisional estimate of the impact of the U.S. Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA), impacts related to our U.S. pension plan termination, and the effects of discrete tax planning actions. We believe that adjusted EPS assists investors in understanding our core operating trends and comparing our results with those of our competitors.

      Free cash flow refers to cash flow provided by operating activities, less payments for property, plant and equipment, software and other deferred charges, plus proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment, plus (minus) net proceeds from sales (purchases) of investments and proceeds from insurance. Free cash flow is also adjusted for the cash contributions related to the termination of our U.S. pension plan. We believe that free cash flow assists investors by showing the amount of cash we have available for debt reductions, dividends, share repurchases, and acquisitions.

      Return on total capital (ROTC) refers to net income excluding the expense and tax benefit of debt financing divided by the average of beginning and ending invested capital. We believe that ROTC assists investors in understanding our ability to generate returns from our capital.

      Adjusted EBIT refers to earnings before interest expense and taxes, excluding non-cash restructuring costs, as well as other items. We believe that adjusted EBIT assists investors in understanding our core operating trends and comparing our results with those of our competitors. We use adjusted EBIT to calculate economic value added (EVA), one of the performance objectives used in our long-term incentive compensation program.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |A-1


Table of Contents

ORGANIC SALES CHANGE

($ in millions)
 2011
 2012
 2013
 2014
 2015
 2-YR
CAGR(1)

 4-YR
CAGR(1)

  2014
 2015
 2016
 2017
 2018
 2014-2018
5-YR CAGR(1)

 2017-2018
2-YR CAGR(2)

Net sales

 $5,844.9 $5,863.5 $6,140.0 $6,330.3 $5,966.9      $6,330.3 $5,966.9 $6,086.5 $6,613.8 $7,159.0    

Organic sales change

   3.8% 4.8% 3.1% 4.6% 3.8% 4.1% 

Reported sales change

 3.1% (5.7)% 2.0% 8.7% 8.2%    

Foreign currency translation

   (3.4)% 0.1% (1.1)% (8.6)%      1.1% 8.6% 2.6% (0.5)% (1.4)%    

Impact of extra week

       1.2% (1.2)%     

Product line divestiture

   (0.1)% (0.1)%   (0.6)%     

Reported sales change(2)

   0.3% 4.7% 3.1% (5.7)%     

Sales change ex. currency (non-GAAP)(3)

 4.2% 2.9% 4.6% 8.2% 6.9% 5.3% 7.5%

Extra week impact

 ~(1.2)% ~1.2%       

Acquisitions/divestiture

  0.6% (0.7)% (3.9)% (1.4)%    

Organic sales change (non-GAAP)(3)

 3.1% 4.6% 3.9% 4.2% 5.5% 4.3% 4.8%

(1)
Compound Annual Growth RateReflects five-year compound annual growth rates, with 2013 as the base period.
(2)
Reflects two-year compound annual growth rates, with 2016 as the base period.
(3)
Totals may not sum due to rounding and other factorsfactors.

ADJUSTED EARNINGS PER SHARE (EPS)


 2011
 2012
 2013
 2014
 2015
 4-YR
CAGR(1)

 2015
Growth

  2014
 2015
 2016
 2017
 2018
 2014-2018
5-YR CAGR(1)

 2017-2018
2-YR CAGR(2)

 

As reported net income per common share from continuing operations, assuming dilution

 $1.34 $1.54 $2.41 $2.58 $2.95      $2.58 $2.95 $3.54 $3.13 $5.28     

Adjustments(2)(3)

 (0.01) (0.02) 0.03 0.04       0.04         

Previously reported net income per common share from continuing operations, assuming dilution

 $1.33 $1.52 $2.44 $2.62 $2.95   12.6%  $2.62 $2.95 $3.54 $3.13 $5.28     

Non-GAAP adjustments per common share, net of tax:

                              

Restructuring costs and other items

 $0.32 $0.44 $0.24 $0.49 $0.49     

Restructuring charges and other items(4)

 0.49 0.49 0.48 0.29 0.68     

Pension plan settlements

     0.84     

Tax benefit from discrete foreign tax planning action

     (0.35)     

TCJA provisional estimate(5)

    1.91 (0.39)     

Impact of previously planned repatriation of foreign earnings for Q4 2017

    (0.33)      

Adjusted non-GAAP net income per common share from continuing operations, assuming dilution

 $1.65 $1.96 $2.68 $3.11 $3.44 20.2% 10.6% 

Adjusted net income per common share from continuing operations, assuming dilution (non-GAAP)

 $3.11 $3.44 $4.02 $5.00 $6.06 17.7% 22.8%

The adjusted tax rate was 28% and 25% for 2017 and 2018, respectively.

(1)
Compound Annual Growth RateReflects five-year compound annual growth rates, with 2013 as the base period.
(2)
Certain prior period amounts have been revised toReflects two-year compound annual growth rates, with 2016 as the base period.
(3)
GAAP adjustments for 2014-2015 reflect the previously disclosed impact of adjustments made in the third quarter of 2015 revision to certain of our benefit plan balances, which had an immaterial impact on the non-GAAP amounts.
(4)
Includes restructuring charges, Argentine peso remeasurement transition loss, other restructuring-related charge, transactions costs, reversal of acquisition-related contingent consideration, net gain on sales of assets, and other items.
(5)
Provision for income taxes for the fourth quarter of 2017 included the estimated impact of the TCJA. In the fourth quarter of 2018, we finalized our provisional estimate as defined under SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SAB 118) related to correct the timing of previously recorded out-of-period adjustments.TCJA.

FREE CASH FLOWAvery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |A-2

($ in millions)
 2012
 2013(1)
 2014(1)
 2015
 4-YR
Average

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

 $513.4 $319.6 $354.9 $473.7    

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

  (99.2) (129.2) (147.9) (135.8)   

Purchases of software and other deferred charges

  (59.1) (52.2) (27.1) (15.7)   

Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment

  4.2  38.7  4.3  7.6    

(Purchases) sales of investments, net

  (6.7) 0.1  0.3  (0.5)   

Plus: Charitable contributions to Avery Dennison Foundation utilizing proceeds from divestitures

    10.0        

Plus: Discretionary contributions to pension plans utilizing proceeds from divestitures

    50.1        

Plus (minus): Divestiture-related payments and free cash outflow (inflow) from discontinued operations

  (49.7) 92.7  0.2  0.1    

Free Cash Flow from Continuing Operations

 $302.9 $329.8 $184.7 $329.4 $286.7 
(1)
2013 and 2014 amounts have been reduced due to our reclassification of certain liquid short-term bank drafts with maturities greater than 90 days to other current assets.
Avery Dennison Corporation|2016 Proxy Statement|A-1

Table of Contents

FREE CASH FLOW

($ in millions)
 2016
 2017
 2018

Net cash provided by operating activities(1)

 $582.1  $645.7  $457.9 

Purchases of property, plant and equipment

 (176.9) (190.5) (226.7)

Purchases of software and other deferred charges

 (29.7) (35.6) (29.9)

Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment

 8.5  6.0  9.4 

Sales (purchases) of investments and proceeds from insurance, net(1)

 3.1  (3.9) 18.5 

Plus: Pension plan contribution for plan termination

 —  —  200.0 

Free cash flow (non-GAAP)

 $387.1  $421.7  $429.2 

(1)
In the first quarter of 2018, we adopted ASU No. 2016-15,Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, on a retrospective basis. This ASU reduces the diversity in the presentation and classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments in the statement of cash flows. Prior year results have been reclassified as required by the ASU.

RETURN ON TOTAL CAPITAL (ROTC)

($ in millions)
 2013
 2014
 2015
 

As reported net income from continuing operations

 $241.7 $247.3 $274.4 

Adjustments(1)

  2.6  3.8  (0.6)

Previously reported income from continuing operations

 $244.3 $251.1 $273.8 

Interest expense, net of tax benefit(1)

  39.6  43.6  40.6 

Effective tax rate(1)

  32.8%  31.1%  32.9% 

Previously reported net operating income after taxes from continuing operations

 $283.9 $294.7 $314.4 

Total debt

 $1,021.5 $1,144.4 $1,058.9 

Shareholders' equity(1)

 $1,468.1 $1,047.7 $965.7 

Return on Total Capital (ROTC)

  10.8%  12.6%  14.9% 
(1)
Certain prior period amounts have been revised to reflect the impact of adjustments made in the third quarter of 2015 to certain of our benefit plan balances and to correct the timing of previously recorded out-of-period adjustments. Interest expense, net of tax benefit, excludes the effect of these adjustments.
($ in millions)
 2017
 2018

Net income

 $281.8 $467.4

Interest expense, net of tax benefit

 30.1 49.5

Effective tax rate

 52.2% 15.4%

Income from operations, excluding expense and tax benefit of debt financing (non-GAAP)

 311.9 516.9

Total debt

 $1,581.7 $1,966.2

Shareholders' equity

 1,046.2 955.1

Total debt and shareholders' equity

 $2,627.9 $2,921.3

Return on Total Capital (ROTC) (non-GAAP)

 12.9% 18.6%

ADJUSTED EARNINGS BEFORE INTEREST AND TAXES (EBIT)

($ in millions)
 2013
 2014
 2015
  2016
 2017
 2018

As reported income from continuing operations before taxes

 $366.0 $360.8 $408.9 

Adjustments(1)

 (2.9) 3.6 (1.0)

Net income

 $320.7 $281.8 $467.4

Reconciling items:

      

Interest expense

 59.9 63.0 58.5

Provision for income taxes

 156.4 307.7 85.4

Previously reported income from continuing operations before taxes

 $363.1 $364.4 $407.9 

Earnings before interest expense and taxes

 $537.0 $652.5 $611.3

Adjustments:

             

Non-cash restructuring costs

 9.6 10.7 6.4  4.1 1.0 9.9

Other items(2)

 (3.7) 2.1 8.8 

Interest expense(1)

 59.0 63.3 60.5 

Other items(1)

 45.3 3.1 91.9

Adjusted operating income before interest expense, taxes, non-cash restructuring costs and other items

 $428.0 $440.5 $483.6 

Adjusted earnings before interest expense, taxes, non-cash restructuring costs and other items (non-GAAP)

 $586.4 $656.6 $713.1

(1)
Certain prior period amounts have been revised to reflect the impact of adjustments made in the third quarter of 2015 to certain of our benefit plan balances and to correct the timing of previously recorded out-of-period adjustments.
(2)
Includes loss on sale of product line and related exit costs, indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment charge, net losslosses from curtailment and settlementsettlements of pension obligations, charitable contribution to Avery Dennison Foundation, legal settlements, certain transaction costs, andnet gains on sales of assets.assets, equity method investment losses and other items.

Avery Dennison Corporation| 2019 Proxy Statement |A-3

|2016 Proxy Statement|A-2

 

 

AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION

C/O BROADRIDGE CORPORATE ISSUER SOLUTIONS, INC.

P.O. BOX 1342

BRENTWOOD, NY 11717

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com

Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on 04/24/2019 for shares held directly and by 11:59 P.M. ET on 04/22/2019 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.

ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS

If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.

VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903

Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on 04/24/2019 for shares held directly and by 11:59 P.M. ET on 04/22/2019 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.

VOTE BY MAIL

Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.

TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:

KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION C/O BROADRIDGE CORPORATE ISSUER SOLUTIONS, INC. P.O. BOX 1342 BRENTWOOD, NY 11717 ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: M99693-P72740 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following nominees: For Against Abstain The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. For Against Abstain 1. Election of Directors ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! 2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation. 1a. Bradley Alford 3. Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2016. 1b. Anthony Anderson 1c. Peter Barker NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. 1d. Mitchell Butier 1e. Ken Hicks 1f. David Pyott 1g. Dean Scarborough 1h. Patrick Siewert 1i. Julia Stewart 1j. Martha Sullivan ! For address change/comments, mark here. (see reverse for instructions) Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. ! Yes ! No Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date

GRAPHIC

 

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.

DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FORthe following nominees:

1.

Election of Directors

Nominees

For

Against

Abstain

1a.

Bradley Alford

o

o

o

For

Against

Abstain

1b.

Anthony Anderson

o

o

o

1i.

Patrick Siewert

o

o

o

1c.

Peter Barker

o

o

o

1j.

Julia Stewart

o

o

o

1d.

Mark Barrenechea

o

o

o

1k.

Martha Sullivan

o

o

o

1e.

Mitchell Butier

o

o

o

The Board of Directors recommends you vote FORproposals 2 and 3.

1f.

Ken Hicks

o

o

o

For

Against

Abstain

1g.

Andres Lopez

o

o

o

2    Approval, on an advisory basis, of our executive compensation.

o

o

o

1h.

David Pyott

o

o

o

3    Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2019.

o

o

o

For address change/comments, mark here.
(see reverse for instructions)

o

NOTE:  Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof.

Yes

No

Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting

o

o

Please sign exactly as your name (s) appear (s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name by authorized officer.

Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]

Date

Signature (Joint Owners)

Date

0000402575_1    R1.0.1.18



Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice and& Proxy Statement, and Annual Report is/are available at  www.proxyvote.com. M99694-P72740 AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS APRIL 28, 2016 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby appoints Susan Miller and Vikas Arora, or each of them, with full power of substitution, proxies for the undersigned to act and vote at the 2016 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Avery Dennison Corporation and at any adjournment or postponement thereof as indicated upon the matters referred to on the reverse side and described in the proxy statement for the meeting, and, in their discretion, upon any other matters that may properly come before the meeting. This card provides voting instructions, as applicable, to (i) the appointed proxies for shares held of record by the undersigned, including those held under the Company's Direct Share Purchase and Sale Program, and (ii) the Trustee for shares held on behalf of the undersigned in the Company's Employee Savings Plan. IF NO OTHER INDICATION IS MADE, THE PROXIES SHALL VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES AND FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3. Consistent with its fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, Fidelity Management Trust Company, as Trustee of the Avery Dennison Corporation Employee Savings Plan, will vote shares of Company stock for which timely instructions are not received and shares of Company stock that have not been allocated to the account of any participant in the same proportion in which allocated shares of Company stock are voted by participants who timely furnish voting instructions. The card must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 25, 2016, and telephone and Internet votes must be completed by 11:59 p.m. on the same day. Your voting instructions are confidential and may not be revealed to anyone, except as required by law. (If you noted any address changes and/or comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.) Continued and to be signed on reverse side Address change/comments:www.proxyvote.com

GRAPHIC

 

AVERY DENNISON CORPORATION

ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

APRIL 25, 2019

THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS

The undersigned hereby appoints Susan Miller and Vikas Arora, or each of them, with full power of substitution, proxies for the undersigned to act and vote at the 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of Avery Dennison Corporation and at any adjournment or postponement thereof as indicated upon the matters set forth on the reverse side and described in the proxy statement for the meeting, and, in their discretion, upon any other matters that may properly come before the meeting. This card provides voting instructions, as applicable, to (i) the appointed proxies for shares held of record by the undersigned, including those held under the Company’s Direct Share Purchase and Sale Program, and (ii) the Trustee for shares held on behalf of the undersigned in the Company’s Employee Savings Plan.

IF NO OTHER INDICATION IS MADE, THE PROXIES WILL VOTE FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL DIRECTOR NOMINEES, AND FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3.

Consistent with its fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, Fidelity Management Trust Company, as Trustee of the Avery Dennison Corporation Employee Savings Plan, will vote shares of Company stock for which timely instructions are not received and shares of Company stock that have not been allocated to the account of any participant in the same proportion in which allocated shares of Company stock are voted by participants who timely furnish voting instructions. The card must be received no later than 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time on April 22, 2019, and telephone and Internet votes must be completed by 11:59 p.m. on the same day.

Your voting instructions are confidential and may not be revealed to anyone, except as required by law.

Address change/comments:

(If you noted any Address Changes and/or Comments above, please mark corresponding box on the reverse side.)                   

Continued and to be signed on reverse side            

0000402575_2    R1.0.1.18